Peter Xu 014868616d mm/hugetlb: fix F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE ... commit 22247efd822e6d263f3c8bd327f3f769aea9b1d9 upstream. Patch series "mm/hugetlb: Fix issues on file sealing and fork", v2. Hugh reported issue with F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE not applied correctly to hugetlbfs, which I can easily verify using the memfd_test program, which seems that the program is hardly run with hugetlbfs pages (as by default shmem). Meanwhile I found another probably even more severe issue on that hugetlb fork won't wr-protect child cow pages, so child can potentially write to parent private pages. Patch 2 addresses that. After this series applied, "memfd_test hugetlbfs" should start to pass. This patch (of 2): F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE is missing for hugetlb starting from the first day. There is a test program for that and it fails constantly. $ ./memfd_test hugetlbfs memfd-hugetlb: CREATE memfd-hugetlb: BASIC memfd-hugetlb: SEAL-WRITE memfd-hugetlb: SEAL-FUTURE-WRITE mmap() didn't fail as expected Aborted (core dumped) I think it's probably because no one is really running the hugetlbfs test. Fix it by checking FUTURE_WRITE also in hugetlbfs_file_mmap() as what we do in shmem_mmap(). Generalize a helper for that. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503234356.9097-1-peterx@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210503234356.9097-2-peterx@redhat.com Fixes: ab3948f58f ("mm/memfd: add an F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal to memfd") Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>		2021-05-19 10:13:11 +02:00
..
inode.c	mm/hugetlb: fix F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE	2021-05-19 10:13:11 +02:00
Makefile	treewide: Add SPDX license identifier - Makefile/Kconfig	2019-05-21 10:50:46 +02:00