drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c:194: warning: Function parameter or member 'i915' not described in 'intel_uc_fw_fetch'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c:194: warning: Excess function parameter 'dev_priv' description in 'intel_uc_fw_fetch'
Fixes: 97dee74bb3 ("drm/i915/uc: Reorder params in intel_uc_fw_fetch")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190727101055.5300-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
According to Firmware layout definition, RSA signature is located
after CSS header and uCode so actual RSA offset in the blob can be
easily calculated when needed (and we need it only once).
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190726184212.1836-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
According to Firmware layout definition, uCode is located right
after CSS header, so ucode offset is always same as header size.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190726184212.1836-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
According to Firmware layout definition, CSS header is located
in front of the firmware blob, so header offset is always 0.
Similarly, size of the CSS header is constant and currently
used version is exactly 128.
While here, move type/status enums up and keep them together.
v2: use sizeof consistently (Daniele), update commit message
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190726184212.1836-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Modifying a remote context requires careful serialisation with requests
on that context, and that serialisation requires us to take their
timeline->mutex. Make it so.
Note that while struct_mutex rules, we can't create more than one
request in parallel, but that age is soon coming to an end.
v2: Though it doesn't affect the current users, contexts may share
timelines so check if we already hold the right mutex.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725131447.27515-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We are already storing runtime value of log level in private
field, so there is no need to modify modparam.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725205106.36148-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
guc->stage_desc_pool is required as part of the init parameters and
there is no reason we have to init them after HuC. This fixes a NULL
ptr dereference due to guc->stage_desc_pool not being set (no fixes
tag since GuC submission can't be enabled yet).
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725174655.24382-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
All intel_uc_fw_* functions are taking uc_fw as first param
except intel_uc_fw_fetch() which is taking i915. Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725210314.21188-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Generic uc firmware layout definitions are unlikely to change and
are separate to other GuC specific definitions.
v2: reordered
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725141308.24660-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Sphinx was rendering firmware layout as html table, but since
we want to add sizes relations switch to plain text graphics.
v2: also update text and do it before move (Daniele)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725141308.24660-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
The way we load the firmwares is the same for both GuC and HuC, the only
difference is in the wopcm destination address and the dma flags, so we
easily can move the logic to a common function and pass in offset and
flags. The only other difference in the uplaod path are some the extra
steps that guc does before and after the xfer, but those don't require
the guc fw to be pinned in ggtt and can safely be performed before
calling the uc_upload function.
Note that this patch re-introduces the dma xfer wait for guc loading that
was removed with "drm/i915/guc: Propagate the fw xfer timeout". This is
not going to slow us down on a successful load (the dma has to complete
before fw init can start), but could slightly increase the timeout in case
of a fw init error.
v2: use _fw variants for uncore accesses (Chris), fix guc_fw status on
failed wait.
v3: use dev_err and print DMA_CTRL (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-9-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
The gt is our new central structure for uc-related code, so we can use
that instead of jumping back to i915 via the fw object. Since we have it
in the upload function it is easy to pass it through the lower levels of
the xfer process instead of continuosly jumping via uc_fw->uc->gt, which
will also make things a bit cleaner for the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-8-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
The binary is perma-pinned and the rsa is not going to change, so copy
it only once and not on every load.
v2: onion unwind (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Fernando Pacheco <fernando.pacheco@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v1
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-7-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
The way we copy the RSA is the same for GuC and HuC, so we can move the
logic in a common function. this will also make any update needed for
local memory easier.
v2: return the number of copied bytes and check it (Chris)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v1
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-6-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
We currently track fetch and load status separately, but the 2 are
actually sequential in the uc lifetime (fetch must complete before we
can attempt the load!). Unifying the 2 variables we can better follow
the sequential states and improve our trackng of the uC state.
Also, sprinkle some GEM_BUG_ON to make sure we transition correctly
between states.
v2: rename states, add the running state (Michal), drop some logs in
the fetch path (Michal, Chris)
v3: re-rename states, extend early status check to all helpers (Michal)
Suggested-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Instead of having 2 identical functions for GuC and HuC firmware
selection, we can unify the selection logic and just use different lists
based on FW type.
Note that the revid is not relevant for current blobs, but the upcoming
CML will be identified as CFL rev 5, so by considering the revid we're
ready for that.
v2: rework blob list defs (Michal), add order check (Chris), fuse GuC
and HuC lists into one.
v3: remove difference between no uC HW and no uC FW, simplify related
selection code, check the whole fw list (Michal)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v2
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
There are 2 issues around handling of missing uC support:
- We treat lack of uC HW and lack of uC FW definition as 2 different
cases, but both of them mean that we don't support the uC on the
platform we're running on.
- We rely on the modparam to decide if we can take uC paths or not, but
we don't sanitize it if it is set incorrectly on platform with no uC
support.
To fix both of them, unify the 2 cases in a single one and sanitize the
modparam on invalid configuration (after printing an error message).
The log has been adapted as well, since the user doesn't care why we
don't support GuC/HuC (no HW or no FW), just that we do not. Developers
can easily find the answer based on the platform, so we can simplify the
log.
Correcting the modparam has been preferred over failing the load since
this is what we usually do for non-supported feature (e.g. the now gone
enable_ppgtt would fall back to the highest supported PPGTT mode if the
selected one was not available).
Note that this patch purposely doesn't change the behavior for platforms
that do have uC support, in which case we will still fail if enable_guc
is set and the firmware is not available on the system.
Suggested-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
We have several HAS_* checks for GuC and HuC but we mostly use HAS_GUC
and HAS_HUC, with only 1 exception. Since our HW always has either
both uC or neither of them, just replace all the checks with a unified
HAS_UC.
v2: use HAS_GT_UC (Michal)
v3: fix comment (Michal)
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
All the GuC objects are perma-pinned, so their offset can't change at
runtime. We can therefore set (and log!) the parameters only once during
boot.
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190724085849.18047-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Fix botched refactoring of the code that uncorrectly split a check on a
bool, treating it as a u32.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Fixes: 84b1ca2f0e ("drm/i915/uc: prefer intel_gt over i915 in GuC/HuC paths")
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190723153733.19401-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
The microcontrollers are part of GT so it makes logical sense to have
them sanitized at the same time. This also fixed an issue with our
status tracking where the FW load status is not reset around
hibernation.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190723091404.6449-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This was the last place in gt/uc that was still using I915_READ
with the global dev_priv.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190723091404.6449-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Prior to freeing the struct, call the fini function to cleanup the
common members. Currently this only calls the debug functions to mark
the structs as destroyed, but may be extended to real work in future.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190718070024.21781-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Access to 0xb100 - 0xb3ff mmio range is controlled by the MCR selector
which only affects CPU MMIO. Therefore these registers cannot be realiably
read with MI_SRM from the command streamer so skip their verification.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190717180624.20354-5-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
A couple issues were present in this code:
1.
fls() usage was incorrect causing off by one in subslice mask lookup,
which in other words means subslice mask of all zeroes is always used
(subslice mask of a slice which is not present, or even out of bounds
array access), rendering the checks in wa_init_mcr either futile or
random.
2.
Condition in WARN_ON was not correct. It is doing a bitwise and operation
between a positive (present subslices) and negative mask (disabled L3
banks).
This means that with corrected fls() usage the assert would always
incorrectly fail.
We could fix this by inverting the fuse bits in the check, but instead do
one better and improve the code so it not only asserts, but finds the
first common index between the two masks and only warns if no such index
can be found.
v2:
* Simplify check for logic and redability.
* Improve commentary explaining what is really happening ie. what the
assert is really trying to check and why.
v3:
* Find first common index instead of just asserting.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Fixes: fe864b76c2 ("drm/i915: Implement WaProgramMgsrForL3BankSpecificMmioReads")
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> # v1
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190717180624.20354-4-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
Instead of re-calculating the MCR selector in read_subslice_reg do the
rwm on its existing value and restore it when done.
This consolidates MCR programming to one place for cnl+, and avoids
re-calculating its default value on older platforms during hangcheck.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190717180624.20354-3-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
fls returns bit positions starting from one for the lsb and the MCR
register expects zero based (sub)slice addressing.
Incorrent MCR programming can have the effect of directing MMIO reads of
registers in the 0xb100-0xb3ff range to invalid subslice returning zeroes
instead of actual content.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Fixes: 1e40d4aea5 ("drm/i915/cnl: Implement WaProgramMgsrForCorrectSliceSpecificMmioReads")
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190717180624.20354-2-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
As we unwind the requests for a preemption event, we return a virtual
request back to its original virtual engine (so that it is available for
execution on any of its siblings). In the process, this means that its
breadcrumb should no longer be associated with the original physical
engine, and so we are forced to decouple it. Previously, as the request
could not complete without our awareness, we would move it to the next
real engine without any danger. However, preempt-to-busy allowed for
requests to continue on the HW and complete in the background as we
unwound, which meant that we could end up retiring the request before
fixing up the breadcrumb link.
[51679.517943] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
[51679.517956] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
[51679.517960] turning off the locking correctness validator.
[51679.517966] CPU: 0 PID: 3270 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Tainted: G U 5.2.0+ #717
[51679.517971] Hardware name: Intel Corporation NUC7i5BNK/NUC7i5BNB, BIOS BNKBL357.86A.0052.2017.0918.1346 09/18/2017
[51679.518012] Workqueue: i915 retire_work_handler [i915]
[51679.518017] Call Trace:
[51679.518026] dump_stack+0x67/0x90
[51679.518031] register_lock_class+0x52c/0x540
[51679.518038] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90
[51679.518042] __lock_acquire+0x68/0x1800
[51679.518047] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90
[51679.518073] ? __i915_sw_fence_complete+0xff/0x1c0 [i915]
[51679.518079] lock_acquire+0x90/0x170
[51679.518105] ? i915_request_cancel_breadcrumb+0x29/0x160 [i915]
[51679.518112] _raw_spin_lock+0x27/0x40
[51679.518138] ? i915_request_cancel_breadcrumb+0x29/0x160 [i915]
[51679.518165] i915_request_cancel_breadcrumb+0x29/0x160 [i915]
[51679.518199] i915_request_retire+0x43f/0x530 [i915]
[51679.518232] retire_requests+0x4d/0x60 [i915]
[51679.518263] i915_retire_requests+0xdf/0x1f0 [i915]
[51679.518294] retire_work_handler+0x4c/0x60 [i915]
[51679.518301] process_one_work+0x22c/0x5c0
[51679.518307] worker_thread+0x37/0x390
[51679.518311] ? process_one_work+0x5c0/0x5c0
[51679.518316] kthread+0x116/0x130
[51679.518320] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
[51679.518325] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
[51679.520177] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[51679.520189] list_del corruption, ffff88883675e2f0->next is LIST_POISON1 (dead000000000100)
Fixes: 22b7a426bb ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190716124931.5870-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Push the engine stop into the back reset_prepare (where it already was!)
This allows us to avoid dangerously setting the RING registers to 0 for
logical contexts. If we clear the register on a live context, those
invalid register values are recorded in the logical context state and
replayed (with hilarious results).
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190716124931.5870-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
By stopping the rings, we may trigger an arbitration point resulting in
a premature context-switch (i.e. a completion event before the request
is actually complete). This clears the active context before the reset,
but we must remember to rewind the incomplete context for replay upon
resume.
Fixes: 1863e3020a ("drm/i915/execlists: Always reset the context's RING registers")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190716124931.5870-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Avoid a global idle barrier by reconfiguring each context by rewriting
them with MI_STORE_DWORD from the kernel context.
v2: We only need to determine the desired register values once, they are
the same for all contexts.
v3: Don't remove the kernel context from the list of known GEM contexts;
the world is not ready for that yet.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190716213443.9874-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Preempt-to-busy uses a GPU semaphore to enforce an idle-barrier across
preemption, but mediated gvt does not fully support semaphores.
v2: Fiddle around with the flags and settle on using has-semaphores for
the core bits so that we retain the ability to preempt our own
semaphores.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Xiaolin Zhang <xiaolin.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190709091233.8573-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We cannot let the request be retired and freed while we are trying to
dump it during error capture. It is not sufficient just to grab a
reference to the request, as during retirement we may free the ring
which we are also dumping. So take the engine lock to prevent retiring
and freeing of the request.
Reported-by: Alex Shumsky <alexthreed@gmail.com>
Fixes: 83c317832e ("drm/i915: Dump the ringbuffer of the active request for debugging")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alex Shumsky <alexthreed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190715080946.15593-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
GVT forces single port submission of individual requests. We do not
enjoy the context amalgamation that the test depends upon for setting up
the test (where port 0 has a large number of requests with a priority
change somewhere in the middle). Under single request submission of gvt
it is quite able for the preemption event to occur while another context
is active and so there be a real need to act upon that preemption.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111108
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190712082549.25053-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Get rid of them to avoid more users being added while the guc code
transitions to use gt more than i915.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
We can get rid of a few more guc_to_i915 and start compartmentalizing
interrupt management a bit more. We should be able to move more code in
the future once the gt_pm code is also moved across to gt.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
With our HW interface logic moving from i915 to gt and with GuC and HuC
being part of the gt HW, it makes sense to use the intel_gt structure
instead of i915 as our reference object in GuC/HuC paths.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
All the intel_uc_* can now be moved to work on the intel_uc structure
for better encapsulation of uc-related actions.
Note: I've introduced uc_to_gt instead of uc_to_i915 because the aim is
to move everything to be gt-focused in the medium term, so we would've
had to replace it soon anyway.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Being part of the GT HW, it make sense to keep the guc/huc structures
inside the GT structure. To help with the encapsulation work done by the
following patches, both structures are placed inside a new intel_uc
container. Although this results in code with ugly nested dereferences
(i915->gt.uc.guc...), it saves us the extra work required in moving
the structures twice (i915 -> gt -> uc). The following patches will
reduce the number of places where we try to access the guc/huc
structures directly from i915 and reduce the ugliness.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Both microcontrollers are part of the GT HW and are closely related to
GT operations. To keep all the files cleanly together, they've been
placed in their own subdir inside the gt/ folder
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Having taken the first step in encapsulating the functionality by moving
the related files under gt/, the next step is to start encapsulating by
passing around the relevant structs rather than the global
drm_i915_private. In this step, we pass intel_gt to intel_reset.c
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190712192953.9187-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Use the "_probe" nomenclature not only in i915_driver_probe() helper
name but also in other related function / variable names for
consistency. Only the userspace exposed name of a related module
parameter is left untouched.
Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190712112429.740-4-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
There is a debug message in the workaround initialisation path that
reports how many entries were added of each type. However, whitelist
workarounds exist for multiple engines but the type name is just
'whitelist'. Tvrtko suggested adding the engine name to make the
message more useful.
v2: Updated the similar message in the workaround reset selftest.
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
CC: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190712070745.35239-4-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
Newer hardware supports extra feature in the whitelist registers. This
patch updates the selftest to test that entries marked as read only
are actually read only.
v2: Removed all use of 'rsvd' for read-only registers to avoid
ambiguous code or error messages.
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
CC: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190712070745.35239-3-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
As per review feedback by Tvrtko, added a check that no invalid bits
are being set in the whitelist flags fields.
Also updated the read/write access definitions to make it clearer that
they are an enum field not a set of single bit flags.
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
CC: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190712070745.35239-2-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
Preemption via GuC submission is not being supported with its current
legacy incarnation. The current FW does support a similar pre-emption
flow via H2G, but it is class-based instead of being instance-based,
which doesn't fit well with the i915 tracking. To fix this, the
firmware is being updated to better support our needs with a new flow,
so we can safely remove the old code.
v2 (Daniele): resurrect & rebase, reword commit message, remove
preempt_context as well
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Acked-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190710005437.3496-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
Specify that we do want a 64b value for sizeof(u32) as we want to
compute the mask of the upper 62bits.
v2: Use round_down() for automatic type promotion
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190710161413.7115-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
