No need to pull the fiemap definitions into almost every file in the
kernel build.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200523073016.2944131-5-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
There is no caller left outside of ioctl.c.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200523073016.2944131-4-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
iomap_fiemap already calls fiemap_check_flags first thing, so this
additional check is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200523073016.2944131-3-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The fiemap and EXT4_IOC_GET_ES_CACHE cases share almost no code, so split
them into entirely separate functions.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200523073016.2944131-2-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Add an extra validation of the len parameter, as for ext4 some files
might have smaller file size limits than others. This also means the
redundant size check in ext4_ioctl_get_es_cache can go away, as all
size checking is done in the shared fiemap handler.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200505154324.3226743-3-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4 supports max number of logical blocks in a file to be 0xffffffff.
(This is since ext4_extent's ee_block is __le32).
This means that EXT4_MAX_LOGICAL_BLOCK should be 0xfffffffe (starting
from 0 logical offset). This patch fixes this.
The issue was seen when ext4 moved to iomap_fiemap API and when
overlayfs was mounted on top of ext4. Since overlayfs was missing
filemap_check_ranges(), so it could pass a arbitrary huge length which
lead to overflow of map.m_len logic.
This patch fixes that.
Fixes: d3b6f23f71 ("ext4: move ext4_fiemap to use iomap framework")
Reported-by: syzbot+77fa5bdb65cc39711820@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200505154324.3226743-2-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When reserved transaction handle is unused, we subtract its reserved
credits in __jbd2_journal_unreserve_handle() called from
jbd2_journal_stop(). However this function forgets to remove reserved
credits from transaction->t_outstanding_credits and thus the transaction
space that was reserved remains effectively leaked. The leaked
transaction space can be quite significant in some cases and leads to
unnecessarily small transactions and thus reducing throughput of the
journalling machinery. E.g. fsmark workload creating lots of 4k files
was observed to have about 20% lower throughput due to this when ext4 is
mounted with dioread_nolock mount option.
Subtract reserved credits from t_outstanding_credits as well.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 8f7d89f368 ("jbd2: transaction reservation support")
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200520133119.1383-3-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Remove ext4_journal_free_reserved() function. It is never used.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200520133119.1383-2-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Currently while doing block allocation grp->bb_free may be getting
modified if discard is happening in parallel.
For e.g. consider a case where there are lot of threads who have
preallocated lot of blocks and there is a thread which is trying
to discard all of this group's PA. Now it could happen that
we see all of those group's bb_free is zero and fail the allocation
while there is sufficient space if we free up all the PA.
So this patch adds another flag "EXT4_MB_STRICT_CHECK" which will be set
if we are unable to allocate any blocks in the first try (since we may
not have considered blocks about to be discarded from PA lists).
So during retry attempt to allocate blocks we will use ext4_lock_group()
for checking if the group is good or not.
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9cb740a117c958c36596f167b12af1beae9a68b7.1589955723.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_mb_good_group() definition was changed some time back
and now it even initializes the buddy cache (via ext4_mb_init_group()),
if in case the EXT4_MB_GRP_NEED_INIT() is true for a group.
Note that ext4_mb_init_group() could sleep and so should not be called
under a spinlock held.
This is fine as of now because ext4_mb_good_group() is called before
loading the buddy bitmap without ext4_lock_group() held
and again called after loading the bitmap, only this time with
ext4_lock_group() held.
But still this whole thing is confusing.
So this patch refactors out ext4_mb_good_group_nolock() which should be
called when without holding ext4_lock_group().
Also in further patches we hold the spinlock (ext4_lock_group()) while
doing any calculations which involves grp->bb_free or grp->bb_fragments.
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d9f7d031a5fbe1c943fae6bf1ff5cdf0604ae722.1589955723.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
There could be a race in function ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations()
where the 1st thread may iterate through group's bb_prealloc_list and
remove all the PAs and add to function's local list head.
Now if the 2nd thread comes in to discard the group preallocations,
it will see that the group->bb_prealloc_list is empty and will return 0.
Consider for a case where we have less number of groups
(for e.g. just group 0),
this may even return an -ENOSPC error from ext4_mb_new_blocks()
(where we call for ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations()).
But that is wrong, since 2nd thread should have waited for 1st thread
to release all the PAs and should have retried for allocation.
Since 1st thread was anyway going to discard the PAs.
The algorithm using this percpu seq counter goes below:
1. We sample the percpu discard_pa_seq counter before trying for block
allocation in ext4_mb_new_blocks().
2. We increment this percpu discard_pa_seq counter when we either allocate
or free these blocks i.e. while marking those blocks as used/free in
mb_mark_used()/mb_free_blocks().
3. We also increment this percpu seq counter when we successfully identify
that the bb_prealloc_list is not empty and hence proceed for discarding
of those PAs inside ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations().
Now to make sure that the regular fast path of block allocation is not
affected, as a small optimization we only sample the percpu seq counter
on that cpu. Only when the block allocation fails and when freed blocks
found were 0, that is when we sample percpu seq counter for all cpus using
below function ext4_get_discard_pa_seq_sum(). This happens after making
sure that all the PAs on grp->bb_prealloc_list got freed or if it's empty.
It can be well argued that why don't just check for grp->bb_free to
see if there are any free blocks to be allocated. So here are the two
concerns which were discussed:-
1. If for some reason the blocks available in the group are not
appropriate for allocation logic (say for e.g.
EXT4_MB_HINT_GOAL_ONLY, although this is not yet implemented), then
the retry logic may result into infinte looping since grp->bb_free is
non-zero.
2. Also before preallocation was clubbed with block allocation with the
same ext4_lock_group() held, there were lot of races where grp->bb_free
could not be reliably relied upon.
Due to above, this patch considers discard_pa_seq logic to determine if
we should retry for block allocation. Say if there are are n threads
trying for block allocation and none of those could allocate or discard
any of the blocks, then all of those n threads will fail the block
allocation and return -ENOSPC error. (Since the seq counter for all of
those will match as no block allocation/discard was done during that
duration).
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7f254686903b87c419d798742fd9a1be34f0657b.1589955723.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Implement ext4_mb_discard_preallocations_should_retry()
which we will need in later patches to add more logic
like check for sequence number match to see if we should
retry for block allocation or not.
There should be no functionality change in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1cfae0098d2aa9afbeb59331401258182868c8f2.1589955723.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_mb_discard_preallocations() only checks for grp->bb_prealloc_list
of every group to discard the group's PA to free up the space if
allocation request fails. Consider below race:-
Process A Process B
1. allocate blocks
1. Fails block allocation from
ext4_mb_regular_allocator()
ext4_lock_group()
allocated blocks
more than ac_o_ex.fe_len
ext4_unlock_group()
2. Scans the
grp->bb_prealloc_list (under
ext4_lock_group()) and
find nothing and thus return
-ENOSPC.
2. Add the additional blocks to PA list
ext4_lock_group()
add blocks to grp->bb_prealloc_list
ext4_unlock_group()
Above race could be avoided if we add those additional blocks to
grp->bb_prealloc_list at the same time with block allocation when
ext4_lock_group() was still held.
With this discard-PA will know if there are actually any blocks which
could be freed from the PA
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a2217dd782585b42328981832e6d396abaaccb80.1589955723.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
No one currently needs EXT4_INODE_CASEFOLD, but add it to keep the
EXT4_INODE_* definitions in sync with the EXT4_*_FL definitions.
Also make it clearer that the casefold flag is only for directories.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200510215252.87833-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The path performing block allocations in ext4_ext_map_blocks() contains
code trimming the length of a new extent that is repeated later
in the function. This code is both redundant and unnecessary as the
exact length of the new extent has already been calculated. Rewrite the
instantiation of the map struct in this case to use the available
values, avoiding the overhead of unnecessary conversions and improving
clarity. Add another map struct instantiation tailored specifically to
the separate case for an existing written extent. Remove an old comment
that no longer appears applicable to the current code.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200510155805.18808-1-enwlinux@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
ext_debug() msgs could be helpful, provided those could be enabled
without recompiling kernel and also if we could selectively enable
only required prints for case by case debugging.
So make ext_debug() implementation use pr_debug().
Also change ext_debug() to be defined with CONFIG_EXT4_DEBUG.
So EXT_DEBUG macro now mostly remain for below 3 functions.
ext4_ext_show_path/leaf/move() (whose print msgs use ext_debug()
which again could be dynamically enabled using pr_debug())
This also changes the ext_debug() to take inode as a parameter
to add inode no. in all of it's msgs.
Prints additional info like process name / pid, superblock id etc.
This also removes any explicit function names passed in ext_debug().
Since ext_debug() on it's own prints file, func and line no.
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d31dc189b0aeda9384fe7665e36da7cd8c61571f.1589086800.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
mb_debug() msg had only 1 control level for all type of msgs.
And if we enable mballoc_debug then all of those msgs would be enabled.
Instead of adding multiple debug levels for mb_debug() msgs, use
pr_debug() with which we could have finer control to print msgs at all
of different levels (i.e. at file, func, line no.).
Also add process name/pid, superblk id, and other info in mb_debug()
msg. This also kills the mballoc_debug module parameter, since it is
not needed any more.
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f0c660cbde9e2edbe95c67942ca9ad80dd2231eb.1589086800.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_map_blocks() has ext_debug msg early at the start of function.
We also get ext_debug msg if we could allocate a block from
ext4_ext_map_blocks(). But there is no ext_debug() msg in case of
block allocation failure. So add one along with error code.
Also add more info in ext_debug() msg like how many blocks were allocated
v/s how many were requested in ext4_ext_map_blocks().
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1610ec2aa932396be00f9d552fe29da473ead176.1589086800.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Make sure to check for e4b->bd_info->bb_bitmap == NULL, in
mb_cmp_bitmaps() and return if NULL, to avoid possible NULL ptr
dereference. Similar to how we do this in other ifdef DOUBLE_CHECK
functions.
Also remove the BUG_ON() logic if kmalloc() or ext4_read_block_bitmap()
fails. We should simply mark grp->bb_bitmap as NULL if above happens.
In fact ext4_read_block_bitmap() may even return an error in case of resize
ioctl. Hence remove this BUG_ON logic (fstests ext4/032 may trigger
this).
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/9a54f8a696ff17c057cd571be3d15ac3ec1407f1.1589086800.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This patch implemets mb_group_bb_bitmap_alloc() and
mb_group_bb_bitmap_free() function to remove #ifdef DOUBLE_CHECK macro
and it's related code from inside
ext4_mb_add_groupinfo()/ext4_mb_release().
There should be no functionality change in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8c2095d74b779f0254a19b24982490dc6f07c4f9.1589086800.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This patch adds some more debugging mb_debug() msgs to help improve
mballoc code debugging.
Other than adding more mb_debug() msgs at few more places,
there should be no other functionality change in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5fc8e7788b924e211fcfa4a4c1d2f8503511661a.1589086800.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We can't fail in the truncate path without requiring an fsck.
Add work around for this by using a combination of retry loops
and the __GFP_NOFAIL flag.
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Anna Pendleton <pendleton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200507175028.15061-1-pendleton@google.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
'igrab(d_inode(dentry->d_parent))' without holding dentry->d_lock is
broken because without d_lock, d_parent can be concurrently changed due
to a rename(). Then if the old directory is immediately deleted, old
d_parent->inode can be NULL. That causes a NULL dereference in igrab().
To fix this, use dget_parent() to safely grab a reference to the parent
dentry, which pins the inode. This also eliminates the need to use
d_find_any_alias() other than for the initial inode, as we no longer
throw away the dentry at each step.
This is an extremely hard race to hit, but it is possible. Adding a
udelay() in between the reads of ->d_parent and its ->d_inode makes it
reproducible on a no-journal filesystem using the following program:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main()
{
if (fork()) {
for (;;) {
mkdir("dir1", 0700);
int fd = open("dir1/file", O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_SYNC);
write(fd, "X", 1);
close(fd);
}
} else {
mkdir("dir2", 0700);
for (;;) {
rename("dir1/file", "dir2/file");
rmdir("dir1");
}
}
}
Fixes: d59729f4e7 ("ext4: fix races in ext4_sync_parent()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200506183140.541194-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
If ext4_ext_convert_to_initialized() fails when called within
ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents(), immediately error out through the
exit point at function end. Fix the error handling in the event
ext4_ext_convert_to_initialized() returns 0, which it shouldn't do when
converting an existing extent. The current code returns the passed in
value of allocated (which is likely non-zero) while failing to set
m_flags, m_pblk, and m_len.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200430185320.23001-5-enwlinux@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
If the call to ext4_split_convert_extents() fails in the
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO case within ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents(),
error out through the exit point at function end rather than jumping
through an intermediate point. Fix the error handling in the event
ext4_split_convert_extents() returns 0, which it shouldn't do when
splitting an existing extent. The current code returns the passed in
value of allocated (which is likely non-zero) while failing to set
m_flags, m_pblk, and m_len.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200430185320.23001-4-enwlinux@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Remove the redundant code assigning values to ext4_map_blocks components
in ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents() for the EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT
case, using the code at the function exit instead. Clean up and reorder
that code to eliminate more redundancy and improve readability.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200430185320.23001-3-enwlinux@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
There's no call to ext4_map_blocks() in the current ext4 code with a
flags argument that combines EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CONVERT and
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_ZERO. Remove the code that corresponds to this case
from ext4_ext_handle_unwritten_extents().
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200430185320.23001-2-enwlinux@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Don't ignore return values from ext4_ext_dirty, since the errors
indicate valid failures below Ext4. In all of the other instances of
ext4_ext_dirty calls, the error return value is handled in some
way. This patch makes those remaining couple of places to handle
ext4_ext_dirty errors as well. In case of ext4_split_extent_at(), the
ignorance of return value is intentional. The reason is that we are
already in error path and there isn't much we can do if ext4_ext_dirty
returns error. This patch adds a comment for that case explaining why
we ignore the return value.
In the longer run, we probably should
make sure that errors from other mark_dirty routines are handled as
well.
Ran gce-xfstests smoke tests and verified that there were no
regressions.
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200427013438.219117-2-harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_mark_inode_dirty() can fail for real reasons. Ignoring its return
value may lead ext4 to ignore real failures that would result in
corruption / crashes. Harden ext4_mark_inode_dirty error paths to fail
as soon as possible and return errors to the caller whenever
appropriate.
One of the possible scnearios when this bug could affected is that
while creating a new inode, its directory entry gets added
successfully but while writing the inode itself mark_inode_dirty
returns error which is ignored. This would result in inconsistency
that the directory entry points to a non-existent inode.
Ran gce-xfstests smoke tests and verified that there were no
regressions.
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200427013438.219117-1-harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Don't pass error pointers to brelse().
commit 7159a986b4 ("ext4: fix some error pointer dereferences") has fixed
some cases, fix the remaining one case.
Once ext4_xattr_block_find()->ext4_sb_bread() failed, error pointer is
stored in @bs->bh, which will be passed to brelse() in the cleanup
routine of ext4_xattr_set_handle(). This will then cause a NULL panic
crash in __brelse().
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000000000005b
RIP: 0010:__brelse+0x1b/0x50
Call Trace:
ext4_xattr_set_handle+0x163/0x5d0
ext4_xattr_set+0x95/0x110
__vfs_setxattr+0x6b/0x80
__vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x68/0x1b0
vfs_setxattr+0xa0/0xb0
setxattr+0x12c/0x1a0
path_setxattr+0x8d/0xc0
__x64_sys_setxattr+0x27/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x60/0x250
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
In this case, @bs->bh stores '-EIO' actually.
Fixes: fb265c9cb4 ("ext4: add ext4_sb_bread() to disambiguate ENOMEM cases")
Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org # 2.6.19
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1587628004-95123-1-git-send-email-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
When we are evicting inode with journalled data, we may race with
transaction commit in the following way:
CPU0 CPU1
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction() evict(inode)
inode_io_list_del()
inode_wait_for_writeback()
process BJ_Forget list
__jbd2_journal_insert_checkpoint()
__jbd2_journal_refile_buffer()
__jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer()
if (test_clear_buffer_jbddirty(bh))
mark_buffer_dirty(bh)
__mark_inode_dirty(inode)
ext4_evict_inode(inode)
frees the inode
This results in use-after-free issues in the writeback code (or
the assertion added in the previous commit triggering).
Fix the problem by removing inode from writeback lists once all the page
cache is evicted and so inode cannot be added to writeback lists again.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421085445.5731-4-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Ext4 needs to remove inode from writeback lists after it is out of
visibility of its journalling machinery (which can still dirty the
inode). Export inode_io_list_del() for it.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421085445.5731-3-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
ext4_orphan_get() invokes ext4_read_inode_bitmap(), which returns a
reference of the specified buffer_head object to "bitmap_bh" with
increased refcnt.
When ext4_orphan_get() returns, local variable "bitmap_bh" becomes
invalid, so the refcount should be decreased to keep refcount balanced.
The reference counting issue happens in one exception handling path of
ext4_orphan_get(). When ext4_iget() fails, the function forgets to
decrease the refcnt increased by ext4_read_inode_bitmap(), causing a
refcnt leak.
Fix this issue by calling brelse() when ext4_iget() fails.
Signed-off-by: Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1587618568-13418-1-git-send-email-xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
If eh->eh_max is 0, EXT_MAX_EXTENT/INDEX would evaluate to unsigned
(-1) resulting in illegal memory accesses. Although there is no
consistent repro, we see that generic/019 sometimes crashes because of
this bug.
Ran gce-xfstests smoke and verified that there were no regressions.
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200421023959.20879-2-harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Fix the following coccicheck warning:
fs/ext4/extents_status.c:1057:5-28: WARNING: Comparison to bool
fs/ext4/inode.c:2314:18-24: WARNING: Comparison to bool
Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200420042918.19459-1-yanaijie@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
As new ext4_map_blocks() flags have been added, not all have gotten flag
bit to string translations to make tracepoint output more readable.
Fix that, and go one step further by adding a translation for the
EXT4_EX_NOCACHE flag as well. The EXT4_EX_FORCE_CACHE flag can never
be set in a tracepoint in the current code, so there's no need to
bother with a translation for it right now.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200415203140.30349-3-enwlinux@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The eofblocks code was removed in the 5.7 release by "ext4: remove
EOFBLOCKS_FL and associated code" (4337ecd1fe). The ext4_map_blocks()
flag used to trigger it can now be removed as well.
Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200415203140.30349-2-enwlinux@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
We can use the ext4_has_feature_bigalloc() function directly to check
bigalloc feature and the variable has_bigalloc is reduncant, so remove
it.
Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1586935542-29588-1-git-send-email-kaixuxia@tencent.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
