linux_dsm_epyc7002/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ring.h
Chris Wilson 5ba32c7be8 drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context reload when rewinding RING_TAIL
If we rewind the RING_TAIL on a context, due to a preemption event, we
must force the context restore for the RING_TAIL update to be properly
handled. Rather than note which preemption events may cause us to rewind
the tail, compare the new request's tail with the previously submitted
RING_TAIL, as it turns out that timeslicing was causing unexpected
rewinds.

   <idle>-0       0d.s2 1280851190us : __execlists_submission_tasklet: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: expired last=130:4698, prio=3, hint=3
   <idle>-0       0d.s2 1280851192us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 66:119966, current 119964
   <idle>-0       0d.s2 1280851195us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4698, current 4695
   <idle>-0       0d.s2 1280851198us : __i915_request_unsubmit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4696, current 4695
^----  Note we unwind 2 requests from the same context

   <idle>-0       0d.s2 1280851208us : __i915_request_submit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4696, current 4695
   <idle>-0       0d.s2 1280851213us : __i915_request_submit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 134:1508, current 1506
^---- But to apply the new timeslice, we have to replay the first request
      before the new client can start -- the unexpected RING_TAIL rewind

   <idle>-0       0d.s2 1280851219us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: submit { 130:4696*, 134:1508 }
 synmark2-5425    2..s. 1280851239us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: cs-irq head=5, tail=0
 synmark2-5425    2..s. 1280851240us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: csb[0]: status=0x00008002:0x00000000
^---- Preemption event for the ELSP update; note the lite-restore

 synmark2-5425    2..s. 1280851243us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: preempted { 130:4698, 66:119966 }
 synmark2-5425    2..s. 1280851246us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: promote { 130:4696*, 134:1508 }
 synmark2-5425    2.... 1280851462us : __i915_request_commit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4700, current 4695
 synmark2-5425    2.... 1280852111us : __i915_request_commit: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: fence 130:4702, current 4695
 synmark2-5425    2.Ns1 1280852296us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: cs-irq head=0, tail=2
 synmark2-5425    2.Ns1 1280852297us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: csb[1]: status=0x00000814:0x00000000
 synmark2-5425    2.Ns1 1280852299us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: completed { 130:4696!, 134:1508 }
 synmark2-5425    2.Ns1 1280852301us : process_csb: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: csb[2]: status=0x00000818:0x00000040
 synmark2-5425    2.Ns1 1280852302us : trace_ports: 0000:00:02.0 rcs0: completed { 134:1508, 0:0 }
 synmark2-5425    2.Ns1 1280852313us : process_csb: process_csb:2336 GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_completed(*execlists->active) && !reset_in_progress(execlists))

Fixes: 8ee36e048c ("drm/i915/execlists: Minimalistic timeslicing")
Referenecs: 82c69bf586 ("drm/i915/gt: Detect if we miss WaIdleLiteRestore")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200207211452.2860634-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2020-02-07 21:41:46 +00:00

140 lines
3.9 KiB
C

/*
* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
*
* Copyright © 2019 Intel Corporation
*/
#ifndef INTEL_RING_H
#define INTEL_RING_H
#include "i915_gem.h" /* GEM_BUG_ON */
#include "i915_request.h"
#include "intel_ring_types.h"
struct intel_engine_cs;
struct intel_ring *
intel_engine_create_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, int size);
u32 *intel_ring_begin(struct i915_request *rq, unsigned int num_dwords);
int intel_ring_cacheline_align(struct i915_request *rq);
unsigned int intel_ring_update_space(struct intel_ring *ring);
int intel_ring_pin(struct intel_ring *ring);
void intel_ring_unpin(struct intel_ring *ring);
void intel_ring_reset(struct intel_ring *ring, u32 tail);
void intel_ring_free(struct kref *ref);
static inline struct intel_ring *intel_ring_get(struct intel_ring *ring)
{
kref_get(&ring->ref);
return ring;
}
static inline void intel_ring_put(struct intel_ring *ring)
{
kref_put(&ring->ref, intel_ring_free);
}
static inline void intel_ring_advance(struct i915_request *rq, u32 *cs)
{
/* Dummy function.
*
* This serves as a placeholder in the code so that the reader
* can compare against the preceding intel_ring_begin() and
* check that the number of dwords emitted matches the space
* reserved for the command packet (i.e. the value passed to
* intel_ring_begin()).
*/
GEM_BUG_ON((rq->ring->vaddr + rq->ring->emit) != cs);
}
static inline u32 intel_ring_wrap(const struct intel_ring *ring, u32 pos)
{
return pos & (ring->size - 1);
}
static inline int intel_ring_direction(const struct intel_ring *ring,
u32 next, u32 prev)
{
typecheck(typeof(ring->size), next);
typecheck(typeof(ring->size), prev);
return (next - prev) << ring->wrap;
}
static inline bool
intel_ring_offset_valid(const struct intel_ring *ring,
unsigned int pos)
{
if (pos & -ring->size) /* must be strictly within the ring */
return false;
if (!IS_ALIGNED(pos, 8)) /* must be qword aligned */
return false;
return true;
}
static inline u32 intel_ring_offset(const struct i915_request *rq, void *addr)
{
/* Don't write ring->size (equivalent to 0) as that hangs some GPUs. */
u32 offset = addr - rq->ring->vaddr;
GEM_BUG_ON(offset > rq->ring->size);
return intel_ring_wrap(rq->ring, offset);
}
static inline void
assert_ring_tail_valid(const struct intel_ring *ring, unsigned int tail)
{
GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_ring_offset_valid(ring, tail));
/*
* "Ring Buffer Use"
* Gen2 BSpec "1. Programming Environment" / 1.4.4.6
* Gen3 BSpec "1c Memory Interface Functions" / 2.3.4.5
* Gen4+ BSpec "1c Memory Interface and Command Stream" / 5.3.4.5
* "If the Ring Buffer Head Pointer and the Tail Pointer are on the
* same cacheline, the Head Pointer must not be greater than the Tail
* Pointer."
*
* We use ring->head as the last known location of the actual RING_HEAD,
* it may have advanced but in the worst case it is equally the same
* as ring->head and so we should never program RING_TAIL to advance
* into the same cacheline as ring->head.
*/
#define cacheline(a) round_down(a, CACHELINE_BYTES)
GEM_BUG_ON(cacheline(tail) == cacheline(ring->head) &&
tail < ring->head);
#undef cacheline
}
static inline unsigned int
intel_ring_set_tail(struct intel_ring *ring, unsigned int tail)
{
/* Whilst writes to the tail are strictly order, there is no
* serialisation between readers and the writers. The tail may be
* read by i915_request_retire() just as it is being updated
* by execlists, as although the breadcrumb is complete, the context
* switch hasn't been seen.
*/
assert_ring_tail_valid(ring, tail);
ring->tail = tail;
return tail;
}
static inline unsigned int
__intel_ring_space(unsigned int head, unsigned int tail, unsigned int size)
{
/*
* "If the Ring Buffer Head Pointer and the Tail Pointer are on the
* same cacheline, the Head Pointer must not be greater than the Tail
* Pointer."
*/
GEM_BUG_ON(!is_power_of_2(size));
return (head - tail - CACHELINE_BYTES) & (size - 1);
}
#endif /* INTEL_RING_H */