If the rpc_task survived longer than the transport, task->tk_xprt
points to freed memory by the time rpc_count_iostats_metrics runs.
Replace the references to task->tk_xprt with references to the
task's tk_client.
Reported-by: syzbot+27db1f90e2b972a5f2d3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 40bf7eb304 ('sunrpc: Add static trace point to report ...')
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
The ro_release_mr methods check whether mr->mr_list is empty.
Therefore, be sure to always use list_del_init when removing an MR
linked into a list using that field. Otherwise, when recovering from
transport failures or device removal, list corruption can result, or
MRs can get mapped or unmapped an odd number of times, resulting in
IOMMU-related failures.
In general this fix is appropriate back to v4.8. However, code
changes since then make it impossible to apply this patch directly
to stable kernels. The fix would have to be applied by hand or
reworked for kernels earlier than v4.16.
Backport guidance -- there are several cases:
- When creating an MR, initialize mr_list so that using list_empty
on an as-yet-unused MR is safe.
- When an MR is being handled by the remote invalidation path,
ensure that mr_list is reinitialized when it is removed from
rl_registered.
- When an MR is being handled by rpcrdma_destroy_mrs, it is removed
from mr_all, but it may still be on an rl_registered list. In
that case, the MR needs to be removed from that list before being
released.
- Other cases are covered by using list_del_init in rpcrdma_mr_pop.
Fixes: 9d6b040978 ('xprtrdma: Place registered MWs on a ... ')
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
In nfs[34]_decode_dirent, the cookie is advanced as soon as it is
read, but decoding may still fail later in the function, returning
an error. Because the cookie has been advanced, the failing entry
is not re-requested from the server, resulting in a missing directory
entry.
In addition, nfs v3 and v4 read the cookie at different locations
in the xdr_stream, so the behavior of the two can be inconsistent.
Fix these by reading the cookie into a temporary variable, and
only advancing the cookie once the entire entry has been decoded
from the xdr_stream successfully.
Signed-off-by: Frank Sorenson <sorenson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
When we use EXCLUSIVE4_1 mode, the server returns an attribute mask where
all the bits indicate which attributes were set, and where the verifier
was stored. In order to figure out which attribute we have to resend,
we need to clear out the attributes that are set in exclcreat_bitmask.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
[Anna: Fixed typo NFS4_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE4 -> NFS4_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE]
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
When we've changed the file size, then ensure we declare it to be
up to date in the inode attributes.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Allocate the owner_id when we allocate the state and free it when we free
the state. That lets us get rid of a gnarly ida_pre_get() / ida_get_new()
loop.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Neither nfs_inode_set_delegation() nor nfs_inode_reclaim_delegation() are
generic code. They have no business delving into NFSv4 OPEN xdr structures,
so let's replace the "struct nfs_openres" parameter.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Replace the open coded bitmap implementation with a generic one.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
If we hold a delegation, then the results of the ACCESS call are protected
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Don't bother even recording an invalid change attribute if we hold a
delegation since we already know the state of our attribute cache.
We can rely on the fact that we will pick up a copy from the server
when we return the delegation.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Currently, if the NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR flag is set, for instance by
a call to nfs_post_op_update_inode_locked(), then it will not be cleared
until all the attributes have been revalidated. This means, for instance,
that NFSv4 writes will always force a full attribute revalidation.
Track the ctime, mtime, size and change attribute separately from the
other attributes so that we can have nfs_post_op_update_inode_locked()
set them correctly, and later have the cache consistency bitmask be
able to clear them.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
If we managed to revalidate all the attributes, then there is no reason
to mark them as invalid again. We do, however want to ensure that we
set nfsi->attrtimeo correctly.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
If we received weak cache consistency data from the server, then those
attributes are up to date, and there is no reason to mark them as
dirty in the attribute cache.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Even if the change attribute is missing, it is still OK to mark the other
attributes as being up to date.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
The cache validity attribute is unsigned long, so make sure that
the flags are too.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Starting with NFSv4.1, the server is able to deduce the client id from
the SEQUENCE op which means it can always figure out whether or not
the client is holding a delegation on a file that is being changed.
For that reason, RFC5661 does not require a delegation to be unconditionally
recalled on operations such as SETATTR, RENAME, or REMOVE.
Note that for now, we continue to return READ delegations since that is
still expected by the Linux knfsd server.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Ensure that when we do finally delete the file, then we return the
delegation.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Move the delegation recall out of the generic code, and into the NFSv4
specific callback.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Move the delegation return out of generic code and down into the
NFSv4 specific unlink code.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Move the delegation return out of generic code.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
The 'fmode' argument can take an FMODE_EXEC value, which we want to
filter out before comparing to the delegation type.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Michal Kalderon has found some corner cases around device unload
with active NFS mounts that I didn't have the imagination to test
when xprtrdma device removal was added last year.
- The ULP device removal handler is responsible for deallocating
the PD. That wasn't clear to me initially, and my own testing
suggested it was not necessary, but that is incorrect.
- The transport destruction path can no longer assume that there
is a valid ID.
- When destroying a transport, ensure that ib_free_cq() is not
invoked on a CQ that was already released.
Reported-by: Michal Kalderon <Michal.Kalderon@cavium.com>
Fixes: bebd031866 ("xprtrdma: Support unplugging an HCA from ...")
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.12+
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
If we have a RECLAIM_COMPLETE with a populated cl_lock_waitq, then
that implies that a reconnect has occurred. Since we can't expect a
CB_NOTIFY_LOCK callback at that point, just wake up the entire queue
so that all the tasks can re-poll for their locks.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
The task is expected to sleep for a while here, and it's possible that
a new EXCHANGE_ID has occurred in the interim, and we were assigned a
new clientid. Since this is a per-client list, there isn't a lot of
value in vetting the clientid on the incoming request.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
We may get a notification and lose the race to another client. Ensure
that we wait again for a notification in that case.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
This information can help track down local misconfiguration issues
as well as network partitions and unresponsive servers.
There are several ways to send a ping, and with transport multi-
plexing, the exact rpc_xprt that is used is sometimes not known by
the upper layer. The rpc_xprt pointer passed to the trace point
call also has to be RCU-safe.
I found a spot inside the client FSM where an rpc_xprt pointer is
always available and safe to use.
Suggested-by: Bill Baker <Bill.Baker@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Introduce a low-overhead mechanism to report information about
latencies of individual RPCs. The goal is to enable user space to
filter the trace record for latency outliers, or build histograms,
etc.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Clean up: struct rpc_task carries a pointer to a struct rpc_clnt,
and in fact task->tk_client is always what is passed into trace
points that are already passing @task.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
If recording xprt->stat.max_slots is moved into xprt_alloc_slot,
then xprt->num_reqs is never manipulated outside
xprt->reserve_lock. There's no longer a need for xprt->num_reqs to
be atomic.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Some RPC transports have more overhead in their send_request
callouts than others. For example, for RPC-over-RDMA:
- Marshaling an RPC often has to DMA map the RPC arguments
- Registration methods perform memory registration as part of
marshaling
To capture just server and network latencies more precisely: when
sending a Call, capture the rq_xtime timestamp _after_ the transport
header has been marshaled.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Some RPC transports have more overhead in their reply handlers
than others. For example, for RPC-over-RDMA:
- RPC completion has to wait for memory invalidation, which is
not a part of the server/network round trip
- Recently a context switch was introduced into the reply handler,
which further artificially inflates the measure of RPC RTT
To capture just server and network latencies more precisely: when
receiving a reply, compute the RTT as soon as the XID is recognized
rather than at RPC completion time.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Since commit 33849792cb ("xprtrdma: Detect unreachable NFS/RDMA
servers more reliably"), the xprtrdma transport now has a ->timer
callout. But xprtrdma does not need to compute RTT data, only UDP
needs that. Move the xprt_update_rtt call into the UDP transport
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Refactor: Both rpcrdma_create_req call sites have to allocate the
buffer where the transport header is built, so just move that
allocation into rpcrdma_create_req.
This buffer is a fixed size. There's no needed information available
in call_allocate that is not also available when the transport is
created.
The original purpose for allocating these buffers on demand was to
reduce the possibility that an allocation failure during transport
creation will hork the mount operation during low memory scenarios.
Some relief for this rare possibility is coming up in the next few
patches.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
With FRWR, the client transport can perform memory registration and
post a Send with just a single ib_post_send.
This reduces contention between the send_request path and the Send
Completion handlers, and reduces the overhead of registering a chunk
that has multiple segments.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
RPC-over-RDMA version 1 credit accounting relies on there being a
response message for every RPC Call. This means that RPC procedures
that have no reply will disrupt credit accounting, just in the same
way as a retransmit would (since it is sent because no reply has
arrived). Deal with the "no reply" case the same way.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Create fewer MRs on average. Many workloads don't need as many as
32 MRs, and the transport can now quickly restock the MR free list.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Currently, when the MR free list is exhausted during marshaling, the
RPC/RDMA transport places the RPC task on the delayq, which forces a
wait for HZ >> 2 before the marshal and send is retried.
With this change, the transport now places such an RPC task on the
pending queue, and wakes it just as soon as more MRs have been
created. Creating more MRs typically takes less than a millisecond,
and this waking mechanism is less deadlock-prone.
Moreover, the waiting RPC task is holding the transport's write
lock, which blocks the transport from sending RPCs. Therefore faster
recovery from MR exhaustion is desirable.
This is the same mechanism that the TCP transport utilizes when
handling write buffer space exhaustion.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Clean up: The generic rq_connect_cookie is sufficient to detect RPC
Call retransmission.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Clean up: We need to check only that the value does not exceed the
range of the u8 field it's going into.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
With v4.15, on one of my NFS/RDMA clients I measured a nearly
doubling in the latency of small read and write system calls. There
was no change in server round trip time. The extra latency appears
in the whole RPC execution path.
"git bisect" settled on commit ccede75985 ("xprtrdma: Spread reply
processing over more CPUs") .
After some experimentation, I found that leaving the WQ bound and
allowing the scheduler to pick the dispatch CPU seems to eliminate
the long latencies, and it does not introduce any new regressions.
The fix is implemented by reverting only the part of
commit ccede75985 ("xprtrdma: Spread reply processing over more
CPUs") that dispatches RPC replies specifically on the CPU where the
matching RPC call was made.
Interestingly, saving the CPU number and later queuing reply
processing there was effective _only_ for a NFS READ and WRITE
request. On my NUMA client, in-kernel RPC reply processing for
asynchronous RPCs was dispatched on the same CPU where the RPC call
was made, as expected. However synchronous RPCs seem to get their
reply dispatched on some other CPU than where the call was placed,
every time.
Fixes: ccede75985 ("xprtrdma: Spread reply processing over ... ")
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.15+
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
