Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Paul Moore
75e22910cf NetLabel: Add IP address family information to the netlbl_skbuff_getattr() function
In order to do any sort of IP header inspection of incoming packets we need to
know which address family, AF_INET/AF_INET6/etc., it belongs to and since the
sk_buff structure does not store this information we need to pass along the
address family separate from the packet itself.

Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
2008-01-30 08:17:20 +11:00
Paul Moore
45c950e0f8 selinux: fix memory leak in netlabel code
Fix a memory leak in security_netlbl_sid_to_secattr() as reported here:
 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=352281

Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
2008-01-22 09:31:00 +11:00
Paul Moore
9534f71ca3 SELinux: restore proper NetLabel caching behavior
A small fix to the SELinux/NetLabel glue code to ensure that the NetLabel
cache is utilized when possible.  This was broken when the SELinux/NetLabel
glue code was reorganized in the last kernel release.

Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Acked-by:  Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
2007-08-02 11:52:21 -04:00
Paul Moore
f36158c410 SELinux: use SECINITSID_NETMSG instead of SECINITSID_UNLABELED for NetLabel
These changes will make NetLabel behave like labeled IPsec where there is an
access check for both labeled and unlabeled packets as well as providing the
ability to restrict domains to receiving only labeled packets when NetLabel is
in use.  The changes to the policy are straight forward with the following
necessary to receive labeled traffic (with SECINITSID_NETMSG defined as
"netlabel_peer_t"):

 allow mydom_t netlabel_peer_t:{ tcp_socket udp_socket rawip_socket } recvfrom;

The policy for unlabeled traffic would be:

 allow mydom_t unlabeled_t:{ tcp_socket udp_socket rawip_socket } recvfrom;

These policy changes, as well as more general NetLabel support, are included in
the latest SELinux Reference Policy release 20070629 or later.  Users who make
use of NetLabel are strongly encouraged to upgrade their policy to avoid
network problems.  Users who do not make use of NetLabel will not notice any
difference.

Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
2007-07-19 10:21:13 -04:00
Paul Moore
23bcdc1ade SELinux: enable dynamic activation/deactivation of NetLabel/SELinux enforcement
Create a new NetLabel KAPI interface, netlbl_enabled(), which reports on the
current runtime status of NetLabel based on the existing configuration.  LSMs
that make use of NetLabel, i.e. SELinux, can use this new function to determine
if they should perform NetLabel access checks.  This patch changes the
NetLabel/SELinux glue code such that SELinux only enforces NetLabel related
access checks when netlbl_enabled() returns true.

At present NetLabel is considered to be enabled when there is at least one
labeled protocol configuration present.  The result is that by default NetLabel
is considered to be disabled, however, as soon as an administrator configured
a CIPSO DOI definition NetLabel is enabled and SELinux starts enforcing
NetLabel related access controls - including unlabeled packet controls.

This patch also tries to consolidate the multiple "#ifdef CONFIG_NETLABEL"
blocks into a single block to ease future review as recommended by Linus.

Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
2007-07-19 10:21:11 -04:00
Linus Torvalds
8d9107e8c5 Revert "SELinux: use SECINITSID_NETMSG instead of SECINITSID_UNLABELED for NetLabel"
This reverts commit 9faf65fb6e.

It bit people like Michal Piotrowski:

  "My system is too secure, I can not login :)"

because it changed how CONFIG_NETLABEL worked, and broke older SElinux
policies.

As a result, quoth James Morris:

  "Can you please revert this patch?

   We thought it only affected people running MLS, but it will affect others.

   Sorry for the hassle."

Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-07-13 16:53:18 -07:00
Paul Moore
9faf65fb6e SELinux: use SECINITSID_NETMSG instead of SECINITSID_UNLABELED for NetLabel
These changes will make NetLabel behave like labeled IPsec where there is an
access check for both labeled and unlabeled packets as well as providing the
ability to restrict domains to receiving only labeled packets when NetLabel
is in use.  The changes to the policy are straight forward with the
following necessary to receive labeled traffic (with SECINITSID_NETMSG
defined as "netlabel_peer_t"):

 allow mydom_t netlabel_peer_t:{ tcp_socket udp_socket rawip_socket } recvfrom;

The policy for unlabeled traffic would be:

 allow mydom_t unlabeled_t:{ tcp_socket udp_socket rawip_socket } recvfrom;

These policy changes, as well as more general NetLabel support, are included
in the SELinux Reference Policy SVN tree, r2352 or later.  Users who enable
NetLabel support in the kernel are strongly encouraged to upgrade their
policy to avoid network problems.

Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
2007-07-11 22:52:31 -04:00
Paul Moore
ba6ff9f2b5 [NetLabel]: consolidate the struct socket/sock handling to just struct sock
The current NetLabel code has some redundant APIs which allow both
"struct socket" and "struct sock" types to be used; this may have made
sense at some point but it is wasteful now.  Remove the functions that
operate on sockets and convert the callers.  Not only does this make
the code smaller and more consistent but it pushes the locking burden
up to the caller which can be more intelligent about the locks.  Also,
perform the same conversion (socket to sock) on the SELinux/NetLabel
glue code where it make sense.

Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Acked-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2007-06-08 13:33:09 -07:00
Paul Moore
5778eabd9c SELinux: extract the NetLabel SELinux support from the security server
Up until this patch the functions which have provided NetLabel support to
SELinux have been integrated into the SELinux security server, which for
various reasons is not really ideal.  This patch makes an effort to extract as
much of the NetLabel support from the security server as possibile and move it
into it's own file within the SELinux directory structure.

Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
2007-04-26 01:35:48 -04:00