mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-14 09:46:54 +07:00
76506a986d
The IPv6 temporary address generation uses a variable called DESYNC_FACTOR to prevent hosts updating the addresses at the same time. Quoting RFC 4941: ... The value DESYNC_FACTOR is a random value (different for each client) that ensures that clients don't synchronize with each other and generate new addresses at exactly the same time ... DESYNC_FACTOR is defined as: DESYNC_FACTOR -- A random value within the range 0 - MAX_DESYNC_FACTOR. It is computed once at system start (rather than each time it is used) and must never be greater than (TEMP_VALID_LIFETIME - REGEN_ADVANCE). First, I believe the RFC has a typo in it and meant to say: "and must never be greater than (TEMP_PREFERRED_LIFETIME - REGEN_ADVANCE)" The reason is that at various places in the RFC, DESYNC_FACTOR is used in a calculation like (TEMP_PREFERRED_LIFETIME - DESYNC_FACTOR) or (TEMP_PREFERRED_LIFETIME - REGEN_ADVANCE - DESYNC_FACTOR). It needs to be smaller than (TEMP_PREFERRED_LIFETIME - REGEN_ADVANCE) for the result of these calculations to be larger than zero. It's never used in a calculation together with TEMP_VALID_LIFETIME. I already submitted an errata to the rfc-editor: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4941 The Linux implementation of DESYNC_FACTOR is very wrong: max_desync_factor is used in places DESYNC_FACTOR should be used. max_desync_factor is initialized to the RFC-recommended value for MAX_DESYNC_FACTOR (600) but the whole point is to get a _random_ value. And nothing ensures that the value used is not greater than (TEMP_PREFERRED_LIFETIME - REGEN_ADVANCE), which leads to underflows. The effect can easily be observed when setting the temp_prefered_lft sysctl e.g. to 60. The preferred lifetime of the temporary addresses will be bogus. TEMP_PREFERRED_LIFETIME and REGEN_ADVANCE are not constants and can be influenced by these three sysctls: regen_max_retry, dad_transmits and temp_prefered_lft. Thus, the upper bound for desync_factor needs to be re-calculated each time a new address is generated and if desync_factor is larger than the new upper bound, a new random value needs to be re-generated. And since we already have max_desync_factor configurable per interface, we also need to calculate and store desync_factor per interface. Signed-off-by: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| acpi | ||
| asm-generic | ||
| clocksource | ||
| crypto | ||
| drm | ||
| dt-bindings | ||
| keys | ||
| kvm | ||
| linux | ||
| math-emu | ||
| media | ||
| memory | ||
| misc | ||
| net | ||
| pcmcia | ||
| ras | ||
| rdma | ||
| rxrpc | ||
| scsi | ||
| soc | ||
| sound | ||
| target | ||
| trace | ||
| uapi | ||
| video | ||
| xen | ||
| Kbuild | ||