mirror of
https://github.com/AuxXxilium/linux_dsm_epyc7002.git
synced 2025-02-28 16:04:18 +07:00
![]() The current assumption in the elantech driver that hw version 3 touchpads are never clickpads and hw version 4 touchpads are always clickpads is wrong. There are several bug reports for this, ie: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030802 http://superuser.com/questions/619582/right-elantech-touchpad-button-not-working-in-linux I've spend a couple of hours wading through various bugzillas, launchpads and forum posts to create a list of fw-versions and capabilities for different laptop models to find a good method to differentiate between clickpads and versions with separate hardware buttons. Which shows that a device being a clickpad is reliable indicated by bit 12 being set in the fw_version. I've included the gathered list inside the driver, so that we've this info at hand if we need to revisit this later. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
alps.c | ||
alps.h | ||
amimouse.c | ||
appletouch.c | ||
atarimouse.c | ||
bcm5974.c | ||
cyapa.c | ||
cypress_ps2.c | ||
cypress_ps2.h | ||
elantech.c | ||
elantech.h | ||
gpio_mouse.c | ||
hgpk.c | ||
hgpk.h | ||
inport.c | ||
Kconfig | ||
lifebook.c | ||
lifebook.h | ||
logibm.c | ||
logips2pp.c | ||
logips2pp.h | ||
Makefile | ||
maplemouse.c | ||
navpoint.c | ||
pc110pad.c | ||
psmouse-base.c | ||
psmouse.h | ||
pxa930_trkball.c | ||
rpcmouse.c | ||
sentelic.c | ||
sentelic.h | ||
sermouse.c | ||
synaptics_i2c.c | ||
synaptics_usb.c | ||
synaptics.c | ||
synaptics.h | ||
touchkit_ps2.c | ||
touchkit_ps2.h | ||
trackpoint.c | ||
trackpoint.h | ||
vsxxxaa.c |