linux_dsm_epyc7002/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c

413 lines
11 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations The x86 stack dump code is a bit of a mess. dump_trace() uses callbacks, and each user of it seems to have slightly different requirements, so there are several slightly different callbacks floating around. Also there are some upcoming features which will need more changes to the stack dump code, including the printing of stack pt_regs, reliable stack detection for live patching, and a DWARF unwinder. Each of those features would at least need more callbacks and/or callback interfaces, resulting in a much bigger mess than what we have today. Before doing all that, we should try to clean things up and replace dump_trace() with something cleaner and more flexible. The new unwinder is a simple state machine which was heavily inspired by a suggestion from Andy Lutomirski: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUbNTqaM2LRyXGRx=kVLRPeY5A3Pc6k4TtQxF320rUT=w@mail.gmail.com It's also similar to the libunwind API: http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html Some if its advantages: - Simplicity: no more callback sprawl and less code duplication. - Flexibility: it allows the caller to stop and inspect the stack state at each step in the unwinding process. - Modularity: the unwinder code, console stack dump code, and stack metadata analysis code are all better separated so that changing one of them shouldn't have much of an impact on any of the others. Two implementations are added which conform to the new unwind interface: - The frame pointer unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. - The "guess" unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. This isn't an "unwinder" per se. All it does is scan the stack for kernel text addresses. But with no frame pointers, guesses are better than nothing in most cases. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6dc2f909c47533d213d0505f0a113e64585bec82.1474045023.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-17 02:18:12 +07:00
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/sched/task.h>
#include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
x86/unwind: Silence entry-related warnings A few people have reported unwinder warnings like the following: WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at ffffc90000fe7ff0 in rsync:1157 has bad value (null) unwind stack type:0 next_sp: (null) mask:2 graph_idx:0 ffffc90000fe7f98: ffffc90000fe7ff0 (0xffffc90000fe7ff0) ffffc90000fe7fa0: ffffffffb7000f56 (trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c) ffffc90000fe7fa8: 0000000000000246 (0x246) ffffc90000fe7fb0: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc90000fe7fc0: 00007ffe3af639bc (0x7ffe3af639bc) ffffc90000fe7fc8: 0000000000000006 (0x6) ffffc90000fe7fd0: 00007f80af433fc5 (0x7f80af433fc5) ffffc90000fe7fd8: 00007ffe3af638e0 (0x7ffe3af638e0) ffffc90000fe7fe0: 00007ffe3af638e0 (0x7ffe3af638e0) ffffc90000fe7fe8: 00007ffe3af63970 (0x7ffe3af63970) ffffc90000fe7ff0: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc90000fe7ff8: ffffffffb7b74b9a (entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x17/0x4f) This warning can happen when unwinding a code path where an interrupt occurred in x86 entry code before it set up the first stack frame. Silently ignore any warnings for this case. Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/dbd6838826466a60dc23a52098185bc973ce2f1e.1492020577.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-04-13 01:47:12 +07:00
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <asm/sections.h>
x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations The x86 stack dump code is a bit of a mess. dump_trace() uses callbacks, and each user of it seems to have slightly different requirements, so there are several slightly different callbacks floating around. Also there are some upcoming features which will need more changes to the stack dump code, including the printing of stack pt_regs, reliable stack detection for live patching, and a DWARF unwinder. Each of those features would at least need more callbacks and/or callback interfaces, resulting in a much bigger mess than what we have today. Before doing all that, we should try to clean things up and replace dump_trace() with something cleaner and more flexible. The new unwinder is a simple state machine which was heavily inspired by a suggestion from Andy Lutomirski: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUbNTqaM2LRyXGRx=kVLRPeY5A3Pc6k4TtQxF320rUT=w@mail.gmail.com It's also similar to the libunwind API: http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html Some if its advantages: - Simplicity: no more callback sprawl and less code duplication. - Flexibility: it allows the caller to stop and inspect the stack state at each step in the unwinding process. - Modularity: the unwinder code, console stack dump code, and stack metadata analysis code are all better separated so that changing one of them shouldn't have much of an impact on any of the others. Two implementations are added which conform to the new unwind interface: - The frame pointer unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. - The "guess" unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. This isn't an "unwinder" per se. All it does is scan the stack for kernel text addresses. But with no frame pointers, guesses are better than nothing in most cases. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6dc2f909c47533d213d0505f0a113e64585bec82.1474045023.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-17 02:18:12 +07:00
#include <asm/ptrace.h>
#include <asm/bitops.h>
#include <asm/stacktrace.h>
#include <asm/unwind.h>
#define FRAME_HEADER_SIZE (sizeof(long) * 2)
unsigned long unwind_get_return_address(struct unwind_state *state)
{
if (unwind_done(state))
return 0;
return __kernel_text_address(state->ip) ? state->ip : 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unwind_get_return_address);
unsigned long *unwind_get_return_address_ptr(struct unwind_state *state)
{
if (unwind_done(state))
return NULL;
return state->regs ? &state->regs->ip : state->bp + 1;
}
x86/unwind: Disable KASAN checks for non-current tasks There are a handful of callers to save_stack_trace_tsk() and show_stack() which try to unwind the stack of a task other than current. In such cases, it's remotely possible that the task is running on one CPU while the unwinder is reading its stack from another CPU, causing the unwinder to see stack corruption. These cases seem to be mostly harmless. The unwinder has checks which prevent it from following bad pointers beyond the bounds of the stack. So it's not really a bug as long as the caller understands that unwinding another task will not always succeed. In such cases, it's possible that the unwinder may read a KASAN-poisoned region of the stack. Account for that by using READ_ONCE_NOCHECK() when reading the stack of another task. Use READ_ONCE() when reading the stack of the current task, since KASAN warnings can still be useful for finding bugs in that case. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4c575eb288ba9f73d498dfe0acde2f58674598f1.1483978430.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-01-10 01:00:23 +07:00
static void unwind_dump(struct unwind_state *state)
{
static bool dumped_before = false;
bool prev_zero, zero = false;
unsigned long word, *sp;
struct stack_info stack_info = {0};
unsigned long visit_mask = 0;
if (dumped_before)
return;
dumped_before = true;
printk_deferred("unwind stack type:%d next_sp:%p mask:0x%lx graph_idx:%d\n",
state->stack_info.type, state->stack_info.next_sp,
state->stack_mask, state->graph_idx);
for (sp = PTR_ALIGN(state->orig_sp, sizeof(long)); sp;
sp = PTR_ALIGN(stack_info.next_sp, sizeof(long))) {
if (get_stack_info(sp, state->task, &stack_info, &visit_mask))
break;
for (; sp < stack_info.end; sp++) {
word = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*sp);
prev_zero = zero;
zero = word == 0;
if (zero) {
if (!prev_zero)
printk_deferred("%p: %0*x ...\n",
sp, BITS_PER_LONG/4, 0);
continue;
}
printk_deferred("%p: %0*lx (%pB)\n",
sp, BITS_PER_LONG/4, word, (void *)word);
}
}
}
x86/unwind: Silence entry-related warnings A few people have reported unwinder warnings like the following: WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at ffffc90000fe7ff0 in rsync:1157 has bad value (null) unwind stack type:0 next_sp: (null) mask:2 graph_idx:0 ffffc90000fe7f98: ffffc90000fe7ff0 (0xffffc90000fe7ff0) ffffc90000fe7fa0: ffffffffb7000f56 (trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c) ffffc90000fe7fa8: 0000000000000246 (0x246) ffffc90000fe7fb0: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc90000fe7fc0: 00007ffe3af639bc (0x7ffe3af639bc) ffffc90000fe7fc8: 0000000000000006 (0x6) ffffc90000fe7fd0: 00007f80af433fc5 (0x7f80af433fc5) ffffc90000fe7fd8: 00007ffe3af638e0 (0x7ffe3af638e0) ffffc90000fe7fe0: 00007ffe3af638e0 (0x7ffe3af638e0) ffffc90000fe7fe8: 00007ffe3af63970 (0x7ffe3af63970) ffffc90000fe7ff0: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc90000fe7ff8: ffffffffb7b74b9a (entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x17/0x4f) This warning can happen when unwinding a code path where an interrupt occurred in x86 entry code before it set up the first stack frame. Silently ignore any warnings for this case. Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/dbd6838826466a60dc23a52098185bc973ce2f1e.1492020577.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-04-13 01:47:12 +07:00
static bool in_entry_code(unsigned long ip)
{
char *addr = (char *)ip;
if (addr >= __entry_text_start && addr < __entry_text_end)
return true;
if (addr >= __irqentry_text_start && addr < __irqentry_text_end)
return true;
return false;
}
x86/unwind: Silence more entry-code related warnings Borislav Petkov reported the following unwinder warning: WARNING: kernel stack regs at ffffc9000024fea8 in udevadm:92 has bad 'bp' value 00007fffc4614d30 unwind stack type:0 next_sp: (null) mask:0x6 graph_idx:0 ffffc9000024fea8: 000055a6100e9b38 (0x55a6100e9b38) ffffc9000024feb0: 000055a6100e9b35 (0x55a6100e9b35) ffffc9000024feb8: 000055a6100e9f68 (0x55a6100e9f68) ffffc9000024fec0: 000055a6100e9f50 (0x55a6100e9f50) ffffc9000024fec8: 00007fffc4614d30 (0x7fffc4614d30) ffffc9000024fed0: 000055a6100eaf50 (0x55a6100eaf50) ffffc9000024fed8: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc9000024fee0: 0000000000000100 (0x100) ffffc9000024fee8: ffff8801187df488 (0xffff8801187df488) ffffc9000024fef0: 00007ffffffff000 (0x7ffffffff000) ffffc9000024fef8: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc9000024ff10: ffffc9000024fe98 (0xffffc9000024fe98) ffffc9000024ff18: 00007fffc4614d00 (0x7fffc4614d00) ffffc9000024ff20: ffffffffffffff10 (0xffffffffffffff10) ffffc9000024ff28: ffffffff811c6c1f (SyS_newlstat+0xf/0x10) ffffc9000024ff30: 0000000000000010 (0x10) ffffc9000024ff38: 0000000000000296 (0x296) ffffc9000024ff40: ffffc9000024ff50 (0xffffc9000024ff50) ffffc9000024ff48: 0000000000000018 (0x18) ffffc9000024ff50: ffffffff816b2e6a (entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8) ... It unwinded from an interrupt which came in right after entry code called into a C syscall handler, before it had a chance to set up the frame pointer, so regs->bp still had its user space value. Add a check to silence warnings in such a case, where an interrupt has occurred and regs->sp is almost at the end of the stack. Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/c695f0d0d4c2cfe6542b90e2d0520e11eb901eb5.1493171120.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-04-26 08:48:51 +07:00
static inline unsigned long *last_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
{
return (unsigned long *)task_pt_regs(state->task) - 2;
}
x86/unwind: Add end-of-stack check for ftrace handlers Dave Jones and Steven Rostedt reported unwinder warnings like the following: WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at ffff8800bda0ff30 in sshd:1090 has bad value 000055b32abf1fa8 In both cases, the unwinder was attempting to unwind from an ftrace handler into entry code. The callchain was something like: syscall entry code C function ftrace handler save_stack_trace() The problem is that the unwinder's end-of-stack logic gets confused by the way ftrace lays out the stack frame (with fentry enabled). I was able to recreate this warning with: echo call_usermodehelper_exec_async:stacktrace > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter (exit login session) I considered fixing this by changing the ftrace code to rewrite the stack to make the unwinder happy. But that seemed too intrusive after I implemented it. Instead, just add another check to the unwinder's end-of-stack logic to detect this special case. Side note: We could probably get rid of these end-of-stack checks by encoding the frame pointer for syscall entry just like we do for interrupt entry. That would be simpler, but it would also be a lot more intrusive since it would slightly affect the performance of every syscall. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/671ba22fbc0156b8f7e0cfa5ab2a795e08bc37e1.1495553739.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-05-23 22:37:30 +07:00
static bool is_last_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
{
return state->bp == last_frame(state);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
#define GCC_REALIGN_WORDS 3
#else
#define GCC_REALIGN_WORDS 1
#endif
x86/unwind: Silence more entry-code related warnings Borislav Petkov reported the following unwinder warning: WARNING: kernel stack regs at ffffc9000024fea8 in udevadm:92 has bad 'bp' value 00007fffc4614d30 unwind stack type:0 next_sp: (null) mask:0x6 graph_idx:0 ffffc9000024fea8: 000055a6100e9b38 (0x55a6100e9b38) ffffc9000024feb0: 000055a6100e9b35 (0x55a6100e9b35) ffffc9000024feb8: 000055a6100e9f68 (0x55a6100e9f68) ffffc9000024fec0: 000055a6100e9f50 (0x55a6100e9f50) ffffc9000024fec8: 00007fffc4614d30 (0x7fffc4614d30) ffffc9000024fed0: 000055a6100eaf50 (0x55a6100eaf50) ffffc9000024fed8: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc9000024fee0: 0000000000000100 (0x100) ffffc9000024fee8: ffff8801187df488 (0xffff8801187df488) ffffc9000024fef0: 00007ffffffff000 (0x7ffffffff000) ffffc9000024fef8: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc9000024ff10: ffffc9000024fe98 (0xffffc9000024fe98) ffffc9000024ff18: 00007fffc4614d00 (0x7fffc4614d00) ffffc9000024ff20: ffffffffffffff10 (0xffffffffffffff10) ffffc9000024ff28: ffffffff811c6c1f (SyS_newlstat+0xf/0x10) ffffc9000024ff30: 0000000000000010 (0x10) ffffc9000024ff38: 0000000000000296 (0x296) ffffc9000024ff40: ffffc9000024ff50 (0xffffc9000024ff50) ffffc9000024ff48: 0000000000000018 (0x18) ffffc9000024ff50: ffffffff816b2e6a (entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8) ... It unwinded from an interrupt which came in right after entry code called into a C syscall handler, before it had a chance to set up the frame pointer, so regs->bp still had its user space value. Add a check to silence warnings in such a case, where an interrupt has occurred and regs->sp is almost at the end of the stack. Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/c695f0d0d4c2cfe6542b90e2d0520e11eb901eb5.1493171120.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-04-26 08:48:51 +07:00
static inline unsigned long *last_aligned_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
{
return last_frame(state) - GCC_REALIGN_WORDS;
}
x86/unwind: Add end-of-stack check for ftrace handlers Dave Jones and Steven Rostedt reported unwinder warnings like the following: WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at ffff8800bda0ff30 in sshd:1090 has bad value 000055b32abf1fa8 In both cases, the unwinder was attempting to unwind from an ftrace handler into entry code. The callchain was something like: syscall entry code C function ftrace handler save_stack_trace() The problem is that the unwinder's end-of-stack logic gets confused by the way ftrace lays out the stack frame (with fentry enabled). I was able to recreate this warning with: echo call_usermodehelper_exec_async:stacktrace > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter (exit login session) I considered fixing this by changing the ftrace code to rewrite the stack to make the unwinder happy. But that seemed too intrusive after I implemented it. Instead, just add another check to the unwinder's end-of-stack logic to detect this special case. Side note: We could probably get rid of these end-of-stack checks by encoding the frame pointer for syscall entry just like we do for interrupt entry. That would be simpler, but it would also be a lot more intrusive since it would slightly affect the performance of every syscall. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/671ba22fbc0156b8f7e0cfa5ab2a795e08bc37e1.1495553739.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-05-23 22:37:30 +07:00
static bool is_last_aligned_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
{
x86/unwind: Silence more entry-code related warnings Borislav Petkov reported the following unwinder warning: WARNING: kernel stack regs at ffffc9000024fea8 in udevadm:92 has bad 'bp' value 00007fffc4614d30 unwind stack type:0 next_sp: (null) mask:0x6 graph_idx:0 ffffc9000024fea8: 000055a6100e9b38 (0x55a6100e9b38) ffffc9000024feb0: 000055a6100e9b35 (0x55a6100e9b35) ffffc9000024feb8: 000055a6100e9f68 (0x55a6100e9f68) ffffc9000024fec0: 000055a6100e9f50 (0x55a6100e9f50) ffffc9000024fec8: 00007fffc4614d30 (0x7fffc4614d30) ffffc9000024fed0: 000055a6100eaf50 (0x55a6100eaf50) ffffc9000024fed8: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc9000024fee0: 0000000000000100 (0x100) ffffc9000024fee8: ffff8801187df488 (0xffff8801187df488) ffffc9000024fef0: 00007ffffffff000 (0x7ffffffff000) ffffc9000024fef8: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc9000024ff10: ffffc9000024fe98 (0xffffc9000024fe98) ffffc9000024ff18: 00007fffc4614d00 (0x7fffc4614d00) ffffc9000024ff20: ffffffffffffff10 (0xffffffffffffff10) ffffc9000024ff28: ffffffff811c6c1f (SyS_newlstat+0xf/0x10) ffffc9000024ff30: 0000000000000010 (0x10) ffffc9000024ff38: 0000000000000296 (0x296) ffffc9000024ff40: ffffc9000024ff50 (0xffffc9000024ff50) ffffc9000024ff48: 0000000000000018 (0x18) ffffc9000024ff50: ffffffff816b2e6a (entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8) ... It unwinded from an interrupt which came in right after entry code called into a C syscall handler, before it had a chance to set up the frame pointer, so regs->bp still had its user space value. Add a check to silence warnings in such a case, where an interrupt has occurred and regs->sp is almost at the end of the stack. Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/c695f0d0d4c2cfe6542b90e2d0520e11eb901eb5.1493171120.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-04-26 08:48:51 +07:00
unsigned long *last_bp = last_frame(state);
unsigned long *aligned_bp = last_aligned_frame(state);
/*
x86/unwind: Add end-of-stack check for ftrace handlers Dave Jones and Steven Rostedt reported unwinder warnings like the following: WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at ffff8800bda0ff30 in sshd:1090 has bad value 000055b32abf1fa8 In both cases, the unwinder was attempting to unwind from an ftrace handler into entry code. The callchain was something like: syscall entry code C function ftrace handler save_stack_trace() The problem is that the unwinder's end-of-stack logic gets confused by the way ftrace lays out the stack frame (with fentry enabled). I was able to recreate this warning with: echo call_usermodehelper_exec_async:stacktrace > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter (exit login session) I considered fixing this by changing the ftrace code to rewrite the stack to make the unwinder happy. But that seemed too intrusive after I implemented it. Instead, just add another check to the unwinder's end-of-stack logic to detect this special case. Side note: We could probably get rid of these end-of-stack checks by encoding the frame pointer for syscall entry just like we do for interrupt entry. That would be simpler, but it would also be a lot more intrusive since it would slightly affect the performance of every syscall. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/671ba22fbc0156b8f7e0cfa5ab2a795e08bc37e1.1495553739.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-05-23 22:37:30 +07:00
* GCC can occasionally decide to realign the stack pointer and change
* the offset of the stack frame in the prologue of a function called
* by head/entry code. Examples:
*
* <start_secondary>:
* push %edi
* lea 0x8(%esp),%edi
* and $0xfffffff8,%esp
* pushl -0x4(%edi)
* push %ebp
* mov %esp,%ebp
*
* <x86_64_start_kernel>:
* lea 0x8(%rsp),%r10
* and $0xfffffffffffffff0,%rsp
* pushq -0x8(%r10)
* push %rbp
* mov %rsp,%rbp
*
x86/unwind: Add end-of-stack check for ftrace handlers Dave Jones and Steven Rostedt reported unwinder warnings like the following: WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at ffff8800bda0ff30 in sshd:1090 has bad value 000055b32abf1fa8 In both cases, the unwinder was attempting to unwind from an ftrace handler into entry code. The callchain was something like: syscall entry code C function ftrace handler save_stack_trace() The problem is that the unwinder's end-of-stack logic gets confused by the way ftrace lays out the stack frame (with fentry enabled). I was able to recreate this warning with: echo call_usermodehelper_exec_async:stacktrace > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter (exit login session) I considered fixing this by changing the ftrace code to rewrite the stack to make the unwinder happy. But that seemed too intrusive after I implemented it. Instead, just add another check to the unwinder's end-of-stack logic to detect this special case. Side note: We could probably get rid of these end-of-stack checks by encoding the frame pointer for syscall entry just like we do for interrupt entry. That would be simpler, but it would also be a lot more intrusive since it would slightly affect the performance of every syscall. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/671ba22fbc0156b8f7e0cfa5ab2a795e08bc37e1.1495553739.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-05-23 22:37:30 +07:00
* After aligning the stack, it pushes a duplicate copy of the return
* address before pushing the frame pointer.
*/
return (state->bp == aligned_bp && *(aligned_bp + 1) == *(last_bp + 1));
}
static bool is_last_ftrace_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
{
unsigned long *last_bp = last_frame(state);
unsigned long *last_ftrace_bp = last_bp - 3;
/*
* When unwinding from an ftrace handler of a function called by entry
* code, the stack layout of the last frame is:
*
* bp
* parent ret addr
* bp
* function ret addr
* parent ret addr
* pt_regs
* -----------------
*/
x86/unwind: Add end-of-stack check for ftrace handlers Dave Jones and Steven Rostedt reported unwinder warnings like the following: WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at ffff8800bda0ff30 in sshd:1090 has bad value 000055b32abf1fa8 In both cases, the unwinder was attempting to unwind from an ftrace handler into entry code. The callchain was something like: syscall entry code C function ftrace handler save_stack_trace() The problem is that the unwinder's end-of-stack logic gets confused by the way ftrace lays out the stack frame (with fentry enabled). I was able to recreate this warning with: echo call_usermodehelper_exec_async:stacktrace > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter (exit login session) I considered fixing this by changing the ftrace code to rewrite the stack to make the unwinder happy. But that seemed too intrusive after I implemented it. Instead, just add another check to the unwinder's end-of-stack logic to detect this special case. Side note: We could probably get rid of these end-of-stack checks by encoding the frame pointer for syscall entry just like we do for interrupt entry. That would be simpler, but it would also be a lot more intrusive since it would slightly affect the performance of every syscall. Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/671ba22fbc0156b8f7e0cfa5ab2a795e08bc37e1.1495553739.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-05-23 22:37:30 +07:00
return (state->bp == last_ftrace_bp &&
*state->bp == *(state->bp + 2) &&
*(state->bp + 1) == *(state->bp + 4));
}
static bool is_last_task_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
{
return is_last_frame(state) || is_last_aligned_frame(state) ||
is_last_ftrace_frame(state);
}
x86/entry/unwind: Create stack frames for saved interrupt registers With frame pointers, when a task is interrupted, its stack is no longer completely reliable because the function could have been interrupted before it had a chance to save the previous frame pointer on the stack. So the caller of the interrupted function could get skipped by a stack trace. This is problematic for live patching, which needs to know whether a stack trace of a sleeping task can be relied upon. There's currently no way to detect if a sleeping task was interrupted by a page fault exception or preemption before it went to sleep. Another issue is that when dumping the stack of an interrupted task, the unwinder has no way of knowing where the saved pt_regs registers are, so it can't print them. This solves those issues by encoding the pt_regs pointer in the frame pointer on entry from an interrupt or an exception. This patch also updates the unwinder to be able to decode it, because otherwise the unwinder would be broken by this change. Note that this causes a change in the behavior of the unwinder: each instance of a pt_regs on the stack is now considered a "frame". So callers of unwind_get_return_address() will now get an occasional 'regs->ip' address that would have previously been skipped over. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8b9f84a21e39d249049e0547b559ff8da0df0988.1476973742.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-10-20 23:34:40 +07:00
/*
* This determines if the frame pointer actually contains an encoded pointer to
* pt_regs on the stack. See ENCODE_FRAME_POINTER.
*/
x86/unwind: Use MSB for frame pointer encoding on 32-bit On x86-32, Tetsuo Handa and Fengguang Wu reported unwinder warnings like: WARNING: kernel stack regs at f60bb9c8 in swapper:1 has bad 'bp' value 0ba00000 And also there were some stack dumps with a bunch of unreliable '?' symbols after an apic_timer_interrupt symbol, meaning the unwinder got confused when it tried to read the regs. The cause of those issues is that, with GCC 4.8 (and possibly older), there are cases where GCC misaligns the stack pointer in a leaf function for no apparent reason: c124a388 <acpi_rs_move_data>: c124a388: 55 push %ebp c124a389: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp c124a38b: 57 push %edi c124a38c: 56 push %esi c124a38d: 89 d6 mov %edx,%esi c124a38f: 53 push %ebx c124a390: 31 db xor %ebx,%ebx c124a392: 83 ec 03 sub $0x3,%esp ... c124a3e3: 83 c4 03 add $0x3,%esp c124a3e6: 5b pop %ebx c124a3e7: 5e pop %esi c124a3e8: 5f pop %edi c124a3e9: 5d pop %ebp c124a3ea: c3 ret If an interrupt occurs in such a function, the regs on the stack will be unaligned, which breaks the frame pointer encoding assumption. So on 32-bit, use the MSB instead of the LSB to encode the regs. This isn't an issue on 64-bit, because interrupts align the stack before writing to it. Reported-and-tested-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Reported-and-tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: LKP <lkp@01.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/279a26996a482ca716605c7dbc7f2db9d8d91e81.1507597785.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-10-10 08:20:03 +07:00
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
x86/entry/unwind: Create stack frames for saved interrupt registers With frame pointers, when a task is interrupted, its stack is no longer completely reliable because the function could have been interrupted before it had a chance to save the previous frame pointer on the stack. So the caller of the interrupted function could get skipped by a stack trace. This is problematic for live patching, which needs to know whether a stack trace of a sleeping task can be relied upon. There's currently no way to detect if a sleeping task was interrupted by a page fault exception or preemption before it went to sleep. Another issue is that when dumping the stack of an interrupted task, the unwinder has no way of knowing where the saved pt_regs registers are, so it can't print them. This solves those issues by encoding the pt_regs pointer in the frame pointer on entry from an interrupt or an exception. This patch also updates the unwinder to be able to decode it, because otherwise the unwinder would be broken by this change. Note that this causes a change in the behavior of the unwinder: each instance of a pt_regs on the stack is now considered a "frame". So callers of unwind_get_return_address() will now get an occasional 'regs->ip' address that would have previously been skipped over. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8b9f84a21e39d249049e0547b559ff8da0df0988.1476973742.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-10-20 23:34:40 +07:00
static struct pt_regs *decode_frame_pointer(unsigned long *bp)
{
unsigned long regs = (unsigned long)bp;
if (!(regs & 0x1))
return NULL;
return (struct pt_regs *)(regs & ~0x1);
}
x86/unwind: Use MSB for frame pointer encoding on 32-bit On x86-32, Tetsuo Handa and Fengguang Wu reported unwinder warnings like: WARNING: kernel stack regs at f60bb9c8 in swapper:1 has bad 'bp' value 0ba00000 And also there were some stack dumps with a bunch of unreliable '?' symbols after an apic_timer_interrupt symbol, meaning the unwinder got confused when it tried to read the regs. The cause of those issues is that, with GCC 4.8 (and possibly older), there are cases where GCC misaligns the stack pointer in a leaf function for no apparent reason: c124a388 <acpi_rs_move_data>: c124a388: 55 push %ebp c124a389: 89 e5 mov %esp,%ebp c124a38b: 57 push %edi c124a38c: 56 push %esi c124a38d: 89 d6 mov %edx,%esi c124a38f: 53 push %ebx c124a390: 31 db xor %ebx,%ebx c124a392: 83 ec 03 sub $0x3,%esp ... c124a3e3: 83 c4 03 add $0x3,%esp c124a3e6: 5b pop %ebx c124a3e7: 5e pop %esi c124a3e8: 5f pop %edi c124a3e9: 5d pop %ebp c124a3ea: c3 ret If an interrupt occurs in such a function, the regs on the stack will be unaligned, which breaks the frame pointer encoding assumption. So on 32-bit, use the MSB instead of the LSB to encode the regs. This isn't an issue on 64-bit, because interrupts align the stack before writing to it. Reported-and-tested-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Reported-and-tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: LKP <lkp@01.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/279a26996a482ca716605c7dbc7f2db9d8d91e81.1507597785.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-10-10 08:20:03 +07:00
#else
static struct pt_regs *decode_frame_pointer(unsigned long *bp)
{
unsigned long regs = (unsigned long)bp;
if (regs & 0x80000000)
return NULL;
return (struct pt_regs *)(regs | 0x80000000);
}
#endif
x86/entry/unwind: Create stack frames for saved interrupt registers With frame pointers, when a task is interrupted, its stack is no longer completely reliable because the function could have been interrupted before it had a chance to save the previous frame pointer on the stack. So the caller of the interrupted function could get skipped by a stack trace. This is problematic for live patching, which needs to know whether a stack trace of a sleeping task can be relied upon. There's currently no way to detect if a sleeping task was interrupted by a page fault exception or preemption before it went to sleep. Another issue is that when dumping the stack of an interrupted task, the unwinder has no way of knowing where the saved pt_regs registers are, so it can't print them. This solves those issues by encoding the pt_regs pointer in the frame pointer on entry from an interrupt or an exception. This patch also updates the unwinder to be able to decode it, because otherwise the unwinder would be broken by this change. Note that this causes a change in the behavior of the unwinder: each instance of a pt_regs on the stack is now considered a "frame". So callers of unwind_get_return_address() will now get an occasional 'regs->ip' address that would have previously been skipped over. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8b9f84a21e39d249049e0547b559ff8da0df0988.1476973742.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-10-20 23:34:40 +07:00
static bool update_stack_state(struct unwind_state *state,
unsigned long *next_bp)
x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations The x86 stack dump code is a bit of a mess. dump_trace() uses callbacks, and each user of it seems to have slightly different requirements, so there are several slightly different callbacks floating around. Also there are some upcoming features which will need more changes to the stack dump code, including the printing of stack pt_regs, reliable stack detection for live patching, and a DWARF unwinder. Each of those features would at least need more callbacks and/or callback interfaces, resulting in a much bigger mess than what we have today. Before doing all that, we should try to clean things up and replace dump_trace() with something cleaner and more flexible. The new unwinder is a simple state machine which was heavily inspired by a suggestion from Andy Lutomirski: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUbNTqaM2LRyXGRx=kVLRPeY5A3Pc6k4TtQxF320rUT=w@mail.gmail.com It's also similar to the libunwind API: http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html Some if its advantages: - Simplicity: no more callback sprawl and less code duplication. - Flexibility: it allows the caller to stop and inspect the stack state at each step in the unwinding process. - Modularity: the unwinder code, console stack dump code, and stack metadata analysis code are all better separated so that changing one of them shouldn't have much of an impact on any of the others. Two implementations are added which conform to the new unwind interface: - The frame pointer unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. - The "guess" unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. This isn't an "unwinder" per se. All it does is scan the stack for kernel text addresses. But with no frame pointers, guesses are better than nothing in most cases. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6dc2f909c47533d213d0505f0a113e64585bec82.1474045023.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-17 02:18:12 +07:00
{
struct stack_info *info = &state->stack_info;
enum stack_type prev_type = info->type;
struct pt_regs *regs;
unsigned long *frame, *prev_frame_end, *addr_p, addr;
size_t len;
if (state->regs)
prev_frame_end = (void *)state->regs + sizeof(*state->regs);
else
prev_frame_end = (void *)state->bp + FRAME_HEADER_SIZE;
/* Is the next frame pointer an encoded pointer to pt_regs? */
regs = decode_frame_pointer(next_bp);
if (regs) {
frame = (unsigned long *)regs;
len = sizeof(*regs);
x86/unwind: Silence entry-related warnings A few people have reported unwinder warnings like the following: WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at ffffc90000fe7ff0 in rsync:1157 has bad value (null) unwind stack type:0 next_sp: (null) mask:2 graph_idx:0 ffffc90000fe7f98: ffffc90000fe7ff0 (0xffffc90000fe7ff0) ffffc90000fe7fa0: ffffffffb7000f56 (trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c) ffffc90000fe7fa8: 0000000000000246 (0x246) ffffc90000fe7fb0: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc90000fe7fc0: 00007ffe3af639bc (0x7ffe3af639bc) ffffc90000fe7fc8: 0000000000000006 (0x6) ffffc90000fe7fd0: 00007f80af433fc5 (0x7f80af433fc5) ffffc90000fe7fd8: 00007ffe3af638e0 (0x7ffe3af638e0) ffffc90000fe7fe0: 00007ffe3af638e0 (0x7ffe3af638e0) ffffc90000fe7fe8: 00007ffe3af63970 (0x7ffe3af63970) ffffc90000fe7ff0: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc90000fe7ff8: ffffffffb7b74b9a (entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x17/0x4f) This warning can happen when unwinding a code path where an interrupt occurred in x86 entry code before it set up the first stack frame. Silently ignore any warnings for this case. Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/dbd6838826466a60dc23a52098185bc973ce2f1e.1492020577.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-04-13 01:47:12 +07:00
state->got_irq = true;
} else {
frame = next_bp;
len = FRAME_HEADER_SIZE;
}
x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations The x86 stack dump code is a bit of a mess. dump_trace() uses callbacks, and each user of it seems to have slightly different requirements, so there are several slightly different callbacks floating around. Also there are some upcoming features which will need more changes to the stack dump code, including the printing of stack pt_regs, reliable stack detection for live patching, and a DWARF unwinder. Each of those features would at least need more callbacks and/or callback interfaces, resulting in a much bigger mess than what we have today. Before doing all that, we should try to clean things up and replace dump_trace() with something cleaner and more flexible. The new unwinder is a simple state machine which was heavily inspired by a suggestion from Andy Lutomirski: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUbNTqaM2LRyXGRx=kVLRPeY5A3Pc6k4TtQxF320rUT=w@mail.gmail.com It's also similar to the libunwind API: http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html Some if its advantages: - Simplicity: no more callback sprawl and less code duplication. - Flexibility: it allows the caller to stop and inspect the stack state at each step in the unwinding process. - Modularity: the unwinder code, console stack dump code, and stack metadata analysis code are all better separated so that changing one of them shouldn't have much of an impact on any of the others. Two implementations are added which conform to the new unwind interface: - The frame pointer unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. - The "guess" unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. This isn't an "unwinder" per se. All it does is scan the stack for kernel text addresses. But with no frame pointers, guesses are better than nothing in most cases. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6dc2f909c47533d213d0505f0a113e64585bec82.1474045023.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-17 02:18:12 +07:00
/*
* If the next bp isn't on the current stack, switch to the next one.
x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations The x86 stack dump code is a bit of a mess. dump_trace() uses callbacks, and each user of it seems to have slightly different requirements, so there are several slightly different callbacks floating around. Also there are some upcoming features which will need more changes to the stack dump code, including the printing of stack pt_regs, reliable stack detection for live patching, and a DWARF unwinder. Each of those features would at least need more callbacks and/or callback interfaces, resulting in a much bigger mess than what we have today. Before doing all that, we should try to clean things up and replace dump_trace() with something cleaner and more flexible. The new unwinder is a simple state machine which was heavily inspired by a suggestion from Andy Lutomirski: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUbNTqaM2LRyXGRx=kVLRPeY5A3Pc6k4TtQxF320rUT=w@mail.gmail.com It's also similar to the libunwind API: http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html Some if its advantages: - Simplicity: no more callback sprawl and less code duplication. - Flexibility: it allows the caller to stop and inspect the stack state at each step in the unwinding process. - Modularity: the unwinder code, console stack dump code, and stack metadata analysis code are all better separated so that changing one of them shouldn't have much of an impact on any of the others. Two implementations are added which conform to the new unwind interface: - The frame pointer unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. - The "guess" unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. This isn't an "unwinder" per se. All it does is scan the stack for kernel text addresses. But with no frame pointers, guesses are better than nothing in most cases. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6dc2f909c47533d213d0505f0a113e64585bec82.1474045023.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-17 02:18:12 +07:00
*
* We may have to traverse multiple stacks to deal with the possibility
* that info->next_sp could point to an empty stack and the next bp
* could be on a subsequent stack.
x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations The x86 stack dump code is a bit of a mess. dump_trace() uses callbacks, and each user of it seems to have slightly different requirements, so there are several slightly different callbacks floating around. Also there are some upcoming features which will need more changes to the stack dump code, including the printing of stack pt_regs, reliable stack detection for live patching, and a DWARF unwinder. Each of those features would at least need more callbacks and/or callback interfaces, resulting in a much bigger mess than what we have today. Before doing all that, we should try to clean things up and replace dump_trace() with something cleaner and more flexible. The new unwinder is a simple state machine which was heavily inspired by a suggestion from Andy Lutomirski: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUbNTqaM2LRyXGRx=kVLRPeY5A3Pc6k4TtQxF320rUT=w@mail.gmail.com It's also similar to the libunwind API: http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html Some if its advantages: - Simplicity: no more callback sprawl and less code duplication. - Flexibility: it allows the caller to stop and inspect the stack state at each step in the unwinding process. - Modularity: the unwinder code, console stack dump code, and stack metadata analysis code are all better separated so that changing one of them shouldn't have much of an impact on any of the others. Two implementations are added which conform to the new unwind interface: - The frame pointer unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. - The "guess" unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. This isn't an "unwinder" per se. All it does is scan the stack for kernel text addresses. But with no frame pointers, guesses are better than nothing in most cases. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6dc2f909c47533d213d0505f0a113e64585bec82.1474045023.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-17 02:18:12 +07:00
*/
while (!on_stack(info, frame, len))
x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations The x86 stack dump code is a bit of a mess. dump_trace() uses callbacks, and each user of it seems to have slightly different requirements, so there are several slightly different callbacks floating around. Also there are some upcoming features which will need more changes to the stack dump code, including the printing of stack pt_regs, reliable stack detection for live patching, and a DWARF unwinder. Each of those features would at least need more callbacks and/or callback interfaces, resulting in a much bigger mess than what we have today. Before doing all that, we should try to clean things up and replace dump_trace() with something cleaner and more flexible. The new unwinder is a simple state machine which was heavily inspired by a suggestion from Andy Lutomirski: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUbNTqaM2LRyXGRx=kVLRPeY5A3Pc6k4TtQxF320rUT=w@mail.gmail.com It's also similar to the libunwind API: http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html Some if its advantages: - Simplicity: no more callback sprawl and less code duplication. - Flexibility: it allows the caller to stop and inspect the stack state at each step in the unwinding process. - Modularity: the unwinder code, console stack dump code, and stack metadata analysis code are all better separated so that changing one of them shouldn't have much of an impact on any of the others. Two implementations are added which conform to the new unwind interface: - The frame pointer unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. - The "guess" unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. This isn't an "unwinder" per se. All it does is scan the stack for kernel text addresses. But with no frame pointers, guesses are better than nothing in most cases. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6dc2f909c47533d213d0505f0a113e64585bec82.1474045023.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-17 02:18:12 +07:00
if (get_stack_info(info->next_sp, state->task, info,
&state->stack_mask))
return false;
/* Make sure it only unwinds up and doesn't overlap the prev frame: */
if (state->orig_sp && state->stack_info.type == prev_type &&
frame < prev_frame_end)
return false;
/* Move state to the next frame: */
if (regs) {
state->regs = regs;
state->bp = NULL;
} else {
state->bp = next_bp;
state->regs = NULL;
}
/* Save the return address: */
if (state->regs && user_mode(state->regs))
state->ip = 0;
else {
addr_p = unwind_get_return_address_ptr(state);
addr = READ_ONCE_TASK_STACK(state->task, *addr_p);
state->ip = ftrace_graph_ret_addr(state->task, &state->graph_idx,
addr, addr_p);
}
/* Save the original stack pointer for unwind_dump(): */
if (!state->orig_sp)
state->orig_sp = frame;
x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations The x86 stack dump code is a bit of a mess. dump_trace() uses callbacks, and each user of it seems to have slightly different requirements, so there are several slightly different callbacks floating around. Also there are some upcoming features which will need more changes to the stack dump code, including the printing of stack pt_regs, reliable stack detection for live patching, and a DWARF unwinder. Each of those features would at least need more callbacks and/or callback interfaces, resulting in a much bigger mess than what we have today. Before doing all that, we should try to clean things up and replace dump_trace() with something cleaner and more flexible. The new unwinder is a simple state machine which was heavily inspired by a suggestion from Andy Lutomirski: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUbNTqaM2LRyXGRx=kVLRPeY5A3Pc6k4TtQxF320rUT=w@mail.gmail.com It's also similar to the libunwind API: http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html Some if its advantages: - Simplicity: no more callback sprawl and less code duplication. - Flexibility: it allows the caller to stop and inspect the stack state at each step in the unwinding process. - Modularity: the unwinder code, console stack dump code, and stack metadata analysis code are all better separated so that changing one of them shouldn't have much of an impact on any of the others. Two implementations are added which conform to the new unwind interface: - The frame pointer unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. - The "guess" unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. This isn't an "unwinder" per se. All it does is scan the stack for kernel text addresses. But with no frame pointers, guesses are better than nothing in most cases. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6dc2f909c47533d213d0505f0a113e64585bec82.1474045023.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-17 02:18:12 +07:00
return true;
}
bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
{
x86/entry/unwind: Create stack frames for saved interrupt registers With frame pointers, when a task is interrupted, its stack is no longer completely reliable because the function could have been interrupted before it had a chance to save the previous frame pointer on the stack. So the caller of the interrupted function could get skipped by a stack trace. This is problematic for live patching, which needs to know whether a stack trace of a sleeping task can be relied upon. There's currently no way to detect if a sleeping task was interrupted by a page fault exception or preemption before it went to sleep. Another issue is that when dumping the stack of an interrupted task, the unwinder has no way of knowing where the saved pt_regs registers are, so it can't print them. This solves those issues by encoding the pt_regs pointer in the frame pointer on entry from an interrupt or an exception. This patch also updates the unwinder to be able to decode it, because otherwise the unwinder would be broken by this change. Note that this causes a change in the behavior of the unwinder: each instance of a pt_regs on the stack is now considered a "frame". So callers of unwind_get_return_address() will now get an occasional 'regs->ip' address that would have previously been skipped over. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8b9f84a21e39d249049e0547b559ff8da0df0988.1476973742.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-10-20 23:34:40 +07:00
struct pt_regs *regs;
unsigned long *next_bp;
x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations The x86 stack dump code is a bit of a mess. dump_trace() uses callbacks, and each user of it seems to have slightly different requirements, so there are several slightly different callbacks floating around. Also there are some upcoming features which will need more changes to the stack dump code, including the printing of stack pt_regs, reliable stack detection for live patching, and a DWARF unwinder. Each of those features would at least need more callbacks and/or callback interfaces, resulting in a much bigger mess than what we have today. Before doing all that, we should try to clean things up and replace dump_trace() with something cleaner and more flexible. The new unwinder is a simple state machine which was heavily inspired by a suggestion from Andy Lutomirski: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUbNTqaM2LRyXGRx=kVLRPeY5A3Pc6k4TtQxF320rUT=w@mail.gmail.com It's also similar to the libunwind API: http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html Some if its advantages: - Simplicity: no more callback sprawl and less code duplication. - Flexibility: it allows the caller to stop and inspect the stack state at each step in the unwinding process. - Modularity: the unwinder code, console stack dump code, and stack metadata analysis code are all better separated so that changing one of them shouldn't have much of an impact on any of the others. Two implementations are added which conform to the new unwind interface: - The frame pointer unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. - The "guess" unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. This isn't an "unwinder" per se. All it does is scan the stack for kernel text addresses. But with no frame pointers, guesses are better than nothing in most cases. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6dc2f909c47533d213d0505f0a113e64585bec82.1474045023.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-17 02:18:12 +07:00
if (unwind_done(state))
return false;
/* Have we reached the end? */
x86/entry/unwind: Create stack frames for saved interrupt registers With frame pointers, when a task is interrupted, its stack is no longer completely reliable because the function could have been interrupted before it had a chance to save the previous frame pointer on the stack. So the caller of the interrupted function could get skipped by a stack trace. This is problematic for live patching, which needs to know whether a stack trace of a sleeping task can be relied upon. There's currently no way to detect if a sleeping task was interrupted by a page fault exception or preemption before it went to sleep. Another issue is that when dumping the stack of an interrupted task, the unwinder has no way of knowing where the saved pt_regs registers are, so it can't print them. This solves those issues by encoding the pt_regs pointer in the frame pointer on entry from an interrupt or an exception. This patch also updates the unwinder to be able to decode it, because otherwise the unwinder would be broken by this change. Note that this causes a change in the behavior of the unwinder: each instance of a pt_regs on the stack is now considered a "frame". So callers of unwind_get_return_address() will now get an occasional 'regs->ip' address that would have previously been skipped over. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8b9f84a21e39d249049e0547b559ff8da0df0988.1476973742.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-10-20 23:34:40 +07:00
if (state->regs && user_mode(state->regs))
goto the_end;
if (is_last_task_frame(state)) {
regs = task_pt_regs(state->task);
/*
* kthreads (other than the boot CPU's idle thread) have some
* partial regs at the end of their stack which were placed
* there by copy_thread_tls(). But the regs don't have any
* useful information, so we can skip them.
*
* This user_mode() check is slightly broader than a PF_KTHREAD
* check because it also catches the awkward situation where a
* newly forked kthread transitions into a user task by calling
* do_execve(), which eventually clears PF_KTHREAD.
*/
if (!user_mode(regs))
goto the_end;
/*
* We're almost at the end, but not quite: there's still the
* syscall regs frame. Entry code doesn't encode the regs
* pointer for syscalls, so we have to set it manually.
*/
state->regs = regs;
state->bp = NULL;
state->ip = 0;
return true;
}
/* Get the next frame pointer: */
x86/unwind: Handle NULL pointer calls better in frame unwinder When the frame unwinder is invoked for an oops caused by a call to NULL, it currently skips the parent function because BP still points to the parent's stack frame; the (nonexistent) current function only has the first half of a stack frame, and BP doesn't point to it yet. Add a special case for IP==0 that calculates a fake BP from SP, then uses the real BP for the next frame. Note that this handles first_frame specially: Return information about the parent function as long as the saved IP is >=first_frame, even if the fake BP points below it. With an artificially-added NULL call in prctl_set_seccomp(), before this patch, the trace is: Call Trace: ? prctl_set_seccomp+0x3a/0x50 __x64_sys_prctl+0x457/0x6f0 ? __ia32_sys_prctl+0x750/0x750 do_syscall_64+0x72/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 After this patch, the trace is: Call Trace: prctl_set_seccomp+0x3a/0x50 __x64_sys_prctl+0x457/0x6f0 ? __ia32_sys_prctl+0x750/0x750 do_syscall_64+0x72/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: syzbot <syzbot+ca95b2b7aef9e7cbd6ab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net> Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190301031201.7416-1-jannh@google.com
2019-03-01 10:12:00 +07:00
if (state->next_bp) {
next_bp = state->next_bp;
state->next_bp = NULL;
} else if (state->regs) {
x86/entry/unwind: Create stack frames for saved interrupt registers With frame pointers, when a task is interrupted, its stack is no longer completely reliable because the function could have been interrupted before it had a chance to save the previous frame pointer on the stack. So the caller of the interrupted function could get skipped by a stack trace. This is problematic for live patching, which needs to know whether a stack trace of a sleeping task can be relied upon. There's currently no way to detect if a sleeping task was interrupted by a page fault exception or preemption before it went to sleep. Another issue is that when dumping the stack of an interrupted task, the unwinder has no way of knowing where the saved pt_regs registers are, so it can't print them. This solves those issues by encoding the pt_regs pointer in the frame pointer on entry from an interrupt or an exception. This patch also updates the unwinder to be able to decode it, because otherwise the unwinder would be broken by this change. Note that this causes a change in the behavior of the unwinder: each instance of a pt_regs on the stack is now considered a "frame". So callers of unwind_get_return_address() will now get an occasional 'regs->ip' address that would have previously been skipped over. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8b9f84a21e39d249049e0547b559ff8da0df0988.1476973742.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-10-20 23:34:40 +07:00
next_bp = (unsigned long *)state->regs->bp;
x86/unwind: Handle NULL pointer calls better in frame unwinder When the frame unwinder is invoked for an oops caused by a call to NULL, it currently skips the parent function because BP still points to the parent's stack frame; the (nonexistent) current function only has the first half of a stack frame, and BP doesn't point to it yet. Add a special case for IP==0 that calculates a fake BP from SP, then uses the real BP for the next frame. Note that this handles first_frame specially: Return information about the parent function as long as the saved IP is >=first_frame, even if the fake BP points below it. With an artificially-added NULL call in prctl_set_seccomp(), before this patch, the trace is: Call Trace: ? prctl_set_seccomp+0x3a/0x50 __x64_sys_prctl+0x457/0x6f0 ? __ia32_sys_prctl+0x750/0x750 do_syscall_64+0x72/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 After this patch, the trace is: Call Trace: prctl_set_seccomp+0x3a/0x50 __x64_sys_prctl+0x457/0x6f0 ? __ia32_sys_prctl+0x750/0x750 do_syscall_64+0x72/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: syzbot <syzbot+ca95b2b7aef9e7cbd6ab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net> Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190301031201.7416-1-jannh@google.com
2019-03-01 10:12:00 +07:00
} else {
next_bp = (unsigned long *)READ_ONCE_TASK_STACK(state->task, *state->bp);
x86/unwind: Handle NULL pointer calls better in frame unwinder When the frame unwinder is invoked for an oops caused by a call to NULL, it currently skips the parent function because BP still points to the parent's stack frame; the (nonexistent) current function only has the first half of a stack frame, and BP doesn't point to it yet. Add a special case for IP==0 that calculates a fake BP from SP, then uses the real BP for the next frame. Note that this handles first_frame specially: Return information about the parent function as long as the saved IP is >=first_frame, even if the fake BP points below it. With an artificially-added NULL call in prctl_set_seccomp(), before this patch, the trace is: Call Trace: ? prctl_set_seccomp+0x3a/0x50 __x64_sys_prctl+0x457/0x6f0 ? __ia32_sys_prctl+0x750/0x750 do_syscall_64+0x72/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 After this patch, the trace is: Call Trace: prctl_set_seccomp+0x3a/0x50 __x64_sys_prctl+0x457/0x6f0 ? __ia32_sys_prctl+0x750/0x750 do_syscall_64+0x72/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: syzbot <syzbot+ca95b2b7aef9e7cbd6ab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net> Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190301031201.7416-1-jannh@google.com
2019-03-01 10:12:00 +07:00
}
x86/entry/unwind: Create stack frames for saved interrupt registers With frame pointers, when a task is interrupted, its stack is no longer completely reliable because the function could have been interrupted before it had a chance to save the previous frame pointer on the stack. So the caller of the interrupted function could get skipped by a stack trace. This is problematic for live patching, which needs to know whether a stack trace of a sleeping task can be relied upon. There's currently no way to detect if a sleeping task was interrupted by a page fault exception or preemption before it went to sleep. Another issue is that when dumping the stack of an interrupted task, the unwinder has no way of knowing where the saved pt_regs registers are, so it can't print them. This solves those issues by encoding the pt_regs pointer in the frame pointer on entry from an interrupt or an exception. This patch also updates the unwinder to be able to decode it, because otherwise the unwinder would be broken by this change. Note that this causes a change in the behavior of the unwinder: each instance of a pt_regs on the stack is now considered a "frame". So callers of unwind_get_return_address() will now get an occasional 'regs->ip' address that would have previously been skipped over. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8b9f84a21e39d249049e0547b559ff8da0df0988.1476973742.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-10-20 23:34:40 +07:00
/* Move to the next frame if it's safe: */
x86/unwind: Silence entry-related warnings A few people have reported unwinder warnings like the following: WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at ffffc90000fe7ff0 in rsync:1157 has bad value (null) unwind stack type:0 next_sp: (null) mask:2 graph_idx:0 ffffc90000fe7f98: ffffc90000fe7ff0 (0xffffc90000fe7ff0) ffffc90000fe7fa0: ffffffffb7000f56 (trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c) ffffc90000fe7fa8: 0000000000000246 (0x246) ffffc90000fe7fb0: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc90000fe7fc0: 00007ffe3af639bc (0x7ffe3af639bc) ffffc90000fe7fc8: 0000000000000006 (0x6) ffffc90000fe7fd0: 00007f80af433fc5 (0x7f80af433fc5) ffffc90000fe7fd8: 00007ffe3af638e0 (0x7ffe3af638e0) ffffc90000fe7fe0: 00007ffe3af638e0 (0x7ffe3af638e0) ffffc90000fe7fe8: 00007ffe3af63970 (0x7ffe3af63970) ffffc90000fe7ff0: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc90000fe7ff8: ffffffffb7b74b9a (entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x17/0x4f) This warning can happen when unwinding a code path where an interrupt occurred in x86 entry code before it set up the first stack frame. Silently ignore any warnings for this case. Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/dbd6838826466a60dc23a52098185bc973ce2f1e.1492020577.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-04-13 01:47:12 +07:00
if (!update_stack_state(state, next_bp))
goto bad_address;
x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations The x86 stack dump code is a bit of a mess. dump_trace() uses callbacks, and each user of it seems to have slightly different requirements, so there are several slightly different callbacks floating around. Also there are some upcoming features which will need more changes to the stack dump code, including the printing of stack pt_regs, reliable stack detection for live patching, and a DWARF unwinder. Each of those features would at least need more callbacks and/or callback interfaces, resulting in a much bigger mess than what we have today. Before doing all that, we should try to clean things up and replace dump_trace() with something cleaner and more flexible. The new unwinder is a simple state machine which was heavily inspired by a suggestion from Andy Lutomirski: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUbNTqaM2LRyXGRx=kVLRPeY5A3Pc6k4TtQxF320rUT=w@mail.gmail.com It's also similar to the libunwind API: http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html Some if its advantages: - Simplicity: no more callback sprawl and less code duplication. - Flexibility: it allows the caller to stop and inspect the stack state at each step in the unwinding process. - Modularity: the unwinder code, console stack dump code, and stack metadata analysis code are all better separated so that changing one of them shouldn't have much of an impact on any of the others. Two implementations are added which conform to the new unwind interface: - The frame pointer unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. - The "guess" unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. This isn't an "unwinder" per se. All it does is scan the stack for kernel text addresses. But with no frame pointers, guesses are better than nothing in most cases. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6dc2f909c47533d213d0505f0a113e64585bec82.1474045023.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-17 02:18:12 +07:00
return true;
x86/entry/unwind: Create stack frames for saved interrupt registers With frame pointers, when a task is interrupted, its stack is no longer completely reliable because the function could have been interrupted before it had a chance to save the previous frame pointer on the stack. So the caller of the interrupted function could get skipped by a stack trace. This is problematic for live patching, which needs to know whether a stack trace of a sleeping task can be relied upon. There's currently no way to detect if a sleeping task was interrupted by a page fault exception or preemption before it went to sleep. Another issue is that when dumping the stack of an interrupted task, the unwinder has no way of knowing where the saved pt_regs registers are, so it can't print them. This solves those issues by encoding the pt_regs pointer in the frame pointer on entry from an interrupt or an exception. This patch also updates the unwinder to be able to decode it, because otherwise the unwinder would be broken by this change. Note that this causes a change in the behavior of the unwinder: each instance of a pt_regs on the stack is now considered a "frame". So callers of unwind_get_return_address() will now get an occasional 'regs->ip' address that would have previously been skipped over. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8b9f84a21e39d249049e0547b559ff8da0df0988.1476973742.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-10-20 23:34:40 +07:00
bad_address:
stacktrace/x86: add function for detecting reliable stack traces For live patching and possibly other use cases, a stack trace is only useful if it can be assured that it's completely reliable. Add a new save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable() function to achieve that. Note that if the target task isn't the current task, and the target task is allowed to run, then it could be writing the stack while the unwinder is reading it, resulting in possible corruption. So the caller of save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable() must ensure that the task is either 'current' or inactive. save_stack_trace_tsk_reliable() relies on the x86 unwinder's detection of pt_regs on the stack. If the pt_regs are not user-mode registers from a syscall, then they indicate an in-kernel interrupt or exception (e.g. preemption or a page fault), in which case the stack is considered unreliable due to the nature of frame pointers. It also relies on the x86 unwinder's detection of other issues, such as: - corrupted stack data - stack grows the wrong way - stack walk doesn't reach the bottom - user didn't provide a large enough entries array Such issues are reported by checking unwind_error() and !unwind_done(). Also add CONFIG_HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE so arch-independent code can determine at build time whether the function is implemented. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> # for the x86 changes Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2017-02-14 08:42:28 +07:00
state->error = true;
/*
* When unwinding a non-current task, the task might actually be
* running on another CPU, in which case it could be modifying its
* stack while we're reading it. This is generally not a problem and
* can be ignored as long as the caller understands that unwinding
* another task will not always succeed.
*/
if (state->task != current)
goto the_end;
x86/unwind: Silence entry-related warnings A few people have reported unwinder warnings like the following: WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at ffffc90000fe7ff0 in rsync:1157 has bad value (null) unwind stack type:0 next_sp: (null) mask:2 graph_idx:0 ffffc90000fe7f98: ffffc90000fe7ff0 (0xffffc90000fe7ff0) ffffc90000fe7fa0: ffffffffb7000f56 (trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c) ffffc90000fe7fa8: 0000000000000246 (0x246) ffffc90000fe7fb0: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc90000fe7fc0: 00007ffe3af639bc (0x7ffe3af639bc) ffffc90000fe7fc8: 0000000000000006 (0x6) ffffc90000fe7fd0: 00007f80af433fc5 (0x7f80af433fc5) ffffc90000fe7fd8: 00007ffe3af638e0 (0x7ffe3af638e0) ffffc90000fe7fe0: 00007ffe3af638e0 (0x7ffe3af638e0) ffffc90000fe7fe8: 00007ffe3af63970 (0x7ffe3af63970) ffffc90000fe7ff0: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc90000fe7ff8: ffffffffb7b74b9a (entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x17/0x4f) This warning can happen when unwinding a code path where an interrupt occurred in x86 entry code before it set up the first stack frame. Silently ignore any warnings for this case. Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/dbd6838826466a60dc23a52098185bc973ce2f1e.1492020577.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-04-13 01:47:12 +07:00
/*
* Don't warn if the unwinder got lost due to an interrupt in entry
x86/unwind: Silence more entry-code related warnings Borislav Petkov reported the following unwinder warning: WARNING: kernel stack regs at ffffc9000024fea8 in udevadm:92 has bad 'bp' value 00007fffc4614d30 unwind stack type:0 next_sp: (null) mask:0x6 graph_idx:0 ffffc9000024fea8: 000055a6100e9b38 (0x55a6100e9b38) ffffc9000024feb0: 000055a6100e9b35 (0x55a6100e9b35) ffffc9000024feb8: 000055a6100e9f68 (0x55a6100e9f68) ffffc9000024fec0: 000055a6100e9f50 (0x55a6100e9f50) ffffc9000024fec8: 00007fffc4614d30 (0x7fffc4614d30) ffffc9000024fed0: 000055a6100eaf50 (0x55a6100eaf50) ffffc9000024fed8: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc9000024fee0: 0000000000000100 (0x100) ffffc9000024fee8: ffff8801187df488 (0xffff8801187df488) ffffc9000024fef0: 00007ffffffff000 (0x7ffffffff000) ffffc9000024fef8: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc9000024ff10: ffffc9000024fe98 (0xffffc9000024fe98) ffffc9000024ff18: 00007fffc4614d00 (0x7fffc4614d00) ffffc9000024ff20: ffffffffffffff10 (0xffffffffffffff10) ffffc9000024ff28: ffffffff811c6c1f (SyS_newlstat+0xf/0x10) ffffc9000024ff30: 0000000000000010 (0x10) ffffc9000024ff38: 0000000000000296 (0x296) ffffc9000024ff40: ffffc9000024ff50 (0xffffc9000024ff50) ffffc9000024ff48: 0000000000000018 (0x18) ffffc9000024ff50: ffffffff816b2e6a (entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8) ... It unwinded from an interrupt which came in right after entry code called into a C syscall handler, before it had a chance to set up the frame pointer, so regs->bp still had its user space value. Add a check to silence warnings in such a case, where an interrupt has occurred and regs->sp is almost at the end of the stack. Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/c695f0d0d4c2cfe6542b90e2d0520e11eb901eb5.1493171120.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-04-26 08:48:51 +07:00
* code or in the C handler before the first frame pointer got set up:
x86/unwind: Silence entry-related warnings A few people have reported unwinder warnings like the following: WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at ffffc90000fe7ff0 in rsync:1157 has bad value (null) unwind stack type:0 next_sp: (null) mask:2 graph_idx:0 ffffc90000fe7f98: ffffc90000fe7ff0 (0xffffc90000fe7ff0) ffffc90000fe7fa0: ffffffffb7000f56 (trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c) ffffc90000fe7fa8: 0000000000000246 (0x246) ffffc90000fe7fb0: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc90000fe7fc0: 00007ffe3af639bc (0x7ffe3af639bc) ffffc90000fe7fc8: 0000000000000006 (0x6) ffffc90000fe7fd0: 00007f80af433fc5 (0x7f80af433fc5) ffffc90000fe7fd8: 00007ffe3af638e0 (0x7ffe3af638e0) ffffc90000fe7fe0: 00007ffe3af638e0 (0x7ffe3af638e0) ffffc90000fe7fe8: 00007ffe3af63970 (0x7ffe3af63970) ffffc90000fe7ff0: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc90000fe7ff8: ffffffffb7b74b9a (entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x17/0x4f) This warning can happen when unwinding a code path where an interrupt occurred in x86 entry code before it set up the first stack frame. Silently ignore any warnings for this case. Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/dbd6838826466a60dc23a52098185bc973ce2f1e.1492020577.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-04-13 01:47:12 +07:00
*/
if (state->got_irq && in_entry_code(state->ip))
goto the_end;
x86/unwind: Silence more entry-code related warnings Borislav Petkov reported the following unwinder warning: WARNING: kernel stack regs at ffffc9000024fea8 in udevadm:92 has bad 'bp' value 00007fffc4614d30 unwind stack type:0 next_sp: (null) mask:0x6 graph_idx:0 ffffc9000024fea8: 000055a6100e9b38 (0x55a6100e9b38) ffffc9000024feb0: 000055a6100e9b35 (0x55a6100e9b35) ffffc9000024feb8: 000055a6100e9f68 (0x55a6100e9f68) ffffc9000024fec0: 000055a6100e9f50 (0x55a6100e9f50) ffffc9000024fec8: 00007fffc4614d30 (0x7fffc4614d30) ffffc9000024fed0: 000055a6100eaf50 (0x55a6100eaf50) ffffc9000024fed8: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc9000024fee0: 0000000000000100 (0x100) ffffc9000024fee8: ffff8801187df488 (0xffff8801187df488) ffffc9000024fef0: 00007ffffffff000 (0x7ffffffff000) ffffc9000024fef8: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc9000024ff10: ffffc9000024fe98 (0xffffc9000024fe98) ffffc9000024ff18: 00007fffc4614d00 (0x7fffc4614d00) ffffc9000024ff20: ffffffffffffff10 (0xffffffffffffff10) ffffc9000024ff28: ffffffff811c6c1f (SyS_newlstat+0xf/0x10) ffffc9000024ff30: 0000000000000010 (0x10) ffffc9000024ff38: 0000000000000296 (0x296) ffffc9000024ff40: ffffc9000024ff50 (0xffffc9000024ff50) ffffc9000024ff48: 0000000000000018 (0x18) ffffc9000024ff50: ffffffff816b2e6a (entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8) ... It unwinded from an interrupt which came in right after entry code called into a C syscall handler, before it had a chance to set up the frame pointer, so regs->bp still had its user space value. Add a check to silence warnings in such a case, where an interrupt has occurred and regs->sp is almost at the end of the stack. Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/c695f0d0d4c2cfe6542b90e2d0520e11eb901eb5.1493171120.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-04-26 08:48:51 +07:00
if (state->regs &&
state->regs->sp >= (unsigned long)last_aligned_frame(state) &&
state->regs->sp < (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(state->task))
goto the_end;
x86/unwind: Silence entry-related warnings A few people have reported unwinder warnings like the following: WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at ffffc90000fe7ff0 in rsync:1157 has bad value (null) unwind stack type:0 next_sp: (null) mask:2 graph_idx:0 ffffc90000fe7f98: ffffc90000fe7ff0 (0xffffc90000fe7ff0) ffffc90000fe7fa0: ffffffffb7000f56 (trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c) ffffc90000fe7fa8: 0000000000000246 (0x246) ffffc90000fe7fb0: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc90000fe7fc0: 00007ffe3af639bc (0x7ffe3af639bc) ffffc90000fe7fc8: 0000000000000006 (0x6) ffffc90000fe7fd0: 00007f80af433fc5 (0x7f80af433fc5) ffffc90000fe7fd8: 00007ffe3af638e0 (0x7ffe3af638e0) ffffc90000fe7fe0: 00007ffe3af638e0 (0x7ffe3af638e0) ffffc90000fe7fe8: 00007ffe3af63970 (0x7ffe3af63970) ffffc90000fe7ff0: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc90000fe7ff8: ffffffffb7b74b9a (entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x17/0x4f) This warning can happen when unwinding a code path where an interrupt occurred in x86 entry code before it set up the first stack frame. Silently ignore any warnings for this case. Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/dbd6838826466a60dc23a52098185bc973ce2f1e.1492020577.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-04-13 01:47:12 +07:00
/*
* There are some known frame pointer issues on 32-bit. Disable
* unwinder warnings on 32-bit until it gets objtool support.
*/
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32))
goto the_end;
if (state->regs) {
printk_deferred_once(KERN_WARNING
"WARNING: kernel stack regs at %p in %s:%d has bad 'bp' value %p\n",
state->regs, state->task->comm,
state->task->pid, next_bp);
unwind_dump(state);
} else {
printk_deferred_once(KERN_WARNING
"WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at %p in %s:%d has bad value %p\n",
state->bp, state->task->comm,
state->task->pid, next_bp);
unwind_dump(state);
}
x86/entry/unwind: Create stack frames for saved interrupt registers With frame pointers, when a task is interrupted, its stack is no longer completely reliable because the function could have been interrupted before it had a chance to save the previous frame pointer on the stack. So the caller of the interrupted function could get skipped by a stack trace. This is problematic for live patching, which needs to know whether a stack trace of a sleeping task can be relied upon. There's currently no way to detect if a sleeping task was interrupted by a page fault exception or preemption before it went to sleep. Another issue is that when dumping the stack of an interrupted task, the unwinder has no way of knowing where the saved pt_regs registers are, so it can't print them. This solves those issues by encoding the pt_regs pointer in the frame pointer on entry from an interrupt or an exception. This patch also updates the unwinder to be able to decode it, because otherwise the unwinder would be broken by this change. Note that this causes a change in the behavior of the unwinder: each instance of a pt_regs on the stack is now considered a "frame". So callers of unwind_get_return_address() will now get an occasional 'regs->ip' address that would have previously been skipped over. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8b9f84a21e39d249049e0547b559ff8da0df0988.1476973742.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-10-20 23:34:40 +07:00
the_end:
state->stack_info.type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
return false;
x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations The x86 stack dump code is a bit of a mess. dump_trace() uses callbacks, and each user of it seems to have slightly different requirements, so there are several slightly different callbacks floating around. Also there are some upcoming features which will need more changes to the stack dump code, including the printing of stack pt_regs, reliable stack detection for live patching, and a DWARF unwinder. Each of those features would at least need more callbacks and/or callback interfaces, resulting in a much bigger mess than what we have today. Before doing all that, we should try to clean things up and replace dump_trace() with something cleaner and more flexible. The new unwinder is a simple state machine which was heavily inspired by a suggestion from Andy Lutomirski: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUbNTqaM2LRyXGRx=kVLRPeY5A3Pc6k4TtQxF320rUT=w@mail.gmail.com It's also similar to the libunwind API: http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html Some if its advantages: - Simplicity: no more callback sprawl and less code duplication. - Flexibility: it allows the caller to stop and inspect the stack state at each step in the unwinding process. - Modularity: the unwinder code, console stack dump code, and stack metadata analysis code are all better separated so that changing one of them shouldn't have much of an impact on any of the others. Two implementations are added which conform to the new unwind interface: - The frame pointer unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. - The "guess" unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. This isn't an "unwinder" per se. All it does is scan the stack for kernel text addresses. But with no frame pointers, guesses are better than nothing in most cases. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6dc2f909c47533d213d0505f0a113e64585bec82.1474045023.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-17 02:18:12 +07:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unwind_next_frame);
void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long *first_frame)
{
unsigned long *bp;
x86/entry/unwind: Create stack frames for saved interrupt registers With frame pointers, when a task is interrupted, its stack is no longer completely reliable because the function could have been interrupted before it had a chance to save the previous frame pointer on the stack. So the caller of the interrupted function could get skipped by a stack trace. This is problematic for live patching, which needs to know whether a stack trace of a sleeping task can be relied upon. There's currently no way to detect if a sleeping task was interrupted by a page fault exception or preemption before it went to sleep. Another issue is that when dumping the stack of an interrupted task, the unwinder has no way of knowing where the saved pt_regs registers are, so it can't print them. This solves those issues by encoding the pt_regs pointer in the frame pointer on entry from an interrupt or an exception. This patch also updates the unwinder to be able to decode it, because otherwise the unwinder would be broken by this change. Note that this causes a change in the behavior of the unwinder: each instance of a pt_regs on the stack is now considered a "frame". So callers of unwind_get_return_address() will now get an occasional 'regs->ip' address that would have previously been skipped over. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8b9f84a21e39d249049e0547b559ff8da0df0988.1476973742.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-10-20 23:34:40 +07:00
x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations The x86 stack dump code is a bit of a mess. dump_trace() uses callbacks, and each user of it seems to have slightly different requirements, so there are several slightly different callbacks floating around. Also there are some upcoming features which will need more changes to the stack dump code, including the printing of stack pt_regs, reliable stack detection for live patching, and a DWARF unwinder. Each of those features would at least need more callbacks and/or callback interfaces, resulting in a much bigger mess than what we have today. Before doing all that, we should try to clean things up and replace dump_trace() with something cleaner and more flexible. The new unwinder is a simple state machine which was heavily inspired by a suggestion from Andy Lutomirski: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUbNTqaM2LRyXGRx=kVLRPeY5A3Pc6k4TtQxF320rUT=w@mail.gmail.com It's also similar to the libunwind API: http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html Some if its advantages: - Simplicity: no more callback sprawl and less code duplication. - Flexibility: it allows the caller to stop and inspect the stack state at each step in the unwinding process. - Modularity: the unwinder code, console stack dump code, and stack metadata analysis code are all better separated so that changing one of them shouldn't have much of an impact on any of the others. Two implementations are added which conform to the new unwind interface: - The frame pointer unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. - The "guess" unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. This isn't an "unwinder" per se. All it does is scan the stack for kernel text addresses. But with no frame pointers, guesses are better than nothing in most cases. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6dc2f909c47533d213d0505f0a113e64585bec82.1474045023.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-17 02:18:12 +07:00
memset(state, 0, sizeof(*state));
state->task = task;
x86/unwind: Silence entry-related warnings A few people have reported unwinder warnings like the following: WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at ffffc90000fe7ff0 in rsync:1157 has bad value (null) unwind stack type:0 next_sp: (null) mask:2 graph_idx:0 ffffc90000fe7f98: ffffc90000fe7ff0 (0xffffc90000fe7ff0) ffffc90000fe7fa0: ffffffffb7000f56 (trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c) ffffc90000fe7fa8: 0000000000000246 (0x246) ffffc90000fe7fb0: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc90000fe7fc0: 00007ffe3af639bc (0x7ffe3af639bc) ffffc90000fe7fc8: 0000000000000006 (0x6) ffffc90000fe7fd0: 00007f80af433fc5 (0x7f80af433fc5) ffffc90000fe7fd8: 00007ffe3af638e0 (0x7ffe3af638e0) ffffc90000fe7fe0: 00007ffe3af638e0 (0x7ffe3af638e0) ffffc90000fe7fe8: 00007ffe3af63970 (0x7ffe3af63970) ffffc90000fe7ff0: 0000000000000000 ... ffffc90000fe7ff8: ffffffffb7b74b9a (entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x17/0x4f) This warning can happen when unwinding a code path where an interrupt occurred in x86 entry code before it set up the first stack frame. Silently ignore any warnings for this case. Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/dbd6838826466a60dc23a52098185bc973ce2f1e.1492020577.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-04-13 01:47:12 +07:00
state->got_irq = (regs);
x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations The x86 stack dump code is a bit of a mess. dump_trace() uses callbacks, and each user of it seems to have slightly different requirements, so there are several slightly different callbacks floating around. Also there are some upcoming features which will need more changes to the stack dump code, including the printing of stack pt_regs, reliable stack detection for live patching, and a DWARF unwinder. Each of those features would at least need more callbacks and/or callback interfaces, resulting in a much bigger mess than what we have today. Before doing all that, we should try to clean things up and replace dump_trace() with something cleaner and more flexible. The new unwinder is a simple state machine which was heavily inspired by a suggestion from Andy Lutomirski: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUbNTqaM2LRyXGRx=kVLRPeY5A3Pc6k4TtQxF320rUT=w@mail.gmail.com It's also similar to the libunwind API: http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html Some if its advantages: - Simplicity: no more callback sprawl and less code duplication. - Flexibility: it allows the caller to stop and inspect the stack state at each step in the unwinding process. - Modularity: the unwinder code, console stack dump code, and stack metadata analysis code are all better separated so that changing one of them shouldn't have much of an impact on any of the others. Two implementations are added which conform to the new unwind interface: - The frame pointer unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. - The "guess" unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. This isn't an "unwinder" per se. All it does is scan the stack for kernel text addresses. But with no frame pointers, guesses are better than nothing in most cases. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6dc2f909c47533d213d0505f0a113e64585bec82.1474045023.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-17 02:18:12 +07:00
/* Don't even attempt to start from user mode regs: */
x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations The x86 stack dump code is a bit of a mess. dump_trace() uses callbacks, and each user of it seems to have slightly different requirements, so there are several slightly different callbacks floating around. Also there are some upcoming features which will need more changes to the stack dump code, including the printing of stack pt_regs, reliable stack detection for live patching, and a DWARF unwinder. Each of those features would at least need more callbacks and/or callback interfaces, resulting in a much bigger mess than what we have today. Before doing all that, we should try to clean things up and replace dump_trace() with something cleaner and more flexible. The new unwinder is a simple state machine which was heavily inspired by a suggestion from Andy Lutomirski: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUbNTqaM2LRyXGRx=kVLRPeY5A3Pc6k4TtQxF320rUT=w@mail.gmail.com It's also similar to the libunwind API: http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html Some if its advantages: - Simplicity: no more callback sprawl and less code duplication. - Flexibility: it allows the caller to stop and inspect the stack state at each step in the unwinding process. - Modularity: the unwinder code, console stack dump code, and stack metadata analysis code are all better separated so that changing one of them shouldn't have much of an impact on any of the others. Two implementations are added which conform to the new unwind interface: - The frame pointer unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. - The "guess" unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. This isn't an "unwinder" per se. All it does is scan the stack for kernel text addresses. But with no frame pointers, guesses are better than nothing in most cases. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6dc2f909c47533d213d0505f0a113e64585bec82.1474045023.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-17 02:18:12 +07:00
if (regs && user_mode(regs)) {
state->stack_info.type = STACK_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
return;
}
x86/entry/unwind: Create stack frames for saved interrupt registers With frame pointers, when a task is interrupted, its stack is no longer completely reliable because the function could have been interrupted before it had a chance to save the previous frame pointer on the stack. So the caller of the interrupted function could get skipped by a stack trace. This is problematic for live patching, which needs to know whether a stack trace of a sleeping task can be relied upon. There's currently no way to detect if a sleeping task was interrupted by a page fault exception or preemption before it went to sleep. Another issue is that when dumping the stack of an interrupted task, the unwinder has no way of knowing where the saved pt_regs registers are, so it can't print them. This solves those issues by encoding the pt_regs pointer in the frame pointer on entry from an interrupt or an exception. This patch also updates the unwinder to be able to decode it, because otherwise the unwinder would be broken by this change. Note that this causes a change in the behavior of the unwinder: each instance of a pt_regs on the stack is now considered a "frame". So callers of unwind_get_return_address() will now get an occasional 'regs->ip' address that would have previously been skipped over. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8b9f84a21e39d249049e0547b559ff8da0df0988.1476973742.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-10-20 23:34:40 +07:00
bp = get_frame_pointer(task, regs);
x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations The x86 stack dump code is a bit of a mess. dump_trace() uses callbacks, and each user of it seems to have slightly different requirements, so there are several slightly different callbacks floating around. Also there are some upcoming features which will need more changes to the stack dump code, including the printing of stack pt_regs, reliable stack detection for live patching, and a DWARF unwinder. Each of those features would at least need more callbacks and/or callback interfaces, resulting in a much bigger mess than what we have today. Before doing all that, we should try to clean things up and replace dump_trace() with something cleaner and more flexible. The new unwinder is a simple state machine which was heavily inspired by a suggestion from Andy Lutomirski: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUbNTqaM2LRyXGRx=kVLRPeY5A3Pc6k4TtQxF320rUT=w@mail.gmail.com It's also similar to the libunwind API: http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html Some if its advantages: - Simplicity: no more callback sprawl and less code duplication. - Flexibility: it allows the caller to stop and inspect the stack state at each step in the unwinding process. - Modularity: the unwinder code, console stack dump code, and stack metadata analysis code are all better separated so that changing one of them shouldn't have much of an impact on any of the others. Two implementations are added which conform to the new unwind interface: - The frame pointer unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. - The "guess" unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. This isn't an "unwinder" per se. All it does is scan the stack for kernel text addresses. But with no frame pointers, guesses are better than nothing in most cases. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6dc2f909c47533d213d0505f0a113e64585bec82.1474045023.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-17 02:18:12 +07:00
x86/unwind: Handle NULL pointer calls better in frame unwinder When the frame unwinder is invoked for an oops caused by a call to NULL, it currently skips the parent function because BP still points to the parent's stack frame; the (nonexistent) current function only has the first half of a stack frame, and BP doesn't point to it yet. Add a special case for IP==0 that calculates a fake BP from SP, then uses the real BP for the next frame. Note that this handles first_frame specially: Return information about the parent function as long as the saved IP is >=first_frame, even if the fake BP points below it. With an artificially-added NULL call in prctl_set_seccomp(), before this patch, the trace is: Call Trace: ? prctl_set_seccomp+0x3a/0x50 __x64_sys_prctl+0x457/0x6f0 ? __ia32_sys_prctl+0x750/0x750 do_syscall_64+0x72/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 After this patch, the trace is: Call Trace: prctl_set_seccomp+0x3a/0x50 __x64_sys_prctl+0x457/0x6f0 ? __ia32_sys_prctl+0x750/0x750 do_syscall_64+0x72/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: syzbot <syzbot+ca95b2b7aef9e7cbd6ab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net> Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190301031201.7416-1-jannh@google.com
2019-03-01 10:12:00 +07:00
/*
* If we crash with IP==0, the last successfully executed instruction
* was probably an indirect function call with a NULL function pointer.
* That means that SP points into the middle of an incomplete frame:
* *SP is a return pointer, and *(SP-sizeof(unsigned long)) is where we
* would have written a frame pointer if we hadn't crashed.
* Pretend that the frame is complete and that BP points to it, but save
* the real BP so that we can use it when looking for the next frame.
*/
if (regs && regs->ip == 0 && (unsigned long *)regs->sp >= first_frame) {
x86/unwind: Handle NULL pointer calls better in frame unwinder When the frame unwinder is invoked for an oops caused by a call to NULL, it currently skips the parent function because BP still points to the parent's stack frame; the (nonexistent) current function only has the first half of a stack frame, and BP doesn't point to it yet. Add a special case for IP==0 that calculates a fake BP from SP, then uses the real BP for the next frame. Note that this handles first_frame specially: Return information about the parent function as long as the saved IP is >=first_frame, even if the fake BP points below it. With an artificially-added NULL call in prctl_set_seccomp(), before this patch, the trace is: Call Trace: ? prctl_set_seccomp+0x3a/0x50 __x64_sys_prctl+0x457/0x6f0 ? __ia32_sys_prctl+0x750/0x750 do_syscall_64+0x72/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 After this patch, the trace is: Call Trace: prctl_set_seccomp+0x3a/0x50 __x64_sys_prctl+0x457/0x6f0 ? __ia32_sys_prctl+0x750/0x750 do_syscall_64+0x72/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: syzbot <syzbot+ca95b2b7aef9e7cbd6ab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net> Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190301031201.7416-1-jannh@google.com
2019-03-01 10:12:00 +07:00
state->next_bp = bp;
bp = ((unsigned long *)regs->sp) - 1;
x86/unwind: Handle NULL pointer calls better in frame unwinder When the frame unwinder is invoked for an oops caused by a call to NULL, it currently skips the parent function because BP still points to the parent's stack frame; the (nonexistent) current function only has the first half of a stack frame, and BP doesn't point to it yet. Add a special case for IP==0 that calculates a fake BP from SP, then uses the real BP for the next frame. Note that this handles first_frame specially: Return information about the parent function as long as the saved IP is >=first_frame, even if the fake BP points below it. With an artificially-added NULL call in prctl_set_seccomp(), before this patch, the trace is: Call Trace: ? prctl_set_seccomp+0x3a/0x50 __x64_sys_prctl+0x457/0x6f0 ? __ia32_sys_prctl+0x750/0x750 do_syscall_64+0x72/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 After this patch, the trace is: Call Trace: prctl_set_seccomp+0x3a/0x50 __x64_sys_prctl+0x457/0x6f0 ? __ia32_sys_prctl+0x750/0x750 do_syscall_64+0x72/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: syzbot <syzbot+ca95b2b7aef9e7cbd6ab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net> Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190301031201.7416-1-jannh@google.com
2019-03-01 10:12:00 +07:00
}
/* Initialize stack info and make sure the frame data is accessible: */
get_stack_info(bp, state->task, &state->stack_info,
x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations The x86 stack dump code is a bit of a mess. dump_trace() uses callbacks, and each user of it seems to have slightly different requirements, so there are several slightly different callbacks floating around. Also there are some upcoming features which will need more changes to the stack dump code, including the printing of stack pt_regs, reliable stack detection for live patching, and a DWARF unwinder. Each of those features would at least need more callbacks and/or callback interfaces, resulting in a much bigger mess than what we have today. Before doing all that, we should try to clean things up and replace dump_trace() with something cleaner and more flexible. The new unwinder is a simple state machine which was heavily inspired by a suggestion from Andy Lutomirski: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUbNTqaM2LRyXGRx=kVLRPeY5A3Pc6k4TtQxF320rUT=w@mail.gmail.com It's also similar to the libunwind API: http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html Some if its advantages: - Simplicity: no more callback sprawl and less code duplication. - Flexibility: it allows the caller to stop and inspect the stack state at each step in the unwinding process. - Modularity: the unwinder code, console stack dump code, and stack metadata analysis code are all better separated so that changing one of them shouldn't have much of an impact on any of the others. Two implementations are added which conform to the new unwind interface: - The frame pointer unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. - The "guess" unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. This isn't an "unwinder" per se. All it does is scan the stack for kernel text addresses. But with no frame pointers, guesses are better than nothing in most cases. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6dc2f909c47533d213d0505f0a113e64585bec82.1474045023.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-17 02:18:12 +07:00
&state->stack_mask);
update_stack_state(state, bp);
x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations The x86 stack dump code is a bit of a mess. dump_trace() uses callbacks, and each user of it seems to have slightly different requirements, so there are several slightly different callbacks floating around. Also there are some upcoming features which will need more changes to the stack dump code, including the printing of stack pt_regs, reliable stack detection for live patching, and a DWARF unwinder. Each of those features would at least need more callbacks and/or callback interfaces, resulting in a much bigger mess than what we have today. Before doing all that, we should try to clean things up and replace dump_trace() with something cleaner and more flexible. The new unwinder is a simple state machine which was heavily inspired by a suggestion from Andy Lutomirski: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUbNTqaM2LRyXGRx=kVLRPeY5A3Pc6k4TtQxF320rUT=w@mail.gmail.com It's also similar to the libunwind API: http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html Some if its advantages: - Simplicity: no more callback sprawl and less code duplication. - Flexibility: it allows the caller to stop and inspect the stack state at each step in the unwinding process. - Modularity: the unwinder code, console stack dump code, and stack metadata analysis code are all better separated so that changing one of them shouldn't have much of an impact on any of the others. Two implementations are added which conform to the new unwind interface: - The frame pointer unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. - The "guess" unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. This isn't an "unwinder" per se. All it does is scan the stack for kernel text addresses. But with no frame pointers, guesses are better than nothing in most cases. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6dc2f909c47533d213d0505f0a113e64585bec82.1474045023.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-17 02:18:12 +07:00
/*
* The caller can provide the address of the first frame directly
* (first_frame) or indirectly (regs->sp) to indicate which stack frame
* to start unwinding at. Skip ahead until we reach it.
*/
while (!unwind_done(state) &&
(!on_stack(&state->stack_info, first_frame, sizeof(long)) ||
x86/unwind: Handle NULL pointer calls better in frame unwinder When the frame unwinder is invoked for an oops caused by a call to NULL, it currently skips the parent function because BP still points to the parent's stack frame; the (nonexistent) current function only has the first half of a stack frame, and BP doesn't point to it yet. Add a special case for IP==0 that calculates a fake BP from SP, then uses the real BP for the next frame. Note that this handles first_frame specially: Return information about the parent function as long as the saved IP is >=first_frame, even if the fake BP points below it. With an artificially-added NULL call in prctl_set_seccomp(), before this patch, the trace is: Call Trace: ? prctl_set_seccomp+0x3a/0x50 __x64_sys_prctl+0x457/0x6f0 ? __ia32_sys_prctl+0x750/0x750 do_syscall_64+0x72/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 After this patch, the trace is: Call Trace: prctl_set_seccomp+0x3a/0x50 __x64_sys_prctl+0x457/0x6f0 ? __ia32_sys_prctl+0x750/0x750 do_syscall_64+0x72/0x160 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: syzbot <syzbot+ca95b2b7aef9e7cbd6ab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Cc: Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net> Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190301031201.7416-1-jannh@google.com
2019-03-01 10:12:00 +07:00
(state->next_bp == NULL && state->bp < first_frame)))
x86/unwind: Add new unwind interface and implementations The x86 stack dump code is a bit of a mess. dump_trace() uses callbacks, and each user of it seems to have slightly different requirements, so there are several slightly different callbacks floating around. Also there are some upcoming features which will need more changes to the stack dump code, including the printing of stack pt_regs, reliable stack detection for live patching, and a DWARF unwinder. Each of those features would at least need more callbacks and/or callback interfaces, resulting in a much bigger mess than what we have today. Before doing all that, we should try to clean things up and replace dump_trace() with something cleaner and more flexible. The new unwinder is a simple state machine which was heavily inspired by a suggestion from Andy Lutomirski: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrUbNTqaM2LRyXGRx=kVLRPeY5A3Pc6k4TtQxF320rUT=w@mail.gmail.com It's also similar to the libunwind API: http://www.nongnu.org/libunwind/man/libunwind(3).html Some if its advantages: - Simplicity: no more callback sprawl and less code duplication. - Flexibility: it allows the caller to stop and inspect the stack state at each step in the unwinding process. - Modularity: the unwinder code, console stack dump code, and stack metadata analysis code are all better separated so that changing one of them shouldn't have much of an impact on any of the others. Two implementations are added which conform to the new unwind interface: - The frame pointer unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=y. - The "guess" unwinder which is used for CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER=n. This isn't an "unwinder" per se. All it does is scan the stack for kernel text addresses. But with no frame pointers, guesses are better than nothing in most cases. Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6dc2f909c47533d213d0505f0a113e64585bec82.1474045023.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2016-09-17 02:18:12 +07:00
unwind_next_frame(state);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__unwind_start);