Halil Pasic 9f2a82caea KVM: s390: index kvm->arch.idle_mask by vcpu_idx ... commit a3e03bc1368c1bc16e19b001fc96dc7430573cc8 upstream. While in practice vcpu->vcpu_idx == vcpu->vcp_id is often true, it may not always be, and we must not rely on this. Reason is that KVM decides the vcpu_idx, userspace decides the vcpu_id, thus the two might not match. Currently kvm->arch.idle_mask is indexed by vcpu_id, which implies that code like for_each_set_bit(vcpu_id, kvm->arch.idle_mask, online_vcpus) { vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, vcpu_id); do_stuff(vcpu); } is not legit. Reason is that kvm_get_vcpu expects an vcpu_idx, not an vcpu_id. The trouble is, we do actually use kvm->arch.idle_mask like this. To fix this problem we have two options. Either use kvm_get_vcpu_by_id(vcpu_id), which would loop to find the right vcpu_id, or switch to indexing via vcpu_idx. The latter is preferable for obvious reasons. Let us make switch from indexing kvm->arch.idle_mask by vcpu_id to indexing it by vcpu_idx. To keep gisa_int.kicked_mask indexed by the same index as idle_mask lets make the same change for it as well. Fixes: 1ee0bc559d ("KVM: s390: get rid of local_int array") Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Christian Bornträger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.15+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210827125429.1912577-1-pasic@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>		2024-07-05 19:13:47 +02:00
..
asm	KVM: s390: index kvm->arch.idle_mask by vcpu_idx	2024-07-05 19:13:47 +02:00
uapi/asm	s390/sie: fix typo in SIGP code description	2020-10-07 21:50:02 +02:00