Linus Torvalds b923f1247b A set oftimekeeping/VDSO updates: ... - Preparatory work to allow S390 to switch over to the generic VDSO implementation. S390 requires that the VDSO data pointer is handed in to the counter read function when time namespace support is enabled. Adding the pointer is a NOOP for all other architectures because the compiler is supposed to optimize that out when it is unused in the architecture specific inline. The change also solved a similar problem for MIPS which fortunately has time namespaces not yet enabled. S390 needs to update clock related VDSO data independent of the timekeeping updates. This was solved so far with yet another sequence counter in the S390 implementation. A better solution is to utilize the already existing VDSO sequence count for this. The core code now exposes helper functions which allow to serialize against the timekeeper code and against concurrent readers. S390 needs extra data for their clock readout function. The initial common VDSO data structure did not provide a way to add that. It now has an embedded architecture specific struct embedded which defaults to an empty struct. Doing this now avoids tree dependencies and conflicts post rc1 and allows all other architectures which work on generic VDSO support to work from a common upstream base. - A trivial comment fix. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJHBAABCgAxFiEEQp8+kY+LLUocC4bMphj1TA10mKEFAl82tGYTHHRnbHhAbGlu dXRyb25peC5kZQAKCRCmGPVMDXSYoRkKD/9YEYlYPQ4omRNVNIJRnalBH6OB/GOk jTJ4RCvNP2ew6XtgEz5Yg1VqxrmJP4MLNCnMr7mQulfezUmslK0uJMlqZC4dgYth PUhliLyFi5PK+CKaY+2NFlZMAoE53YlJ2FVPq114FUW4ASVbucDPXpmhO22cc2Iu 0RD3z9/+vQmA8lUqI6wPIFTC+euN+2kbkeZjt7BlkBAdiRBga5UnarFzetq0nWyc kcprQ2qZfGLYzRY6dRuvNLz27Ta7SAlVGOGUDpWr9MISLDFQzHwhVATDNFW3hLGT Fr5xNqStUVxxTzYkfCj/Podez0aR3por8bm9SoWxZn7oeLdLgTsDwn2pY0J0PjyB wWz9lmqT1vzrHEfQH1YhHvycowl6azue9rT2ERWwZTdbADEwu6Zr8ufv2XHcMu0J dyzSYa81cQrTeAwwdNjODs+QCTX+0G6u86AU2Xg+YgqkAywcAMvzcff/9D62hfv2 5BSz+0OeitQCnSvHILUPw4XT/2rNZfhlcmc4tkzoBFewzDsMEqWT19p+GgqcRNiU 5Jl4kGnaeHjP0e5Vn/ZJurKaF3YEJwgjkohDORloaqo0AXiYo1ANhDlKvSRu5hnU GDIWOVu8ATXwkjMFcLQz7O5/J1MqJCkleIjSCDjLDhhMbLY/nR9L3QS9jbqiVVRN nTZlSMF6HeQmew== =y8Z5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Merge tag 'timers-urgent-2020-08-14' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull timekeeping updates from Thomas Gleixner: "A set of timekeeping/VDSO updates: - Preparatory work to allow S390 to switch over to the generic VDSO implementation. S390 requires that the VDSO data pointer is handed in to the counter read function when time namespace support is enabled. Adding the pointer is a NOOP for all other architectures because the compiler is supposed to optimize that out when it is unused in the architecture specific inline. The change also solved a similar problem for MIPS which fortunately has time namespaces not yet enabled. S390 needs to update clock related VDSO data independent of the timekeeping updates. This was solved so far with yet another sequence counter in the S390 implementation. A better solution is to utilize the already existing VDSO sequence count for this. The core code now exposes helper functions which allow to serialize against the timekeeper code and against concurrent readers. S390 needs extra data for their clock readout function. The initial common VDSO data structure did not provide a way to add that. It now has an embedded architecture specific struct embedded which defaults to an empty struct. Doing this now avoids tree dependencies and conflicts post rc1 and allows all other architectures which work on generic VDSO support to work from a common upstream base. - A trivial comment fix" * tag 'timers-urgent-2020-08-14' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: time: Delete repeated words in comments lib/vdso: Allow to add architecture-specific vdso data timekeeping/vsyscall: Provide vdso_update_begin/end() vdso/treewide: Add vdso_data pointer argument to __arch_get_hw_counter()		2020-08-14 14:26:08 -07:00
..
asm	A set oftimekeeping/VDSO updates:	2020-08-14 14:26:08 -07:00
uapi/asm	Support for FSGSBASE. Almost 5 years after the first RFC to support it,	2020-08-04 21:16:22 -07:00