Commit Graph

414828 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Wang Shilong
9d89ce6587 Btrfs: move btrfs_{set,clear}_and_info() to ctree.h
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-24 16:43:32 -07:00
David Sterba
3f9e3df8da btrfs: replace error code from btrfs_drop_extents
There's a case which clone does not handle and used to BUG_ON instead,
(testcase xfstests/btrfs/035), now returns EINVAL. This error code is
confusing to the ioctl caller, as it normally signifies errorneous
arguments.

Change it to ENOPNOTSUPP which allows a fall back to copy instead of
clone. This does not affect the common reflink operation.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-24 16:43:32 -07:00
Qu Wenruo
c5f7d0bb29 btrfs: Change the hole range to a more accurate value.
Commit 3ac0d7b96a fixed the btrfs expanding
write problem but the hole punched is sometimes too large for some
iovec, which has unmapped data ranges.
This patch will change to hole range to a more accurate value using the
counts checked by the write check routines.

Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-24 16:43:32 -07:00
Christoph Jaeger
0040e606e3 btrfs: fix use-after-free in mount_subvol()
Pointer 'newargs' is used after the memory that it points to has already
been freed.

Picked up by Coverity - CID 1201425.

Fixes: 0723a0473f ("btrfs: allow mounting btrfs subvolumes with
different ro/rw options")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Jaeger <christophjaeger@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-14 11:31:08 -07:00
Wang Shilong
e4fbaee292 Btrfs: fix compile warnings on on avr32 platform
fs/btrfs/scrub.c: In function 'get_raid56_logic_offset':
fs/btrfs/scrub.c:2269: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
fs/btrfs/scrub.c:2269: warning: right shift count >= width of type
fs/btrfs/scrub.c:2269: warning: passing argument 1 of '__div64_32' from incompatible pointer type

Since @rot is an int type, we should not use do_div(), fix it.

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-11 06:35:50 -07:00
Harald Hoyer
0723a0473f btrfs: allow mounting btrfs subvolumes with different ro/rw options
Given the following /etc/fstab entries:

/dev/sda3 /mnt/foo btrfs subvol=foo,ro 0 0
/dev/sda3 /mnt/bar btrfs subvol=bar,rw 0 0

you can't issue:

$ mount /mnt/foo
$ mount /mnt/bar

You would have to do:

$ mount /mnt/foo
$ mount -o remount,rw /mnt/foo
$ mount --bind -o remount,ro /mnt/foo
$ mount /mnt/bar

or

$ mount /mnt/bar
$ mount --rw /mnt/foo
$ mount --bind -o remount,ro /mnt/foo

With this patch you can do

$ mount /mnt/foo
$ mount /mnt/bar

$ cat /proc/self/mountinfo
49 33 0:41 /foo /mnt/foo ro,relatime shared:36 - btrfs /dev/sda3 rw,ssd,space_cache
87 33 0:41 /bar /mnt/bar rw,relatime shared:74 - btrfs /dev/sda3 rw,ssd,space_cache

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-10 13:32:50 -07:00
David Sterba
36523e9512 btrfs: export global block reserve size as space_info
Introduce a block group type bit for a global reserve and fill the space
info for SPACE_INFO ioctl. This should replace the newly added ioctl
(01e219e806) to get just the 'size' part
of the global reserve, while the actual usage can be now visible in the
'btrfs fi df' output during ENOSPC stress.

The unpatched userspace tools will show the blockgroup as 'unknown'.

CC: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
CC: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 10:41:53 -07:00
Sergei Trofimovich
800ee2247f btrfs: fix crash in remount(thread_pool=) case
Reproducer:
    mount /dev/ubda /mnt
    mount -oremount,thread_pool=42 /mnt

Gives a crash:
    ? btrfs_workqueue_set_max+0x0/0x70
    btrfs_resize_thread_pool+0xe3/0xf0
    ? sync_filesystem+0x0/0xc0
    ? btrfs_resize_thread_pool+0x0/0xf0
    btrfs_remount+0x1d2/0x570
    ? kern_path+0x0/0x80
    do_remount_sb+0xd9/0x1c0
    do_mount+0x26a/0xbf0
    ? kfree+0x0/0x1b0
    SyS_mount+0xc4/0x110

It's a call
    btrfs_workqueue_set_max(fs_info->scrub_wr_completion_workers, new_pool_size);
with
    fs_info->scrub_wr_completion_workers = NULL;

as scrub wqs get created only on user's demand.

Patch skips not-created-yet workqueues.

Signed-off-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
CC: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
CC: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
CC: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 10:41:52 -07:00
Josef Bacik
c4a050bbbb Btrfs: abort the transaction when we don't find our extent ref
I'm not sure why we weren't aborting here in the first place, it is obviously a
bad time from the fact that we print the leaf and yell loudly about it.  Fix
this up, otherwise we panic because our path could be pointing into oblivion.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 09:08:51 -07:00
Chris Mason
3a29bc0928 Btrfs: fix EINVAL checks in btrfs_clone
btrfs_drop_extents can now return -EINVAL, but only one caller
in btrfs_clone was checking for it.  This adds it to the
caller for inline extents, which is where we really need it.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 09:08:50 -07:00
Wang Shilong
a1ecaabbf9 Btrfs: fix unlock in __start_delalloc_inodes()
This patch fix a regression caused by the following patch:
Btrfs: don't flush all delalloc inodes when we doesn't get s_umount lock

break while loop will make us call @spin_unlock() without
calling @spin_lock() before, fix it.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 09:08:50 -07:00
Wang Shilong
3b080b2564 Btrfs: scrub raid56 stripes in the right way
Steps to reproduce:
 # mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sda[8-11] -m raid5 -d raid5
 # mount /dev/sda8 /mnt
 # btrfs scrub start -BR /mnt
 # echo $? <--unverified errors make return value be 3

This is because we don't setup right mapping between physical
and logical address for raid56, which makes checksum mismatch.
But we will find everthing is fine later when rechecking using
btrfs_map_block().

This patch fixed the problem by settuping right mappings and
we only verify data stripes' checksums.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 09:08:49 -07:00
Wang Shilong
68bb462d42 Btrfs: don't compress for a small write
To compress a small file range(<=blocksize) that is not
an inline extent can not save disk space at all. skip it can
save us some cpu time.

This patch can also fix wrong setting nocompression flag for
inode, say a case when @total_in is 4096, and then we get
@total_compressed 52,because we do aligment to page cache size
firstly, and then we get into conclusion @total_in=@total_compressed
thus we will clear this inode's compression flag.

An exception comes from inserting inline extent failure but we
still have @total_compressed < @total_in,so we will still reset
inode's flag, this is ok, because we don't have good compression
effect.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 09:08:48 -07:00
Filipe Manana
c50d3e71c3 Btrfs: more efficient io tree navigation on wait_extent_bit
If we don't reschedule use rb_next to find the next extent state
instead of a full tree search, which is more efficient and safe
since we didn't release the io tree's lock.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 09:08:47 -07:00
Filipe Manana
c715e155c9 Btrfs: send, build path string only once in send_hole
There's no point building the path string in each iteration of the
send_hole loop, as it produces always the same string.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 09:08:46 -07:00
Gui Hecheng
9a40f1222a btrfs: filter invalid arg for btrfs resize
Originally following cmds will work:
	# btrfs fi resize -10A  <mnt>
	# btrfs fi resize -10Gaha <mnt>
Filter the arg by checking the return pointer of memparse.

Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 09:08:45 -07:00
Filipe Manana
766b5e5ae7 Btrfs: send, fix data corruption due to incorrect hole detection
During an incremental send, when we finish processing an inode (corresponding to
a regular file) we would assume the gap between the end of the last processed file
extent and the file's size corresponded to a file hole, and therefore incorrectly
send a bunch of zero bytes to overwrite that region in the file.

This affects only kernel 3.14.

Reproducer:

    mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
    mount /dev/sdc /mnt

    xfs_io -f -c "falloc -k 0 268435456" /mnt/foo

    btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap0

    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x01 -b 9216 16190218 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x02 -b 1121 198720104 1121" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x05 -b 9216 107887439 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x06 -b 9216 225520207 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x07 -b 67584 102138300 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x08 -b 7000 94897484 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x09 -b 113664 245083212 113664" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x10 -b 123 17937788 123" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x11 -b 39936 229573311 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x12 -b 67584 174792222 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x13 -b 9216 249253213 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x16 -b 67584 150046083 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x17 -b 39936 118246040 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x18 -b 67584 215965442 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x19 -b 33792 97096725 33792" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x20 -b 125952 166300596 125952" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x21 -b 123 1078957 123" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x25 -b 9216 212044492 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x26 -b 7000 265037146 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x27 -b 42757 215922685 42757" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x28 -b 7000 69865411 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x29 -b 67584 67948958 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x30 -b 39936 266967019 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x31 -b 1121 19582453 1121" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x32 -b 17408 257710255 17408" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x33 -b 39936 3895518 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x34 -b 125952 12045847 125952" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x35 -b 17408 19156379 17408" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x36 -b 39936 50160066 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x37 -b 113664 9549793 113664" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x38 -b 105472 94391506 105472" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x39 -b 23552 143632863 23552" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x40 -b 39936 241283845 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x41 -b 113664 199937606 113664" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x42 -b 67584 67380093 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x43 -b 67584 26793129 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x44 -b 39936 14421913 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x45 -b 123 253097405 123" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x46 -b 1121 128233424 1121" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x47 -b 105472 91577959 105472" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x48 -b 1121 7245381 1121" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x49 -b 113664 182414694 113664" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x50 -b 9216 32750608 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x51 -b 67584 266546049 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x52 -b 67584 87969398 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x53 -b 9216 260848797 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x54 -b 39936 119461243 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x55 -b 7000 200178693 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x56 -b 9216 243316029 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x57 -b 7000 209658229 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x58 -b 101376 179745192 101376" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x59 -b 9216 64012300 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x60 -b 125952 181705139 125952" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x61 -b 23552 235737348 23552" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x62 -b 113664 106021355 113664" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x63 -b 67584 135753552 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x64 -b 23552 95730888 23552" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x65 -b 11 17311415 11" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x66 -b 33792 120695553 33792" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x67 -b 9216 17164631 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x68 -b 9216 136065853 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x69 -b 67584 37752198 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x70 -b 101376 189717473 101376" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x71 -b 7000 227463698 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x72 -b 9216 12655137 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x73 -b 7000 7488866 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x74 -b 113664 87813649 113664" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x75 -b 33792 25802183 33792" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x76 -b 39936 93524024 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x77 -b 33792 113336388 33792" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x78 -b 105472 184955320 105472" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x79 -b 101376 225691598 101376" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x80 -b 23552 77023155 23552" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x81 -b 11 201888192 11" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x82 -b 11 115332492 11" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x83 -b 67584 230278015 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x84 -b 11 120589073 11" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x85 -b 125952 202207819 125952" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x86 -b 113664 86672080 113664" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x87 -b 17408 208459603 17408" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x88 -b 7000 73372211 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x89 -b 7000 42252122 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x90 -b 23552 46784881 23552" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x91 -b 101376 63172351 101376" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x92 -b 23552 59341931 23552" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x93 -b 39936 239599283 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x94 -b 67584 175643105 67584" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x97 -b 23552 105534880 23552" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x98 -b 113664 8236844 113664" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x99 -b 125952 144489686 125952" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa0 -b 7000 73273112 7000" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa1 -b 125952 194580243 125952" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa2 -b 123 56296779 123" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa3 -b 11 233066845 11" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa4 -b 39936 197727090 39936" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa5 -b 101376 53579812 101376" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa6 -b 9216 85669738 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa7 -b 125952 21266322 125952" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa8 -b 23552 125726568 23552" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa9 -b 9216 18423680 9216" /mnt/foo
    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xb0 -b 1121 165901483 1121" /mnt/foo

    btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1

    xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xff -b 10 16190218 10" /mnt/foo

    btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2

    md5sum /mnt/foo          # returns 79e53f1466bfc09fd82b450689e6119e
    md5sum /mnt/mysnap2/foo  # returns 79e53f1466bfc09fd82b450689e6119e too

    btrfs send /mnt/mysnap1 -f /tmp/1.snap
    btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/2.snap

    mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
    mount /dev/sdc /mnt

    btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/1.snap
    btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/2.snap

    md5sum /mnt/mysnap2/foo  # returns 2bb414c5155767cedccd7063e51beabd !!

A testcase for xfstests follows soon too.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 09:08:45 -07:00
Dan Carpenter
84dbeb87d1 Btrfs: kmalloc() doesn't return an ERR_PTR
The error handling was copy and pasted from memdup_user().  It should be
checking for NULL obviously.

Fixes: abccd00f8a ('btrfs: Fix 32/64-bit problem with BTRFS_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL ioctl')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 09:08:44 -07:00
Wang Shilong
e9894fd3e3 Btrfs: fix snapshot vs nocow writting
While running fsstress and snapshots concurrently, we will hit something
like followings:

Thread 1			Thread 2

|->fallocate
  |->write pages
    |->join transaction
       |->add ordered extent
    |->end transaction
				|->flushing data
				  |->creating pending snapshots
|->write data into src root's
   fallocated space

After above work flows finished, we will get a state that source and
snapshot root share same space, but source root have written data into
fallocated space, this will make fsck fail to verify checksums for
snapshot root's preallocating file extent data.Nocow writting also
has this same problem.

Fix this problem by syncing snapshots with nocow writting:

 1.for nocow writting,if there are pending snapshots, we will
 fall into COW way.

 2.if there are pending nocow writes, snapshots for this root
 will be blocked until nocow writting finish.

Reported-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 09:08:43 -07:00
Qu Wenruo
3ac0d7b96a btrfs: Change the expanding write sequence to fix snapshot related bug.
When testing fsstress with snapshot making background, some snapshot
following problem.

Snapshot 270:
inode 323: size 0

Snapshot 271:
inode 323: size 349145
|-------Hole---|---------Empty gap-------|-------Hole-----|
0	    122880			172032	      349145

Snapshot 272:
inode 323: size 349145
|-------Hole---|------------Data---------|-------Hole-----|
0	    122880			172032	      349145

The fsstress operation on inode 323 is the following:
write: 		offset 	126832 	len 43124
truncate: 	size 	349145

Since the write with offset is consist of 2 operations:
1. punch hole
2. write data
Hole punching is faster than data write, so hole punching in write
and truncate is done first and then buffered write, so the snapshot 271 got
empty gap, which will not pass btrfsck.

To fix the bug, this patch will change the write sequence which will
first punch a hole covering the write end if a hole is needed.

Reported-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 09:08:42 -07:00
David Sterba
60999ca4b4 btrfs: make device scan less noisy
Print the message only when the device is seen for the first time.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 09:08:41 -07:00
Jeff Mahoney
ed55b6ac07 btrfs: fix lockdep warning with reclaim lock inversion
When encountering memory pressure, testers have run into the following
lockdep warning. It was caused by __link_block_group calling kobject_add
with the groups_sem held. kobject_add calls kvasprintf with GFP_KERNEL,
which gets us into reclaim context. The kobject doesn't actually need
to be added under the lock -- it just needs to ensure that it's only
added for the first block group to be linked.

=========================================================
[ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
3.14.0-rc8-default #1 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/169 just changed the state of lock:
 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa018baea>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x3a/0x200 [btrfs]
but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past:
 (&found->groups_sem){+++++.}

and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&found->groups_sem);
                               local_irq_disable();
                               lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
                               lock(&found->groups_sem);
  <Interrupt>
    lock(&delayed_node->mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kswapd0/169:
 #0:  (shrinker_rwsem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff81159e8a>] shrink_slab+0x3a/0x160
 #1:  (&type->s_umount_key#27){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff811bac6f>] grab_super_passive+0x3f/0x90

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 09:08:40 -07:00
Josef Bacik
3f8a18cc53 Btrfs: hold the commit_root_sem when getting the commit root during send
We currently rely too heavily on roots being read-only to save us from just
accessing root->commit_root.  We can easily balance blocks out from underneath a
read only root, so to save us from getting screwed make sure we only access
root->commit_root under the commit root sem.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-07 09:08:39 -07:00
Josef Bacik
9e351cc862 Btrfs: remove transaction from send
Lets try this again.  We can deadlock the box if we send on a box and try to
write onto the same fs with the app that is trying to listen to the send pipe.
This is because the writer could get stuck waiting for a transaction commit
which is being blocked by the send.  So fix this by making sure looking at the
commit roots is always going to be consistent.  We do this by keeping track of
which roots need to have their commit roots swapped during commit, and then
taking the commit_root_sem and swapping them all at once.  Then make sure we
take a read lock on the commit_root_sem in cases where we search the commit root
to make sure we're always looking at a consistent view of the commit roots.
Previously we had problems with this because we would swap a fs tree commit root
and then swap the extent tree commit root independently which would cause the
backref walking code to screw up sometimes.  With this patch we no longer
deadlock and pass all the weird send/receive corner cases.  Thanks,

Reportedy-by: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-06 17:39:30 -07:00
Josef Bacik
a26e8c9f75 Btrfs: don't clear uptodate if the eb is under IO
So I have an awful exercise script that will run snapshot, balance and
send/receive in parallel.  This sometimes would crash spectacularly and when it
came back up the fs would be completely hosed.  Turns out this is because of a
bad interaction of balance and send/receive.  Send will hold onto its entire
path for the whole send, but its blocks could get relocated out from underneath
it, and because it doesn't old tree locks theres nothing to keep this from
happening.  So it will go to read in a slot with an old transid, and we could
have re-allocated this block for something else and it could have a completely
different transid.  But because we think it is invalid we clear uptodate and
re-read in the block.  If we do this before we actually write out the new block
we could write back stale data to the fs, and boom we're screwed.

Now we definitely need to fix this disconnect between send and balance, but we
really really need to not allow ourselves to accidently read in stale data over
new data.  So make sure we check if the extent buffer is not under io before
clearing uptodate, this will kick back EIO to the caller instead of reading in
stale data and keep us from corrupting the fs.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-06 17:34:37 -07:00
Josef Bacik
573a075567 Btrfs: check for an extent_op on the locked ref
We could have possibly added an extent_op to the locked_ref while we dropped
locked_ref->lock, so check for this case as well and loop around.  Otherwise we
could lose flag updates which would lead to extent tree corruption.  Thanks,

cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-06 17:34:36 -07:00
Josef Bacik
ba8b028933 Btrfs: do not reset last_snapshot after relocation
This was done to allow NO_COW to continue to be NO_COW after relocation but it
is not right.  When relocating we will convert blocks to FULL_BACKREF that we
relocate.  We can leave some of these full backref blocks behind if they are not
cow'ed out during the relocation, like if we fail the relocation with ENOSPC and
then just drop the reloc tree.  Then when we go to cow the block again we won't
lookup the extent flags because we won't think there has been a snapshot
recently which means we will do our normal ref drop thing instead of adding back
a tree ref and dropping the shared ref.  This will cause btrfs_free_extent to
blow up because it can't find the ref we are trying to free.  This was found
with my ref verifying tool.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-04-06 17:34:35 -07:00
Liu Bo
00fdf13a2e Btrfs: fix a crash of clone with inline extents's split
xfstests's btrfs/035 triggers a BUG_ON, which we use to detect the split
of inline extents in __btrfs_drop_extents().

For inline extents, we cannot duplicate another EXTENT_DATA item, because
it breaks the rule of inline extents, that is, 'start offset' needs to be 0.

We have set limitations for the source inode's compressed inline extents,
because it needs to decompress and recompress.  Now the destination inode's
inline extents also need similar limitations.

With this, xfstests btrfs/035 doesn't run into panic.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 17:35:18 -07:00
Chris Mason
73b802f447 btrfs: fix uninit variable warning
fs/btrfs/send.c:2926: warning: ‘entry’ may be used uninitialized in this
function

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 15:30:44 -07:00
Josef Bacik
4485386853 Btrfs: take into account total references when doing backref lookup
I added an optimization for large files where we would stop searching for
backrefs once we had looked at the number of references we currently had for
this extent.  This works great most of the time, but for snapshots that point to
this extent and has changes in the original root this assumption falls on it
face.  So keep track of any delayed ref mods made and add in the actual ref
count as reported by the extent item and use that to limit how far down an inode
we'll search for extents.  Thanks,

Reportedy-by: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reported-by: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Tested-by: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 15:28:09 -07:00
Filipe Manana
bfa7e1f8be Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename
For an incremental send, fix the process of determining whether the directory
inode we're currently processing needs to have its move/rename operation delayed.

We were ignoring the fact that if the inode's new immediate ancestor has a higher
inode number than ours but wasn't renamed/moved, we might still need to delay our
move/rename, because some other ancestor directory higher in the hierarchy might
have an inode number higher than ours *and* was renamed/moved too - in this case
we have to wait for rename/move of that ancestor to happen before our current
directory's rename/move operation.

Simple steps to reproduce this issue:

      $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
      $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

      $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2
      $ mkdir /mnt/a/Z
      $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3/x4/x5

      $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
      $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send

      $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3 /mnt/a/Z/X33
      $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2 /mnt/a/Z/X33/x4/x5/X22

      $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
      $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when
building the path string for directory Z after its references are processed.

A more complex scenario:

      $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
      $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

      $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d
      $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/e
      $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/f
      $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/a/b/c/d/f/E2
      $ mkdir /mmt/a/b/c/g
      $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d /mnt/a/b/D2

      $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
      $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send

      $ mkdir /mnt/a/o
      $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/g /mnt/a/b/D2/f/G2
      $ mv /mnt/a/b/D2 /mnt/a/b/dd
      $ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/C2
      $ mv /mnt/a/b/dd/f /mnt/a/o/FF
      $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/o/FF/E2/BB

      $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
      $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

A test case for xfstests follows.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 15:25:48 -07:00
Filipe Manana
7b119a8b89 Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename
It's possible to change the parent/child relationship between directories
in such a way that if a child directory has a higher inode number than
its parent, it doesn't necessarily means the child rename/move operation
can be performed immediately. The parent migth have its own rename/move
operation delayed, therefore in this case the child needs to have its
rename/move operation delayed too, and be performed after its new parent's
rename/move.

Steps to reproduce the issue:

      $ umount /mnt
      $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
      $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt

      $ mkdir /mnt/A
      $ mkdir /mnt/B
      $ mkdir /mnt/C
      $ mv /mnt/C /mnt/A
      $ mv /mnt/B /mnt/A/C
      $ mkdir /mnt/A/C/D

      $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
      $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send

      $ mv /mnt/A/C/D /mnt/A/D2
      $ mv /mnt/A/C/B /mnt/A/D2/B2
      $ mv /mnt/A/C /mnt/A/D2/B2/C2

      $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
      $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when
building the path string for directory C after its references are processed.

The necessary conditions here are that C has an inode number higher than both
A and B, and B as an higher inode number higher than A, and D has the highest
inode number, that is:
    inode_number(A) < inode_number(B) < inode_number(C) < inode_number(D)

The same issue could happen if after the first snapshot there's any number
of intermediary parent directories between A2 and B2, and between B2 and C2.

A test case for xfstests follows, covering this simple case and more advanced
ones, with files and hard links created inside the directories.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-21 15:24:27 -07:00
Filipe Manana
425b5dafc8 Btrfs: remove unnecessary inode generation lookup in send
No need to search in the send tree for the generation number of the inode,
we already have it in the recorded_ref structure passed to us.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-20 17:15:28 -07:00
Filipe Manana
21543baddc Btrfs: fix race when updating existing ref head
While we update an existing ref head's extent_op, we're not holding
its spinlock, so while we're updating its extent_op contents (key,
flags) we can have a task running __btrfs_run_delayed_refs() that
holds the ref head's lock and sets its extent_op to NULL right after
the task updating the ref head just checked its extent_op was not NULL.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-20 17:15:28 -07:00
Qu Wenruo
c3a468915a btrfs: Add trace for btrfs_workqueue alloc/destroy
Since most of the btrfs_workqueue is printed as pointer address,
for easier analysis, add trace for btrfs_workqueue alloc/destroy.
So it is possible to determine the workqueue that a given work belongs
to(by comparing the wq pointer address with alloc trace event).

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-20 17:15:28 -07:00
Filipe Manana
f094c9bd3e Btrfs: less fs tree lock contention when using autodefrag
When finding new extents during an autodefrag, don't do so many fs tree
lookups to find an extent with a size smaller then the target treshold.
Instead, after each fs tree forward search immediately unlock upper
levels and process the entire leaf while holding a read lock on the leaf,
since our leaf processing is very fast.
This reduces lock contention, allowing for higher concurrency when other
tasks want to write/update items related to other inodes in the fs tree,
as we're not holding read locks on upper tree levels while processing the
leaf and we do less tree searches.

Test:

    sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=512 --file-total-size=16G \
       --file-test-mode=rndrw --num-threads=32 --file-block-size=32768 \
       --file-rw-ratio=3 --file-io-mode=sync --max-time=1800 \
       --max-requests=10000000000 [prepare|run]

(fileystem mounted with -o autodefrag, averages of 5 runs)

Before this change: 58.852Mb/sec throughtput, read 77.589Gb, written 25.863Gb
After this change:  63.034Mb/sec throughtput, read 83.102Gb, written 27.701Gb

Test machine: quad core intel i5-3570K, 32Gb of RAM, SSD.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-20 17:15:27 -07:00
Guangyu Sun
72de6b5393 Btrfs: return EPERM when deleting a default subvolume
The error message is confusing:

 # btrfs sub delete /mnt/mysub/
 Delete subvolume '/mnt/mysub'
 ERROR: cannot delete '/mnt/mysub' - Directory not empty

The error message does not make sense to me: It's not about deleting a
directory but it's a subvolume, and it doesn't matter if the subvolume is
empty or not.

Maybe EPERM or is more appropriate in this case, combined with an explanatory
kernel log message. (e.g. "subvolume with ID 123 cannot be deleted because
it is configured as default subvolume.")

Reported-by: Koen De Wit <koen.de.wit@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Guangyu Sun <guangyu.sun@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-20 17:15:27 -07:00
Filipe Manana
ef66af101a Btrfs: add missing kfree in btrfs_destroy_workqueue
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-20 17:15:27 -07:00
Filipe Manana
308d9800b2 Btrfs: cache extent states in defrag code path
When locking file ranges in the inode's io_tree, cache the first
extent state that belongs to the target range, so that when unlocking
the range we don't need to search in the io_tree again, reducing cpu
time and making and therefore holding the io_tree's lock for a shorter
period.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-20 17:15:27 -07:00
Josef Bacik
3bbb24b20a Btrfs: fix deadlock with nested trans handles
Zach found this deadlock that would happen like this

btrfs_end_transaction <- reduce trans->use_count to 0
  btrfs_run_delayed_refs
    btrfs_cow_block
      find_free_extent
	btrfs_start_transaction <- increase trans->use_count to 1
          allocate chunk
	btrfs_end_transaction <- decrease trans->use_count to 0
	  btrfs_run_delayed_refs
	    lock tree block we are cowing above ^^

We need to only decrease trans->use_count if it is above 1, otherwise leave it
alone.  This will make nested trans be the only ones who decrease their added
ref, and will let us get rid of the trans->use_count++ hack if we have to commit
the transaction.  Thanks,

cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Tested-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-03-20 17:15:27 -07:00
Miao Xie
573bfb72f7 Btrfs: fix possible empty list access when flushing the delalloc inodes
We didn't have a lock to protect the access to the delalloc inodes list, that is
we might access a empty delalloc inodes list if someone start flushing delalloc
inodes because the delalloc inodes were moved into a other list temporarily.
Fix it by wrapping the access with a lock.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:29 -04:00
Miao Xie
31f3d255c6 Btrfs: split the global ordered extents mutex
When we create a snapshot, we just need wait the ordered extents in
the source fs/file root, but because we use the global mutex to protect
this ordered extents list of the source fs/file root to avoid accessing
a empty list, if someone got the mutex to access the ordered extents list
of the other fs/file root, we had to wait.

This patch splits the above global mutex, now every fs/file root has
its own mutex to protect its own list.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:28 -04:00
Miao Xie
6c255e67ce Btrfs: don't flush all delalloc inodes when we doesn't get s_umount lock
We needn't flush all delalloc inodes when we doesn't get s_umount lock,
or we would make the tasks wait for a long time.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:27 -04:00
Miao Xie
24af7dd188 Btrfs: reclaim delalloc metadata more aggressively
generic/074 in xfstests failed sometimes because of the enospc error,
the reason of this problem is that we just reclaimed the space we need
from the reserved space for delalloc, and then tried to reserve the space,
but if some task did no-flush reservation between the above reclamation
and reservation,
	Task1			Task2
	shrink_delalloc()
	reclaim 1 block
	(The space that can
	 be reserved now is 1
	 block)
				do no-flush reservation
				reserve 1 block
				(The space that can
				 be reserved now is 0
				 block)
	reserving 1 block failed
the reservation of Task1 failed, but in fact, there was enough space to
reserve if we could reclaim more space before.

Fix this problem by the aggressive reclamation of the reserved delalloc
metadata space.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:26 -04:00
Miao Xie
0424c54897 Btrfs: remove unnecessary lock in may_commit_transaction()
The reason is:
- The per-cpu counter has its own lock to protect itself.
- Here we needn't get a exact value.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:25 -04:00
Miao Xie
b88935bf98 Btrfs: remove the unnecessary flush when preparing the pages
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:25 -04:00
Miao Xie
41bd9ca459 Btrfs: just do dirty page flush for the inode with compression before direct IO
As the comment in the btrfs_direct_IO says, only the compressed pages need be
flush again to make sure they are on the disk, but the common pages needn't,
so we add a if statement to check if the inode has compressed pages or not,
if no, skip the flush.

And in order to prevent the write ranges from intersecting, we need wait for
the running ordered extents. But the current code waits for them twice, one
is done before the direct IO starts (in btrfs_wait_ordered_range()), the other
is before we get the blocks, it is unnecessary. because we can do the direct
IO without holding i_mutex, it means that the intersected ordered extents may
happen during the direct IO, the first wait can not avoid this problem. So we
use filemap_fdatawrite_range() instead of btrfs_wait_ordered_range() to remove
the first wait.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:24 -04:00
Miao Xie
af7a65097b Btrfs: wake up the tasks that wait for the io earlier
The tasks that wait for the IO_DONE flag just care about the io of the dirty
pages, so it is better to wake up them immediately after all the pages are
written, not the whole process of the io completes.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:23 -04:00
Miao Xie
8b9d83cd6b Btrfs: fix early enospc due to the race of the two ordered extent wait
btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() moves all the list entries to a new list,
and then deals with them one by one. But if the other task invokes this
function at that time, it would get a empty list. It makes the enospc
error happens more early. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:22 -04:00
Miao Xie
8257b2dc3c Btrfs: introduce btrfs_{start, end}_nocow_write() for each subvolume
If the snapshot creation happened after the nocow write but before the dirty
data flush, we would fail to flush the dirty data because of no space.

So we must keep track of when those nocow write operations start and when they
end, if there are nocow writers, the snapshot creators must wait. In order
to implement this function, I introduce btrfs_{start, end}_nocow_write(),
which is similar to mnt_{want,drop}_write().

These two functions are only used for nocow file write operations.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
2014-03-10 15:17:22 -04:00