Commit Graph

8892 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Omar Sandoval
2390a6daf9 btrfs: remove unused btrfs_dio_private::private
We haven't used this since commit 9be3395bcd ("Btrfs: use a btrfs
bioset instead of abusing bio internals").

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:26 +02:00
Omar Sandoval
ce06d3ec2b btrfs: make btrfs_check_repairable() static
Since its introduction in commit 2fe6303e7c ("Btrfs: split
bio_readpage_error into several functions"), btrfs_check_repairable()
has only been used from extent_io.c where it is defined.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:25 +02:00
Omar Sandoval
47df7765a8 btrfs: rename __readpage_endio_check to check_data_csum
__readpage_endio_check() is also used from the direct I/O read code, so
give it a more descriptive name.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:25 +02:00
Omar Sandoval
fb30f4707d btrfs: clarify btrfs_lookup_bio_sums documentation
Fix a couple of issues in the btrfs_lookup_bio_sums documentation:

* The bio doesn't need to be a btrfs_io_bio if dst was provided. Move
  the declaration in the code to make that clear, too.
* dst must be large enough to hold nblocks * csum_size, not just
  csum_size.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:25 +02:00
Omar Sandoval
f337bd7478 btrfs: don't do repair validation for checksum errors
The purpose of the validation step is to distinguish between good and
bad sectors in a failed multi-sector read. If a multi-sector read
succeeded but some of those sectors had checksum errors, we don't need
to validate anything; we know the sectors with bad checksums need to be
repaired.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:25 +02:00
Omar Sandoval
c7333972b9 btrfs: look at full bi_io_vec for repair decision
Read repair does two things: it finds a good copy of data to return to
the reader, and it corrects the bad copy on disk. If a read of multiple
sectors has an I/O error, repair does an extra "validation" step that
issues a separate read for each sector. This allows us to find the exact
failing sectors and only rewrite those.

This heuristic is implemented in
bio_readpage_error()/btrfs_check_repairable() as:

	failed_bio_pages = failed_bio->bi_iter.bi_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
	if (failed_bio_pages > 1)
		do validation

However, at this point, bi_iter may have already been advanced. This
means that we'll skip the validation step and rewrite the entire failed
read.

Fix it by getting the actual size from the biovec (which we can do
because this is only called for non-cloned bios, although that will
change in a later commit).

Fixes: 8a2ee44a37 ("btrfs: look at bi_size for repair decisions")
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:25 +02:00
Omar Sandoval
c36cac28cb btrfs: fix double __endio_write_update_ordered in direct I/O
In btrfs_submit_direct(), if we fail to allocate the btrfs_dio_private,
we complete the ordered extent range. However, we don't mark that the
range doesn't need to be cleaned up from btrfs_direct_IO() until later.
Therefore, if we fail to allocate the btrfs_dio_private, we complete the
ordered extent range twice. We could fix this by updating
unsubmitted_oe_range earlier, but it's cleaner to reorganize the code so
that creating the btrfs_dio_private and submitting the bios are
separate, and once the btrfs_dio_private is created, cleanup always
happens through the btrfs_dio_private.

The logic around unsubmitted_oe_range_end and unsubmitted_oe_range_start
is really subtle. We have the following:

  1. btrfs_direct_IO sets those two to the same value.

  2. When we call __blockdev_direct_IO unless
     btrfs_get_blocks_direct->btrfs_get_blocks_direct_write is called to
     modify unsubmitted_oe_range_start so that start < end. Cleanup
     won't happen.

  3. We come into btrfs_submit_direct - if it dip allocation fails we'd
     return with oe_range_end now modified so cleanup will happen.

  4. If we manage to allocate the dip we reset the unsubmitted range
     members to be equal so that cleanup happens from
     btrfs_endio_direct_write.

This 4-step logic is not really obvious, especially given it's scattered
across 3 functions.

Fixes: f28a492878 ("Btrfs: fix leaking of ordered extents after direct IO write error")
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
[ add range start/end logic explanation from Nikolay ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:25 +02:00
Omar Sandoval
6d3113a193 btrfs: fix error handling when submitting direct I/O bio
In btrfs_submit_direct_hook(), if a direct I/O write doesn't span a RAID
stripe or chunk, we submit orig_bio without cloning it. In this case, we
don't increment pending_bios. Then, if btrfs_submit_dio_bio() fails, we
decrement pending_bios to -1, and we never complete orig_bio. Fix it by
initializing pending_bios to 1 instead of incrementing later.

Fixing this exposes another bug: we put orig_bio prematurely and then
put it again from end_io. Fix it by not putting orig_bio.

After this change, pending_bios is really more of a reference count, but
I'll leave that cleanup separate to keep the fix small.

Fixes: e65e153554 ("btrfs: fix panic caused by direct IO")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:24 +02:00
Filipe Manana
534cf531cc btrfs: simplify error handling of clean_pinned_extents()
At clean_pinned_extents(), whether we end up returning success or failure,
we pretty much have to do the same things:

1) unlock unused_bg_unpin_mutex
2) decrement reference count on the previous transaction

We also call btrfs_dec_block_group_ro() in case of failure, but that is
better done in its caller, btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(), since its the
caller that calls inc_block_group_ro(), so it should be responsible for
the decrement operation, as it is in case any of the other functions it
calls fail.

So move the call to btrfs_dec_block_group_ro() from clean_pinned_extents()
into  btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() and unify the error and success return
paths for clean_pinned_extents(), reducing duplicated code and making it
simpler.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:24 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
e3b8336117 btrfs: remove the redundant parameter level in btrfs_bin_search()
All callers pass the eb::level so we can get read it directly inside the
btrfs_bin_search and key_search.

This is inspired by the work of Marek in U-boot.

CC: Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:24 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
b335eab890 btrfs: make btrfs_read_disk_super return struct btrfs_disk_super
Instead of returning both the page and the super block structure, make
btrfs_read_disk_super just return a pointer to struct btrfs_disk_super.
As a result the function signature is simplified. Also,
read_cache_page_gfp can never return NULL so check its return value only
for IS_ERR.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:24 +02:00
Nikolay Borisov
a7571232b2 btrfs: use list_for_each_entry_safe in free_reloc_roots
The function always works on a local copy of the reloc root list, which
cannot be modified outside of it so using list_for_each_entry is fine.
Additionally the macro handles empty lists so drop list_empty checks of
callers. No semantic changes.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:23 +02:00
David Sterba
7c09c03091 btrfs: don't force read-only after error in drop snapshot
Deleting a subvolume on a full filesystem leads to ENOSPC followed by a
forced read-only. This is not a transaction abort and the filesystem is
otherwise ok, so the error should be just propagated to the callers.

This is caused by unnecessary call to btrfs_handle_fs_error for all
errors, except EAGAIN. This does not make sense as the standard
transaction abort mechanism is in btrfs_drop_snapshot so all relevant
failures are handled.

Originally in commit cb1b69f450 ("Btrfs: forced readonly when
btrfs_drop_snapshot() fails") there was no return value at all, so the
btrfs_std_error made some sense but once the error handling and
propagation has been implemented we don't need it anymore.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:23 +02:00
Filipe Manana
2d9faa5a8a btrfs: remove pointless assertion on reclaim_size counter
The reclaim_size counter of a space_info object is unsigned. So its value
can never be negative, it's pointless to have an assertion that checks
its value is >= 0, therefore remove it.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:23 +02:00
Zheng Wei
72f4f078de btrfs: tree-checker: remove duplicate definition of 'inode_item_err'
Remove the duplicate definition of 'inode_item_err' in the file
tree-checker.c that got there by accident in c23c77b097 ("btrfs:
tree-checker: Refactor inode key check into seperate function").

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Wei <wei.zheng@vivo.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:23 +02:00
Josef Bacik
9c343784c4 btrfs: force chunk allocation if our global rsv is larger than metadata
Nikolay noticed a bunch of test failures with my global rsv steal
patches.  At first he thought they were introduced by them, but they've
been failing for a while with 64k nodes.

The problem is with 64k nodes we have a global reserve that calculates
out to 13MiB on a freshly made file system, which only has 8MiB of
metadata space.  Because of changes I previously made we no longer
account for the global reserve in the overcommit logic, which means we
correctly allow overcommit to happen even though we are already
overcommitted.

However in some corner cases, for example btrfs/170, we will allocate
the entire file system up with data chunks before we have enough space
pressure to allocate a metadata chunk.  Then once the fs is full we
ENOSPC out because we cannot overcommit and the global reserve is taking
up all of the available space.

The most ideal way to deal with this is to change our space reservation
stuff to take into account the height of the tree's that we're
modifying, so that our global reserve calculation does not end up so
obscenely large.

However that is a huge undertaking.  Instead fix this by forcing a chunk
allocation if the global reserve is larger than the total metadata
space.  This gives us essentially the same behavior that happened
before, we get a chunk allocated and these tests can pass.

This is meant to be a stop-gap measure until we can tackle the "tree
height only" project.

Fixes: 0096420adb ("btrfs: do not account global reserve in can_overcommit")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:23 +02:00
Josef Bacik
42a72cb753 btrfs: run btrfs_try_granting_tickets if a priority ticket fails
With normal tickets we could have a large reservation at the front of
the list that is unable to be satisfied, but a smaller ticket later on
that can be satisfied.  The way we handle this is to run
btrfs_try_granting_tickets() in maybe_fail_all_tickets().

However no such protection exists for priority tickets.  Fix this by
handling it in handle_reserve_ticket().  If we've returned after
attempting to flush space in a priority related way, we'll still be on
the priority list and need to be removed.

We rely on the flushing to free up space and wake the ticket, but if
there is not enough space to reclaim _but_ there's enough space in the
space_info to handle subsequent reservations then we would have gotten
an ENOSPC erroneously.

Address this by catching where we are still on the list, meaning we were
a priority ticket, and removing ourselves and then running
btrfs_try_granting_tickets().  This will handle this particular corner
case.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:23 +02:00
Josef Bacik
666daa9f97 btrfs: only check priority tickets for priority flushing
In debugging a generic/320 failure on ppc64, Nikolay noticed that
sometimes we'd ENOSPC out with plenty of space to reclaim if we had
committed the transaction.  He further discovered that this was because
there was a priority ticket that was small enough to fit in the free
space currently in the space_info.

Consider the following scenario.  There is no more space to reclaim in
the fs without committing the transaction.  Assume there's 1MiB of space
free in the space info, but there are pending normal tickets with 2MiB
reservations.

Now a priority ticket comes in with a .5MiB reservation.  Because we
have normal tickets pending we add ourselves to the priority list,
despite the fact that we could satisfy this reservation.

The flushing machinery now gets to the point where it wants to commit
the transaction, but because there's a .5MiB ticket on the priority list
and we have 1MiB of free space we assume the ticket will be granted
soon, so we bail without committing the transaction.

Meanwhile the priority flushing does not commit the transaction, and
eventually fails with an ENOSPC.  Then all other tickets are failed with
ENOSPC because we were never able to actually commit the transaction.

The fix for this is we should have simply granted the priority flusher
his reservation, because there was space to make the reservation.
Priority flushers by definition take priority, so they are allowed to
make their reservations before any previous normal tickets.  By not
adding this priority ticket to the list the normal flushing mechanisms
will then commit the transaction and everything will continue normally.

We still need to serialize ourselves with other priority tickets, so if
there are any tickets on the priority list then we need to add ourselves
to that list in order to maintain the serialization between priority
tickets.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:22 +02:00
Josef Bacik
bb4f58a747 btrfs: account for trans_block_rsv in may_commit_transaction
On ppc64le with 64k page size (respectively 64k block size) generic/320
was failing and debug output showed we were getting a premature ENOSPC
with a bunch of space in btrfs_fs_info::trans_block_rsv.

This meant there were still open transaction handles holding space, yet
the flusher didn't commit the transaction because it deemed the freed
space won't be enough to satisfy the current reserve ticket. Fix this
by accounting for space in trans_block_rsv when deciding whether the
current transaction should be committed or not.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:22 +02:00
Josef Bacik
e6549c2aab btrfs: allow to use up to 90% of the global block rsv for unlink
We previously had a limit of stealing 50% of the global reserve for
unlink.  This was from a time when the global reserve was used for the
delayed refs as well.  However now those reservations are kept separate,
so the global reserve can be depleted much more to allow us to make
progress for space restoring operations like unlink.  Change the minimum
amount of space required to be left in the global reserve to 10%.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:22 +02:00
Josef Bacik
7f9fe61440 btrfs: improve global reserve stealing logic
For unlink transactions and block group removal
btrfs_start_transaction_fallback_global_rsv will first try to start an
ordinary transaction and if it fails it will fall back to reserving the
required amount by stealing from the global reserve. This is problematic
because of all the same reasons we had with previous iterations of the
ENOSPC handling, thundering herd.  We get a bunch of failures all at
once, everybody tries to allocate from the global reserve, some win and
some lose, we get an ENSOPC.

Fix this behavior by introducing BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL_STEAL. It's
used to mark unlink reservation. To fix this we need to integrate this
logic into the normal ENOSPC infrastructure.  We still go through all of
the normal flushing work, and at the moment we begin to fail all the
tickets we try to satisfy any tickets that are allowed to steal by
stealing from the global reserve.  If this works we start the flushing
system over again just like we would with a normal ticket satisfaction.
This serializes our global reserve stealing, so we don't have the
thundering herd problem.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:22 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
876de781b0 btrfs: backref: distinguish reloc and non-reloc use of indirect resolution
For relocation tree detection, relocation backref cache uses
btrfs_should_ignore_reloc_root() which uses relocation-specific checks
like checking the DEAD_RELOC_ROOT bit.

However for general purpose backref cache, we can rely on that check, as
it's possible that relocation is also running.

For generic purposed backref cache, we detect reloc root by
SHARED_BLOCK_REF item.  Only reloc root node has its parent bytenr
pointing back to itself.

And in that case, backref cache will mark the reloc root node useless,
dropping any child orphan nodes.

So only call btrfs_should_ignore_reloc_root() if the backref cache is
for relocation.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:22 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
1b23ea180b btrfs: reloc: move error handling of build_backref_tree() to backref.c
The error cleanup will be extracted as a new function,
btrfs_backref_error_cleanup(), and moved to backref.c and exported for
later usage.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:21 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
fc997ed05a btrfs: backref: rename and move finish_upper_links()
This the the 2nd major part of generic backref cache. Move it to
backref.c so we can reuse it.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:21 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
1b60d2ec98 btrfs: backref: rename and move handle_one_tree_block()
This function is the major part of backref cache build process, move it
to backref.c so we can reuse it later.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:21 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
d36e7f0e8f btrfs: reloc: open code read_fs_root() for handle_indirect_tree_backref()
The backref code is going to be moved to backref.c, and read_fs_root()
is just a simple wrapper, open-code it to prepare to the incoming code
move.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:21 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
55465730bc btrfs: backref: rename and move should_ignore_root()
This function is mostly single purpose to relocation backref cache, but
since we're moving the main part of backref cache to backref.c, we need
to export such function.

And to avoid confusion, rename the function to
btrfs_should_ignore_reloc_root() make the name a little more clear.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:21 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
982c92cbd5 btrfs: backref: rename and move backref_tree_panic()
Also change the parameter, since all callers can easily grab an fs_info,
there is no need for all the pointer chasing.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:21 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
13fe1bdb22 btrfs: backref: rename and move backref_cache_cleanup()
Since we're releasing all existing nodes/edges, other than cleanup the
mess after error, "release" is a more proper naming here.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:20 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
023acb07bc btrfs: backref: rename and move remove_backref_node()
Also add comment explaining the cleanup progress, to differ it from
btrfs_backref_drop_node().

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:20 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
b0fe7078d6 btrfs: backref: rename and move drop_backref_node()
With extra comment for drop_backref_node() as it has some similarity
with remove_backref_node(), thus we need extra comment explaining the
difference.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:20 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
741188d3a5 btrfs: backref: rename and move free_backref_(node|edge)
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:20 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
f39911e552 btrfs: backref: rename and move link_backref_edge()
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:20 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
47254d07f3 btrfs: backref: rename and move alloc_backref_edge()
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:19 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
b1818dab9b btrfs: backref: rename and move alloc_backref_node()
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:19 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
584fb12187 btrfs: backref: rename and move backref_cache_init()
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:19 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
e9a28dc52a btrfs: rename tree_entry to rb_simple_node and export it
Structure tree_entry provides a very simple rb_tree which only uses
bytenr as search index.

That tree_entry is used in 3 structures: backref_node, mapping_node and
tree_block.

Since we're going to make backref_node independnt from relocation, it's
a good time to extract the tree_entry into rb_simple_node, and export it
into misc.h.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:19 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
7053544146 btrfs: backref: move btrfs_backref_(node|edge|cache) structures to backref.h
These 3 structures are the main part of btrfs backref cache, move them
to backref.h to build the basis for later reuse.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:19 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
a26195a523 btrfs: reloc: add btrfs_ prefix for backref_node/edge/cache
Those three structures are the main elements of backref cache. Add the
"btrfs_" prefix for later export.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:18 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
29db137b6b btrfs: reloc: refactor useless nodes handling into its own function
This patch will also add some comment for the cleanup.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:18 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
1f87292466 btrfs: reloc: refactor finishing part of upper linkage into finish_upper_links()
After handle_one_tree_backref(), all newly added (not cached) edges and
nodes have the following features:

- Only backref_edge::list[LOWER] is linked.
  This means, we can only iterate from botton to top, not the other
  direction.

- Newly added nodes are not added to cache rb_tree yet

So to finish the backref cache, we still need to finish the links and
add all nodes into backref cache rb_tree.

This patch will refactor the existing code into finish_upper_links(),
add more comments of each branch, and why we need to do all the work.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:18 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
e7d571c7b0 btrfs: reloc: remove the open-coded goto loop for breadth-first search
build_backref_tree() uses "goto again;" to implement a breadth-first
search to build backref cache.

This patch will extract most of its work into a wrapper,
handle_one_tree_block(), and use a do {} while() loop to implement the
same thing.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:18 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
0304f2d8cc btrfs: reloc: pass essential members for alloc_backref_node()
Bytenr and level are essential parameters for backref_node, thus it
makes sense to initialize them at allocation time.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:18 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
2a979612d5 btrfs: reloc: use wrapper to replace open-coded edge linking
Since backref_edge is used to connect upper and lower backref nodes, and
needs to access both nodes, some code can look pretty nasty:

		list_add_tail(&edge->list[LOWER], &cur->upper);

The above code will link @cur to the LOWER side of the edge, while both
"LOWER" and "upper" words show up.  This can sometimes be very confusing
for reader to grasp.

This patch introduces a new wrapper, link_backref_edge(), to handle the
linking behavior.  Which also has extra ASSERT() to ensure caller won't
pass wrong nodes.

Also, this updates the comment of related lists of backref_node and
backref_edge, to make it more clear that each list points to what.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:18 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
4d81ea8bb4 btrfs: reloc: refactor indirect tree backref processing into its own function
The processing of indirect tree backref (TREE_BLOCK_REF) is the most
complex work.

We need to grab the fs root, do a tree search to locate all its parent
nodes, link all needed edges, and put all uncached edges to pending edge
list.

This is definitely worth a helper function.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:17 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
4007ea87d9 btrfs: reloc: refactor direct tree backref processing into its own function
For BTRFS_SHARED_BLOCK_REF_KEY, its processing is straightforward, as we
now the parent node bytenr directly.

If the parent is already cached, or a root, call it a day.
If the parent is not cached, add it pending list.

This patch will just refactor this part into its own function,
handle_direct_tree_backref() and add some comment explaining the
@ref_key parameter.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:17 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
2433bea592 btrfs: reloc: make reloc root search-specific for relocation backref cache
find_reloc_root() searches reloc_control::reloc_root_tree to find the
reloc root.  This behavior is only useful for relocation backref cache.

For the incoming more generic purpose backref cache, we don't care
about who owns the reloc root, but only care if it's a reloc root.

So this patch makes the following modifications to make the reloc root
search more specific to relocation backref:

- Add backref_node::is_reloc_root
  This will be an extra indicator for generic purposed backref cache.
  User doesn't need to read root key from backref_node::root to
  determine if it's a reloc root.
  Also for reloc tree root, it's useless and will be queued to useless
  list.

- Add backref_cache::is_reloc
  This will allow backref cache code to do different behavior for
  generic purpose backref cache and relocation backref cache.

- Pass fs_info to find_reloc_root()

- Export find_reloc_root()
  So backref.c can utilize this function.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:17 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
33a0f1f716 btrfs: reloc: add backref_cache::fs_info member
Add this member so that we can grab fs_info without the help from
reloc_control.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:17 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
8478028933 btrfs: reloc: add backref_cache::pending_edge and backref_cache::useless_node
These two new members will act the same as the existing local lists,
@useless and @list in build_backref_tree().

Currently build_backref_tree() is only executed serially, thus moving
such local list into backref_cache is still safe.

Also since we're here, use list_first_entry() to replace a lot of
list_entry() calls after !list_empty().

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:17 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
9569cc203d btrfs: reloc: rename mark_block_processed and __mark_block_processed
These two functions are weirdly named, mark_block_processed() in fact
just marks a range dirty unconditionally, while __mark_block_processed()
does extra check before doing the marking.

This patch will open code old mark_block_processed, and rename
__mark_block_processed() to remove the "__" prefix.

Since we're here, also kill the forward declaration, which could also
kill in_block_group() with in_range() macro.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-05-25 11:25:16 +02:00