Commit Graph

768639 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Qu Wenruo
cf90d884b3 btrfs: Introduce mount time chunk <-> dev extent mapping check
This patch will introduce chunk <-> dev extent mapping check, to protect
us against invalid dev extents or chunks.

Since chunk mapping is the fundamental infrastructure of btrfs, extra
check at mount time could prevent a lot of unexpected behavior (BUG_ON).

Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200403
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200407
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:03 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
7ef49515fa btrfs: Verify that every chunk has corresponding block group at mount time
If a crafted image has missing block group items, it could cause
unexpected behavior and breaks the assumption of 1:1 chunk<->block group
mapping.

Although we have the block group -> chunk mapping check, we still need
chunk -> block group mapping check.

This patch will do extra check to ensure each chunk has its
corresponding block group.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199847
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:03 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
514c7dca85 btrfs: Check that each block group has corresponding chunk at mount time
A crafted btrfs image with incorrect chunk<->block group mapping will
trigger a lot of unexpected things as the mapping is essential.

Although the problem can be caught by block group item checker
added in "btrfs: tree-checker: Verify block_group_item", it's still not
sufficient.  A sufficiently valid block group item can pass the check
added by the mentioned patch but could fail to match the existing chunk.

This patch will add extra block group -> chunk mapping check, to ensure
we have a completely matching (start, len, flags) chunk for each block
group at mount time.

Here we reuse the original helper find_first_block_group(), which is
already doing the basic bg -> chunk checks, adding further checks of the
start/len and type flags.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199837
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:03 +02:00
Filipe Manana
22d3151c2c Btrfs: send, fix incorrect file layout after hole punching beyond eof
When doing an incremental send, if we have a file in the parent snapshot
that has prealloc extents beyond EOF and in the send snapshot it got a
hole punch that partially covers the prealloc extents, the send stream,
when replayed by a receiver, can result in a file that has a size bigger
than it should and filled with zeroes past the correct EOF.

For example:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt

  $ xfs_io -f -c "falloc -k 0 4M" /mnt/foobar
  $ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xea 0 1M" /mnt/foobar

  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
  $ btrfs send -f /tmp/1.send /mnt/snap1

  $ xfs_io -c "fpunch 1M 2M" /mnt/foobar

  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
  $ btrfs send -f /tmp/2.send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2

  $ stat --format %s /mnt/snap2/foobar
  1048576
  $ md5sum /mnt/snap2/foobar
  d31659e82e87798acd4669a1e0a19d4f  /mnt/snap2/foobar

  $ umount /mnt
  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
  $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt

  $ btrfs receive -f /mnt/1.snap /mnt
  $ btrfs receive -f /mnt/2.snap /mnt

  $ stat --format %s /mnt/snap2/foobar
  3145728
  # --> should be 1Mb and not 3Mb (which was the end offset of hole
  #     punch operation)
  $ md5sum /mnt/snap2/foobar
  117baf295297c2a995f92da725b0b651  /mnt/snap2/foobar
  # --> should be d31659e82e87798acd4669a1e0a19d4f as in the original fs

This issue actually happens only since commit ffa7c4296e ("Btrfs: send,
do not issue unnecessary truncate operations"), but before that commit we
were issuing a write operation full of zeroes (to "punch" a hole) which
was extending the file size beyond the correct value and then immediately
issue a truncate operation to the correct size and undoing the previous
write operation. Since the send protocol does not support fallocate, for
extent preallocation and hole punching, fix this by not even attempting
to send a "hole" (regular write full of zeroes) if it starts at an offset
greater then or equals to the file's size. This approach, besides being
much more simple then making send issue the truncate operation, adds the
benefit of avoiding the useless pair of write of zeroes and truncate
operations, saving time and IO at the receiver and reducing the size of
the send stream.

A test case for fstests follows soon.

Fixes: ffa7c4296e ("Btrfs: send, do not issue unnecessary truncate operations")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.17+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:03 +02:00
Misono Tomohiro
672d599041 btrfs: Use wrapper macro for rcu string to remove duplicate code
Cleanup patch and no functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:02 +02:00
Al Viro
f5b3a4173f btrfs: simplify btrfs_iget
Don't open-code iget_failed(), don't bother with btrfs_free_path(NULL),
move handling of positive return values of btrfs_lookup_inode() from
btrfs_read_locked_inode() to btrfs_iget() and kill now obviously
pointless ASSERT() in there.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:02 +02:00
Al Viro
9bc2ceff66 btrfs: lift make_bad_inode into btrfs_iget
We don't need to check is_bad_inode() after the call of
btrfs_read_locked_inode() - it's exactly the same as checking return
value for being non-zero.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:02 +02:00
Al Viro
8d9e220ca0 btrfs: simplify IS_ERR/PTR_ERR checks
IS_ERR(p) && PTR_ERR(p) == n is a weird way to spell p == ERR_PTR(n).

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:02 +02:00
Al Viro
2e19f1f9d3 btrfs: btrfs_iget never returns an is_bad_inode inode
Just get rid of pointless checks.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:02 +02:00
Misono Tomohiro
1e7e1f9e3a btrfs: replace: Reset on-disk dev stats value after replace
on-disk devs stats value is updated in btrfs_run_dev_stats(),
which is called during commit transaction, if device->dev_stats_ccnt
is not zero.

Since current replace operation does not touch dev_stats_ccnt,
on-disk dev stats value is not updated. Therefore "btrfs device stats"
may return old device's value after umount/mount
(Example: See "btrfs ins dump-t -t DEV $DEV" after btrfs/100 finish).

Fix this by just incrementing dev_stats_ccnt in
btrfs_dev_replace_finishing() when replace is succeeded and this will
update the values.

Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:01 +02:00
Misono Tomohiro
85c3954819 btrfs: extent-tree: Remove unused __btrfs_free_block_rsv
There is no user of this function anymore.

This was forgotten to be removed in commit a575ceeb13
("Btrfs: get rid of unused orphan infrastructure").

Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:01 +02:00
Misono Tomohiro
afc6961ffd btrfs: backref: Use ERR_CAST to return error code
Use ERR_CAST() instead of void * to make meaning clear.

Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:01 +02:00
Lu Fengqi
5b7d687ad5 btrfs: Remove redundant btrfs_release_path from btrfs_unlink_subvol
Although it is safe to call this on already released paths with no locks
held or extent buffers, removing the redundant btrfs_release_path is
reasonable.

Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:01 +02:00
Lu Fengqi
401b3b19d5 btrfs: Remove root parameter from btrfs_unlink_subvol
All callers pass the root tree of dir, we can push that down to the
function itself.

Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:01 +02:00
Lu Fengqi
6025c19fb2 btrfs: Remove fs_info from btrfs_add_root_ref
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle.

Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:00 +02:00
Lu Fengqi
3ee1c5530e btrfs: Remove fs_info from btrfs_del_root_ref
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle.

Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:00 +02:00
Lu Fengqi
ab9ce7d42b btrfs: Remove fs_info from btrfs_del_root
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle.

Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:00 +02:00
Lu Fengqi
9add29457a btrfs: Remove fs_info from btrfs_delete_delayed_dir_index
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle.

Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:00 +02:00
Lu Fengqi
4465c8b422 btrfs: Remove fs_info from btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle.

Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:13:00 +02:00
David Sterba
b5851021f1 btrfs: extent-tree: remove unused member walk_control::for_reloc
Leftover after fix e339a6b097 ("Btrfs: __btrfs_mod_ref should always
use no_quota"), that removed it from the function calls but not the
structure.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:59 +02:00
Filipe Manana
46b2f4590a Btrfs: fix send failure when root has deleted files still open
The more common use case of send involves creating a RO snapshot and then
use it for a send operation. In this case it's not possible to have inodes
in the snapshot that have a link count of zero (inode with an orphan item)
since during snapshot creation we do the orphan cleanup. However, other
less common use cases for send can end up seeing inodes with a link count
of zero and in this case the send operation fails with a ENOENT error
because any attempt to generate a path for the inode, with the purpose
of creating it or updating it at the receiver, fails since there are no
inode reference items. One use case it to use a regular subvolume for
a send operation after turning it to RO mode or turning a RW snapshot
into RO mode and then using it for a send operation. In both cases, if a
file gets all its hard links deleted while there is an open file
descriptor before turning the subvolume/snapshot into RO mode, the send
operation will encounter an inode with a link count of zero and then
fail with errno ENOENT.

Example using a full send with a subvolume:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt

  $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1
  $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo
  $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar

  # keep an open file descriptor on file bar
  $ exec 73</mnt/sv1/bar
  $ unlink /mnt/sv1/bar

  # Turn the subvolume to RO mode and use it for a full send, while
  # holding the open file descriptor.
  $ btrfs property set /mnt/sv1 ro true

  $ btrfs send -f /tmp/full.send /mnt/sv1
  At subvol /mnt/sv1
  ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory

Example using an incremental send with snapshots:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt

  $ btrfs subvolume create /mnt/sv1
  $ touch /mnt/sv1/foo
  $ touch /mnt/sv1/bar

  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap1

  $ echo "hello world" >> /mnt/sv1/bar

  $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/sv1 /mnt/snap2

  # Turn the second snapshot to RW mode and delete file foo while
  # holding an open file descriptor on it.
  $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro false
  $ exec 73</mnt/snap2/foo
  $ unlink /mnt/snap2/foo

  # Set the second snapshot back to RO mode and do an incremental send.
  $ btrfs property set /mnt/snap2 ro true

  $ btrfs send -f /tmp/inc.send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2
  At subvol /mnt/snap2
  ERROR: send ioctl failed with -2: No such file or directory

So fix this by ignoring inodes with a link count of zero if we are either
doing a full send or if they do not exist in the parent snapshot (they
are new in the send snapshot), and unlink all paths found in the parent
snapshot when doing an incremental send (and ignoring all other inode
items, such as xattrs and extents).

A test case for fstests follows soon.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reported-by: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:59 +02:00
Filipe Manana
0d836392ca Btrfs: fix mount failure after fsync due to hard link recreation
If we end up with logging an inode reference item which has the same name
but different index from the one we have persisted, we end up failing when
replaying the log with an errno value of -EEXIST. The error comes from
btrfs_add_link(), which is called from add_inode_ref(), when we are
replaying an inode reference item.

Example scenario where this happens:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt

  $ touch /mnt/foo
  $ ln /mnt/foo /mnt/bar

  $ sync

  # Rename the first hard link (foo) to a new name and rename the second
  # hard link (bar) to the old name of the first hard link (foo).
  $ mv /mnt/foo /mnt/qwerty
  $ mv /mnt/bar /mnt/foo

  # Create a new file, in the same parent directory, with the old name of
  # the second hard link (bar) and fsync this new file.
  # We do this instead of calling fsync on foo/qwerty because if we did
  # that the fsync resulted in a full transaction commit, not triggering
  # the problem.
  $ touch /mnt/bar
  $ xfs_io -c "fsync" /mnt/bar

  <power fail>

  $ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
  mount: mount /dev/sdb on /mnt failed: File exists

So fix this by checking if a conflicting inode reference exists (same
name, same parent but different index), removing it (and the associated
dir index entries from the parent inode) if it exists, before attempting
to add the new reference.

A test case for fstests follows soon.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:59 +02:00
Josef Bacik
4559b0a717 btrfs: don't leak ret from do_chunk_alloc
If we're trying to make a data reservation and we have to allocate a
data chunk we could leak ret == 1, as do_chunk_alloc() will return 1 if
it allocated a chunk.  Since the end of the function is the success path
just return 0.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:59 +02:00
David Sterba
84db5ccf42 btrfs: merge free_fs_root helpers
The exported helper just calls the static one. There's no obvious reason
to have them separate eg. for performance reasons where the static one
could be better optimized in the same unit. There's a slight decrease in
code size and stack consumption.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:59 +02:00
David Sterba
2ffad70ed3 btrfs: constify strings passed to assertion helper
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:59 +02:00
David Sterba
e9539cff04 btrfs: dev-replace: remove unused members of btrfs_dev_replace
Lock owner and nesting level have been unused since day 1, probably
copy&pasted from the extent_buffer locking scheme without much thinking.
The locking of device replace is simpler and does not need any lock
nesting.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:58 +02:00
David Sterba
e17385ca29 btrfs: remove unused member btrfs_root::name
Added in 58176a9604 ("Btrfs: Add per-root block accounting and sysfs
entries") in 2007, the roots had names exported in sysfs. The code
was commented out in 4df27c4d5c ("Btrfs: change how subvolumes
are organized") and cleaned by 182608c829 ("btrfs: remove old
unused commented out code").

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:58 +02:00
Adam Borowski
616d374efa btrfs: allow defrag on a file opened read-only that has rw permissions
Requiring a read-write descriptor conflicts both ways with exec,
returning ETXTBSY whenever you try to defrag a program that's currently
being run, or causing intermittent exec failures on a live system being
defragged.

As defrag doesn't change the file's contents in any way, there's no
reason to consider it a rw operation.  Thus, let's check only whether
the file could have been opened rw.  Such access control is still needed
as currently defrag can use extra disk space, and might trigger bugs.

We return EINVAL when the request is invalid; here it's ok but merely
the user has insufficient privileges.  Thus, the EPERM return value
reflects the error better -- as discussed in the identical case for
dedupe.

According to codesearch.debian.net, no userspace program distinguishes
these values beyond strerror().

Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ fold the EPERM patch from Adam ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:58 +02:00
Josef Bacik
3c4276936f Btrfs: fix btrfs_write_inode vs delayed iput deadlock
We recently ran into the following deadlock involving
btrfs_write_inode():

[  +0.005066]  __schedule+0x38e/0x8c0
[  +0.007144]  schedule+0x36/0x80
[  +0.006447]  bit_wait+0x11/0x60
[  +0.006446]  __wait_on_bit+0xbe/0x110
[  +0.007487]  ? bit_wait_io+0x60/0x60
[  +0.007319]  __inode_wait_for_writeback+0x96/0xc0
[  +0.009568]  ? autoremove_wake_function+0x40/0x40
[  +0.009565]  inode_wait_for_writeback+0x21/0x30
[  +0.009224]  evict+0xb0/0x190
[  +0.006099]  iput+0x1a8/0x210
[  +0.006103]  btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x73/0xc0
[  +0.009047]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x799/0x8c0
[  +0.009567]  btrfs_write_inode+0x81/0xb0
[  +0.008008]  __writeback_single_inode+0x267/0x320
[  +0.009569]  writeback_sb_inodes+0x25b/0x4e0
[  +0.008702]  wb_writeback+0x102/0x2d0
[  +0.007487]  wb_workfn+0xa4/0x310
[  +0.006794]  ? wb_workfn+0xa4/0x310
[  +0.007143]  process_one_work+0x150/0x410
[  +0.008179]  worker_thread+0x6d/0x520
[  +0.007490]  kthread+0x12c/0x160
[  +0.006620]  ? put_pwq_unlocked+0x80/0x80
[  +0.008185]  ? kthread_park+0xa0/0xa0
[  +0.007484]  ? do_syscall_64+0x53/0x150
[  +0.007837]  ret_from_fork+0x29/0x40

Writeback calls:

btrfs_write_inode
  btrfs_commit_transaction
    btrfs_run_delayed_iputs

If iput() is called on that same inode, evict() will wait for writeback
forever.

btrfs_write_inode() was originally added way back in 4730a4bc5b
("btrfs_dirty_inode") to support O_SYNC writes. However, ->write_inode()
hasn't been used for O_SYNC since 148f948ba8 ("vfs: Introduce new
helpers for syncing after writing to O_SYNC file or IS_SYNC inode"), so
btrfs_write_inode() is actually unnecessary (and leads to a bunch of
unnecessary commits). Get rid of it, which also gets rid of the
deadlock.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.2+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
[Omar: new commit message]
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:58 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
97aff912a2 btrfs: Remove fs_info from btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:58 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
f4208794d0 btrfs: Remove fs_info form btrfs_free_chunk
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:57 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
4f5ad7bd63 btrfs: Remove fs_info from btrfs_destroy_dev_replace_tgtdev
This function is always passed a well-formed tgtdevice so the fs_info
can be referenced from there.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:57 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
d6507cf1e2 btrfs: Remove fs_info from btrfs_assign_next_active_device
It can be referenced from the passed 'device' argument which is always
a well-formed device.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:57 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
5495f195fc btrfs: remove fs_info argument from update_dev_stat_item
It can be referenced from the passed transaction handle.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:57 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
68a9db5f23 btrfs: Remove fs_info from btrfs_rm_dev_replace_remove_srcdev
It can be referenced from the passed srcdev argument.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:57 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
8e87e85627 btrfs: Remove fs_info argument from btrfs_add_dev_item
It can be referenced form the passed transaction handle.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:56 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
5e23a6fea6 btrfs: extent-tree: Remove dead alignment check
In find_free_extent() under checks: label, we have the following code:

		search_start = ALIGN(offset, fs_info->stripesize);
		/* move on to the next group */
		if (search_start + num_bytes >
		    block_group->key.objectid + block_group->key.offset) {
			btrfs_add_free_space(block_group, offset, num_bytes);
			goto loop;
		}
		if (offset < search_start)
			btrfs_add_free_space(block_group, offset,
					     search_start - offset);
		BUG_ON(offset > search_start);

However ALIGN() is rounding up, thus @search_start >= @offset and that
BUG_ON() will never be triggered.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:56 +02:00
Filipe Manana
ca5d2ba1ae Btrfs: remove unused key assignment when doing a full send
At send.c:full_send_tree() we were setting the 'key' variable in the loop
while never using it later. We were also using two btrfs_key variables
to store the initial key for search and the key found in every iteration
of the loop. So remove this useless key assignment and use the same
btrfs_key variable to store the initial search key and the key found in
each iteration. This was introduced in the initial send commit but was
never used (commit 31db9f7c23 ("Btrfs: introduce BTRFS_IOC_SEND for
btrfs send/receive").

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:56 +02:00
David Sterba
5cdc84bfde btrfs: drop extent_io_ops::set_range_writeback callback
The data and metadata callback implementation both use the same
function. We can remove the call indirection and intermediate helper
completely.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:56 +02:00
David Sterba
00032d38ea btrfs: drop extent_io_ops::merge_bio_hook callback
The data and metadata callback implementation both use the same
function. We can remove the call indirection completely.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:56 +02:00
David Sterba
05912a3c04 btrfs: drop extent_io_ops::tree_fs_info callback
All implementations of the callback are trivial and do the same and
there's only one user. Merge everything together.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:55 +02:00
David Sterba
e288c080dd btrfs: unify end_io callbacks of async_submit_bio
The end_io callbacks passed to btrfs_wq_submit_bio
(btrfs_submit_bio_done and btree_submit_bio_done) are effectively the
same code, there's no point to do the indirection. Export
btrfs_submit_bio_done and call it directly.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:55 +02:00
David Sterba
d7cbfafc4b btrfs: remove unused member async_submit_bio::bio_flags
After splitting the start and end hooks in a758781d4b ("btrfs:
separate types for submit_bio_start and submit_bio_done"), some of
the function arguments were dropped but not removed from the structure.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:55 +02:00
David Sterba
d7e8555b1d btrfs: remove unused member async_submit_bio::fs_info
Introduced by c6100a4b4e ("Btrfs: replace tree->mapping with
tree->private_data") to be used in run_one_async_done where it got
unused after 736cd52e0c ("Btrfs: remove nr_async_submits and
async_submit_draining").

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:55 +02:00
Gu Jinxiang
315409b009 btrfs: validate type when reading a chunk
Reported in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199839, with an
image that has an invalid chunk type but does not return an error.

Add chunk type check in btrfs_check_chunk_valid, to detect the wrong
type combinations.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199839
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:55 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
b0132a3be5 btrfs: Rename EXTENT_BUFFER_DUMMY to EXTENT_BUFFER_UNMAPPED
EXTENT_BUFFER_DUMMY is an awful name for this flag. Buffers which have
this flag set are not in any way dummy. Rather, they are private in the
sense that are not mapped and linked to the global buffer tree. This
flag has subtle implications to the way free_extent_buffer works for
example, as well as controls whether page->mapping->private_lock is held
during extent_buffer release. Pages for an unmapped buffer cannot be
under io, nor can they be written by a 3rd party so taking the lock is
unnecessary.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ EXTENT_BUFFER_UNMAPPED, update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:55 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
07e21c4dad btrfs: Document locking requirement via lockdep_assert_held
Remove stale comment since there is no longer an eb->eb_lock and
document the locking expectation with a lockdep_assert_held statement.
No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:54 +02:00
David Sterba
55ac01396a btrfs: rename btrfs_release_extent_buffer_page
The function used to release one page (and always the first one), but
not anymore since a50924e3a4 ("btrfs: drop constant param
from btrfs_release_extent_buffer_page").  Update the name and comment.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:54 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
d64766fdf9 btrfs: Refactor loop in btrfs_release_extent_buffer_page
The purpose of the function is to free all the pages comprising an
extent buffer. This can be achieved with a simple for loop rather than
the slightly more involved 'do {} while' construct. So rewrite the
loop using a 'for' construct. Additionally we can never have an
extent_buffer that has 0 pages so remove the check for index == 0. No
functional changes.

The reversed order used to have a meaning in the past where the first
page served as a blocking point for several callers. See eg
4f2de97ace ("Btrfs: set page->private to the eb").

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:54 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
b16d011e79 btrfs: Reword dodgy comments in alloc_extent_buffer
Commit eb14ab8ed2 ("Btrfs: fix page->private races") fixed a genuine
race between extent buffer initialisation and btree_releasepage.
Unfortunately as the code has evolved the comments weren't changed which
made them slightly wrong and they weren't very clear in the fist place.
Fix this by (hopefully) rewording them in a more approachable manner.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-08-06 13:12:54 +02:00