Sam Ravnborg suggested packing single-lines cases in switch statements
in nocheck uaccess macros makes for easier to read code.
Suggested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Sam Ravnborg suggested packing single-lines cases in switch statements
in nocheck uaccess macros makes for easier to read code.
Suggested-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
While working on arch/xtensa/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that some macros within this header are made harder to read because they
violate a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
While working on arch/sh/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that one macro within this header is made harder to read because it
violates a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
While working on arch/parisc/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that some macros within this header are made harder to read because they
violate a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
While working on arch/m68k/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that one macro within this header is made harder to read because it
violates a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
While working on arch/m32r/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that some macros within this header are made harder to read because they
violate a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
While working on arch/frv/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that one macro within this header is made harder to read because it
violates a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
While working on arch/cris/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that some macros within this header are made harder to read because they
violate a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
While working on arch/avr32/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that some macros within this header are made harder to read because they
violate a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
While working on arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that one macro within this header is made harder to read because it
violates a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
While working on arch/arm/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that some macros within this header are made harder to read because they
violate a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
While working on arch/alpha/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that some macros within this header are made harder to read because they
violate a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
While working on arch/blackfin/include/asm/uaccess.h, I noticed
that some macros within this header are made harder to read because they
violate a coding style rule: space is missing after comma.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Macros within arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_64.h are made harder to
read because they violate a bunch of coding style rules.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Macros within arch/sparc/include/asm/uaccess_32.h are made harder to
read because they violate a bunch of coding style rules.
Fix it up.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
virtio wants to write bitwise types to userspace using put_user.
At the moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed
through an integer.
For example:
__le32 __user *p;
__le32 x;
put_user(x, p);
is safe, but currently triggers a sparse warning.
Fix that up using __force.
Note: this does not suppress any useful sparse checks since caller
assigns x to typeof(*p), which in turn forces all the necessary type
checks.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
virtio wants to write bitwise types to userspace using put_user.
At the moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed
through an integer.
For example:
__le32 __user *p;
__le32 x;
put_user(x, p);
is safe, but currently triggers a sparse warning.
Fix that up using __force.
This also fixes warnings due to writing a pointer out to
userland.
Note: this does not suppress any useful sparse checks since callers
do a cast (__typeof__(*(ptr))) (x) which in turn forces all the
necessary type checks.
Suggested-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
virtio wants to write bitwise types to userspace using put_user.
At the moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed
through an integer.
For example:
__le32 __user *p;
__le32 x;
put_user(x, p);
is safe, but currently triggers a sparse warning.
Fix that up using __force.
Note: this does not suppress any useful sparse checks since callers
do a cast (__typeof__(*(ptr))) (x) which in turn forces all the
necessary type checks.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
virtio wants to write bitwise types to userspace using put_user.
At the moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed
through an integer.
For example:
__le32 __user *p;
__le32 x;
put_user(x, p);
is safe, but currently triggers a sparse warning.
Fix that up using __force.
Note: this does not suppress any useful sparse checks since caller
assigns x to typeof(*p), which in turn forces all the necessary type
checks.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
virtio wants to write bitwise types to userspace using put_user.
At the moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed
through an integer.
For example:
__le32 __user *p;
__le32 x;
put_user(x, p);
is safe, but currently triggers a sparse warning.
Fix that up using __force.
Note: this does not suppress any useful sparse checks since caller
assigns x to typeof(*p), which in turn forces all the necessary type
checks.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
virtio wants to read bitwise types from userspace using get_user. At the
moment this triggers sparse errors, since the value is passed through an
integer.
Fix that up using __force.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
commit 8b38694a2d
vhost/net: virtio 1.0 byte swap
had this chunk:
- heads[headcount - 1].len += datalen;
+ heads[headcount - 1].len = cpu_to_vhost32(vq, len - datalen);
This adds datalen with the wrong sign, causing guest panics.
Fixes: 8b38694a2d
Reported-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
The reason we defer kfree until release function is because it's a
general rule for kobjects: kfree of the reference counter itself is only
legal in the release function.
Previous patch didn't make this clear, document this in code.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
A struct device which has just been unregistered can live on past the
point at which a driver decides to drop it's initial reference to the
kobject gained on allocation.
This implies that when releasing a virtio device, we can't free a struct
virtio_device until the underlying struct device has been released,
which might not happen immediately on device_unregister().
Unfortunately, this is exactly what virtio pci does:
it has an empty release callback, and frees memory immediately
after unregistering the device.
This causes an easy to reproduce crash if CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE
it enabled.
To fix, free the memory only once we know the device is gone in the release
callback.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
It turns out we need to add device-specific code
in release callback. Move it to virtio_pci_legacy.c.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Wire up sys_execveat(). Tested on 32 & 64 bit.
Fix for kdump on LE systems with cpus hot unplugged.
Revert Anton's fix for "kernel BUG at kernel/smpboot.c:134!", this broke other
platforms, we'll do a proper fix for 3.20.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=1yze
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'powerpc-3.19-3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mpe/linux
Pull powerpc fixes from Michael Ellerman:
- Wire up sys_execveat(). Tested on 32 & 64 bit.
- Fix for kdump on LE systems with cpus hot unplugged.
- Revert Anton's fix for "kernel BUG at kernel/smpboot.c:134!", this
broke other platforms, we'll do a proper fix for 3.20.
* tag 'powerpc-3.19-3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mpe/linux:
Revert "powerpc: Secondary CPUs must set cpu_callin_map after setting active and online"
powerpc/kdump: Ignore failure in enabling big endian exception during crash
powerpc: Wire up sys_execveat() syscall
Pull UML fixes from Richard Weinberger:
"Two fixes for UML regressions. Nothing exciting"
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/uml:
x86, um: actually mark system call tables readonly
um: Skip futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() test
Commit a074335a37 ("x86, um: Mark system call tables readonly") was
supposed to mark the sys_call_table in UML as RO by adding the const,
but it doesn't have the desired effect as it's nevertheless being placed
into the data section since __cacheline_aligned enforces sys_call_table
being placed into .data..cacheline_aligned instead. We need to use
the ____cacheline_aligned version instead to fix this issue.
Before:
$ nm -v arch/x86/um/sys_call_table_64.o | grep -1 "sys_call_table"
U sys_writev
0000000000000000 D sys_call_table
0000000000000000 D syscall_table_size
After:
$ nm -v arch/x86/um/sys_call_table_64.o | grep -1 "sys_call_table"
U sys_writev
0000000000000000 R sys_call_table
0000000000000000 D syscall_table_size
Fixes: a074335a37 ("x86, um: Mark system call tables readonly")
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() does not work on UML because
it triggers a copy_from_user() in kernel context.
On UML copy_from_user() can only be used if the kernel was called
by a real user space process such that UML can use ptrace()
to fetch the value.
Reported-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Suggested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Tested-by: Daniel Walter <d.walter@0x90.at>
