Hans de Goede 00452ba9fd x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi Rewrite locking ... There are 2 problems with the old iosf PMIC I2C bus arbritration code which need to be addressed: 1. The lockdep code complains about a possible deadlock in the iosf_mbi_[un]block_punit_i2c_access code: [ 6.712662] ====================================================== [ 6.712673] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 6.712685] 5.3.0-rc2+ #79 Not tainted [ 6.712692] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 6.712702] kworker/0:1/7 is trying to acquire lock: [ 6.712712] 00000000df1c5681 (iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access_count_mutex){+.+.}, at: iosf_mbi_unblock_punit_i2c_access+0x13/0x90 [ 6.712739] but task is already holding lock: [ 6.712749] 0000000067cb23e7 (iosf_mbi_punit_mutex){+.+.}, at: iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access+0x97/0x186 [ 6.712768] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 6.712780] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 6.712792] -> #1 (iosf_mbi_punit_mutex){+.+.}: [ 6.712808] __mutex_lock+0xa8/0x9a0 [ 6.712818] iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access+0x97/0x186 [ 6.712831] i2c_dw_acquire_lock+0x20/0x30 [ 6.712841] i2c_dw_set_reg_access+0x15/0xb0 [ 6.712851] i2c_dw_probe+0x57/0x473 [ 6.712861] dw_i2c_plat_probe+0x33e/0x640 [ 6.712874] platform_drv_probe+0x38/0x80 [ 6.712884] really_probe+0xf3/0x380 [ 6.712894] driver_probe_device+0x59/0xd0 [ 6.712905] bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xd0 [ 6.712915] __device_attach+0xe4/0x170 [ 6.712925] bus_probe_device+0x9f/0xb0 [ 6.712935] deferred_probe_work_func+0x79/0xd0 [ 6.712946] process_one_work+0x234/0x560 [ 6.712957] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 6.712967] kthread+0x10a/0x140 [ 6.712977] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [ 6.712986] -> #0 (iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access_count_mutex){+.+.}: [ 6.713004] __lock_acquire+0xe07/0x1930 [ 6.713015] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x1a0 [ 6.713025] __mutex_lock+0xa8/0x9a0 [ 6.713035] iosf_mbi_unblock_punit_i2c_access+0x13/0x90 [ 6.713047] i2c_dw_set_reg_access+0x4d/0xb0 [ 6.713058] i2c_dw_probe+0x57/0x473 [ 6.713068] dw_i2c_plat_probe+0x33e/0x640 [ 6.713079] platform_drv_probe+0x38/0x80 [ 6.713089] really_probe+0xf3/0x380 [ 6.713099] driver_probe_device+0x59/0xd0 [ 6.713109] bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xd0 [ 6.713119] __device_attach+0xe4/0x170 [ 6.713129] bus_probe_device+0x9f/0xb0 [ 6.713140] deferred_probe_work_func+0x79/0xd0 [ 6.713150] process_one_work+0x234/0x560 [ 6.713160] worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 [ 6.713170] kthread+0x10a/0x140 [ 6.713180] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [ 6.713189] other info that might help us debug this: [ 6.713202] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 6.713212] CPU0 CPU1 [ 6.713221] ---- ---- [ 6.713229] lock(iosf_mbi_punit_mutex); [ 6.713239] lock(iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access_count_mutex); [ 6.713253] lock(iosf_mbi_punit_mutex); [ 6.713265] lock(iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access_count_mutex); [ 6.713276] *** DEADLOCK *** In practice can never happen because only the first caller which increments iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access_count will also take iosf_mbi_punit_mutex, that is the whole purpose of the counter, which itself is protected by iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access_count_mutex. But there is no way to tell the lockdep code about this and we really want to be able to run a kernel with lockdep enabled without these warnings being triggered. 2. The lockdep warning also points out another real problem, if 2 threads both are in a block of code protected by iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access and the first thread to acquire the block exits before the second thread then the second thread will call mutex_unlock on iosf_mbi_punit_mutex, but it is not the thread which took the mutex and unlocking by another thread is not allowed. Fix this by getting rid of the notion of holding a mutex for the entire duration of the PMIC accesses, be it either from the PUnit side, or from an in kernel I2C driver. In general holding a mutex after exiting a function is a bad idea and the above problems show this case is no different. Instead 2 counters are now used, one for PMIC accesses from the PUnit and one for accesses from in kernel I2C code. When access is requested now the code will wait (using a waitqueue) for the counter of the other type of access to reach 0 and on release, if the counter reaches 0 the wakequeue is woken. Note that the counter approach is necessary to allow nested calls. The main reason for this is so that a series of i2c transfers can be done with the punit blocked from accessing the bus the whole time. This is necessary to be able to safely read/modify/write a PMIC register without racing with the PUNIT doing the same thing. Allowing nested iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access() calls also is desirable from a performance pov since the whole dance necessary to block the PUnit from accessing the PMIC I2C bus is somewhat expensive. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190812102113.95794-1-hdegoede@redhat.com		2019-08-19 20:52:39 +02:00
..
iosf_mbi.c	x86/platform/intel/iosf_mbi Rewrite locking	2019-08-19 20:52:39 +02:00
Makefile	treewide: Add SPDX license identifier - Makefile/Kconfig	2019-05-21 10:50:46 +02:00