mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-28 11:18:45 +07:00
80bf6ceaf9
When we get into activate_mm(), lockdep complains that we're doing
something strange:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.1.0-10252-gb00152307319-dirty #121 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
inside.sh/366 is trying to acquire lock:
(____ptrval____) (&(&p->alloc_lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: flush_old_exec+0x703/0x8d7
but task is already holding lock:
(____ptrval____) (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: flush_old_exec+0x6c5/0x8d7
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}:
[...]
__lock_acquire+0x12ab/0x139f
lock_acquire+0x155/0x18e
down_write+0x3f/0x98
flush_old_exec+0x748/0x8d7
load_elf_binary+0x2ca/0xddb
[...]
-> #0 (&(&p->alloc_lock)->rlock){+.+.}:
[...]
__lock_acquire+0x12ab/0x139f
lock_acquire+0x155/0x18e
_raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x83
flush_old_exec+0x703/0x8d7
load_elf_binary+0x2ca/0xddb
[...]
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
lock(&(&p->alloc_lock)->rlock);
lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
lock(&(&p->alloc_lock)->rlock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by inside.sh/366:
#0: (____ptrval____) (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.}, at: __do_execve_file+0x12d/0x869
#1: (____ptrval____) (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: flush_old_exec+0x6c5/0x8d7
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 366 Comm: inside.sh Not tainted 5.1.0-10252-gb00152307319-dirty #121
Stack:
[...]
Call Trace:
[<600420de>] show_stack+0x13b/0x155
[<6048906b>] dump_stack+0x2a/0x2c
[<6009ae64>] print_circular_bug+0x332/0x343
[<6009c5c6>] check_prev_add+0x669/0xdad
[<600a06b4>] __lock_acquire+0x12ab/0x139f
[<6009f3d0>] lock_acquire+0x155/0x18e
[<604a07e0>] _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x83
[<60151e6a>] flush_old_exec+0x703/0x8d7
[<601a8eb8>] load_elf_binary+0x2ca/0xddb
[...]
I think it's because in exec_mmap() we have
down_read(&old_mm->mmap_sem);
...
task_lock(tsk);
...
activate_mm(active_mm, mm);
(which does down_write(&mm->mmap_sem))
I'm not really sure why lockdep throws in the whole knowledge
about the task lock, but it seems that old_mm and mm shouldn't
ever be the same (and it doesn't deadlock) so tell lockdep that
they're different.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
83 lines
1.8 KiB
C
83 lines
1.8 KiB
C
/*
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2002 - 2007 Jeff Dike (jdike@{addtoit,linux.intel}.com)
|
|
* Licensed under the GPL
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __UM_MMU_CONTEXT_H
|
|
#define __UM_MMU_CONTEXT_H
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/sched.h>
|
|
#include <linux/mm_types.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/mmu.h>
|
|
|
|
extern void uml_setup_stubs(struct mm_struct *mm);
|
|
/*
|
|
* Needed since we do not use the asm-generic/mm_hooks.h:
|
|
*/
|
|
static inline int arch_dup_mmap(struct mm_struct *oldmm, struct mm_struct *mm)
|
|
{
|
|
uml_setup_stubs(mm);
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
extern void arch_exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm);
|
|
static inline void arch_unmap(struct mm_struct *mm,
|
|
unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
|
|
{
|
|
}
|
|
static inline void arch_bprm_mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm,
|
|
struct vm_area_struct *vma)
|
|
{
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static inline bool arch_vma_access_permitted(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
|
|
bool write, bool execute, bool foreign)
|
|
{
|
|
/* by default, allow everything */
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* end asm-generic/mm_hooks.h functions
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#define deactivate_mm(tsk,mm) do { } while (0)
|
|
|
|
extern void force_flush_all(void);
|
|
|
|
static inline void activate_mm(struct mm_struct *old, struct mm_struct *new)
|
|
{
|
|
/*
|
|
* This is called by fs/exec.c and sys_unshare()
|
|
* when the new ->mm is used for the first time.
|
|
*/
|
|
__switch_mm(&new->context.id);
|
|
down_write_nested(&new->mmap_sem, 1);
|
|
uml_setup_stubs(new);
|
|
up_write(&new->mmap_sem);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
|
|
struct task_struct *tsk)
|
|
{
|
|
unsigned cpu = smp_processor_id();
|
|
|
|
if(prev != next){
|
|
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(prev));
|
|
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(next));
|
|
if(next != &init_mm)
|
|
__switch_mm(&next->context.id);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static inline void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm,
|
|
struct task_struct *tsk)
|
|
{
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
extern int init_new_context(struct task_struct *task, struct mm_struct *mm);
|
|
|
|
extern void destroy_context(struct mm_struct *mm);
|
|
|
|
#endif
|