mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-25 02:59:26 +07:00
e6018c0f5c
The only guarantee provided by wake_q_add() is that a wakeup will happen after it, it does _NOT_ guarantee the wakeup will be delayed until the matching wake_up_q(). If wake_q_add() fails the cmpxchg() a concurrent wakeup is pending and that can happen at any time after the cmpxchg(). This means we should not rely on the wakeup happening at wake_q_up(), but should be ready for wake_q_add() to issue the wakeup. The delay; if provided (most likely); should only result in more efficient behaviour. Reported-by: Yongji Xie <elohimes@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| autogroup.h | ||
| clock.h | ||
| coredump.h | ||
| cpufreq.h | ||
| cputime.h | ||
| deadline.h | ||
| debug.h | ||
| hotplug.h | ||
| idle.h | ||
| init.h | ||
| isolation.h | ||
| jobctl.h | ||
| loadavg.h | ||
| mm.h | ||
| nohz.h | ||
| numa_balancing.h | ||
| prio.h | ||
| rt.h | ||
| signal.h | ||
| smt.h | ||
| stat.h | ||
| sysctl.h | ||
| task_stack.h | ||
| task.h | ||
| topology.h | ||
| user.h | ||
| wake_q.h | ||
| xacct.h | ||