mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-11 17:36:49 +07:00
41ef8f8266
We (Linux Kernel Performance project) found a regression
introduced by commit:
5a505085f0
mm/rmap: Convert the struct anon_vma::mutex to an rwsem
which converted all anon_vma::mutex locks rwsem write locks.
The semantics are the same, but the behavioral difference is
quite huge in some cases. After investigating it we found the
root cause: mutexes support lock stealing while rwsems don't.
Here is the link for the detailed regression report:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/29/84
Ingo suggested adding write lock stealing to rwsems:
"I think we should allow lock-steal between rwsem writers - that
will not hurt fairness as most rwsem fairness concerns relate to
reader vs. writer fairness"
And here is the rwsem-spinlock version.
With this patch, we got a double performance increase in one
test box with following aim7 workfile:
FILESIZE: 1M
POOLSIZE: 10M
10 fork_test
/usr/bin/time output w/o patch /usr/bin/time_output with patch
-- Percent of CPU this job got: 369% Percent of CPU this job got: 537%
Voluntary context switches: 640595016 Voluntary context switches: 157915561
We got a 45% increase in CPU usage and saved about 3/4 voluntary context switches.
Reported-by: LKP project <lkp@linux.intel.com>
Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1359716356-23865-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
303 lines
6.7 KiB
C
303 lines
6.7 KiB
C
/* rwsem-spinlock.c: R/W semaphores: contention handling functions for
|
|
* generic spinlock implementation
|
|
*
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2001 David Howells (dhowells@redhat.com).
|
|
* - Derived partially from idea by Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
|
|
* - Derived also from comments by Linus
|
|
*/
|
|
#include <linux/rwsem.h>
|
|
#include <linux/sched.h>
|
|
#include <linux/export.h>
|
|
|
|
struct rwsem_waiter {
|
|
struct list_head list;
|
|
struct task_struct *task;
|
|
unsigned int flags;
|
|
#define RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ 0x00000001
|
|
#define RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE 0x00000002
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
int rwsem_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
|
{
|
|
int ret = 1;
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
if (raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags)) {
|
|
ret = (sem->activity != 0);
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
}
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rwsem_is_locked);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* initialise the semaphore
|
|
*/
|
|
void __init_rwsem(struct rw_semaphore *sem, const char *name,
|
|
struct lock_class_key *key)
|
|
{
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
|
|
/*
|
|
* Make sure we are not reinitializing a held semaphore:
|
|
*/
|
|
debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)sem, sizeof(*sem));
|
|
lockdep_init_map(&sem->dep_map, name, key, 0);
|
|
#endif
|
|
sem->activity = 0;
|
|
raw_spin_lock_init(&sem->wait_lock);
|
|
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&sem->wait_list);
|
|
}
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__init_rwsem);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* handle the lock release when processes blocked on it that can now run
|
|
* - if we come here, then:
|
|
* - the 'active count' _reached_ zero
|
|
* - the 'waiting count' is non-zero
|
|
* - the spinlock must be held by the caller
|
|
* - woken process blocks are discarded from the list after having task zeroed
|
|
* - writers are only woken if wakewrite is non-zero
|
|
*/
|
|
static inline struct rw_semaphore *
|
|
__rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int wakewrite)
|
|
{
|
|
struct rwsem_waiter *waiter;
|
|
struct task_struct *tsk;
|
|
int woken;
|
|
|
|
waiter = list_entry(sem->wait_list.next, struct rwsem_waiter, list);
|
|
|
|
if (!wakewrite) {
|
|
if (waiter->flags & RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE)
|
|
goto out;
|
|
goto dont_wake_writers;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* as we support write lock stealing, we can't set sem->activity
|
|
* to -1 here to indicate we get the lock. Instead, we wake it up
|
|
* to let it go get it again.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (waiter->flags & RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE) {
|
|
wake_up_process(waiter->task);
|
|
goto out;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* grant an infinite number of read locks to the front of the queue */
|
|
dont_wake_writers:
|
|
woken = 0;
|
|
while (waiter->flags & RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ) {
|
|
struct list_head *next = waiter->list.next;
|
|
|
|
list_del(&waiter->list);
|
|
tsk = waiter->task;
|
|
smp_mb();
|
|
waiter->task = NULL;
|
|
wake_up_process(tsk);
|
|
put_task_struct(tsk);
|
|
woken++;
|
|
if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
|
|
break;
|
|
waiter = list_entry(next, struct rwsem_waiter, list);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sem->activity += woken;
|
|
|
|
out:
|
|
return sem;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* wake a single writer
|
|
*/
|
|
static inline struct rw_semaphore *
|
|
__rwsem_wake_one_writer(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
|
{
|
|
struct rwsem_waiter *waiter;
|
|
|
|
waiter = list_entry(sem->wait_list.next, struct rwsem_waiter, list);
|
|
wake_up_process(waiter->task);
|
|
|
|
return sem;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* get a read lock on the semaphore
|
|
*/
|
|
void __sched __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
|
{
|
|
struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
|
|
struct task_struct *tsk;
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
if (sem->activity >= 0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
|
|
/* granted */
|
|
sem->activity++;
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
goto out;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tsk = current;
|
|
set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
|
|
|
|
/* set up my own style of waitqueue */
|
|
waiter.task = tsk;
|
|
waiter.flags = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ;
|
|
get_task_struct(tsk);
|
|
|
|
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
|
|
|
|
/* we don't need to touch the semaphore struct anymore */
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
/* wait to be given the lock */
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
if (!waiter.task)
|
|
break;
|
|
schedule();
|
|
set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
|
|
out:
|
|
;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* trylock for reading -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
|
|
*/
|
|
int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
int ret = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
if (sem->activity >= 0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) {
|
|
/* granted */
|
|
sem->activity++;
|
|
ret = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* get a write lock on the semaphore
|
|
*/
|
|
void __sched __down_write_nested(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int subclass)
|
|
{
|
|
struct rwsem_waiter waiter;
|
|
struct task_struct *tsk;
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
/* set up my own style of waitqueue */
|
|
tsk = current;
|
|
waiter.task = tsk;
|
|
waiter.flags = RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE;
|
|
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
|
|
|
|
/* wait for someone to release the lock */
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* That is the key to support write lock stealing: allows the
|
|
* task already on CPU to get the lock soon rather than put
|
|
* itself into sleep and waiting for system woke it or someone
|
|
* else in the head of the wait list up.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (sem->activity == 0)
|
|
break;
|
|
set_task_state(tsk, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
schedule();
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
}
|
|
/* got the lock */
|
|
sem->activity = -1;
|
|
list_del(&waiter.list);
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void __sched __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
|
{
|
|
__down_write_nested(sem, 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* trylock for writing -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention
|
|
*/
|
|
int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
int ret = 0;
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
if (sem->activity == 0) {
|
|
/* got the lock */
|
|
sem->activity = -1;
|
|
ret = 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* release a read lock on the semaphore
|
|
*/
|
|
void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
if (--sem->activity == 0 && !list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
|
|
sem = __rwsem_wake_one_writer(sem);
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* release a write lock on the semaphore
|
|
*/
|
|
void __up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
sem->activity = 0;
|
|
if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
|
|
sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, 1);
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* downgrade a write lock into a read lock
|
|
* - just wake up any readers at the front of the queue
|
|
*/
|
|
void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
sem->activity = 1;
|
|
if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
|
|
sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, 0);
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
}
|
|
|