As said by Linus:
A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use.
Otherwise it's actively misleading.
In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the
caller wants.
In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the
future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or
something. The "zero" part of the interface isn't even _relevant_.
The main reason that kzfree() exists is to clear sensitive information
that should not be leaked to other future users of the same memory
objects.
Rename kzfree() to kfree_sensitive() to follow the example of the recently
added kvfree_sensitive() and make the intention of the API more explicit.
In addition, memzero_explicit() is used to clear the memory to make sure
that it won't get optimized away by the compiler.
The renaming is done by using the command sequence:
git grep -w --name-only kzfree |\
xargs sed -i 's/kzfree/kfree_sensitive/'
followed by some editing of the kfree_sensitive() kerneldoc and adding
a kzfree backward compatibility macro in slab.h.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c needs linux/slab.h]
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix fs/crypto/inline_crypt.c some more]
Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200616154311.12314-3-longman@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
In fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx(), ->i_crypt_info isn't known to be
non-NULL until we check fscrypt_inode_uses_inline_crypto(). So, load
->i_crypt_info after the check rather than before. This makes no
difference currently, but it prevents people from introducing bugs where
the pointer is dereferenced when it may be NULL.
Suggested-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200727174158.121456-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Normally smp_store_release() or cmpxchg_release() is paired with
smp_load_acquire(). Sometimes smp_load_acquire() can be replaced with
the more lightweight READ_ONCE(). However, for this to be safe, all the
published memory must only be accessed in a way that involves the
pointer itself. This may not be the case if allocating the object also
involves initializing a static or global variable, for example.
fscrypt_info includes various sub-objects which are internal to and are
allocated by other kernel subsystems such as keyrings and crypto. So by
using READ_ONCE() for ->i_crypt_info, we're relying on internal
implementation details of these other kernel subsystems.
Remove this fragile assumption by using smp_load_acquire() instead.
(Note: I haven't seen any real-world problems here. This change is just
fixing the code to be guaranteed correct and less fragile.)
Fixes: e37a784d8b ("fscrypt: use READ_ONCE() to access ->i_crypt_info")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721225920.114347-5-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Normally smp_store_release() or cmpxchg_release() is paired with
smp_load_acquire(). Sometimes smp_load_acquire() can be replaced with
the more lightweight READ_ONCE(). However, for this to be safe, all the
published memory must only be accessed in a way that involves the
pointer itself. This may not be the case if allocating the object also
involves initializing a static or global variable, for example.
super_block::s_master_keys is a keyring, which is internal to and is
allocated by the keyrings subsystem. By using READ_ONCE() for it, we're
relying on internal implementation details of the keyrings subsystem.
Remove this fragile assumption by using smp_load_acquire() instead.
(Note: I haven't seen any real-world problems here. This change is just
fixing the code to be guaranteed correct and less fragile.)
Fixes: 22d94f493b ("fscrypt: add FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721225920.114347-4-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Normally smp_store_release() or cmpxchg_release() is paired with
smp_load_acquire(). Sometimes smp_load_acquire() can be replaced with
the more lightweight READ_ONCE(). However, for this to be safe, all the
published memory must only be accessed in a way that involves the
pointer itself. This may not be the case if allocating the object also
involves initializing a static or global variable, for example.
fscrypt_prepared_key includes a pointer to a crypto_skcipher object,
which is internal to and is allocated by the crypto subsystem. By using
READ_ONCE() for it, we're relying on internal implementation details of
the crypto subsystem.
Remove this fragile assumption by using smp_load_acquire() instead.
(Note: I haven't seen any real-world problems here. This change is just
fixing the code to be guaranteed correct and less fragile.)
Fixes: 5fee36095c ("fscrypt: add inline encryption support")
Cc: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721225920.114347-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
fscrypt_do_sha256() is only used for hashing encrypted filenames to
create no-key tokens, which isn't performance-critical. Therefore a C
implementation of SHA-256 is sufficient.
Also, the logic to create no-key tokens is always potentially needed.
This differs from fscrypt's other dependencies on crypto API algorithms,
which are conditionally needed depending on what encryption policies
userspace is using. Therefore, for fscrypt there isn't much benefit to
allowing SHA-256 to be a loadable module.
So, make fscrypt_do_sha256() use the SHA-256 library instead of the
crypto_shash API. This is much simpler, since it avoids having to
implement one-time-init (which is hard to do correctly, and in fact was
implemented incorrectly) and handle failures to allocate the
crypto_shash object.
Fixes: edc440e3d2 ("fscrypt: improve format of no-key names")
Cc: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721225920.114347-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
IV_INO_LBLK_* exist only because of hardware limitations, and currently
the only known use case for them involves AES-256-XTS. Therefore, for
now only allow them in combination with AES-256-XTS. This way we don't
have to worry about them being combined with other encryption modes.
(To be clear, combining IV_INO_LBLK_* with other encryption modes
*should* work just fine. It's just not being tested, so we can't be
100% sure it works. So with no known use case, it's best to disallow it
for now, just like we don't allow other weird combinations like
AES-256-XTS contents encryption with Adiantum filenames encryption.)
This can be relaxed later if a use case for other combinations arises.
Fixes: b103fb7653 ("fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_64 policies")
Fixes: e3b1078bed ("fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_32 policies")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200721181012.39308-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
The name "FS_KEY_DERIVATION_NONCE_SIZE" is a bit outdated since due to
the addition of FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY, the file nonce may now
be used as a tweak instead of for key derivation. Also, we're now
prefixing the fscrypt constants with "FSCRYPT_" instead of "FS_".
Therefore, rename this constant to FSCRYPT_FILE_NONCE_SIZE.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200708215722.147154-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Each HKDF context byte is associated with a specific format of the
remaining part of the application-specific info string. Add comments so
that it's easier to keep track of what these all are.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200708215529.146890-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Add support for inline encryption to fs/crypto/. With "inline
encryption", the block layer handles the decryption/encryption as part
of the bio, instead of the filesystem doing the crypto itself via
Linux's crypto API. This model is needed in order to take advantage of
the inline encryption hardware present on most modern mobile SoCs.
To use inline encryption, the filesystem needs to be mounted with
'-o inlinecrypt'. Blk-crypto will then be used instead of the traditional
filesystem-layer crypto whenever possible to encrypt the contents
of any encrypted files in that filesystem. Fscrypt still provides the key
and IV to use, and the actual ciphertext on-disk is still the same;
therefore it's testable using the existing fscrypt ciphertext verification
tests.
Note that since blk-crypto has a fallback to Linux's crypto API, and
also supports all the encryption modes currently supported by fscrypt,
this feature is usable and testable even without actual inline
encryption hardware.
Per-filesystem changes will be needed to set encryption contexts when
submitting bios and to implement the 'inlinecrypt' mount option. This
patch just adds the common code.
Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200702015607.1215430-3-satyat@google.com
Co-developed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
- Add the IV_INO_LBLK_32 encryption policy flag which modifies the
encryption to be optimized for eMMC inline encryption hardware.
- Make the test_dummy_encryption mount option for ext4 and f2fs support
v2 encryption policies.
- Fix kerneldoc warnings and some coding style inconsistencies.
There will be merge conflicts with the ext4 and f2fs trees due to the
test_dummy_encryption change, but the resolutions are straightforward.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iIoEABYIADIWIQSacvsUNc7UX4ntmEPzXCl4vpKOKwUCXtScMBQcZWJpZ2dlcnNA
Z29vZ2xlLmNvbQAKCRDzXCl4vpKOKxC6AP0eOEkMrc9e10YftdN6xsyRjvqiPyFg
oMjuU+SvQ+/sVgEAo0mBFITnl75ZGb8PyqXCNMDAy6uHaxcEjVGufx5q2QE=
=dbxy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'fscrypt-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/fscrypt
Pull fscrypt updates from Eric Biggers:
- Add the IV_INO_LBLK_32 encryption policy flag which modifies the
encryption to be optimized for eMMC inline encryption hardware.
- Make the test_dummy_encryption mount option for ext4 and f2fs support
v2 encryption policies.
- Fix kerneldoc warnings and some coding style inconsistencies.
* tag 'fscrypt-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/fscrypt:
fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_32 policies
fscrypt: make test_dummy_encryption use v2 by default
fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2
fscrypt: add fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key()
linux/parser.h: add include guards
fscrypt: remove unnecessary extern keywords
fscrypt: name all function parameters
fscrypt: fix all kerneldoc warnings
The eMMC inline crypto standard will only specify 32 DUN bits (a.k.a. IV
bits), unlike UFS's 64. IV_INO_LBLK_64 is therefore not applicable, but
an encryption format which uses one key per policy and permits the
moving of encrypted file contents (as f2fs's garbage collector requires)
is still desirable.
To support such hardware, add a new encryption format IV_INO_LBLK_32
that makes the best use of the 32 bits: the IV is set to
'SipHash-2-4(inode_number) + file_logical_block_number mod 2^32', where
the SipHash key is derived from the fscrypt master key. We hash only
the inode number and not also the block number, because we need to
maintain contiguity of DUNs to merge bios.
Unlike with IV_INO_LBLK_64, with this format IV reuse is possible; this
is unavoidable given the size of the DUN. This means this format should
only be used where the requirements of the first paragraph apply.
However, the hash spreads out the IVs in the whole usable range, and the
use of a keyed hash makes it difficult for an attacker to determine
which files use which IVs.
Besides the above differences, this flag works like IV_INO_LBLK_64 in
that on ext4 it is only allowed if the stable_inodes feature has been
enabled to prevent inode numbers and the filesystem UUID from changing.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200515204141.251098-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Since v1 encryption policies are deprecated, make test_dummy_encryption
test v2 policies by default.
Note that this causes ext4/023 and ext4/028 to start failing due to
known bugs in those tests (see previous commit).
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200512233251.118314-5-ebiggers@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
v1 encryption policies are deprecated in favor of v2, and some new
features (e.g. encryption+casefolding) are only being added for v2.
Therefore, the "test_dummy_encryption" mount option (which is used for
encryption I/O testing with xfstests) needs to support v2 policies.
To do this, extend its syntax to be "test_dummy_encryption=v1" or
"test_dummy_encryption=v2". The existing "test_dummy_encryption" (no
argument) also continues to be accepted, to specify the default setting
-- currently v1, but the next patch changes it to v2.
To cleanly support both v1 and v2 while also making it easy to support
specifying other encryption settings in the future (say, accepting
"$contents_mode:$filenames_mode:v2"), make ext4 and f2fs maintain a
pointer to the dummy fscrypt_context rather than using mount flags.
To avoid concurrency issues, don't allow test_dummy_encryption to be set
or changed during a remount. (The former restriction is new, but
xfstests doesn't run into it, so no one should notice.)
Tested with 'gce-xfstests -c {ext4,f2fs}/encrypt -g auto'. On ext4,
there are two regressions, both of which are test bugs: ext4/023 and
ext4/028 fail because they set an xattr and expect it to be stored
inline, but the increase in size of the fscrypt_context from
24 to 40 bytes causes this xattr to be spilled into an external block.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200512233251.118314-4-ebiggers@kernel.org
Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Currently, the test_dummy_encryption mount option (which is used for
encryption I/O testing with xfstests) uses v1 encryption policies, and
it relies on userspace inserting a test key into the session keyring.
We need test_dummy_encryption to support v2 encryption policies too.
Requiring userspace to add the test key doesn't work well with v2
policies, since v2 policies only support the filesystem keyring (not the
session keyring), and keys in the filesystem keyring are lost when the
filesystem is unmounted. Hooking all test code that unmounts and
re-mounts the filesystem would be difficult.
Instead, let's make the filesystem automatically add the test key to its
keyring when test_dummy_encryption is enabled.
That puts the responsibility for choosing the test key on the kernel.
We could just hard-code a key. But out of paranoia, let's first try
using a per-boot random key, to prevent this code from being misused.
A per-boot key will work as long as no one expects dummy-encrypted files
to remain accessible after a reboot. (gce-xfstests doesn't.)
Therefore, this patch adds a function fscrypt_add_test_dummy_key() which
implements the above. The next patch will use it.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200512233251.118314-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Remove the unnecessary 'extern' keywords from function declarations.
This makes it so that we don't have a mix of both styles, so it won't be
ambiguous what to use in new fscrypt patches. This also makes the code
shorter and matches the 'checkpatch --strict' expectation.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200511191358.53096-4-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Fix all kerneldoc warnings in fs/crypto/ and include/linux/fscrypt.h.
Most of these were due to missing documentation for function parameters.
Detected with:
scripts/kernel-doc -v -none fs/crypto/*.{c,h} include/linux/fscrypt.h
This cleanup makes it possible to check new patches for kerneldoc
warnings without having to filter out all the existing ones.
For consistency, also adjust some function "brief descriptions" to
include the parentheses and to wrap at 80 characters. (The latter
matches the checkpatch expectation.)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200511191358.53096-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Instead of manually allocating a 'struct shash_desc' on the stack and
calling crypto_shash_digest(), switch to using the new helper function
crypto_shash_tfm_digest() which does this for us.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Add an ioctl FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE which retrieves a file's
encryption nonce. This makes it easier to write automated tests which
verify that fscrypt is doing the encryption correctly.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iIoEABYIADIWIQSacvsUNc7UX4ntmEPzXCl4vpKOKwUCXoIg/RQcZWJpZ2dlcnNA
Z29vZ2xlLmNvbQAKCRDzXCl4vpKOK2mZAQDjEil0Kf8AqZhjPuJSRrbifkzEPfu+
4EmERSyBZ5OCLgEA155kKnL5jiz7b5DRS9wGEw+drGpW8I7WfhTGv/XjoQs=
=2jU9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'fscrypt-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/fscrypt
Pull fscrypt updates from Eric Biggers:
"Add an ioctl FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE which retrieves a file's
encryption nonce.
This makes it easier to write automated tests which verify that
fscrypt is doing the encryption correctly"
* tag 'fscrypt-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/fscrypt:
ubifs: wire up FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE
f2fs: wire up FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE
ext4: wire up FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE
fscrypt: add FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE ioctl
Add an ioctl FS_IOC_GET_ENCRYPTION_NONCE which retrieves the nonce from
an encrypted file or directory. The nonce is the 16-byte random value
stored in the inode's encryption xattr. It is normally used together
with the master key to derive the inode's actual encryption key.
The nonces are needed by automated tests that verify the correctness of
the ciphertext on-disk. Except for the IV_INO_LBLK_64 case, there's no
way to replicate a file's ciphertext without knowing that file's nonce.
The nonces aren't secret, and the existing ciphertext verification tests
in xfstests retrieve them from disk using debugfs or dump.f2fs. But in
environments that lack these debugging tools, getting the nonces by
manually parsing the filesystem structure would be very hard.
To make this important type of testing much easier, let's just add an
ioctl that retrieves the nonce.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200314205052.93294-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
After FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY removes a key, it syncs the
filesystem and tries to get and put all inodes that were unlocked by the
key so that unused inodes get evicted via fscrypt_drop_inode().
Normally, the inodes are all clean due to the sync.
However, after the filesystem is sync'ed, userspace can modify and close
one of the files. (Userspace is *supposed* to close the files before
removing the key. But it doesn't always happen, and the kernel can't
assume it.) This causes the inode to be dirtied and have i_count == 0.
Then, fscrypt_drop_inode() failed to consider this case and indicated
that the inode can be dropped, causing the write to be lost.
On f2fs, other problems such as a filesystem freeze could occur due to
the inode being freed while still on f2fs's dirty inode list.
Fix this bug by making fscrypt_drop_inode() only drop clean inodes.
I've written an xfstest which detects this bug on ext4, f2fs, and ubifs.
Fixes: b1c0ec3599 ("fscrypt: add FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200305084138.653498-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
When an encrypted directory is listed without the key, the filesystem
must show "no-key names" that uniquely identify directory entries, are
at most 255 (NAME_MAX) bytes long, and don't contain '/' or '\0'.
Currently, for short names the no-key name is the base64 encoding of the
ciphertext filename, while for long names it's the base64 encoding of
the ciphertext filename's dirhash and second-to-last 16-byte block.
This format has the following problems:
- Since it doesn't always include the dirhash, it's incompatible with
directories that will use a secret-keyed dirhash over the plaintext
filenames. In this case, the dirhash won't be computable from the
ciphertext name without the key, so it instead must be retrieved from
the directory entry and always included in the no-key name.
Casefolded encrypted directories will use this type of dirhash.
- It's ambiguous: it's possible to craft two filenames that map to the
same no-key name, since the method used to abbreviate long filenames
doesn't use a proper cryptographic hash function.
Solve both these problems by switching to a new no-key name format that
is the base64 encoding of a variable-length structure that contains the
dirhash, up to 149 bytes of the ciphertext filename, and (if any bytes
remain) the SHA-256 of the remaining bytes of the ciphertext filename.
This ensures that each no-key name contains everything needed to find
the directory entry again, contains only legal characters, doesn't
exceed NAME_MAX, is unambiguous unless there's a SHA-256 collision, and
that we only take the performance hit of SHA-256 on very long filenames.
Note: this change does *not* address the existing issue where users can
modify the 'dirhash' part of a no-key name and the filesystem may still
accept the name.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>
[EB: improved comments and commit message, fixed checking return value
of base64_decode(), check for SHA-256 error, continue to set disk_name
for short names to keep matching simpler, and many other cleanups]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-7-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Now that there's sometimes a second type of per-file key (the dirhash
key), clarify some function names, macros, and documentation that
specifically deal with per-file *encryption* keys.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-4-ebiggers@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
When we allow indexed directories to use both encryption and
casefolding, for the dirhash we can't just hash the ciphertext filenames
that are stored on-disk (as is done currently) because the dirhash must
be case insensitive, but the stored names are case-preserving. Nor can
we hash the plaintext names with an unkeyed hash (or a hash keyed with a
value stored on-disk like ext4's s_hash_seed), since that would leak
information about the names that encryption is meant to protect.
Instead, if we can accept a dirhash that's only computable when the
fscrypt key is available, we can hash the plaintext names with a keyed
hash using a secret key derived from the directory's fscrypt master key.
We'll use SipHash-2-4 for this purpose.
Prepare for this by deriving a SipHash key for each casefolded encrypted
directory. Make sure to handle deriving the key not only when setting
up the directory's fscrypt_info, but also in the case where the casefold
flag is enabled after the fscrypt_info was already set up. (We could
just always derive the key regardless of casefolding, but that would
introduce unnecessary overhead for people not using casefolding.)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>
[EB: improved commit message, updated fscrypt.rst, squashed with change
that avoids unnecessarily deriving the key, and many other cleanups]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Casefolded encrypted directories will use a new dirhash method that
requires a secret key. If the directory uses a v2 encryption policy,
it's easy to derive this key from the master key using HKDF. However,
v1 encryption policies don't provide a way to derive additional keys.
Therefore, don't allow casefolding on directories that use a v1 policy.
Specifically, make it so that trying to enable casefolding on a
directory that has a v1 policy fails, trying to set a v1 policy on a
casefolded directory fails, and trying to open a casefolded directory
that has a v1 policy (if one somehow exists on-disk) fails.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Rosenberg <drosen@google.com>
[EB: improved commit message, updated fscrypt.rst, and other cleanups]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120223201.241390-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
fname_encrypt() is a global function, due to being used in both fname.c
and hooks.c. So it should be prefixed with "fscrypt_", like all the
other global functions in fs/crypto/.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120071736.45915-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
When an encryption key can't be fully removed due to file(s) protected
by it still being in-use, we shouldn't really print the path to one of
these files to the kernel log, since parts of this path are likely to be
encrypted on-disk, and (depending on how the system is set up) the
confidentiality of this path might be lost by printing it to the log.
This is a trade-off: a single file path often doesn't matter at all,
especially if it's a directory; the kernel log might still be protected
in some way; and I had originally hoped that any "inode(s) still busy"
bugs (which are security weaknesses in their own right) would be quickly
fixed and that to do so it would be super helpful to always know the
file path and not have to run 'find dir -inum $inum' after the fact.
But in practice, these bugs can be hard to fix (e.g. due to asynchronous
process killing that is difficult to eliminate, for performance
reasons), and also not tied to specific files, so knowing a file path
doesn't necessarily help.
So to be safe, for now let's just show the inode number, not the path.
If someone really wants to know a path they can use 'find -inum'.
Fixes: b1c0ec3599 ("fscrypt: add FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200120060732.390362-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Document that fscrypt_encrypt_pagecache_blocks() allocates the bounce
page from a mempool, and document what this means for the @gfp_flags
argument.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191231181026.47400-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Currently fscrypt_zeroout_range() issues and waits on a bio for each
block it writes, which makes it very slow.
Optimize it to write up to 16 pages at a time instead.
Also add a function comment, and improve reliability by allowing the
allocations of the bio and the first ciphertext page to wait on the
corresponding mempools.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191226160813.53182-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
The commit 643fa9612b ("fscrypt: remove filesystem specific
build config option") removed modular support for fs/crypto. This
causes the Crypto API to be built-in whenever fscrypt is enabled.
This makes it very difficult for me to test modular builds of
the Crypto API without disabling fscrypt which is a pain.
As fscrypt is still evolving and it's developing new ties with the
fs layer, it's hard to build it as a module for now.
However, the actual algorithms are not required until a filesystem
is mounted. Therefore we can allow them to be built as modules.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191227024700.7vrzuux32uyfdgum@gondor.apana.org.au
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
fscrypt_valid_enc_modes() is only used by policy.c, so move it to there.
Also adjust the order of the checks to be more natural, matching the
numerical order of the constants and also keeping AES-256 (the
recommended default) first in the list.
No change in behavior.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209211829.239800-4-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY is currently only allowed with Adiantum
encryption. But FS_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY allowed it in combination
with other encryption modes, and an error wasn't reported until later
when the encrypted directory was actually used.
Fix it to report the error earlier by validating the correct use of the
DIRECT_KEY flag in fscrypt_supported_policy(), similar to how we
validate the IV_INO_LBLK_64 flag.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209211829.239800-3-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Make fscrypt_supported_policy() call new functions
fscrypt_supported_v1_policy() and fscrypt_supported_v2_policy(), to
reduce the indentation level and make the code easier to read.
Also adjust the function comment to mention that whether the encryption
policy is supported can also depend on the inode.
No change in behavior.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209211829.239800-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
fscrypt_d_revalidate() and fscrypt_d_ops really belong in fname.c, since
they're specific to filenames encryption. crypto.c is for contents
encryption and general fs/crypto/ initialization and utilities.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209204359.228544-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Constify the struct fscrypt_hkdf parameter to fscrypt_hkdf_expand().
This makes it clearer that struct fscrypt_hkdf contains the key only,
not any per-request state.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209204054.227736-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
As a sanity check, verify that the allocated crypto_skcipher actually
has the ivsize that fscrypt is assuming it has. This will always be the
case unless there's a bug. But if there ever is such a bug (e.g. like
there was in earlier versions of the ESSIV conversion patch [1]) it's
preferable for it to be immediately obvious, and not rely on the
ciphertext verification tests failing due to uninitialized IV bytes.
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-crypto/20190702215517.GA69157@gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209203918.225691-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Crypto API users shouldn't really be accessing struct skcipher_alg
directly. <crypto/skcipher.h> already has a function
crypto_skcipher_driver_name(), so use that instead.
No change in behavior.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191209203810.225302-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Extend the FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl to allow the raw key to be
specified by a Linux keyring key, rather than specified directly.
This is useful because fscrypt keys belong to a particular filesystem
instance, so they are destroyed when that filesystem is unmounted.
Usually this is desired. But in some cases, userspace may need to
unmount and re-mount the filesystem while keeping the keys, e.g. during
a system update. This requires keeping the keys somewhere else too.
The keys could be kept in memory in a userspace daemon. But depending
on the security architecture and assumptions, it can be preferable to
keep them only in kernel memory, where they are unreadable by userspace.
We also can't solve this by going back to the original fscrypt API
(where for each file, the master key was looked up in the process's
keyring hierarchy) because that caused lots of problems of its own.
Therefore, add the ability for FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY to accept a
Linux keyring key. This solves the problem by allowing userspace to (if
needed) save the keys securely in a Linux keyring for re-provisioning,
while still using the new fscrypt key management ioctls.
This is analogous to how dm-crypt accepts a Linux keyring key, but the
key is then stored internally in the dm-crypt data structures rather
than being looked up again each time the dm-crypt device is accessed.
Use a custom key type "fscrypt-provisioning" rather than one of the
existing key types such as "logon". This is strongly desired because it
enforces that these keys are only usable for a particular purpose: for
fscrypt as input to a particular KDF. Otherwise, the keys could also be
passed to any kernel API that accepts a "logon" key with any service
prefix, e.g. dm-crypt, UBIFS, or (recently proposed) AF_ALG. This would
risk leaking information about the raw key despite it ostensibly being
unreadable. Of course, this mistake has already been made for multiple
kernel APIs; but since this is a new API, let's do it right.
This patch has been tested using an xfstest which I wrote to test it.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191119222447.226853-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Replace all the occurrences of FIELD_SIZEOF() with sizeof_field() except
at places where these are defined. Later patches will remove the unused
definition of FIELD_SIZEOF().
This patch is generated using following script:
EXCLUDE_FILES="include/linux/stddef.h|include/linux/kernel.h"
git grep -l -e "\bFIELD_SIZEOF\b" | while read file;
do
if [[ "$file" =~ $EXCLUDE_FILES ]]; then
continue
fi
sed -i -e 's/\bFIELD_SIZEOF\b/sizeof_field/g' $file;
done
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190924105839.110713-3-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com
Co-developed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> # for net
Inline encryption hardware compliant with the UFS v2.1 standard or with
the upcoming version of the eMMC standard has the following properties:
(1) Per I/O request, the encryption key is specified by a previously
loaded keyslot. There might be only a small number of keyslots.
(2) Per I/O request, the starting IV is specified by a 64-bit "data unit
number" (DUN). IV bits 64-127 are assumed to be 0. The hardware
automatically increments the DUN for each "data unit" of
configurable size in the request, e.g. for each filesystem block.
Property (1) makes it inefficient to use the traditional fscrypt
per-file keys. Property (2) precludes the use of the existing
DIRECT_KEY fscrypt policy flag, which needs at least 192 IV bits.
Therefore, add a new fscrypt policy flag IV_INO_LBLK_64 which causes the
encryption to modified as follows:
- The encryption keys are derived from the master key, encryption mode
number, and filesystem UUID.
- The IVs are chosen as (inode_number << 32) | file_logical_block_num.
For filenames encryption, file_logical_block_num is 0.
Since the file nonces aren't used in the key derivation, many files may
share the same encryption key. This is much more efficient on the
target hardware. Including the inode number in the IVs and mixing the
filesystem UUID into the keys ensures that data in different files is
nevertheless still encrypted differently.
Additionally, limiting the inode and block numbers to 32 bits and
placing the block number in the low bits maintains compatibility with
the 64-bit DUN convention (property (2) above).
Since this scheme assumes that inode numbers are stable (which may
preclude filesystem shrinking) and that inode and file logical block
numbers are at most 32-bit, IV_INO_LBLK_64 will only be allowed on
filesystems that meet these constraints. These are acceptable
limitations for the cases where this format would actually be used.
Note that IV_INO_LBLK_64 is an on-disk format, not an implementation.
This patch just adds support for it using the existing filesystem layer
encryption. A later patch will add support for inline encryption.
Reviewed-by: Paul Crowley <paulcrowley@google.com>
Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala <satyat@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
The access to logged_impl_name is technically a data race, which tools
like KCSAN could complain about in the future. See:
https://github.com/google/ktsan/wiki/READ_ONCE-and-WRITE_ONCE
Fix by using xchg(), which also ensures that only one thread does the
logging.
This also required switching from bool to int, to avoid a build error on
the RISC-V architecture which doesn't implement xchg on bytes.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
memset the struct fscrypt_info to zero before freeing. This isn't
really needed currently, since there's no secret key directly in the
fscrypt_info. But there's a decent chance that someone will add such a
field in the future, e.g. in order to use an API that takes a raw key
such as siphash(). So it's good to do this as a hardening measure.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Now that ext4 and f2fs implement their own post-read workflow that
supports both fscrypt and fsverity, the fscrypt-only workflow based
around struct fscrypt_ctx is no longer used. So remove the unused code.
This is based on a patch from Chandan Rajendra's "Consolidate FS read
I/O callbacks code" patchset, but rebased onto the latest kernel, folded
__fscrypt_decrypt_bio() into fscrypt_decrypt_bio(), cleaned up
fscrypt_initialize(), and updated the commit message.
Originally-from: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Instead of open-coding the calculations for ESSIV handling, use an ESSIV
skcipher which does all of this under the hood. ESSIV was added to the
crypto API in v5.4.
This is based on a patch from Ard Biesheuvel, but reworked to apply
after all the fscrypt changes that went into v5.4.
Tested with 'kvm-xfstests -c ext4,f2fs -g encrypt', including the
ciphertext verification tests for v1 and v2 encryption policies.
Originally-from: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
By looking up the master keys in a filesystem-level keyring rather than
in the calling processes' key hierarchy, it becomes possible for a user
to set an encryption policy which refers to some key they don't actually
know, then encrypt their files using that key. Cryptographically this
isn't much of a problem, but the semantics of this would be a bit weird.
Thus, enforce that a v2 encryption policy can only be set if the user
has previously added the key, or has capable(CAP_FOWNER).
We tolerate that this problem will continue to exist for v1 encryption
policies, however; there is no way around that.
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Add a root-only variant of the FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl which
removes all users' claims of the key, not just the current user's claim.
I.e., it always removes the key itself, no matter how many users have
added it.
This is useful for forcing a directory to be locked, without having to
figure out which user ID(s) the key was added under. This is planned to
be used by a command like 'sudo fscrypt lock DIR --all-users' in the
fscrypt userspace tool (http://github.com/google/fscrypt).
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Allow the FS_IOC_ADD_ENCRYPTION_KEY and FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY
ioctls to be used by non-root users to add and remove encryption keys
from the filesystem-level crypto keyrings, subject to limitations.
Motivation: while privileged fscrypt key management is sufficient for
some users (e.g. Android and Chromium OS, where a privileged process
manages all keys), the old API by design also allows non-root users to
set up and use encrypted directories, and we don't want to regress on
that. Especially, we don't want to force users to continue using the
old API, running into the visibility mismatch between files and keyrings
and being unable to "lock" encrypted directories.
Intuitively, the ioctls have to be privileged since they manipulate
filesystem-level state. However, it's actually safe to make them
unprivileged if we very carefully enforce some specific limitations.
First, each key must be identified by a cryptographic hash so that a
user can't add the wrong key for another user's files. For v2
encryption policies, we use the key_identifier for this. v1 policies
don't have this, so managing keys for them remains privileged.
Second, each key a user adds is charged to their quota for the keyrings
service. Thus, a user can't exhaust memory by adding a huge number of
keys. By default each non-root user is allowed up to 200 keys; this can
be changed using the existing sysctl 'kernel.keys.maxkeys'.
Third, if multiple users add the same key, we keep track of those users
of the key (of which there remains a single copy), and won't really
remove the key, i.e. "lock" the encrypted files, until all those users
have removed it. This prevents denial of service attacks that would be
possible under simpler schemes, such allowing the first user who added a
key to remove it -- since that could be a malicious user who has
compromised the key. Of course, encryption keys should be kept secret,
but the idea is that using encryption should never be *less* secure than
not using encryption, even if your key was compromised.
We tolerate that a user will be unable to really remove a key, i.e.
unable to "lock" their encrypted files, if another user has added the
same key. But in a sense, this is actually a good thing because it will
avoid providing a false notion of security where a key appears to have
been removed when actually it's still in memory, available to any
attacker who compromises the operating system kernel.
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
