Instead of making multiple calls to BTRFS_I simply take btrfs_inode as
an input paramter.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The vfs inode is only used for a pair of inode_lock/unlock calls all
other uses call for btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All of its children functions use btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All of its children take btrfs_inode so bubble up this requirement to
btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space's interface and stop calling BTRFS_I
internally.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Instead of calling BTRFS_I on the passed vfs_inode take btrfs_inode
directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It needs btrfs_inode so take it as a parameter directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It only uses btrfs_inode internally so take it as a parameter.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
No point in taking an inode only to get btrfs_fs_info from it, instead
take btrfs_fs_info directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There's only a single use of vfs_inode in a tracepoint so let's take
btrfs_inode directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There is a single use of the generic vfs_inode so let's take btrfs_inode
as a parameter and remove couple of redundant BTRFS_I() calls.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Preparation to make btrfs_dirty_pages take btrfs_inode as parameter.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Only find_lock_delalloc_range uses vfs_inode so let's take the
btrfs_inode as a parameter.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It has only a single use for a generic vfs inode vs 3 for btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function really needs a btrfs_inode and not a generic vfs one. Take
it as a parameter and get rid of superfluous BTRFS_I() calls.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Take btrfs_inode directly and stop using superfulous BTRFS_I calls.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Simply forwards its argument so let's get rid of one extra BTRFS_I by
taking btrfs_inode directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All children now take btrfs_inode so convert it to taking it as a
parameter as well.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Gets rid of superfulous BTRFS_I() calls and prepare for converting
btrfs_run_delalloc_range to using btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Simply gets rid of superfluous BTRFS_I() calls.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Gets rid of superfluous BTRFS_I() calls.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Preparation to converting btrfs_run_delalloc_range to using btrfs_inode
without BTRFS_I() calls.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It really wants btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It doesn't really need vfs_inode but btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It only uses vfs inode for assigning it to the async_chunk function.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It only really uses btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It really wants btrfs_inode and is prepration to converting
run_delalloc_nocow to taking btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It just forwards its argument to __btrfs_qgroup_release_data.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All but 3 uses require vfs_inode so convert the logic to have
btrfs_inode be the main inode struct.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Majority of its uses are for btrfs_inode so take it as an argument
directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It simpy forwards its inode argument to __btrfs_add_ordered_extent which
already takes btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
All its children functions take btrfs_inode so convert it to taking
btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Preparation to converting its callers to taking btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It has only 2 uses for the vfs_inode - insert_inline_extent and
i_size_read. On the flipside it will allow converting its callers to
btrfs_inode, so convert it to taking btrfs_inode.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It passes btrfs_inode to its callee so change the interface.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It uses vfs_inode only for a tracepoint so convert its interface to take
btrfs_inode directly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
It only uses btrfs_inode so can just as easily take it as an argument.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Only 6 out of all flush states were being printed correctly since
only they were exported via the TRACE_DEFINE_ENUM macro. This patch
converts all flush states to use the newly introduced EM macro so that
they can all be printed correctly.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This fixes correct pint out of the extent io tree owner in
btrfs_set_extent_bit/btrfs_clear_extent_bit/btrfs_convert_extent_bit
tracepoints.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since qgroup's reservation types are define in a macro they must be
exported to user space in order for user space tools to convert raw
binary data to symbolic names. Currently trace-cmd report produces
the following output:
kworker/u8:2-459 [003] 1208.543587: qgroup_update_reserve:
2b742cae-e0e5-4def-9ef7-28a9b34a951e: qgid=5 type=0x2 cur_reserved=54870016 diff=-32768
With this fix the output is:
kworker/u8:2-459 [003] 1208.543587: qgroup_update_reserve:
2b742cae-e0e5-4def-9ef7-28a9b34a951e: qgid=5 type=BTRFS_QGROUP_RSV_META_PREALLOC cur_reserved=54870016 diff=-32768
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since all enums used in btrfs' tracepoints are going to be redefined
to allow proper parsing of their values by userspace tools let's
rearrange when they are defined. This will allow to use only a single
set of #define EM/#undef EM sequence. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
extent's type is an enum and this requires that the enum values be
exported to user space so that user space tools can correctly map raw
binary data to the symbolic name. Currently tracepoints using
btrfs__file_extent_item_regular or btrfs__file_extent_item_inline result
in the following output:
fio-443 [002] 586.609450: btrfs_get_extent_show_fi_regular: f0c3bf8e-0174-4bcc-92aa-6c2d62430420:i
root=5(FS_TREE) inode=258 size=2136457216 disk_isize=0
file extent range=[2126946304 2136457216] (num_bytes=9510912
ram_bytes=9510912 disk_bytenr=0 disk_num_bytes=0 extent_offset=0
type=0x1 compression=0
E.g type is 0x1 . With this patch applie the output is:
<ommitted for brevity> disk_bytenr=141348864 disk_num_bytes=4096 extent_offset=0 type=REG compression=0
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When tracepoints use __print_symbolic to print textual representation of
a value that comes from an ENUM each enum value needs to be exported
to user space so that user space tools can convert the binary value
data to the trings as user space does not know what those enums are
about.
Doing a trace-cmd record && trace-cmd report currently results in:
kworker/u8:1-61 [000] 66.299527:
btrfs_flush_space: 5302ee13-c65e-45bb-98ef-8fe3835bd943:
state=3(0x3) flags=4(METADATA) num_bytes=2621440 ret=0
I.e state is not translated to its symbolic counterpart. With this patch
applied the output is:
fio-370 [002] 56.762402: btrfs_trigger_flush: d04cd7ac-38e2-452f-a7f5-8157529fd5f0:
preempt: flush=3(BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL) flags=4(METADATA) bytes=655360
See also 190f0b76ca ("mm: tracing: Export enums in tracepoints to user
space").
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
On a filesystem with exhausted metadata, but still enough to start
balance, it's possible to hit this error:
[324402.053842] BTRFS info (device loop0): 1 enospc errors during balance
[324402.060769] BTRFS info (device loop0): balance: ended with status: -28
[324402.172295] BTRFS: error (device loop0) in reset_balance_state:3321: errno=-28 No space left
It fails inside reset_balance_state and turns the filesystem to
read-only, which is unnecessary and should be fixed too, but the problem
is caused by lack for space when the balance item is deleted. This is a
one-time operation and from the same rank as unlink that is allowed to
use the global block reserve. So do the same for the balance item.
Status of the filesystem (100GiB) just after the balance fails:
$ btrfs fi df mnt
Data, single: total=80.01GiB, used=38.58GiB
System, single: total=4.00MiB, used=16.00KiB
Metadata, single: total=19.99GiB, used=19.48GiB
GlobalReserve, single: total=512.00MiB, used=50.11MiB
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The function btrfs_check_can_nocow() now has two completely different
call patterns.
For nowait variant, callers don't need to do any cleanup. While for
wait variant, callers need to release the lock if they can do nocow
write.
This is somehow confusing, and is already a problem for the exported
btrfs_check_can_nocow().
So this patch will separate the different patterns into different
functions.
For nowait variant, the function will be called check_nocow_nolock().
For wait variant, the function pair will be btrfs_check_nocow_lock()
btrfs_check_nocow_unlock().
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
These two functions have extra conditions that their callers need to
meet, and some not-that-common parameters used for return value.
So adding some comments may save reviewers some time.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[BUG]
When the data space is exhausted, even if the inode has NOCOW attribute,
we will still refuse to truncate unaligned range due to ENOSPC.
The following script can reproduce it pretty easily:
#!/bin/bash
dev=/dev/test/test
mnt=/mnt/btrfs
umount $dev &> /dev/null
umount $mnt &> /dev/null
mkfs.btrfs -f $dev -b 1G
mount -o nospace_cache $dev $mnt
touch $mnt/foobar
chattr +C $mnt/foobar
xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -b 4k 0 4k" $mnt/foobar > /dev/null
xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -b 4k 0 1G" $mnt/padding &> /dev/null
sync
xfs_io -c "fpunch 0 2k" $mnt/foobar
umount $mnt
Currently this will fail at the fpunch part.
[CAUSE]
Because btrfs_truncate_block() always reserves space without checking
the NOCOW attribute.
Since the writeback path follows NOCOW bit, we only need to bother the
space reservation code in btrfs_truncate_block().
[FIX]
Make btrfs_truncate_block() follow btrfs_buffered_write() to try to
reserve data space first, and fall back to NOCOW check only when we
don't have enough space.
Such always-try-reserve is an optimization introduced in
btrfs_buffered_write(), to avoid expensive btrfs_check_can_nocow() call.
This patch will export check_can_nocow() as btrfs_check_can_nocow(), and
use it in btrfs_truncate_block() to fix the problem.
Reported-by: Martin Doucha <martin.doucha@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Estimated time of removal of the functionality is 5.11, the option will
be still parsed but will have no effect.
Reasons for deprecation and removal:
- very poor naming choice of the mount option, it's supposed to cache
and reuse the inode _numbers_, but it sounds a some generic cache for
inodes
- the only known usecase where this option would make sense is on a
32bit architecture where inode numbers in one subvolume would be
exhausted due to 32bit inode::i_ino
- the cache is stored on disk, consumes space, needs to be loaded and
written back
- new inode number allocation is slower due to lookups into the cache
(compared to a simple increment which is the default)
- uses the free-space-cache code that is going to be deprecated as well
in the future
Known problems:
- since 2011, returning EEXIST when there's not enough space in a page
to store all checksums, see commit 4b9465cb9e ("Btrfs: add mount -o
inode_cache")
Remaining issues:
- if the option was enabled, new inodes created, the option disabled
again, the cache is still stored on the devices and there's currently
no way to remove it
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Last touched in 2013 by commit de78b51a28 ("btrfs: remove cache only
arguments from defrag path") that was the only code that used the value.
Now it's only set but never used for anything, so we can remove it.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The fiemap callback is not part of UAPI interface and the prototypes
don't have the __u64 types either.
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
