mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-19 14:58:53 +07:00
9d664c0aec
Those architectures that have a special atomic_set implementation also need a special atomic_set_release(), because for the very same reason WRITE_ONCE() is broken for them, smp_store_release() is too. The vast majority is architectures that have spinlock hash based atomic implementation except hexagon which seems to have a hardware 'feature'. The spinlock based atomics should be SC, that is, none of them appear to place extra barriers in atomic_cmpxchg() or any of the other SC atomic primitives and therefore seem to rely on their spinlock implementation being SC (I did not fully validate all that). Therefore, the normal atomic_set() is SC and can be used at atomic_set_release(). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> [for tile] Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: davem@davemloft.net Cc: james.hogan@imgtec.com Cc: jejb@parisc-linux.org Cc: rkuo@codeaurora.org Cc: vgupta@synopsys.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170609110506.yod47flaav3wgoj5@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| arch | ||
| asm | ||
| gxio | ||
| hv | ||
| uapi | ||