drm/i915/guc: Don't pass CTB while writing

Since we only have one SEND buffer we don't need to explicitly pass
it to the write function.

Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117082039.65644-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
This commit is contained in:
Michal Wajdeczko 2020-01-17 08:20:36 +00:00 committed by Chris Wilson
parent 1b9fc94a77
commit 6a327cb186

View File

@ -311,12 +311,13 @@ static u32 ct_get_next_fence(struct intel_guc_ct *ct)
* ^-----------------len-------------------^
*/
static int ctb_write(struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb,
const u32 *action,
u32 len /* in dwords */,
u32 fence,
bool want_response)
static int ct_write(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
const u32 *action,
u32 len /* in dwords */,
u32 fence,
bool want_response)
{
struct intel_guc_ct_buffer *ctb = &ct->ctbs[CTB_SEND];
struct guc_ct_buffer_desc *desc = ctb->desc;
u32 head = desc->head / 4; /* in dwords */
u32 tail = desc->tail / 4; /* in dwords */
@ -492,7 +493,7 @@ static int ct_send(struct intel_guc_ct *ct,
list_add_tail(&request.link, &ct->requests.pending);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ct->requests.lock, flags);
err = ctb_write(ctb, action, len, fence, !!response_buf);
err = ct_write(ct, action, len, fence, !!response_buf);
if (unlikely(err))
goto unlink;