While fixing an out of bounds array access in known_siginfo_layout
reported by the kernel test robot it became apparent that the same bug
exists in siginfo_layout and affects copy_siginfo_from_user32.
The straight forward fix that makes guards against making this mistake
in the future and should keep the code size small is to just take an
unsigned signal number instead of a signed signal number, as I did to
fix known_siginfo_layout.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: cc731525f2 ("signal: Remove kernel interal si_code magic")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
The bounds checks in known_siginfo_layout only guards against positive
numbers that are too large, large negative can slip through and
can cause out of bounds accesses.
Ordinarily this is not a concern because early in signal processing
the signal number is filtered with valid_signal which ensures it
is a small positive signal number, but copy_siginfo_from_user
is called before this check is performed.
[ 73.031126] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffff6281bcb6
[ 73.032038] PGD 3014067 P4D 3014067 PUD 0
[ 73.032565] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI
[ 73.033287] CPU: 0 PID: 732 Comm: trinity-c3 Tainted: G W T 4.19.0-rc1-00077-g4ce5f9c #1
[ 73.034423] RIP: 0010:copy_siginfo_from_user+0x4d/0xd0
[ 73.034908] Code: 00 8b 53 08 81 fa 80 00 00 00 0f 84 90 00 00 00 85 d2 7e 2d 48 63 0b 83 f9 1f 7f 1c 8d 71 ff bf d8 04 01 50 48 0f a3 f7 73 0e <0f> b6 8c 09 20 bb 81 82 39 ca 7f 15 eb 68 31 c0 83 fa 06 7f 0c eb
[ 73.036665] RSP: 0018:ffff88001b8f7e20 EFLAGS: 00010297
[ 73.037160] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88001b8f7e90 RCX: fffffffff00000cb
[ 73.037865] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 00000000f00000ca RDI: 00000000500104d8
[ 73.038546] RBP: ffff88001b8f7e80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 73.039201] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000008
[ 73.039874] R13: 00000000000002dc R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 73.040613] FS: 000000000104a880(0000) GS:ffff88001f000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 73.041649] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 73.042405] CR2: ffffffff6281bcb6 CR3: 000000001cb52003 CR4: 00000000001606b0
[ 73.043351] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 73.044286] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600
[ 73.045221] Call Trace:
[ 73.045556] __x64_sys_rt_tgsigqueueinfo+0x34/0xa0
[ 73.046199] do_syscall_64+0x1a4/0x390
[ 73.046708] ? vtime_user_enter+0x61/0x80
[ 73.047242] ? __context_tracking_enter+0x4e/0x60
[ 73.047714] ? __context_tracking_enter+0x4e/0x60
[ 73.048278] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Therefore fix known_siginfo_layout to take an unsigned signal number
instead of a signed signal number. All valid signal numbers are small
positive numbers so they will not be affected, but invalid negative
signal numbers will now become large positive signal numbers and will
not be used as indices into the sig_sicodes array.
Making the signal number unsigned makes it difficult for similar mistakes to
happen in the future.
Fixes: 4ce5f9c9e7 ("signal: Use a smaller struct siginfo in the kernel")
Inspired-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com> reported:
> Accoding to the man page, the user should not set si_signo, it has to be set
> by kernel.
>
> $ man 2 rt_sigqueueinfo
>
> The uinfo argument specifies the data to accompany the signal. This
> argument is a pointer to a structure of type siginfo_t, described in
> sigaction(2) (and defined by including <sigaction.h>). The caller
> should set the following fields in this structure:
>
> si_code
> This must be one of the SI_* codes in the Linux kernel source
> file include/asm-generic/siginfo.h, with the restriction that
> the code must be negative (i.e., cannot be SI_USER, which is
> used by the kernel to indicate a signal sent by kill(2)) and
> cannot (since Linux 2.6.39) be SI_TKILL (which is used by the
> kernel to indicate a signal sent using tgkill(2)).
>
> si_pid This should be set to a process ID, typically the process ID of
> the sender.
>
> si_uid This should be set to a user ID, typically the real user ID of
> the sender.
>
> si_value
> This field contains the user data to accompany the signal. For
> more information, see the description of the last (union sigval)
> argument of sigqueue(3).
>
> Internally, the kernel sets the si_signo field to the value specified
> in sig, so that the receiver of the signal can also obtain the signal
> number via that field.
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 07:19:02PM +0200, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> If there is some application that calls sigqueueinfo directly that has
>> a problem with this added sanity check we can revisit this when we see
>> what kind of crazy that application is doing.
>
>
> I already know two "applications" ;)
>
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/peeksiginfo.c
> https://github.com/checkpoint-restore/criu/blob/master/test/zdtm/static/sigpending.c
>
> Disclaimer: I'm the author of both of them.
Looking at the kernel code the historical behavior has alwasy been to prefer
the signal number passed in by the kernel.
So sigh. Implmenet __copy_siginfo_from_user and __copy_siginfo_from_user32 to
take that signal number and prefer it. The user of ptrace will still
use copy_siginfo_from_user and copy_siginfo_from_user32 as they do not and
never have had a signal number there.
Luckily this change has never made it farther than linux-next.
Fixes: e75dc036c4 ("signal: Fail sigqueueinfo if si_signo != sig")
Reported-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
We reserve 128 bytes for struct siginfo but only use about 48 bytes on
64bit and 32 bytes on 32bit. Someday we might use more but it is unlikely
to be anytime soon.
Userspace seems content with just enough bytes of siginfo to implement
sigqueue. Or in the case of checkpoint/restart reinjecting signals
the kernel has sent.
Reducing the stack footprint and the work to copy siginfo around from
2 cachelines to 1 cachelines seems worth doing even if I don't have
benchmarks to show a performance difference.
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Linus recently observed that if we did not worry about the padding
member in struct siginfo it is only about 48 bytes, and 48 bytes is
much nicer than 128 bytes for allocating on the stack and copying
around in the kernel.
The obvious thing of only adding the padding when userspace is
including siginfo.h won't work as there are sigframe definitions in
the kernel that embed struct siginfo.
So split siginfo in two; kernel_siginfo and siginfo. Keeping the
traditional name for the userspace definition. While the version that
is used internally to the kernel and ultimately will not be padded to
128 bytes is called kernel_siginfo.
The definition of struct kernel_siginfo I have put in include/signal_types.h
A set of buildtime checks has been added to verify the two structures have
the same field offsets.
To make it easy to verify the change kernel_siginfo retains the same
size as siginfo. The reduction in size comes in a following change.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
In preparation for using a smaller version of siginfo in the kernel
introduce copy_siginfo_from_user and use it when siginfo is copied from
userspace.
Make the pattern for using copy_siginfo_from_user and
copy_siginfo_from_user32 to capture the return value and return that
value on error.
This is a necessary prerequisite for using a smaller siginfo
in the kernel than the kernel exports to userspace.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Rework the defintion of struct siginfo so that the array padding
struct siginfo to SI_MAX_SIZE can be placed in a union along side of
the rest of the struct siginfo members. The result is that we no
longer need the __ARCH_SI_PREAMBLE_SIZE or SI_PAD_SIZE definitions.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
The kernel needs to validate that the contents of struct siginfo make
sense as siginfo is copied into the kernel, so that the proper union
members can be put in the appropriate locations. The field si_signo
is a fundamental part of that validation. As such changing the
contents of si_signo after the validation make no sense and can result
in nonsense values in the kernel.
As such simply fail if someone is silly enough to set si_signo out of
sync with the signal number passed to sigqueueinfo.
I don't expect a problem as glibc's sigqueue implementation sets
"si_signo = sig" and CRIU just returns to the kernel what the kernel
gave to it.
If there is some application that calls sigqueueinfo directly that has
a problem with this added sanity check we can revisit this when we see
what kind of crazy that application is doing.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
When moving all of the architectures specific si_codes into
siginfo.h, I apparently overlooked EMT_TAGOVF. Move it now.
Remove the now redundant test in siginfo_layout for SIGEMT
as now NSIGEMT is always defined.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Pass the signal number, and the signal code, and the faulting
address into uc32_notify_die so the callers do not need
to generate a struct siginfo.
In ucs32_ntoify_die use the newly passed in information to
call force_sig_fault to generate the siginfo and send the error.
This simplifies the code making the chances of bugs much less likely.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Pass signr, sicode, and address into unhandled_exception as explicit
parameters instead of members of struct siginfo. Then in unhandled
exception generate and send the siginfo using force_sig_fault.
This keeps the code simpler and less error prone.
Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
The ia64 handling of failure to return from a signal frame has been trying
to set overlapping fields in struct siginfo since 2.3.43. The si_code
corresponds to the fields that were stomped (not the field that is
actually written), so I can not imagine a piece of userspace code
making sense of the signal frame if it looks closely.
In practice failure to return from a signal frame is a rare event that
almost never happens. Someone using an alternate signal stack to
recover and looking in detail is even more rare. So I presume no one
has ever noticed and reported this ia64 nonsense.
Sort this out by causing ia64 to use force_sig(SIGSEGV) like other architectures.
Fixes: 2.3.43
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
The ia64 handling of failure to setup a signal frame has been trying
to set overlapping fields in struct siginfo since 2.3.43. The si_pid
and si_uid fields are stomped when the si_addr field is set. The
si_code of SI_KERNEL indicates that si_pid and si_uid should be valid,
and that si_addr does not exist.
Being at odds with the definition of SI_KERNEL and with nothing to
indicate that this was a signal frame setup failure there is no way
for userspace to know that si_addr was filled out instead.
In practice failure to setup a signal frame is rare, and si_pid and
si_uid are always set to 0 when si_code is SI_KERNEL so I expect no
one has looked closely enough before to see this weirdness. Further
the only difference between force_sigsegv_info and the generic
force_sigsegv other than the return code is that force_sigsegv_info
stomps the si_uid and si_pid fields.
Remove the bug and simplify the code by using force_sigsegv in this
case just like other architectures.
Fixes: 2.3.43
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
This simplifies the code making it clearer what is going on, and
making the siginfo generation easier to maintain.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
In arm_notify_die call force_sig_fault to let the generic
code handle siginfo generation.
This removes some boiler plate making the code easier to
maintain in the long run.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Add arm64_force_sig_ptrace_errno_trap for consistency with
arm64_force_sig_fault and use it where appropriate.
This adds the show_signal logic to the force_sig_errno_trap case,
where it was apparently overlooked earlier.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
This will let the description be reused shortly.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
The function has no more callers so remove it.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Add arm64_force_sig_mceerr for consistency with arm64_force_sig_fault,
and use it in the one location that can take advantage of it.
This removes the fiddly filling out of siginfo before sending a signal
reporting an memory error to userspace.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Wrap force_sig_fault with a helper that calls arm64_show_signal
and call arm64_force_sig_fault where appropraite.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
This code is truly common between the signal sending cases so share it.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
As this work is truly common between all of the signal sending cases
there is no need to repeat it between the different cases.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Not all of the signals passed to __do_user_fault can be handled
the same way so expand the now tiny __do_user_fault in it's callers
and remove it.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
It gets easy to confuse what is going on when some code is shared and some not
so stop sharing the trivial bits of signal generation to make future updates
easier to understand.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
These two cases are practically the same and use siginfo differently
from the other signals sent from do_page_fault. So consolidate them
to make future changes easier.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
This pepares for sending signals with something other than
arm64_force_sig_info.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Filling in siginfo is error prone and so it is wise to use more
specialized helpers to do that work. Factor out the arm specific
unhandled signal reporting from the work of delivering a signal so
the code can be modified to use functions that take the information
to fill out siginfo as parameters.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Every caller passes in current for tsk so there is no need to pass
tsk. Instead make tsk a local variable initialized to current.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Instead of generating a struct siginfo before calling arm64_notify_die
pass the signal number, tne sicode and the fault address into
arm64_notify_die and have it call force_sig_fault instead of
force_sig_info to let the generic code generate the struct siginfo.
This keeps code passing just the needed information into
siginfo generating code, making it easier to see what
is happening and harder to get wrong. Further by letting
the generic code handle the generation of struct siginfo
it reduces the number of sites generating struct siginfo
making it possible to review them and verify that all
of the fiddly details for a structure passed to userspace
are handled properly.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Call force_sig_pkuerr directly instead of rolling it by hand
in _exception_pkey.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Now that _exception no longer calls _exception_pkey it is no longer
necessary to handle any signal with any si_code. All pkey exceptions
are SIGSEGV with paired with SEGV_PKUERR. So just handle
that case and remove the now unnecessary parameters from _exception_pkey.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
The callers of _exception don't need the pkey exception logic because
they are not processing a pkey exception. So just call exception_common
directly and then call force_sig_fault to generate the appropriate siginfo
and deliver the appropriate signal.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
It is brittle and wrong to populate si_pkey when there was not a pkey
exception. The field does not exist for all si_codes and in some
cases another field exists in the same memory location.
So factor out the code that all exceptions handlers must run
into exception_common, leaving the individual exception handlers
to generate the signals themselves.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Now that bad_key_fault_exception no longer calls __bad_area_nosemaphore
there is no reason for __bad_area_nosemaphore to handle pkeys.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
This removes the need for other code paths to deal with pkey exceptions.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
There are no callers of __bad_area that pass in a pkey parameter so it makes
no sense to take one.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
In do_sigbus isolate the mceerr signaling code and call
force_sig_mceerr instead of falling through to the force_sig_info that
works for all of the other signals.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Now that si_code == SEGV_PKUERR is the flag indicating that a pkey
is present there is no longer a need to pass a pointer to a local
pkey value, instead pkey can be passed more efficiently by value.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Now that the pkey handling has been removed force_sig_info_fault and
force_sig_fault perform identical work. Just the type of the address
paramter is different. So replace calls to force_sig_info_fault with
calls to force_sig_fault, and remove force_sig_info_fault.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
There is only one code path that can generate a pkuerr signal. That
code path calls __bad_area_nosemaphore and can be dectected by testing
if si_code == SEGV_PKUERR. It can be seen from inspection that all of
the other tests in fill_sig_info_pkey are unnecessary.
Therefore call force_sig_pkuerr directly from __bad_area_semaphore and
remove fill_sig_info_pkey.
At the same time move the comment above force_sig_info_pkey into
bad_area_access_error, so that the documentation about pkey generation
races is not lost.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
There is only one caller of __bad_area that passes in PKUERR and thus
will generate a siginfo with si_pkey set. Therefore simplify the
logic and hoist reading of vma_pkey up into that caller, and just
pass *pkey into __bad_area.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
