We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already
dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it
dynamically, which is no longer needed.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already
dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it
dynamically, which is no longer needed.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the custom ti,hwmods dts property. We have already
dropped the platform data earlier, but have been still allocating it
dynamically, which is no longer needed.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We can now probe devices with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Ankur Tyagi <ankur.tyagi@gallagher.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We can now probe cpsw with ti-sysc interconnect driver and dts
data. Let's drop the related platform data and custom ti,hwmods
dts property for am3 and am4.
As we're just dropping data, and the early platform data init
is based on the custom ti,hwmods property, we want to drop both
the platform data and ti,hwmods property in a single patch.
Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
In preparation for dropping legacy platform data and custom ti,hwmods
property, we need to make functional clock available for mdio for the
SoCs so the the mdio driver can find it.
The mdio hardware currently relies on a mdio_hwmod to manage the clock
for omap variants. This is wrong though as there are no separate
sysconfig registers for mdio. All the cpsw related components are just
children of the gmac module.
Note that since mdio is a child of cpsw, just doing pm_runtime_get()
in the mdio driver enables the clock. However, since mdio is also used
by davinci that does not implement runtime PM, let's just add the fck
for now.
Also note that am437x mdio already has a clock, let's update it to
not use the legacy clock naming to unify things further.
Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We are currently using a wrong register for dcan revision. Although
this is currently only used for detecting the dcan module, let's
fix it to avoid confusion.
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Some interconnect target modules have no module control registers at
all, such as d_can on am335x and am437x.
The d_can register offset at 0 is CTL register with 0x401 as the default
value. I guess I mistook the 0x401 value for a revision register as the
value happens to look similar to what the revision registers typically
have for other modules.
To handle modules with no control registers, we need to improve the
ti-sysc driver a bit to bail out with errors on no control registers,
and then we can remove the bogus revision registers for d_can.
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Switch to use phy-gmii-sel PHY instead of cpsw-phy-sel.
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
We need to add mcasp l3 port ranges for mcasp to use a correct l3
data port address for dma.
Fixes: d95adfd458 ("ARM: dts: am437x: Move l4 child devices to
probe them with ti-sysc")
Reported-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Tested-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
With l4 interconnect hierarchy and ti-sysc interconnect target module
data in place, we can simply move all the related child devices to
their proper location and enable probing using ti-sysc.
In general the first child device address range starts at range 0
from the ti-sysc interconnect target so the move involves adjusting
the child device reg properties for that.
In case of any regressions, problem devices can be reverted to probe
with legacy platform data as needed by moving them back and removing
the related interconnect target module node.
Note that we are not yet moving dss or wkup_m3, those will be moved
later after some related driver changes.
Cc: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Similar to commit 8f42cb7f64 ("ARM: dts: omap4: Add l4 interconnect
hierarchy and ti-sysc data"), let's add proper interconnect hierarchy
for l4 interconnect instances with the related ti-sysc interconnect
module data as in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/ti-sysc.txt.
Using ti-sysc driver binding allows us to start dropping legacy platform
data in arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap*hwmod*data.c files later on in favor of
ti-sysc dts data.
This data is generated based on platform data from a booted system
and the interconnect acces protection registers for ranges. To avoid
regressions, we initially validate the device tree provided data
against the existing platform data on boot.
Note that we cannot yet include this file from the SoC dtsi file until
the child devices are moved to their proper locations in the
interconnect hierarchy in the following patch. Otherwise we would have
the each module probed twice.
Cc: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
