Add assert_return to use in testcases instead of assert. The issues
with assert are:
1) It's disabled when NDEBUG is defined
2) Even if it's well supported by testsuite (the parent will
report the child died) it can't output any meaningful
error message
If a test has expected_fail=true, it means the return code must be
different from 0 *and* the outputs must match. This way it's possible to
check if the error messages are printed as they should.
This partially reverts ad7f175 ("Add test for depmod using search dirs
with same prefix"). Testing it twice in the inverted order doesn't
ensure we get the bug with wrong ordering.
As put by Anssi Hannula <anssi@mageia.org>:
So the bug is triggered only if the shorter name is higher-prio _and_
shorter name is traversed first. If the long name is traversed first,
the bug don't trigger with either "search" directive order (and on my
"make check" runs this is the case).
Test depmod with search dirs "foo" and "foobar". Previously to 49b33c1
("depmod: do not allow partial matches with "search" directive") we were
failing this test due to matching the prefix without checking if
it's the full dir name.
We are adding 2 tests here in order to catch the case we only pass the
test due to processing the directories in a favourable order.
In a specific configuration (chroot with the linux32 personality), the
modprobe_install_cmd_loop test failed, because the bash process handling
the install command segfaulted. The backtrace showed a uname() call
during libpthread initialization, at which point the environ pointer
hadn't been initialized yet:
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x080c1591 in getenv (name=<optimized out>,
name@entry=0xf775f850 "TESTSUITE_UNAME_R") at getenv.c:81
81 for (i = 0, len = strlen (name); environ[i]; i++)
(gdb) bt
#0 0x080c1591 in getenv (name=<optimized out>,
name@entry=0xf775f850 "TESTSUITE_UNAME_R") at getenv.c:81
#1 0xf775f754 in uname (u=u@entry=0xff946350) at testsuite/uname.c:32
#2 0xf74ffc6c in is_smp_system ()
at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/smp.h:39
#3 __pthread_initialize_minimal_internal () at nptl-init.c:460
#4 0xf74fe32c in _init () at ../sysdeps/i386/crti.S:74
#5 0x00000000 in ?? ()
(gdb) p environ
$1 = (char **) 0x0
I don't know why it only happend in the chroot, but glibc can call its
own functions and impose any restrictions before main() is started, so
we have to adapt.
Also, do not return error if there is an environment, but the
environment variable is not found. If uname() is called by kmod, then
the respective test will simply fail later. If it's something else
calling uname(), then we do not want to disturb the program.
These redirecting makefiles simplifies compiling from some editors and
when CWD is not the root of the source tree. This is similar to what was
introduced in systemd in 340d89e ("build-sys: add small redirecting
Makefiles to simplify compilation from within emacs")
In kcmdline it's possible to have a dot in the param's value. The
support for this was added in 66f3228 ("libkmod: Add support for '.' in
module parameter on kcmdline") and is needed to correctly support some
modules that depend on it.
This test was added in order to make sure the commit aa87854
("libkmod-config: Only match dot before '=' in /proc/cmdline") didn't
break it. Although that commit message says it's allowing to match a
dot before '=' it's actually enforcing the first part of the string to
be always in the format "<module-name>.param". Dots after '=' are still
correctly allowed.
Strings unrelated to modules and modprobe should be ignored and not
appear in the output of "modprobe -c".
This adds a test for the fix provided in aa87854 ("libkmod-config: Only
match dot before '=' in /proc/cmdline").
We are not only checking if those options are correctly parsed from
kcmdline, but if in fact they are being passed to the final
(f)init_module call. This is why we use 'modprobe --show-depends'
instead of the simpler 'modprobe -c'.
Use "modprobe -c" to dump the configuration. Since we configure our
rootfs to have only a /proc/cmdline file, this should dump the knowledge
we have from its parsed content.
Test if <module>.option, without any value is correctly parsed, as fixed
in commit 493dc65 ("libkmod: Fix getting param with no value from kcmdline")
Add a ->modules_loaded member to struct test, which is a comma-separated
list of modules that should be present after the test finishes. Both
missing and excess modules cause an error.
Also define noreturn w/o <stdnoreturn.h> and move it to macro.h instead
of in the testsuite.
Based on similar commit on systemd by Shawn Landden
<shawn@churchofgit.com>.
stdout and stderr are names reserved for the implementation
and musl uses them rightfully as macro - and the expansion
causes (of course) unexpected results.
rename the struct members stdout to out and stderr
to err, to be 1) compliant 2) cause compilation to
succeed.
fixes build with musl libc.
- Fix infinite loop when path is relative
- Fix not considering EEXIST as a success
- General refactor to mkdir_p so it never calls mkdir for an existing
dir (given no one creates it from outside)
Instead of linking dynamically with libkmod, use libkmod-private.la. We
disallow creating a static libkmod because we can't hide symbols there
and it cause problems with external programs. However this should not
prevent users that are only interested in the tools we provide not being
able to ship only them keeping the library alone.
Other projects also do this to allow our tools to use certain functions
that should not be used outside of the project.
The reason to have a kmod-nolib binary is that we need to call kmod on
test cases (or a symlink to it) and for testing things in tree. Since
we are using libtool if we are dinamically linking to libkmod what we
end up having is a shell script that (depending on the version *)
changes argv[0] to contain an "lt-" prefix. Since this screws with our
compat stuff, we had a kmod-nolib that links statically.
This all workaround works fine iff we are using one of the compat
commands, i.e. we are using the symlinks insmod, rmmod, modprobe, etc.
However if we are actually trying the kmod binary, this doesn't work
because we can't create a kmod symlink since there's already a kmod
binary.
So, completely give up on libtool fixing their mess. Now we create a
tool/test/ directory and the symlinks and kmod is put there.
* http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libtool/2011-12/msg00023.html
Use an if instead of a case statemente. If __NR_finit_module is not
defined in system headers we define it to -1, causing a "duplicate case
value" error. Yet, we don't want to actually call our finit_module()
function if -1 is passed.
This also fix errno being set with negative value.
When we don't have finit_module() in libc (most likely because as of
today glibc didn't add it yet), we end up using
syscall(__NR_finit_module, ...). In this case we would not wrap the
function in the testsuite and thus having some tests failing:
TESTSUITE: ERR: could not insert module: Operation not permitted
This implementation relies on the fact that this is the only caller of
syscall(2), because we can't call libc's syscall(). There's an abort()
in place to be future safe: as soon as we need more calls to syscall(),
we can detect (and decide what to do).
Now we have all tests passing in the testsuite again.
Check for finit_module() and don't use our own static inline function if
there's such function in libc (or another lib).
In testsuite we need to unconditionally define HAVE_FINIT_MODULE because
we want to override this function, and never use the static inline one
in missing.h
Putting something like "alias psmouse deadbeef" is a hackish way to
blacklist a module. While I don't encourage doing so, let's not explode
if we fiund such config files.
A small difference from the behavior of module-init-tools: we exit with
0 instead of 1.
Put this one /etc/modprobe.d/bougs.conf:
alias psmouse deaddood
`modprobe --show-depends --quiet psmouse` explodes in an assertion
(unless you have a module named deaddood). Some people and initrd's use
"alias psmouse off" to disable a module instead of blacklisting it or
adding a install rule.
Add a test with expected_fail == true before fixing this.
