mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-17 15:46:20 +07:00
f035083055
And rely on the fact that it's 0 to assume that machines without a PCH
will have PCH_NONE as dev_priv->pch_type.
Just today I finally realized that HAS_PCH_IBX is true for machines
without a PCH. IMHO this is totally counter-intuitive and I don't
think it's a good idea to assume that we're going to check for
HAS_PCH_IBX only after we check for HAS_PCH_SPLIT.
I believe that in the future we'll have more PCH types and checks
like:
if (HAS_PCH_IBX(dev) || HAS_PCH_CPT(dev))
will become more and more common. There's a good chance that we may
break non-PCH machines by adding these checks in code that runs on all
machines. I also believe that the HAS_PCH_SPLIT check will become less
common as we add more and more different PCH types. We'll probably
start replacing checks like:
if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev))
foo();
else
bar();
with:
if (HAS_PCH_NEW(dev))
baz();
else if (HAS_PCH_OLD(dev) || HAS_PCH_IBX(dev))
foo();
else
bar();
and this may break gen 2/3/4.
As far as we have investigated, this patch will affect the behavior of
intel_hdmi_dpms and intel_dp_link_down on gen 4. In both functions the
code inside the HAS_PCH_IBX check is for IBX-specific workarounds, so
we should be safe. If we start bisecting gen 2/3/4 bugs to this commit
we should consider replacing the HAS_PCH_IBX checks with something
else.
V2: Improve commit message, list possible side effects and solution.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| ast | ||
| cirrus | ||
| exynos | ||
| gma500 | ||
| i2c | ||
| i810 | ||
| i915 | ||
| mga | ||
| mgag200 | ||
| nouveau | ||
| r128 | ||
| radeon | ||
| savage | ||
| sis | ||
| tdfx | ||
| ttm | ||
| udl | ||
| via | ||
| vmwgfx | ||
| ati_pcigart.c | ||
| drm_agpsupport.c | ||
| drm_auth.c | ||
| drm_buffer.c | ||
| drm_bufs.c | ||
| drm_cache.c | ||
| drm_context.c | ||
| drm_crtc_helper.c | ||
| drm_crtc.c | ||
| drm_debugfs.c | ||
| drm_dma.c | ||
| drm_dp_i2c_helper.c | ||
| drm_drv.c | ||
| drm_edid_load.c | ||
| drm_edid_modes.h | ||
| drm_edid.c | ||
| drm_encoder_slave.c | ||
| drm_fb_helper.c | ||
| drm_fops.c | ||
| drm_gem.c | ||
| drm_global.c | ||
| drm_hashtab.c | ||
| drm_info.c | ||
| drm_ioc32.c | ||
| drm_ioctl.c | ||
| drm_irq.c | ||
| drm_lock.c | ||
| drm_memory.c | ||
| drm_mm.c | ||
| drm_modes.c | ||
| drm_pci.c | ||
| drm_platform.c | ||
| drm_prime.c | ||
| drm_proc.c | ||
| drm_scatter.c | ||
| drm_stub.c | ||
| drm_sysfs.c | ||
| drm_trace_points.c | ||
| drm_trace.h | ||
| drm_usb.c | ||
| drm_vm.c | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| Makefile | ||
| README.drm | ||
************************************************************
* For the very latest on DRI development, please see: *
* http://dri.freedesktop.org/ *
************************************************************
The Direct Rendering Manager (drm) is a device-independent kernel-level
device driver that provides support for the XFree86 Direct Rendering
Infrastructure (DRI).
The DRM supports the Direct Rendering Infrastructure (DRI) in four major
ways:
1. The DRM provides synchronized access to the graphics hardware via
the use of an optimized two-tiered lock.
2. The DRM enforces the DRI security policy for access to the graphics
hardware by only allowing authenticated X11 clients access to
restricted regions of memory.
3. The DRM provides a generic DMA engine, complete with multiple
queues and the ability to detect the need for an OpenGL context
switch.
4. The DRM is extensible via the use of small device-specific modules
that rely extensively on the API exported by the DRM module.
Documentation on the DRI is available from:
http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Documentation
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=387
http://dri.sourceforge.net/doc/
For specific information about kernel-level support, see:
The Direct Rendering Manager, Kernel Support for the Direct Rendering
Infrastructure
http://dri.sourceforge.net/doc/drm_low_level.html
Hardware Locking for the Direct Rendering Infrastructure
http://dri.sourceforge.net/doc/hardware_locking_low_level.html
A Security Analysis of the Direct Rendering Infrastructure
http://dri.sourceforge.net/doc/security_low_level.html