mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2024-12-13 07:56:47 +07:00
3d59eebc5e
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)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=ivQa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'balancenuma-v11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mel/linux-balancenuma
Pull Automatic NUMA Balancing bare-bones from Mel Gorman:
"There are three implementations for NUMA balancing, this tree
(balancenuma), numacore which has been developed in tip/master and
autonuma which is in aa.git.
In almost all respects balancenuma is the dumbest of the three because
its main impact is on the VM side with no attempt to be smart about
scheduling. In the interest of getting the ball rolling, it would be
desirable to see this much merged for 3.8 with the view to building
scheduler smarts on top and adapting the VM where required for 3.9.
The most recent set of comparisons available from different people are
mel: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/9/108
mingo: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/7/331
tglx: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/10/437
srikar: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/10/397
The results are a mixed bag. In my own tests, balancenuma does
reasonably well. It's dumb as rocks and does not regress against
mainline. On the other hand, Ingo's tests shows that balancenuma is
incapable of converging for this workloads driven by perf which is bad
but is potentially explained by the lack of scheduler smarts. Thomas'
results show balancenuma improves on mainline but falls far short of
numacore or autonuma. Srikar's results indicate we all suffer on a
large machine with imbalanced node sizes.
My own testing showed that recent numacore results have improved
dramatically, particularly in the last week but not universally.
We've butted heads heavily on system CPU usage and high levels of
migration even when it shows that overall performance is better.
There are also cases where it regresses. Of interest is that for
specjbb in some configurations it will regress for lower numbers of
warehouses and show gains for higher numbers which is not reported by
the tool by default and sometimes missed in treports. Recently I
reported for numacore that the JVM was crashing with
NullPointerExceptions but currently it's unclear what the source of
this problem is. Initially I thought it was in how numacore batch
handles PTEs but I'm no longer think this is the case. It's possible
numacore is just able to trigger it due to higher rates of migration.
These reports were quite late in the cycle so I/we would like to start
with this tree as it contains much of the code we can agree on and has
not changed significantly over the last 2-3 weeks."
* tag 'balancenuma-v11' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mel/linux-balancenuma: (50 commits)
mm/rmap, migration: Make rmap_walk_anon() and try_to_unmap_anon() more scalable
mm/rmap: Convert the struct anon_vma::mutex to an rwsem
mm: migrate: Account a transhuge page properly when rate limiting
mm: numa: Account for failed allocations and isolations as migration failures
mm: numa: Add THP migration for the NUMA working set scanning fault case build fix
mm: numa: Add THP migration for the NUMA working set scanning fault case.
mm: sched: numa: Delay PTE scanning until a task is scheduled on a new node
mm: sched: numa: Control enabling and disabling of NUMA balancing if !SCHED_DEBUG
mm: sched: numa: Control enabling and disabling of NUMA balancing
mm: sched: Adapt the scanning rate if a NUMA hinting fault does not migrate
mm: numa: Use a two-stage filter to restrict pages being migrated for unlikely task<->node relationships
mm: numa: migrate: Set last_nid on newly allocated page
mm: numa: split_huge_page: Transfer last_nid on tail page
mm: numa: Introduce last_nid to the page frame
sched: numa: Slowly increase the scanning period as NUMA faults are handled
mm: numa: Rate limit setting of pte_numa if node is saturated
mm: numa: Rate limit the amount of memory that is migrated between nodes
mm: numa: Structures for Migrate On Fault per NUMA migration rate limiting
mm: numa: Migrate pages handled during a pmd_numa hinting fault
mm: numa: Migrate on reference policy
...
80 lines
2.0 KiB
C
80 lines
2.0 KiB
C
/*
|
|
* Only give sleepers 50% of their service deficit. This allows
|
|
* them to run sooner, but does not allow tons of sleepers to
|
|
* rip the spread apart.
|
|
*/
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS, true)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Place new tasks ahead so that they do not starve already running
|
|
* tasks
|
|
*/
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(START_DEBIT, true)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Prefer to schedule the task we woke last (assuming it failed
|
|
* wakeup-preemption), since its likely going to consume data we
|
|
* touched, increases cache locality.
|
|
*/
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(NEXT_BUDDY, false)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Prefer to schedule the task that ran last (when we did
|
|
* wake-preempt) as that likely will touch the same data, increases
|
|
* cache locality.
|
|
*/
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(LAST_BUDDY, true)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Consider buddies to be cache hot, decreases the likelyness of a
|
|
* cache buddy being migrated away, increases cache locality.
|
|
*/
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(CACHE_HOT_BUDDY, true)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Allow wakeup-time preemption of the current task:
|
|
*/
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(WAKEUP_PREEMPTION, true)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Use arch dependent cpu power functions
|
|
*/
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(ARCH_POWER, true)
|
|
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(HRTICK, false)
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(DOUBLE_TICK, false)
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(LB_BIAS, true)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Spin-wait on mutex acquisition when the mutex owner is running on
|
|
* another cpu -- assumes that when the owner is running, it will soon
|
|
* release the lock. Decreases scheduling overhead.
|
|
*/
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(OWNER_SPIN, true)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Decrement CPU power based on time not spent running tasks
|
|
*/
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(NONTASK_POWER, true)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Queue remote wakeups on the target CPU and process them
|
|
* using the scheduler IPI. Reduces rq->lock contention/bounces.
|
|
*/
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(TTWU_QUEUE, true)
|
|
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(FORCE_SD_OVERLAP, false)
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(RT_RUNTIME_SHARE, true)
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(LB_MIN, false)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Apply the automatic NUMA scheduling policy. Enabled automatically
|
|
* at runtime if running on a NUMA machine. Can be controlled via
|
|
* numa_balancing=. Allow PTE scanning to be forced on UMA machines
|
|
* for debugging the core machinery.
|
|
*/
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(NUMA, false)
|
|
SCHED_FEAT(NUMA_FORCE, false)
|
|
#endif
|