mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-25 18:15:11 +07:00
c23a283b53
Add documentation for KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework. - Add intro and usage guide for KUnit - Add API reference Signed-off-by: Felix Guo <felixguoxiuping@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
80 lines
3.5 KiB
ReStructuredText
80 lines
3.5 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
|
|
|
=========================================
|
|
KUnit - Unit Testing for the Linux Kernel
|
|
=========================================
|
|
|
|
.. toctree::
|
|
:maxdepth: 2
|
|
|
|
start
|
|
usage
|
|
api/index
|
|
faq
|
|
|
|
What is KUnit?
|
|
==============
|
|
|
|
KUnit is a lightweight unit testing and mocking framework for the Linux kernel.
|
|
These tests are able to be run locally on a developer's workstation without a VM
|
|
or special hardware.
|
|
|
|
KUnit is heavily inspired by JUnit, Python's unittest.mock, and
|
|
Googletest/Googlemock for C++. KUnit provides facilities for defining unit test
|
|
cases, grouping related test cases into test suites, providing common
|
|
infrastructure for running tests, and much more.
|
|
|
|
Get started now: :doc:`start`
|
|
|
|
Why KUnit?
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
A unit test is supposed to test a single unit of code in isolation, hence the
|
|
name. A unit test should be the finest granularity of testing and as such should
|
|
allow all possible code paths to be tested in the code under test; this is only
|
|
possible if the code under test is very small and does not have any external
|
|
dependencies outside of the test's control like hardware.
|
|
|
|
Outside of KUnit, there are no testing frameworks currently
|
|
available for the kernel that do not require installing the kernel on a test
|
|
machine or in a VM and all require tests to be written in userspace running on
|
|
the kernel; this is true for Autotest, and kselftest, disqualifying
|
|
any of them from being considered unit testing frameworks.
|
|
|
|
KUnit addresses the problem of being able to run tests without needing a virtual
|
|
machine or actual hardware with User Mode Linux. User Mode Linux is a Linux
|
|
architecture, like ARM or x86; however, unlike other architectures it compiles
|
|
to a standalone program that can be run like any other program directly inside
|
|
of a host operating system; to be clear, it does not require any virtualization
|
|
support; it is just a regular program.
|
|
|
|
KUnit is fast. Excluding build time, from invocation to completion KUnit can run
|
|
several dozen tests in only 10 to 20 seconds; this might not sound like a big
|
|
deal to some people, but having such fast and easy to run tests fundamentally
|
|
changes the way you go about testing and even writing code in the first place.
|
|
Linus himself said in his `git talk at Google
|
|
<https://gist.github.com/lorn/1272686/revisions#diff-53c65572127855f1b003db4064a94573R874>`_:
|
|
|
|
"... a lot of people seem to think that performance is about doing the
|
|
same thing, just doing it faster, and that is not true. That is not what
|
|
performance is all about. If you can do something really fast, really
|
|
well, people will start using it differently."
|
|
|
|
In this context Linus was talking about branching and merging,
|
|
but this point also applies to testing. If your tests are slow, unreliable, are
|
|
difficult to write, and require a special setup or special hardware to run,
|
|
then you wait a lot longer to write tests, and you wait a lot longer to run
|
|
tests; this means that tests are likely to break, unlikely to test a lot of
|
|
things, and are unlikely to be rerun once they pass. If your tests are really
|
|
fast, you run them all the time, every time you make a change, and every time
|
|
someone sends you some code. Why trust that someone ran all their tests
|
|
correctly on every change when you can just run them yourself in less time than
|
|
it takes to read their test log?
|
|
|
|
How do I use it?
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
* :doc:`start` - for new users of KUnit
|
|
* :doc:`usage` - for a more detailed explanation of KUnit features
|
|
* :doc:`api/index` - for the list of KUnit APIs used for testing
|