mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-16 23:56:45 +07:00
da17066c40
We track the node sizes per-root, but they never vary from the values in the superblock. This patch messes with the 80-column style a bit, but subsequent patches to factor out root->fs_info into a convenience variable fix it up again. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
890 lines
25 KiB
C
890 lines
25 KiB
C
/*
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2013 Fusion IO. All rights reserved.
|
|
*
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
|
|
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public
|
|
* License v2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
|
|
*
|
|
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
|
|
* General Public License for more details.
|
|
*
|
|
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public
|
|
* License along with this program; if not, write to the
|
|
* Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
|
|
* Boston, MA 021110-1307, USA.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/slab.h>
|
|
#include "btrfs-tests.h"
|
|
#include "../ctree.h"
|
|
#include "../disk-io.h"
|
|
#include "../free-space-cache.h"
|
|
|
|
#define BITS_PER_BITMAP (PAGE_SIZE * 8UL)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* This test just does basic sanity checking, making sure we can add an extent
|
|
* entry and remove space from either end and the middle, and make sure we can
|
|
* remove space that covers adjacent extent entries.
|
|
*/
|
|
static int test_extents(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache)
|
|
{
|
|
int ret = 0;
|
|
|
|
test_msg("Running extent only tests\n");
|
|
|
|
/* First just make sure we can remove an entire entry */
|
|
ret = btrfs_add_free_space(cache, 0, SZ_4M);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Error adding initial extents %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(cache, 0, SZ_4M);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Error removing extent %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (test_check_exists(cache, 0, SZ_4M)) {
|
|
test_msg("Full remove left some lingering space\n");
|
|
return -1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Ok edge and middle cases now */
|
|
ret = btrfs_add_free_space(cache, 0, SZ_4M);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Error adding half extent %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(cache, 3 * SZ_1M, SZ_1M);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Error removing tail end %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(cache, 0, SZ_1M);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Error removing front end %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(cache, SZ_2M, 4096);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Error removing middle piece %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (test_check_exists(cache, 0, SZ_1M)) {
|
|
test_msg("Still have space at the front\n");
|
|
return -1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (test_check_exists(cache, SZ_2M, 4096)) {
|
|
test_msg("Still have space in the middle\n");
|
|
return -1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (test_check_exists(cache, 3 * SZ_1M, SZ_1M)) {
|
|
test_msg("Still have space at the end\n");
|
|
return -1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Cleanup */
|
|
__btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache->free_space_ctl);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static int test_bitmaps(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache,
|
|
u32 sectorsize)
|
|
{
|
|
u64 next_bitmap_offset;
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
test_msg("Running bitmap only tests\n");
|
|
|
|
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, 0, SZ_4M, 1);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't create a bitmap entry %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(cache, 0, SZ_4M);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Error removing bitmap full range %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (test_check_exists(cache, 0, SZ_4M)) {
|
|
test_msg("Left some space in bitmap\n");
|
|
return -1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, 0, SZ_4M, 1);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't add to our bitmap entry %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(cache, SZ_1M, SZ_2M);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't remove middle chunk %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* The first bitmap we have starts at offset 0 so the next one is just
|
|
* at the end of the first bitmap.
|
|
*/
|
|
next_bitmap_offset = (u64)(BITS_PER_BITMAP * sectorsize);
|
|
|
|
/* Test a bit straddling two bitmaps */
|
|
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, next_bitmap_offset - SZ_2M,
|
|
SZ_4M, 1);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't add space that straddles two bitmaps %d\n",
|
|
ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(cache, next_bitmap_offset - SZ_1M, SZ_2M);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't remove overlapping space %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (test_check_exists(cache, next_bitmap_offset - SZ_1M, SZ_2M)) {
|
|
test_msg("Left some space when removing overlapping\n");
|
|
return -1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
__btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache->free_space_ctl);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* This is the high grade jackassery */
|
|
static int test_bitmaps_and_extents(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache,
|
|
u32 sectorsize)
|
|
{
|
|
u64 bitmap_offset = (u64)(BITS_PER_BITMAP * sectorsize);
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
test_msg("Running bitmap and extent tests\n");
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* First let's do something simple, an extent at the same offset as the
|
|
* bitmap, but the free space completely in the extent and then
|
|
* completely in the bitmap.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, SZ_4M, SZ_1M, 1);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't create bitmap entry %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, 0, SZ_1M, 0);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't add extent entry %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(cache, 0, SZ_1M);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't remove extent entry %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (test_check_exists(cache, 0, SZ_1M)) {
|
|
test_msg("Left remnants after our remove\n");
|
|
return -1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Now to add back the extent entry and remove from the bitmap */
|
|
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, 0, SZ_1M, 0);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't re-add extent entry %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(cache, SZ_4M, SZ_1M);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't remove from bitmap %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (test_check_exists(cache, SZ_4M, SZ_1M)) {
|
|
test_msg("Left remnants in the bitmap\n");
|
|
return -1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Ok so a little more evil, extent entry and bitmap at the same offset,
|
|
* removing an overlapping chunk.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, SZ_1M, SZ_4M, 1);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't add to a bitmap %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(cache, SZ_512K, 3 * SZ_1M);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't remove overlapping space %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (test_check_exists(cache, SZ_512K, 3 * SZ_1M)) {
|
|
test_msg("Left over pieces after removing overlapping\n");
|
|
return -1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
__btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache->free_space_ctl);
|
|
|
|
/* Now with the extent entry offset into the bitmap */
|
|
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, SZ_4M, SZ_4M, 1);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't add space to the bitmap %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, SZ_2M, SZ_2M, 0);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't add extent to the cache %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(cache, 3 * SZ_1M, SZ_4M);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Problem removing overlapping space %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (test_check_exists(cache, 3 * SZ_1M, SZ_4M)) {
|
|
test_msg("Left something behind when removing space");
|
|
return -1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* This has blown up in the past, the extent entry starts before the
|
|
* bitmap entry, but we're trying to remove an offset that falls
|
|
* completely within the bitmap range and is in both the extent entry
|
|
* and the bitmap entry, looks like this
|
|
*
|
|
* [ extent ]
|
|
* [ bitmap ]
|
|
* [ del ]
|
|
*/
|
|
__btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache->free_space_ctl);
|
|
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, bitmap_offset + SZ_4M, SZ_4M, 1);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't add bitmap %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, bitmap_offset - SZ_1M,
|
|
5 * SZ_1M, 0);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't add extent entry %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(cache, bitmap_offset + SZ_1M, 5 * SZ_1M);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Failed to free our space %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (test_check_exists(cache, bitmap_offset + SZ_1M, 5 * SZ_1M)) {
|
|
test_msg("Left stuff over\n");
|
|
return -1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
__btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache->free_space_ctl);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* This blew up before, we have part of the free space in a bitmap and
|
|
* then the entirety of the rest of the space in an extent. This used
|
|
* to return -EAGAIN back from btrfs_remove_extent, make sure this
|
|
* doesn't happen.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, SZ_1M, SZ_2M, 1);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't add bitmap entry %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, 3 * SZ_1M, SZ_1M, 0);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't add extent entry %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(cache, SZ_1M, 3 * SZ_1M);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Error removing bitmap and extent overlapping %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
__btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache->free_space_ctl);
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Used by test_steal_space_from_bitmap_to_extent(). */
|
|
static bool test_use_bitmap(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
|
|
struct btrfs_free_space *info)
|
|
{
|
|
return ctl->free_extents > 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Used by test_steal_space_from_bitmap_to_extent(). */
|
|
static int
|
|
check_num_extents_and_bitmaps(const struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache,
|
|
const int num_extents,
|
|
const int num_bitmaps)
|
|
{
|
|
if (cache->free_space_ctl->free_extents != num_extents) {
|
|
test_msg("Incorrect # of extent entries in the cache: %d, expected %d\n",
|
|
cache->free_space_ctl->free_extents, num_extents);
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
}
|
|
if (cache->free_space_ctl->total_bitmaps != num_bitmaps) {
|
|
test_msg("Incorrect # of extent entries in the cache: %d, expected %d\n",
|
|
cache->free_space_ctl->total_bitmaps, num_bitmaps);
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
}
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Used by test_steal_space_from_bitmap_to_extent(). */
|
|
static int check_cache_empty(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache)
|
|
{
|
|
u64 offset;
|
|
u64 max_extent_size;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Now lets confirm that there's absolutely no free space left to
|
|
* allocate.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (cache->free_space_ctl->free_space != 0) {
|
|
test_msg("Cache free space is not 0\n");
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* And any allocation request, no matter how small, should fail now. */
|
|
offset = btrfs_find_space_for_alloc(cache, 0, 4096, 0,
|
|
&max_extent_size);
|
|
if (offset != 0) {
|
|
test_msg("Space allocation did not fail, returned offset: %llu",
|
|
offset);
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* And no extent nor bitmap entries in the cache anymore. */
|
|
return check_num_extents_and_bitmaps(cache, 0, 0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Before we were able to steal free space from a bitmap entry to an extent
|
|
* entry, we could end up with 2 entries representing a contiguous free space.
|
|
* One would be an extent entry and the other a bitmap entry. Since in order
|
|
* to allocate space to a caller we use only 1 entry, we couldn't return that
|
|
* whole range to the caller if it was requested. This forced the caller to
|
|
* either assume ENOSPC or perform several smaller space allocations, which
|
|
* wasn't optimal as they could be spread all over the block group while under
|
|
* concurrency (extra overhead and fragmentation).
|
|
*
|
|
* This stealing approach is beneficial, since we always prefer to allocate
|
|
* from extent entries, both for clustered and non-clustered allocation
|
|
* requests.
|
|
*/
|
|
static int
|
|
test_steal_space_from_bitmap_to_extent(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache,
|
|
u32 sectorsize)
|
|
{
|
|
int ret;
|
|
u64 offset;
|
|
u64 max_extent_size;
|
|
const struct btrfs_free_space_op test_free_space_ops = {
|
|
.recalc_thresholds = cache->free_space_ctl->op->recalc_thresholds,
|
|
.use_bitmap = test_use_bitmap,
|
|
};
|
|
const struct btrfs_free_space_op *orig_free_space_ops;
|
|
|
|
test_msg("Running space stealing from bitmap to extent\n");
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* For this test, we want to ensure we end up with an extent entry
|
|
* immediately adjacent to a bitmap entry, where the bitmap starts
|
|
* at an offset where the extent entry ends. We keep adding and
|
|
* removing free space to reach into this state, but to get there
|
|
* we need to reach a point where marking new free space doesn't
|
|
* result in adding new extent entries or merging the new space
|
|
* with existing extent entries - the space ends up being marked
|
|
* in an existing bitmap that covers the new free space range.
|
|
*
|
|
* To get there, we need to reach the threshold defined set at
|
|
* cache->free_space_ctl->extents_thresh, which currently is
|
|
* 256 extents on a x86_64 system at least, and a few other
|
|
* conditions (check free_space_cache.c). Instead of making the
|
|
* test much longer and complicated, use a "use_bitmap" operation
|
|
* that forces use of bitmaps as soon as we have at least 1
|
|
* extent entry.
|
|
*/
|
|
orig_free_space_ops = cache->free_space_ctl->op;
|
|
cache->free_space_ctl->op = &test_free_space_ops;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Extent entry covering free space range [128Mb - 256Kb, 128Mb - 128Kb[
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, SZ_128M - SZ_256K, SZ_128K, 0);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't add extent entry %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Bitmap entry covering free space range [128Mb + 512Kb, 256Mb[ */
|
|
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, SZ_128M + SZ_512K,
|
|
SZ_128M - SZ_512K, 1);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't add bitmap entry %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = check_num_extents_and_bitmaps(cache, 2, 1);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Now make only the first 256Kb of the bitmap marked as free, so that
|
|
* we end up with only the following ranges marked as free space:
|
|
*
|
|
* [128Mb - 256Kb, 128Mb - 128Kb[
|
|
* [128Mb + 512Kb, 128Mb + 768Kb[
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(cache,
|
|
SZ_128M + 768 * SZ_1K,
|
|
SZ_128M - 768 * SZ_1K);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Failed to free part of bitmap space %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Confirm that only those 2 ranges are marked as free. */
|
|
if (!test_check_exists(cache, SZ_128M - SZ_256K, SZ_128K)) {
|
|
test_msg("Free space range missing\n");
|
|
return -ENOENT;
|
|
}
|
|
if (!test_check_exists(cache, SZ_128M + SZ_512K, SZ_256K)) {
|
|
test_msg("Free space range missing\n");
|
|
return -ENOENT;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Confirm that the bitmap range [128Mb + 768Kb, 256Mb[ isn't marked
|
|
* as free anymore.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (test_check_exists(cache, SZ_128M + 768 * SZ_1K,
|
|
SZ_128M - 768 * SZ_1K)) {
|
|
test_msg("Bitmap region not removed from space cache\n");
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Confirm that the region [128Mb + 256Kb, 128Mb + 512Kb[, which is
|
|
* covered by the bitmap, isn't marked as free.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (test_check_exists(cache, SZ_128M + SZ_256K, SZ_256K)) {
|
|
test_msg("Invalid bitmap region marked as free\n");
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Confirm that the region [128Mb, 128Mb + 256Kb[, which is covered
|
|
* by the bitmap too, isn't marked as free either.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (test_check_exists(cache, SZ_128M, SZ_256K)) {
|
|
test_msg("Invalid bitmap region marked as free\n");
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Now lets mark the region [128Mb, 128Mb + 512Kb[ as free too. But,
|
|
* lets make sure the free space cache marks it as free in the bitmap,
|
|
* and doesn't insert a new extent entry to represent this region.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = btrfs_add_free_space(cache, SZ_128M, SZ_512K);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Error adding free space: %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
/* Confirm the region is marked as free. */
|
|
if (!test_check_exists(cache, SZ_128M, SZ_512K)) {
|
|
test_msg("Bitmap region not marked as free\n");
|
|
return -ENOENT;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Confirm that no new extent entries or bitmap entries were added to
|
|
* the cache after adding that free space region.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = check_num_extents_and_bitmaps(cache, 2, 1);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Now lets add a small free space region to the right of the previous
|
|
* one, which is not contiguous with it and is part of the bitmap too.
|
|
* The goal is to test that the bitmap entry space stealing doesn't
|
|
* steal this space region.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = btrfs_add_free_space(cache, SZ_128M + SZ_16M, sectorsize);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Error adding free space: %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Confirm that no new extent entries or bitmap entries were added to
|
|
* the cache after adding that free space region.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = check_num_extents_and_bitmaps(cache, 2, 1);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Now mark the region [128Mb - 128Kb, 128Mb[ as free too. This will
|
|
* expand the range covered by the existing extent entry that represents
|
|
* the free space [128Mb - 256Kb, 128Mb - 128Kb[.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = btrfs_add_free_space(cache, SZ_128M - SZ_128K, SZ_128K);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Error adding free space: %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
/* Confirm the region is marked as free. */
|
|
if (!test_check_exists(cache, SZ_128M - SZ_128K, SZ_128K)) {
|
|
test_msg("Extent region not marked as free\n");
|
|
return -ENOENT;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Confirm that our extent entry didn't stole all free space from the
|
|
* bitmap, because of the small 4Kb free space region.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = check_num_extents_and_bitmaps(cache, 2, 1);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* So now we have the range [128Mb - 256Kb, 128Mb + 768Kb[ as free
|
|
* space. Without stealing bitmap free space into extent entry space,
|
|
* we would have all this free space represented by 2 entries in the
|
|
* cache:
|
|
*
|
|
* extent entry covering range: [128Mb - 256Kb, 128Mb[
|
|
* bitmap entry covering range: [128Mb, 128Mb + 768Kb[
|
|
*
|
|
* Attempting to allocate the whole free space (1Mb) would fail, because
|
|
* we can't allocate from multiple entries.
|
|
* With the bitmap free space stealing, we get a single extent entry
|
|
* that represents the 1Mb free space, and therefore we're able to
|
|
* allocate the whole free space at once.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (!test_check_exists(cache, SZ_128M - SZ_256K, SZ_1M)) {
|
|
test_msg("Expected region not marked as free\n");
|
|
return -ENOENT;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (cache->free_space_ctl->free_space != (SZ_1M + sectorsize)) {
|
|
test_msg("Cache free space is not 1Mb + %u\n", sectorsize);
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
offset = btrfs_find_space_for_alloc(cache,
|
|
0, SZ_1M, 0,
|
|
&max_extent_size);
|
|
if (offset != (SZ_128M - SZ_256K)) {
|
|
test_msg("Failed to allocate 1Mb from space cache, returned offset is: %llu\n",
|
|
offset);
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* All that remains is a sectorsize free space region in a bitmap.
|
|
* Confirm.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = check_num_extents_and_bitmaps(cache, 1, 1);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
if (cache->free_space_ctl->free_space != sectorsize) {
|
|
test_msg("Cache free space is not %u\n", sectorsize);
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
offset = btrfs_find_space_for_alloc(cache,
|
|
0, sectorsize, 0,
|
|
&max_extent_size);
|
|
if (offset != (SZ_128M + SZ_16M)) {
|
|
test_msg("Failed to allocate %u, returned offset : %llu\n",
|
|
sectorsize, offset);
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = check_cache_empty(cache);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
__btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache->free_space_ctl);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Now test a similar scenario, but where our extent entry is located
|
|
* to the right of the bitmap entry, so that we can check that stealing
|
|
* space from a bitmap to the front of an extent entry works.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Extent entry covering free space range [128Mb + 128Kb, 128Mb + 256Kb[
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, SZ_128M + SZ_128K, SZ_128K, 0);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't add extent entry %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Bitmap entry covering free space range [0, 128Mb - 512Kb[ */
|
|
ret = test_add_free_space_entry(cache, 0, SZ_128M - SZ_512K, 1);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't add bitmap entry %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = check_num_extents_and_bitmaps(cache, 2, 1);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Now make only the last 256Kb of the bitmap marked as free, so that
|
|
* we end up with only the following ranges marked as free space:
|
|
*
|
|
* [128Mb + 128b, 128Mb + 256Kb[
|
|
* [128Mb - 768Kb, 128Mb - 512Kb[
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = btrfs_remove_free_space(cache, 0, SZ_128M - 768 * SZ_1K);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Failed to free part of bitmap space %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Confirm that only those 2 ranges are marked as free. */
|
|
if (!test_check_exists(cache, SZ_128M + SZ_128K, SZ_128K)) {
|
|
test_msg("Free space range missing\n");
|
|
return -ENOENT;
|
|
}
|
|
if (!test_check_exists(cache, SZ_128M - 768 * SZ_1K, SZ_256K)) {
|
|
test_msg("Free space range missing\n");
|
|
return -ENOENT;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Confirm that the bitmap range [0, 128Mb - 768Kb[ isn't marked
|
|
* as free anymore.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (test_check_exists(cache, 0, SZ_128M - 768 * SZ_1K)) {
|
|
test_msg("Bitmap region not removed from space cache\n");
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Confirm that the region [128Mb - 512Kb, 128Mb[, which is
|
|
* covered by the bitmap, isn't marked as free.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (test_check_exists(cache, SZ_128M - SZ_512K, SZ_512K)) {
|
|
test_msg("Invalid bitmap region marked as free\n");
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Now lets mark the region [128Mb - 512Kb, 128Mb[ as free too. But,
|
|
* lets make sure the free space cache marks it as free in the bitmap,
|
|
* and doesn't insert a new extent entry to represent this region.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = btrfs_add_free_space(cache, SZ_128M - SZ_512K, SZ_512K);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Error adding free space: %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
/* Confirm the region is marked as free. */
|
|
if (!test_check_exists(cache, SZ_128M - SZ_512K, SZ_512K)) {
|
|
test_msg("Bitmap region not marked as free\n");
|
|
return -ENOENT;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Confirm that no new extent entries or bitmap entries were added to
|
|
* the cache after adding that free space region.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = check_num_extents_and_bitmaps(cache, 2, 1);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Now lets add a small free space region to the left of the previous
|
|
* one, which is not contiguous with it and is part of the bitmap too.
|
|
* The goal is to test that the bitmap entry space stealing doesn't
|
|
* steal this space region.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = btrfs_add_free_space(cache, SZ_32M, 2 * sectorsize);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Error adding free space: %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Now mark the region [128Mb, 128Mb + 128Kb[ as free too. This will
|
|
* expand the range covered by the existing extent entry that represents
|
|
* the free space [128Mb + 128Kb, 128Mb + 256Kb[.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = btrfs_add_free_space(cache, SZ_128M, SZ_128K);
|
|
if (ret) {
|
|
test_msg("Error adding free space: %d\n", ret);
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
/* Confirm the region is marked as free. */
|
|
if (!test_check_exists(cache, SZ_128M, SZ_128K)) {
|
|
test_msg("Extent region not marked as free\n");
|
|
return -ENOENT;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Confirm that our extent entry didn't stole all free space from the
|
|
* bitmap, because of the small 2 * sectorsize free space region.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = check_num_extents_and_bitmaps(cache, 2, 1);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* So now we have the range [128Mb - 768Kb, 128Mb + 256Kb[ as free
|
|
* space. Without stealing bitmap free space into extent entry space,
|
|
* we would have all this free space represented by 2 entries in the
|
|
* cache:
|
|
*
|
|
* extent entry covering range: [128Mb, 128Mb + 256Kb[
|
|
* bitmap entry covering range: [128Mb - 768Kb, 128Mb[
|
|
*
|
|
* Attempting to allocate the whole free space (1Mb) would fail, because
|
|
* we can't allocate from multiple entries.
|
|
* With the bitmap free space stealing, we get a single extent entry
|
|
* that represents the 1Mb free space, and therefore we're able to
|
|
* allocate the whole free space at once.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (!test_check_exists(cache, SZ_128M - 768 * SZ_1K, SZ_1M)) {
|
|
test_msg("Expected region not marked as free\n");
|
|
return -ENOENT;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (cache->free_space_ctl->free_space != (SZ_1M + 2 * sectorsize)) {
|
|
test_msg("Cache free space is not 1Mb + %u\n", 2 * sectorsize);
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
offset = btrfs_find_space_for_alloc(cache, 0, SZ_1M, 0,
|
|
&max_extent_size);
|
|
if (offset != (SZ_128M - 768 * SZ_1K)) {
|
|
test_msg("Failed to allocate 1Mb from space cache, returned offset is: %llu\n",
|
|
offset);
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* All that remains is 2 * sectorsize free space region
|
|
* in a bitmap. Confirm.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = check_num_extents_and_bitmaps(cache, 1, 1);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
if (cache->free_space_ctl->free_space != 2 * sectorsize) {
|
|
test_msg("Cache free space is not %u\n", 2 * sectorsize);
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
offset = btrfs_find_space_for_alloc(cache,
|
|
0, 2 * sectorsize, 0,
|
|
&max_extent_size);
|
|
if (offset != SZ_32M) {
|
|
test_msg("Failed to allocate %u, offset: %llu\n",
|
|
2 * sectorsize,
|
|
offset);
|
|
return -EINVAL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ret = check_cache_empty(cache);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
return ret;
|
|
|
|
cache->free_space_ctl->op = orig_free_space_ops;
|
|
__btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache->free_space_ctl);
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int btrfs_test_free_space_cache(u32 sectorsize, u32 nodesize)
|
|
{
|
|
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info;
|
|
struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache;
|
|
struct btrfs_root *root = NULL;
|
|
int ret = -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
test_msg("Running btrfs free space cache tests\n");
|
|
fs_info = btrfs_alloc_dummy_fs_info(nodesize, sectorsize);
|
|
if (!fs_info)
|
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* For ppc64 (with 64k page size), bytes per bitmap might be
|
|
* larger than 1G. To make bitmap test available in ppc64,
|
|
* alloc dummy block group whose size cross bitmaps.
|
|
*/
|
|
cache = btrfs_alloc_dummy_block_group(fs_info,
|
|
BITS_PER_BITMAP * sectorsize + PAGE_SIZE);
|
|
if (!cache) {
|
|
test_msg("Couldn't run the tests\n");
|
|
btrfs_free_dummy_fs_info(fs_info);
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
root = btrfs_alloc_dummy_root(fs_info);
|
|
if (IS_ERR(root)) {
|
|
ret = PTR_ERR(root);
|
|
goto out;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
root->fs_info->extent_root = root;
|
|
|
|
ret = test_extents(cache);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
goto out;
|
|
ret = test_bitmaps(cache, sectorsize);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
goto out;
|
|
ret = test_bitmaps_and_extents(cache, sectorsize);
|
|
if (ret)
|
|
goto out;
|
|
|
|
ret = test_steal_space_from_bitmap_to_extent(cache, sectorsize);
|
|
out:
|
|
btrfs_free_dummy_block_group(cache);
|
|
btrfs_free_dummy_root(root);
|
|
btrfs_free_dummy_fs_info(fs_info);
|
|
test_msg("Free space cache tests finished\n");
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|