Stephen Warren 3712a3c488 pinctrl: add explicit gpio_disable_free pinmux_op ... Some pinctrl drivers (Tegra at least) program a pin to be a GPIO in a completely different manner than they select which function to mux out of that pin. In order to support a single "free" pinmux_op, the driver would need to maintain a per-pin state of requested-for-gpio vs. requested-for- function. However, that's a lot of work when the core already has explicit separate paths for gpio request/free and function request/free. So, add a gpio_disable_free op to struct pinmux_ops, and make pin_free() call it when appropriate. When doing this, I noticed that when calling pin_request(): !!gpio == (gpio_range != NULL) ... and so I collapsed those two parameters in both pin_request(), and when adding writing the new code in pin_free(). Also, for pin_free(): !!free_func == (gpio_range != NULL) However, I didn't want pin_free() to know about the GPIO function naming special case, so instead, I reworked pin_free() to always return the pin's previously requested function, and now pinmux_free_gpio() calls kfree(function). This is much more balanced with the allocation having been performed in pinmux_request_gpio(). Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>		2012-01-03 09:09:59 +01:00
..
machine.h
pinctrl.h	pinctrl: fix "warning: 'struct pinctrl_dev' declared inside parameter list"	2011-11-09 15:07:40 +01:00
pinmux.h	pinctrl: add explicit gpio_disable_free pinmux_op	2012-01-03 09:09:59 +01:00