In the next patch nested_get_evmcs_version will be always set in kvm_x86_ops for
VMX, even if nesting is disabled. Therefore, check whether VMX (aka nesting)
is available in the function, the caller will not do the check anymore.
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Remove all references to cr3_target_value[0-3] and replace the fields
in vmcs12 with "dead_space" to preserve the vmcs12 layout. KVM doesn't
support emulating CR3-target values, despite a variety of code that
implies otherwise, as KVM unconditionally reports '0' for the number of
supported CR3-target values.
This technically fixes a bug where KVM would incorrectly allow VMREAD
and VMWRITE to nonexistent fields, i.e. cr3_target_value[0-3]. Per
Intel's SDM, the number of supported CR3-target values reported in
VMX_MISC also enumerates the existence of the associated VMCS fields:
If a future implementation supports more than 4 CR3-target values, they
will be encoded consecutively following the 4 encodings given here.
Alternatively, the "bug" could be fixed by actually advertisting support
for 4 CR3-target values, but that'd likely just enable kvm-unit-tests
given that no one has complained about lack of support for going on ten
years, e.g. KVM, Xen and HyperV don't use CR3-target values.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20200416000739.9012-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Sane L1 hypervisors are not supposed to turn any of the unsupported VMX
controls on for its guests and nested_vmx_check_controls() checks for
that. This is, however, not the case for the controls which are supported
on the host but are missing in enlightened VMCS and when eVMCS is in use.
It would certainly be possible to add these missing checks to
nested_check_vm_execution_controls()/_vm_exit_controls()/.. but it seems
preferable to keep eVMCS-specific stuff in eVMCS and reduce the impact on
non-eVMCS guests by doing less unrelated checks. Create a separate
nested_evmcs_check_controls() for this purpose.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
With fine grained VMX feature enablement QEMU>=4.2 tries to do KVM_SET_MSRS
with default (matching CPU model) values and in case eVMCS is also enabled,
fails.
It would be possible to drop VMX feature filtering completely and make
this a guest's responsibility: if it decides to use eVMCS it should know
which fields are available and which are not. Hyper-V mostly complies to
this, however, there are some problematic controls:
SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES
VM_{ENTRY,EXIT}_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL
which Hyper-V enables. As there are no corresponding fields in eVMCS, we
can't handle this properly in KVM. This is a Hyper-V issue.
Move VMX controls sanitization from nested_enable_evmcs() to vmx_get_msr(),
and do the bare minimum (only clear controls which are known to cause issues).
This allows userspace to keep setting controls it wants and at the same
time hides them from the guest.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
In nested_enable_evmcs() evmcs_already_enabled check doesn't really do
anything: controls are already sanitized and we return '0' regardless.
Just drop the check.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
When Enlightened VMCS is in use, it is valid to do VMCLEAR and,
according to TLFS, this should "transition an enlightened VMCS from the
active to the non-active state". It is, however, wrong to assume that
it is only valid to do VMCLEAR for the eVMCS which is currently active
on the vCPU performing VMCLEAR.
Currently, the logic in handle_vmclear() is broken: in case, there is no
active eVMCS on the vCPU doing VMCLEAR we treat the argument as a 'normal'
VMCS and kvm_vcpu_write_guest() to the 'launch_state' field irreversibly
corrupts the memory area.
So, in case the VMCLEAR argument is not the current active eVMCS on the
vCPU, how can we know if the area it is pointing to is a normal or an
enlightened VMCS?
Thanks to the bug in Hyper-V (see commit 72aeb60c52 ("KVM: nVMX: Verify
eVMCS revision id match supported eVMCS version on eVMCS VMPTRLD")) we can
not, the revision can't be used to distinguish between them. So let's
assume it is always enlightened in case enlightened vmentry is enabled in
the assist page. Also, check if vmx->nested.enlightened_vmcs_enabled to
minimize the impact for 'unenlightened' workloads.
Fixes: b8bbab928f ("KVM: nVMX: implement enlightened VMPTRLD and VMCLEAR")
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Commit e2e871ab2f ("x86/kvm/hyper-v: Introduce nested_get_evmcs_version()
helper") broke EVMCS enablement: to set vmcs_version we now call
nested_get_evmcs_version() but this function checks
enlightened_vmcs_enabled flag which is not yet set so we end up returning
zero.
Fix the issue by re-arranging things in nested_enable_evmcs().
Fixes: e2e871ab2f ("x86/kvm/hyper-v: Introduce nested_get_evmcs_version() helper")
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
The upcoming KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_HV_CPUID ioctl will need to return
Enlightened VMCS version in HYPERV_CPUID_NESTED_FEATURES.EAX when
it was enabled.
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
The header, evmcs.h, already exists and contains a fair amount of code,
but there are a few pieces in vmx.c that can be moved verbatim. In
addition, move an array definition to evmcs.c to prepare for multiple
consumers of evmcs.h.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
