mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-27 12:25:08 +07:00
5b43d20a4d
Without this patch, on an idle system I get: cpu-power-0:21.638 cpu-power-1:27.102 cpu-power-2:29.343 cpu-power-3:25.784 Total: 103.8W With this patch: cpu-power-0:11.730 cpu-power-1:17.185 cpu-power-2:18.547 cpu-power-3:17.528 Total: 65.0W If I lower HZ to 100, I can get it as low as: cpu-power-0:10.938 cpu-power-1:16.021 cpu-power-2:17.245 cpu-power-3:16.145 Total: 60.2W Another (older) Quad G5 went from 54W to 39W at HZ=250. Coming back out of Deep Nap takes 40-70 cycles longer than coming back from just Nap (which already takes quite a while). I don't think it'll be a performance issue (interrupt latency on an idle system), but in case someone does measurements feel free to report them. Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Acked-by: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
alpha | ||
arm | ||
arm26 | ||
avr32 | ||
cris | ||
frv | ||
h8300 | ||
i386 | ||
ia64 | ||
m32r | ||
m68k | ||
m68knommu | ||
mips | ||
parisc | ||
powerpc | ||
ppc | ||
s390 | ||
sh | ||
sh64 | ||
sparc | ||
sparc64 | ||
um | ||
v850 | ||
x86_64 | ||
xtensa |