All callers pass the eb::level so we can get read it directly inside the
btrfs_bin_search and key_search.
This is inspired by the work of Marek in U-boot.
CC: Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of returning both the page and the super block structure, make
btrfs_read_disk_super just return a pointer to struct btrfs_disk_super.
As a result the function signature is simplified. Also,
read_cache_page_gfp can never return NULL so check its return value only
for IS_ERR.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function always works on a local copy of the reloc root list, which
cannot be modified outside of it so using list_for_each_entry is fine.
Additionally the macro handles empty lists so drop list_empty checks of
callers. No semantic changes.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Deleting a subvolume on a full filesystem leads to ENOSPC followed by a
forced read-only. This is not a transaction abort and the filesystem is
otherwise ok, so the error should be just propagated to the callers.
This is caused by unnecessary call to btrfs_handle_fs_error for all
errors, except EAGAIN. This does not make sense as the standard
transaction abort mechanism is in btrfs_drop_snapshot so all relevant
failures are handled.
Originally in commit cb1b69f450 ("Btrfs: forced readonly when
btrfs_drop_snapshot() fails") there was no return value at all, so the
btrfs_std_error made some sense but once the error handling and
propagation has been implemented we don't need it anymore.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The reclaim_size counter of a space_info object is unsigned. So its value
can never be negative, it's pointless to have an assertion that checks
its value is >= 0, therefore remove it.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Remove the duplicate definition of 'inode_item_err' in the file
tree-checker.c that got there by accident in c23c77b097 ("btrfs:
tree-checker: Refactor inode key check into seperate function").
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Wei <wei.zheng@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Nikolay noticed a bunch of test failures with my global rsv steal
patches. At first he thought they were introduced by them, but they've
been failing for a while with 64k nodes.
The problem is with 64k nodes we have a global reserve that calculates
out to 13MiB on a freshly made file system, which only has 8MiB of
metadata space. Because of changes I previously made we no longer
account for the global reserve in the overcommit logic, which means we
correctly allow overcommit to happen even though we are already
overcommitted.
However in some corner cases, for example btrfs/170, we will allocate
the entire file system up with data chunks before we have enough space
pressure to allocate a metadata chunk. Then once the fs is full we
ENOSPC out because we cannot overcommit and the global reserve is taking
up all of the available space.
The most ideal way to deal with this is to change our space reservation
stuff to take into account the height of the tree's that we're
modifying, so that our global reserve calculation does not end up so
obscenely large.
However that is a huge undertaking. Instead fix this by forcing a chunk
allocation if the global reserve is larger than the total metadata
space. This gives us essentially the same behavior that happened
before, we get a chunk allocated and these tests can pass.
This is meant to be a stop-gap measure until we can tackle the "tree
height only" project.
Fixes: 0096420adb ("btrfs: do not account global reserve in can_overcommit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
With normal tickets we could have a large reservation at the front of
the list that is unable to be satisfied, but a smaller ticket later on
that can be satisfied. The way we handle this is to run
btrfs_try_granting_tickets() in maybe_fail_all_tickets().
However no such protection exists for priority tickets. Fix this by
handling it in handle_reserve_ticket(). If we've returned after
attempting to flush space in a priority related way, we'll still be on
the priority list and need to be removed.
We rely on the flushing to free up space and wake the ticket, but if
there is not enough space to reclaim _but_ there's enough space in the
space_info to handle subsequent reservations then we would have gotten
an ENOSPC erroneously.
Address this by catching where we are still on the list, meaning we were
a priority ticket, and removing ourselves and then running
btrfs_try_granting_tickets(). This will handle this particular corner
case.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In debugging a generic/320 failure on ppc64, Nikolay noticed that
sometimes we'd ENOSPC out with plenty of space to reclaim if we had
committed the transaction. He further discovered that this was because
there was a priority ticket that was small enough to fit in the free
space currently in the space_info.
Consider the following scenario. There is no more space to reclaim in
the fs without committing the transaction. Assume there's 1MiB of space
free in the space info, but there are pending normal tickets with 2MiB
reservations.
Now a priority ticket comes in with a .5MiB reservation. Because we
have normal tickets pending we add ourselves to the priority list,
despite the fact that we could satisfy this reservation.
The flushing machinery now gets to the point where it wants to commit
the transaction, but because there's a .5MiB ticket on the priority list
and we have 1MiB of free space we assume the ticket will be granted
soon, so we bail without committing the transaction.
Meanwhile the priority flushing does not commit the transaction, and
eventually fails with an ENOSPC. Then all other tickets are failed with
ENOSPC because we were never able to actually commit the transaction.
The fix for this is we should have simply granted the priority flusher
his reservation, because there was space to make the reservation.
Priority flushers by definition take priority, so they are allowed to
make their reservations before any previous normal tickets. By not
adding this priority ticket to the list the normal flushing mechanisms
will then commit the transaction and everything will continue normally.
We still need to serialize ourselves with other priority tickets, so if
there are any tickets on the priority list then we need to add ourselves
to that list in order to maintain the serialization between priority
tickets.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
On ppc64le with 64k page size (respectively 64k block size) generic/320
was failing and debug output showed we were getting a premature ENOSPC
with a bunch of space in btrfs_fs_info::trans_block_rsv.
This meant there were still open transaction handles holding space, yet
the flusher didn't commit the transaction because it deemed the freed
space won't be enough to satisfy the current reserve ticket. Fix this
by accounting for space in trans_block_rsv when deciding whether the
current transaction should be committed or not.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We previously had a limit of stealing 50% of the global reserve for
unlink. This was from a time when the global reserve was used for the
delayed refs as well. However now those reservations are kept separate,
so the global reserve can be depleted much more to allow us to make
progress for space restoring operations like unlink. Change the minimum
amount of space required to be left in the global reserve to 10%.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For unlink transactions and block group removal
btrfs_start_transaction_fallback_global_rsv will first try to start an
ordinary transaction and if it fails it will fall back to reserving the
required amount by stealing from the global reserve. This is problematic
because of all the same reasons we had with previous iterations of the
ENOSPC handling, thundering herd. We get a bunch of failures all at
once, everybody tries to allocate from the global reserve, some win and
some lose, we get an ENSOPC.
Fix this behavior by introducing BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL_STEAL. It's
used to mark unlink reservation. To fix this we need to integrate this
logic into the normal ENOSPC infrastructure. We still go through all of
the normal flushing work, and at the moment we begin to fail all the
tickets we try to satisfy any tickets that are allowed to steal by
stealing from the global reserve. If this works we start the flushing
system over again just like we would with a normal ticket satisfaction.
This serializes our global reserve stealing, so we don't have the
thundering herd problem.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For relocation tree detection, relocation backref cache uses
btrfs_should_ignore_reloc_root() which uses relocation-specific checks
like checking the DEAD_RELOC_ROOT bit.
However for general purpose backref cache, we can rely on that check, as
it's possible that relocation is also running.
For generic purposed backref cache, we detect reloc root by
SHARED_BLOCK_REF item. Only reloc root node has its parent bytenr
pointing back to itself.
And in that case, backref cache will mark the reloc root node useless,
dropping any child orphan nodes.
So only call btrfs_should_ignore_reloc_root() if the backref cache is
for relocation.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The error cleanup will be extracted as a new function,
btrfs_backref_error_cleanup(), and moved to backref.c and exported for
later usage.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This the the 2nd major part of generic backref cache. Move it to
backref.c so we can reuse it.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is the major part of backref cache build process, move it
to backref.c so we can reuse it later.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The backref code is going to be moved to backref.c, and read_fs_root()
is just a simple wrapper, open-code it to prepare to the incoming code
move.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is mostly single purpose to relocation backref cache, but
since we're moving the main part of backref cache to backref.c, we need
to export such function.
And to avoid confusion, rename the function to
btrfs_should_ignore_reloc_root() make the name a little more clear.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Also change the parameter, since all callers can easily grab an fs_info,
there is no need for all the pointer chasing.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since we're releasing all existing nodes/edges, other than cleanup the
mess after error, "release" is a more proper naming here.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Also add comment explaining the cleanup progress, to differ it from
btrfs_backref_drop_node().
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
With extra comment for drop_backref_node() as it has some similarity
with remove_backref_node(), thus we need extra comment explaining the
difference.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Structure tree_entry provides a very simple rb_tree which only uses
bytenr as search index.
That tree_entry is used in 3 structures: backref_node, mapping_node and
tree_block.
Since we're going to make backref_node independnt from relocation, it's
a good time to extract the tree_entry into rb_simple_node, and export it
into misc.h.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
These 3 structures are the main part of btrfs backref cache, move them
to backref.h to build the basis for later reuse.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Those three structures are the main elements of backref cache. Add the
"btrfs_" prefix for later export.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This patch will also add some comment for the cleanup.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
After handle_one_tree_backref(), all newly added (not cached) edges and
nodes have the following features:
- Only backref_edge::list[LOWER] is linked.
This means, we can only iterate from botton to top, not the other
direction.
- Newly added nodes are not added to cache rb_tree yet
So to finish the backref cache, we still need to finish the links and
add all nodes into backref cache rb_tree.
This patch will refactor the existing code into finish_upper_links(),
add more comments of each branch, and why we need to do all the work.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
build_backref_tree() uses "goto again;" to implement a breadth-first
search to build backref cache.
This patch will extract most of its work into a wrapper,
handle_one_tree_block(), and use a do {} while() loop to implement the
same thing.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Bytenr and level are essential parameters for backref_node, thus it
makes sense to initialize them at allocation time.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since backref_edge is used to connect upper and lower backref nodes, and
needs to access both nodes, some code can look pretty nasty:
list_add_tail(&edge->list[LOWER], &cur->upper);
The above code will link @cur to the LOWER side of the edge, while both
"LOWER" and "upper" words show up. This can sometimes be very confusing
for reader to grasp.
This patch introduces a new wrapper, link_backref_edge(), to handle the
linking behavior. Which also has extra ASSERT() to ensure caller won't
pass wrong nodes.
Also, this updates the comment of related lists of backref_node and
backref_edge, to make it more clear that each list points to what.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The processing of indirect tree backref (TREE_BLOCK_REF) is the most
complex work.
We need to grab the fs root, do a tree search to locate all its parent
nodes, link all needed edges, and put all uncached edges to pending edge
list.
This is definitely worth a helper function.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
For BTRFS_SHARED_BLOCK_REF_KEY, its processing is straightforward, as we
now the parent node bytenr directly.
If the parent is already cached, or a root, call it a day.
If the parent is not cached, add it pending list.
This patch will just refactor this part into its own function,
handle_direct_tree_backref() and add some comment explaining the
@ref_key parameter.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
find_reloc_root() searches reloc_control::reloc_root_tree to find the
reloc root. This behavior is only useful for relocation backref cache.
For the incoming more generic purpose backref cache, we don't care
about who owns the reloc root, but only care if it's a reloc root.
So this patch makes the following modifications to make the reloc root
search more specific to relocation backref:
- Add backref_node::is_reloc_root
This will be an extra indicator for generic purposed backref cache.
User doesn't need to read root key from backref_node::root to
determine if it's a reloc root.
Also for reloc tree root, it's useless and will be queued to useless
list.
- Add backref_cache::is_reloc
This will allow backref cache code to do different behavior for
generic purpose backref cache and relocation backref cache.
- Pass fs_info to find_reloc_root()
- Export find_reloc_root()
So backref.c can utilize this function.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Add this member so that we can grab fs_info without the help from
reloc_control.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
These two new members will act the same as the existing local lists,
@useless and @list in build_backref_tree().
Currently build_backref_tree() is only executed serially, thus moving
such local list into backref_cache is still safe.
Also since we're here, use list_first_entry() to replace a lot of
list_entry() calls after !list_empty().
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
These two functions are weirdly named, mark_block_processed() in fact
just marks a range dirty unconditionally, while __mark_block_processed()
does extra check before doing the marking.
This patch will open code old mark_block_processed, and rename
__mark_block_processed() to remove the "__" prefix.
Since we're here, also kill the forward declaration, which could also
kill in_block_group() with in_range() macro.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
In the core function of relocation, build_backref_tree, it needs to
iterate all backref items of one tree block.
Use btrfs_backref_iter infrastructure to do the loop and make the code
more readable.
The backref items look would be much more easier to read:
ret = btrfs_backref_iter_start(iter, cur->bytenr);
for (; ret == 0; ret = btrfs_backref_iter_next(iter)) {
/* The really important work */
}
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function will go to the next inline/keyed backref for
btrfs_backref_iter infrastructure.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Due to the complex nature of btrfs extent tree, when we want to iterate
all backrefs of one extent, this involves quite a lot of work, like
searching the EXTENT_ITEM/METADATA_ITEM, iteration through inline and keyed
backrefs.
Normally this would result in a complex code, something like:
btrfs_search_slot()
/* Ensure we are at EXTENT_ITEM/METADATA_ITEM */
while (1) { /* Loop for extent tree items */
while (ptr < end) { /* Loop for inlined items */
/* Real work here */
}
next:
ret = btrfs_next_item()
/* Ensure we're still at keyed item for specified bytenr */
}
The idea of btrfs_backref_iter is to avoid such complex and hard to
read code structure, but something like the following:
iter = btrfs_backref_iter_alloc();
ret = btrfs_backref_iter_start(iter, bytenr);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
for (; ; ret = btrfs_backref_iter_next(iter)) {
/* Real work here */
}
out:
btrfs_backref_iter_free(iter);
This patch is just the skeleton + btrfs_backref_iter_start() code.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Sparse reports a warning at btrfs_tree_lock()
warning: context imbalance in btrfs_tree_lock() - wrong count at exit
The root cause is the missing annotation at btrfs_tree_lock()
Add the missing __acquires(&eb->lock) annotation
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Sparse reports a warning at btrfs_lock_cluster()
warning: context imbalance in btrfs_lock_cluster()
- wrong count
The root cause is the missing annotation at btrfs_lock_cluster()
Add the missing __acquires(&cluster->refill_lock) annotation.
Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Some older compilers like gcc-4.8 warn about mismatched curly braces in
a initializer:
fs/btrfs/backref.c: In function 'is_shared_data_backref':
fs/btrfs/backref.c:394:9: error: missing braces around
initializer [-Werror=missing-braces]
struct prelim_ref target = {0};
^
fs/btrfs/backref.c:394:9: error: (near initialization for
'target.rbnode') [-Werror=missing-braces]
Use the GNU empty initializer extension to avoid this.
Fixes: ed58f2e66e ("btrfs: backref, don't add refs from shared block when resolving normal backref")
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
One run of btrfs/063 triggered the following lockdep warning:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.6.0-rc7-custom+ #48 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
kworker/u24:0/7 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs]
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs]
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(sb_internal#2);
lock(sb_internal#2);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
4 locks held by kworker/u24:0/7:
#0: ffff88817b495948 ((wq_completion)btrfs-endio-write){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80
#1: ffff888189ea7db8 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80
#2: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs]
#3: ffff888174ca4da8 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}, at: btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x83/0xd0 [btrfs]
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/u24:0 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc7-custom+ #48
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0xc2/0x11a
__lock_acquire.cold+0xce/0x214
lock_acquire+0xe6/0x210
__sb_start_write+0x14e/0x290
start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs]
btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs]
find_free_extent+0x1504/0x1a50 [btrfs]
btrfs_reserve_extent+0xd5/0x1f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x1ac/0x570 [btrfs]
btrfs_copy_root+0x213/0x580 [btrfs]
create_reloc_root+0x3bd/0x470 [btrfs]
btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2d2/0x310 [btrfs]
record_root_in_trans+0x191/0x1d0 [btrfs]
btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x90/0xd0 [btrfs]
start_transaction+0x16e/0x890 [btrfs]
btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs]
btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x55d/0xcd0 [btrfs]
finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs]
btrfs_work_helper+0x116/0x9a0 [btrfs]
process_one_work+0x632/0xb80
worker_thread+0x80/0x690
kthread+0x1a3/0x1f0
ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50
It's pretty hard to reproduce, only one hit so far.
[CAUSE]
This is because we're calling btrfs_join_transaction() without re-using
the current running one:
btrfs_finish_ordered_io()
|- btrfs_join_transaction() <<< Call #1
|- btrfs_record_root_in_trans()
|- btrfs_reserve_extent()
|- btrfs_join_transaction() <<< Call #2
Normally such btrfs_join_transaction() call should re-use the existing
one, without trying to re-start a transaction.
But the problem is, in btrfs_join_transaction() call #1, we call
btrfs_record_root_in_trans() before initializing current::journal_info.
And in btrfs_join_transaction() call #2, we're relying on
current::journal_info to avoid such deadlock.
[FIX]
Call btrfs_record_root_in_trans() after we have initialized
current::journal_info.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When we have an inode with a prealloc extent that starts at an offset
lower than the i_size and there is another prealloc extent that starts at
an offset beyond i_size, we can end up losing part of the first prealloc
extent (the part that starts at i_size) and have an implicit hole if we
fsync the file and then have a power failure.
Consider the following example with comments explaining how and why it
happens.
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
# Create our test file with 2 consecutive prealloc extents, each with a
# size of 128Kb, and covering the range from 0 to 256Kb, with a file
# size of 0.
$ xfs_io -f -c "falloc -k 0 128K" /mnt/foo
$ xfs_io -c "falloc -k 128K 128K" /mnt/foo
# Fsync the file to record both extents in the log tree.
$ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/foo
# Now do a redudant extent allocation for the range from 0 to 64Kb.
# This will merely increase the file size from 0 to 64Kb. Instead we
# could also do a truncate to set the file size to 64Kb.
$ xfs_io -c "falloc 0 64K" /mnt/foo
# Fsync the file, so we update the inode item in the log tree with the
# new file size (64Kb). This also ends up setting the number of bytes
# for the first prealloc extent to 64Kb. This is done by the truncation
# at btrfs_log_prealloc_extents().
# This means that if a power failure happens after this, a write into
# the file range 64Kb to 128Kb will not use the prealloc extent and
# will result in allocation of a new extent.
$ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/foo
# Now set the file size to 256K with a truncate and then fsync the file.
# Since no changes happened to the extents, the fsync only updates the
# i_size in the inode item at the log tree. This results in an implicit
# hole for the file range from 64Kb to 128Kb, something which fsck will
# complain when not using the NO_HOLES feature if we replay the log
# after a power failure.
$ xfs_io -c "truncate 256K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo
So instead of always truncating the log to the inode's current i_size at
btrfs_log_prealloc_extents(), check first if there's a prealloc extent
that starts at an offset lower than the i_size and with a length that
crosses the i_size - if there is one, just make sure we truncate to a
size that corresponds to the end offset of that prealloc extent, so
that we don't lose the part of that extent that starts at i_size if a
power failure happens.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Fixes: 31d11b83b9 ("Btrfs: fix duplicate extents after fsync of file with prealloc extents")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
btrfs_recover_relocation() invokes btrfs_join_transaction(), which joins
a btrfs_trans_handle object into transactions and returns a reference of
it with increased refcount to "trans".
When btrfs_recover_relocation() returns, "trans" becomes invalid, so the
refcount should be decreased to keep refcount balanced.
The reference counting issue happens in one exception handling path of
btrfs_recover_relocation(). When read_fs_root() failed, the refcnt
increased by btrfs_join_transaction() is not decreased, causing a refcnt
leak.
Fix this issue by calling btrfs_end_transaction() on this error path
when read_fs_root() failed.
Fixes: 79787eaab4 ("btrfs: replace many BUG_ONs with proper error handling")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
