mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-19 13:07:13 +07:00
d6699dd3a7
I keep telling myself that those tables aren't great because their size is the number of dwords we need to program and not the number of entries (number of dwords = number of entries * 2). And... I got it wrong when I refactored the code. Fortunately, it was only wrong when the VBT table (or the code parsing it) is itself erroneous. Long story short, it shouldn't matter, but still, there's a potential array overflow and random programming of the DDI translation tables. Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| drm | ||
| host1x | ||
| ipu-v3 | ||
| vga | ||
| Makefile | ||