While we do flush writes to the vma before unbinding (to make sure they
go through the right detiling register), we may also be concurrently
poking at the GGTT_WRITE bit from set-domain, as we mark all GGTT vma
associated with an object. We know this is for another vma, as we
are currently unbinding this one -- so if this vma will be reused, it
will be refaulted and have its dirty bit set before the next write.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/999
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200121222447.419489-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Despite the fact that the VBT appears to have a field for specifying
that a system is equipped with a panel that supports standard VESA
backlight controls over the DP AUX channel, so far every system we've
spotted DPCD backlight control support on doesn't actually set this
field correctly and all have it set to INTEL_BACKLIGHT_DISPLAY_DDI.
While we don't know the exact reason for this VBT misuse, talking with
some vendors indicated that there's a good number of laptop panels out
there that supposedly support both PWM backlight controls and DPCD
backlight controls as a workaround until Intel supports DPCD backlight
controls across platforms universally. This being said, the X1 Extreme
2nd Gen that I have here (note that Lenovo is not the hardware vendor
that informed us of this) PWM backlight controls are advertised, but
only DPCD controls actually function. I'm going to make an educated
guess here and say that on systems like this one, it's likely that PWM
backlight controls might have been intended to work but were never
really tested by QA.
Since we really need backlights to work without any extra module
parameters, let's take the risk here and rely on the standard DPCD caps
to tell us whether AUX backlight controls are supported or not. We still
check the VBT, just so we can print a debugging message on systems that
advertise DPCD backlight support on the panel but not in the VBT.
Changes since v3:
* Print a debugging message if we enable DPCD backlight control on a
device which doesn't report DPCD backlight controls in it's VBT,
instead of warning on custom panel backlight interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112376
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Perry Yuan <pyuan@redhat.com>
Cc: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117232155.135579-1-lyude@redhat.com
For a simulated preemption reset, we don't populate the request and so
do not fill in the guilty context name.
[ 79.991294] i915 0000:00:02.0: GPU HANG: ecode 9:1:e757fefe, in [0]
Just don't mention the empty string in the logs!
Fixes: 742379c0c4 ("drm/i915: Start chopping up the GPU error capture")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200121132107.267709-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Eliminate the inconsistencies in the hdcp code local variables:
- use dev_priv over dev
- use to_i915() instead of dev->dev_private
- initialize variables when declaring them
- a bit of declaration suffling to appease ocd
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191204180549.1267-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Report port presence based on port presence in VBT alone, relaxing the
requirements on supported encoders (DP, DVI, or HDMI). The goal is to
make future changes easier, however there is a small risk of reporting
more ports present than before in case of dubious VBT.
Regarding the current callers of intel_bios_is_port_present(), the
potential issue might be caused by DVO_PORT_CRT being identified as port
E in dvo_port_to_port(). Hopefully no VBT has that on SKL+ which support
DP/DVI/HDMI on port E; the current CRT init code on HSW/BDW does not
care.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/4338a29e4ed49e69f859dff1490fd85f6ae6177e.1579270868.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Currently we create a new mmap_offset for every call to
mmap_offset_ioctl. This exposes ourselves to an abusive client that may
simply create new mmap_offsets ad infinitum, which will exhaust physical
memory and the virtual address space. In addition to the exhaustion, a
very long linear list of mmap_offsets causes other clients using the
object to incur long list walks -- these long lists can also be
generated by simply having many clients generate their own mmap_offset.
However, we can simply use the drm_vma_node itself to manage the file
association (allow/revoke) dropping our need to keep an mmo per-file.
Then if we keep a small rbtree of per-type mmap_offsets, we can lookup
duplicate requests quickly.
Fixes: cc662126b4 ("drm/i915: Introduce DRM_I915_GEM_MMAP_OFFSET")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200120104924.4000706-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Move the force_dvi check to a single function that can be called from
both mode validation and compute_config(). Note that currently we
don't call it from mode validation, but that will change soon.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200108181242.13650-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
The strings we want to print to the on stack buffers should
be no more than
8 * 3 + strlen("(GET_SCALED_HDTV_RESOLUTION_SUPPORT)") + 1 = 61
bytes. So let's shrink the buffers down to 64 bytes.
Also switch the BUG_ON()s to WARN_ON()s if I made a mistake in
my arithmentic.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200108181242.13650-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
sync_mode_slaves_mask is a bitmask so use PIPE_CONF_CHECK_X() for it
so we get the mismatch printed in hex instead of decimal.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200115190813.17971-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Tested-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Let's use the pipe rather than the silly 'i' iterator from
for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state() for indexing the ddb
entries array. Maybe one day we can assume c99 and hide the
'i' entirely from sight.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200115190813.17971-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Currently we don't call intel_crtc_prepare_cleared_state() for crtcs
that are going to be entirely disabled (uapi.enable==false). That
means such crtcs will leave stale junk lying around in their states
and we have to sprinkle hw.enable checks all over before we can
look at the states. Let's change that a bit so that we aways do
the state clearing, even for fully disabled crtcs.
Note that we still keep some parts of the old state (see
intel_crtc_prepare_cleared_state() for the details) so probably
can't trust things 100% when hw.enable==false. But at least there's
less chance now that we end up looking at stale junk.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200115190813.17971-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
The post-fastset "does anyone still need a full modeset?" for
port sync looks busted. The outer loop bails out of a full modeset
is still needed by the current crtc, and then we skip forcing
a full modeset on the related crtcs. That's totally the opposite
of what we want.
The MST path has the logic mostly the other way around so it
looks correct. To fix the port sync case let's follow the MST
logic for both. So, if the current crtc already needs a modeset
we do nothing. otherwise we check if any of the related crtcs
needs a modeset, and if so we force a full modeset for the
current crtc.
And while at let's change the else if to a plain if to so
we don't have needless coupling between the MST and port sync
checks.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Fixes: 05a8e45136 ("drm/i915/display: Use external dependency loop for port sync")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200115190813.17971-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
In our ABI we have defined I915_ENGINE_CLASS_INVALID_NONE and
I915_ENGINE_CLASS_INVALID_VIRTUAL as negative values which creates
implicit coupling with type widths used in, also ABI, struct
i915_engine_class_instance.
One place where we export engine->uabi_class
I915_ENGINE_CLASS_INVALID_VIRTUAL is from our our tracepoints. Because the
type of the former is u8 in contrast to u16 defined in the ABI, 254 will
be returned instead of 65534 which userspace would legitimately expect.
Another place is I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_ENGINES.
Therefore we need to align the type used to store engine ABI class and
instance.
v2:
* Update the commit message mentioning get_engines and cc stable.
(Chris)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Fixes: 6d06779e86 ("drm/i915: Load balancing across a virtual engine")
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.3+
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116134508.25211-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
If we create a rather large userptr object(e.g 1ULL << 32) we might
shift past the type-width of num_pages: (int)num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT,
resulting in a totally bogus sg_table, which fortunately will eventually
manifest as:
gen8_ppgtt_insert_huge:463 GEM_BUG_ON(iter->sg->length < page_size)
kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c:463!
v2: more unsigned long
prefer I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE
Fixes: 5cc9ed4b9a ("drm/i915: Introduce mapping of user pages into video memory (userptr) ioctl")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117132413.1170563-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
Don't allow a mismatch between obj->base.size/vma->size and the actual
number of pages for the backing store, which is limited to INT_MAX
pages.
v2: document what are missing before we can safely drop the limit check
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117132413.1170563-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
Since commit 22b7a426bb ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy"), we
prune the engine->active.requests list prior to preemption, thus
removing the trace of the currently executing request. If that request
hangs rather than be preempted, we conclude that no active request was
on the GPU. Fortunately, this only impacts our debugging, and not our
means of hang detection or recovery.
v2: Use from to check the current iterator before continuing, and report
active as NULL if the current request is already completed.
References: 22b7a426bb ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117113259.3023890-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As we now have "ct" available almost in all functions we can
start using dev variants of logs also for debug.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117082039.65644-6-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
As we now have "ct" available in ct_read function we can switch
from generic DRM_ERROR to our custom CT_ERROR.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Piotr Piórkowski <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117082039.65644-5-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Since we only have one RECV buffer we don't need to explicitly pass
it to the read function.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117082039.65644-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Since we only have one SEND buffer we don't need to explicitly pass
it to the write function.
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117082039.65644-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
We should never BUG_ON on any corruption in CTB descriptor as
data there can be also modified by the GuC. Instead we can
use flag "is_in_error" to indicate that we will not process
any further messages over this CTB (until reset). While here
move descriptor error reporting to the function that actually
touches that descriptor.
Note that unexpected content of the specific CT messages, that
still complies with generic CT message format, shall not trigger
disabling whole CTB, as that might just indicate new unsupported
message types.
v2: drop redundant message (Daniele)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117082039.65644-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Smatch worries that the engine->mask may be 0 leading to the loop being
shortcircuited leaving the next pointer unset,
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_active.c:667 i915_active_acquire_preallocate_barrier() error: uninitialized symbol 'next'.
Assert that mask is not 0 and smatch can then verify that next must be
initialised before use.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117110603.2982286-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
A forgetful copy'n'paste left the name of the old function intact, and
did not introduce the new function 'i915_request_is_ready'
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117101639.2908469-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Since commit 742379c0c4 ("drm/i915: Start chopping up the GPU error
capture"), function 'i915_error_state_store' was defined and used with
only one parameter.
But if no 'CONFIG_DRM_I915_CAPTURE_ERROR', this function was defined
with two parameter.
This may lead compile error. This patch fix it.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117073436.6507-1-zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs_params.c:228:15: warning: symbol 'i915_debugfs_params' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs_params.c:228:16: error: no previous prototype for ‘i915_debugfs_params’ [-Werror=missing-prototypes]
228 | struct dentry *i915_debugfs_params(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Fixes: c43c5a8818 ("drm/i915/params: add i915 parameters to debugfs")
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117102145.2948244-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Turns out we actually already have some companies, such as Lenovo,
shipping machines with AMOLED screens that don't allow controlling the
backlight through the usual PWM interface and only allow controlling it
through the standard EDP DPCD interface. One example of one of these
laptops is the X1 Extreme 2nd Generation.
Since we've got systems that need this turned on by default now to have
backlight controls working out of the box, let's start auto-detecting it
for systems by default based on what the VBT tells us. We do this by
changing the default value for the enable_dpcd_backlight module param
from 0 to -1.
Tested-by: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Perry Yuan <pyuan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116211623.53799-6-lyude@redhat.com
For eDP panels, it appears it's expected that so long as the panel is in
DPCD control mode that the brightness value is never set to 0. Instead,
if the desired effect is to set the panel's backlight to 0 we're
expected to simply turn off the backlight through the
DP_EDP_DISPLAY_CONTROL_REGISTER.
We already do the latter correctly in intel_dp_aux_disable_backlight().
But, we make the mistake of writing the DPCD registers in the wrong
order when enabling the backlight in intel_dp_aux_enable_backlight()
since we currently enable the backlight through
DP_EDP_DISPLAY_CONTROL_REGISTER before writing the brightness level. On
the X1 Extreme 2nd Generation, this appears to have the potential of
confusing the panel in such a way that further attempts to set the
brightness don't actually change the backlight as expected and leave it
off. Presumably, this happens because the incorrect register writing
order briefly leaves the panel with DPCD mode enabled and a 0 brightness
level set.
So, reverse the order we write the DPCD registers when enabling the
panel backlight so that we write the brightness value first, and enable
the backlight second. This fix appears to be the final bit needed to get
the backlight on the ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2nd Generation's AMOLED screen
working.
Tested-by: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Perry Yuan <pyuan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116211623.53799-4-lyude@redhat.com
Currently we always determine the initial panel brightness level by
simply reading the value from DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_BRIGHTNESS_MSB/LSB. This
seems wrong though, because if the panel is not currently in DPCD
control mode there's not really any reason why there would be any
brightness value programmed in the first place.
This appears to be the case on the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2nd
Generation, where the default value in these registers is always 0 on
boot despite the fact the panel runs at max brightness by default.
Getting the initial brightness value correct here is important as well,
since the panel on this laptop doesn't behave well if it's ever put into
DPCD control mode while the brightness level is programmed to 0.
So, let's fix this by checking what the current backlight control mode
is before reading the brightness level. If it's in DPCD control mode, we
return the programmed brightness level. Otherwise we assume 100%
brightness and return the highest possible brightness level. This also
prevents us from accidentally programming a brightness level of 0.
This is one of the many fixes that gets backlight controls working on
the ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2nd Generation with optional 4K AMOLED screen.
Changes since v1:
* s/DP_EDP_DISPLAY_CONTROL_REGISTER/DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_MODE_SET_REGISTER/
- Jani
Tested-by: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Perry Yuan <pyuan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116211623.53799-3-lyude@redhat.com
