Commit Graph

975 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David S. Miller
ec7146db15 Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Daniel Borkmann says:

====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2019-01-29

The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.

The main changes are:

1) Teach verifier dead code removal, this also allows for optimizing /
   removing conditional branches around dead code and to shrink the
   resulting image. Code store constrained architectures like nfp would
   have hard time doing this at JIT level, from Jakub.

2) Add JMP32 instructions to BPF ISA in order to allow for optimizing
   code generation for 32-bit sub-registers. Evaluation shows that this
   can result in code reduction of ~5-20% compared to 64 bit-only code
   generation. Also add implementation for most JITs, from Jiong.

3) Add support for __int128 types in BTF which is also needed for
   vmlinux's BTF conversion to work, from Yonghong.

4) Add a new command to bpftool in order to dump a list of BPF-related
   parameters from the system or for a specific network device e.g. in
   terms of available prog/map types or helper functions, from Quentin.

5) Add AF_XDP sock_diag interface for querying sockets from user
   space which provides information about the RX/TX/fill/completion
   rings, umem, memory usage etc, from Björn.

6) Add skb context access for skb_shared_info->gso_segs field, from Eric.

7) Add support for testing flow dissector BPF programs by extending
   existing BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN infrastructure, from Stanislav.

8) Split BPF kselftest's test_verifier into various subgroups of tests
   in order better deal with merge conflicts in this area, from Jakub.

9) Add support for queue/stack manipulations in bpftool, from Stanislav.

10) Document BTF, from Yonghong.

11) Dump supported ELF section names in libbpf on program load
    failure, from Taeung.

12) Silence a false positive compiler warning in verifier's BTF
    handling, from Peter.

13) Fix help string in bpftool's feature probing, from Prashant.

14) Remove duplicate includes in BPF kselftests, from Yue.
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2019-01-28 19:38:33 -08:00
Jiong Wang
a7b76c8857 bpf: JIT blinds support JMP32
This patch adds JIT blinds support for JMP32.

Like BPF_JMP_REG/IMM, JMP32 version are needed for building raw bpf insn.
They are added to both include/linux/filter.h and
tools/include/linux/filter.h.

Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-26 13:33:01 -08:00
Jiong Wang
503a8865a4 bpf: interpreter support for JMP32
This patch implements interpreting new JMP32 instructions.

Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-26 13:33:01 -08:00
Jiong Wang
56cbd82ef0 bpf: disassembler support JMP32
This patch teaches disassembler about JMP32. There are two places to
update:

  - Class 0x6 now used by BPF_JMP32, not "unused".

  - BPF_JMP32 need to show comparison operands properly.
    The disassemble format is to add an extra "(32)" before the operands if
    it is a sub-register. A better disassemble format for both JMP32 and
    ALU32 just show the register prefix as "w" instead of "r", this is the
    format using by LLVM assembler.

Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-26 13:33:01 -08:00
Jiong Wang
092ed0968b bpf: verifier support JMP32
This patch teach verifier about the new BPF_JMP32 instruction class.
Verifier need to treat it similar as the existing BPF_JMP class.
A BPF_JMP32 insn needs to go through all checks that have been done on
BPF_JMP.

Also, verifier is doing runtime optimizations based on the extra info
conditional jump instruction could offer, especially when the comparison is
between constant and register that the value range of the register could be
improved based on the comparison results. These code are updated
accordingly.

Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-26 13:33:01 -08:00
Jiong Wang
a72dafafbd bpf: refactor verifier min/max code for condition jump
The current min/max code does both signed and unsigned comparisons against
the input argument "val" which is "u64" and there is explicit type casting
when the comparison is signed.

As we will need slightly more complexer type casting when JMP32 introduced,
it is better to host the signed type casting. This makes the code more
clean with ignorable runtime overhead.

Also, code for J*GE/GT/LT/LE and JEQ/JNE are very similar, this patch
combine them.

The main purpose for this refactor is to make sure the min/max code will
still be readable and with minimum code duplication after JMP32 introduced.

Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-26 13:33:01 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski
08ca90afba bpf: notify offload JITs about optimizations
Let offload JITs know when instructions are replaced and optimized
out, so they can update their state appropriately.  The optimizations
are best effort, if JIT returns an error from any callback verifier
will stop notifying it as state may now be out of sync, but the
verifier continues making progress.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-23 17:35:32 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski
9e4c24e7ee bpf: verifier: record original instruction index
The communication between the verifier and advanced JITs is based
on instruction indexes.  We have to keep them stable throughout
the optimizations otherwise referring to a particular instruction
gets messy quickly.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-23 17:35:32 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski
a1b14abc00 bpf: verifier: remove unconditional branches by 0
Unconditional branches by 0 instructions are basically noops
but they can result from earlier optimizations, e.g. a conditional
jumps which would never be taken or a conditional jump around
dead code.

Remove those branches.

v0.2:
 - s/opt_remove_dead_branches/opt_remove_nops/ (Jiong).

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-23 17:35:32 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski
52875a04f4 bpf: verifier: remove dead code
Instead of overwriting dead code with jmp -1 instructions
remove it completely for root.  Adjust verifier state and
line info appropriately.

v2:
 - adjust func_info (Alexei);
 - make sure first instruction retains line info (Alexei).
v4: (Yonghong)
 - remove unnecessary if (!insn to remove) checks;
 - always keep last line info if first live instruction lacks one.
v5: (Martin Lau)
 - improve and clarify comments.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-23 17:35:31 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski
e2ae4ca266 bpf: verifier: hard wire branches to dead code
Loading programs with dead code becomes more and more
common, as people begin to patch constants at load time.
Turn conditional jumps to unconditional ones, to avoid
potential branch misprediction penalty.

This optimization is enabled for privileged users only.

For branches which just fall through we could just mark
them as not seen and have dead code removal take care of
them, but that seems less clean.

v0.2:
 - don't call capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) twice (Jiong).
v3:
 - fix GCC warning;

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-23 17:35:31 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski
2cbd95a5c4 bpf: change parameters of call/branch offset adjustment
In preparation for code removal change parameters to branch
and call adjustment functions to be more universal.  The
current parameters assume we are patching a single instruction
with a longer set.

A diagram may help reading the change, this is for the patch
single case, patching instruction 1 with a replacement of 4:
   ____
0 |____|
1 |____| <-- pos                ^
2 |    | <-- end old  ^         |
3 |    |              |  delta  |  len
4 |____|              |         |  (patch region)
5 |    | <-- end new  v         v
6 |____|

end_old = pos + 1
end_new = pos + delta + 1

If we are before the patch region - curr variable and the target
are fully in old coordinates (hence comparing against end_old).
If we are after the region curr is in new coordinates (hence
the comparison to end_new) but target is in mixed coordinates,
so we just check if it falls before end_new, and if so it needs
the adjustment.

Note that we will not fix up branches which land in removed region
in case of removal, which should be okay, as we are only going to
remove dead code.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-23 17:35:31 -08:00
Daniel Borkmann
9d5564ddcf bpf: fix inner map masking to prevent oob under speculation
During review I noticed that inner meta map setup for map in
map is buggy in that it does not propagate all needed data
from the reference map which the verifier is later accessing.

In particular one such case is index masking to prevent out of
bounds access under speculative execution due to missing the
map's unpriv_array/index_mask field propagation. Fix this such
that the verifier is generating the correct code for inlined
lookups in case of unpriviledged use.

Before patch (test_verifier's 'map in map access' dump):

  # bpftool prog dump xla id 3
     0: (62) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = 0
     1: (bf) r2 = r10
     2: (07) r2 += -4
     3: (18) r1 = map[id:4]
     5: (07) r1 += 272                |
     6: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0)     |
     7: (35) if r0 >= 0x1 goto pc+6   | Inlined map in map lookup
     8: (54) (u32) r0 &= (u32) 0      | with index masking for
     9: (67) r0 <<= 3                 | map->unpriv_array.
    10: (0f) r0 += r1                 |
    11: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0)     |
    12: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1   |
    13: (05) goto pc+1                |
    14: (b7) r0 = 0                   |
    15: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+11
    16: (62) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = 0
    17: (bf) r2 = r10
    18: (07) r2 += -4
    19: (bf) r1 = r0
    20: (07) r1 += 272                |
    21: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0)     | Index masking missing (!)
    22: (35) if r0 >= 0x1 goto pc+3   | for inner map despite
    23: (67) r0 <<= 3                 | map->unpriv_array set.
    24: (0f) r0 += r1                 |
    25: (05) goto pc+1                |
    26: (b7) r0 = 0                   |
    27: (b7) r0 = 0
    28: (95) exit

After patch:

  # bpftool prog dump xla id 1
     0: (62) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = 0
     1: (bf) r2 = r10
     2: (07) r2 += -4
     3: (18) r1 = map[id:2]
     5: (07) r1 += 272                |
     6: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0)     |
     7: (35) if r0 >= 0x1 goto pc+6   | Same inlined map in map lookup
     8: (54) (u32) r0 &= (u32) 0      | with index masking due to
     9: (67) r0 <<= 3                 | map->unpriv_array.
    10: (0f) r0 += r1                 |
    11: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r0 +0)     |
    12: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1   |
    13: (05) goto pc+1                |
    14: (b7) r0 = 0                   |
    15: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+12
    16: (62) *(u32 *)(r10 -4) = 0
    17: (bf) r2 = r10
    18: (07) r2 += -4
    19: (bf) r1 = r0
    20: (07) r1 += 272                |
    21: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0)     |
    22: (35) if r0 >= 0x1 goto pc+4   | Now fixed inlined inner map
    23: (54) (u32) r0 &= (u32) 0      | lookup with proper index masking
    24: (67) r0 <<= 3                 | for map->unpriv_array.
    25: (0f) r0 += r1                 |
    26: (05) goto pc+1                |
    27: (b7) r0 = 0                   |
    28: (b7) r0 = 0
    29: (95) exit

Fixes: b2157399cc ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-18 15:19:56 -08:00
Mathieu Malaterre
c8dc79806e bpf: Annotate implicit fall through in cgroup_dev_func_proto
There is a plan to build the kernel with -Wimplicit-fallthrough
and this place in the code produced a warnings (W=1).

This commit removes the following warning:

  kernel/bpf/cgroup.c:719:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-17 16:52:23 +01:00
Mathieu Malaterre
583c531853 bpf: Make function btf_name_offset_valid static
Initially in commit 69b693f0ae ("bpf: btf: Introduce BPF Type Format
(BTF)") the function 'btf_name_offset_valid' was introduced as static
function it was later on changed to a non-static one, and then finally
in commit 23127b33ec ("bpf: Create a new btf_name_by_offset() for
non type name use case") the function prototype was removed.

Revert back to original implementation and make the function static.
Remove warning triggered with W=1:

  kernel/bpf/btf.c:470:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'btf_name_offset_valid' [-Wmissing-prototypes]

Fixes: 23127b33ec ("bpf: Create a new btf_name_by_offset() for non type name use case")
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-17 16:47:05 +01:00
Stanislav Fomichev
4af396ae48 bpf: zero out build_id for BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP
When returning BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_IP from stack_map_get_build_id_offset,
make sure that build_id field is empty. Since we are using percpu
free list, there is a possibility that we might reuse some previous
bpf_stack_build_id with non-zero build_id.

Fixes: 615755a77b ("bpf: extend stackmap to save binary_build_id+offset instead of address")
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-17 16:42:35 +01:00
Stanislav Fomichev
0b698005a9 bpf: don't assume build-id length is always 20 bytes
Build-id length is not fixed to 20, it can be (`man ld` /--build-id):
  * 128-bit (uuid)
  * 160-bit (sha1)
  * any length specified in ld --build-id=0xhexstring

To fix the issue of missing BPF_STACK_BUILD_ID_VALID for shorter build-ids,
assume that build-id is somewhere in the range of 1 .. 20.
Set the remaining bytes to zero.

v2:
* don't introduce new "len = min(BPF_BUILD_ID_SIZE, nhdr->n_descsz)",
  we already know that nhdr->n_descsz <= BPF_BUILD_ID_SIZE if we enter
  this 'if' condition

Fixes: 615755a77b ("bpf: extend stackmap to save binary_build_id+offset instead of address")
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-17 16:42:35 +01:00
Peter Oskolkov
d0b2818efb bpf: fix a (false) compiler warning
An older GCC compiler complains:

kernel/bpf/verifier.c: In function 'bpf_check':
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:4***:13: error: 'prev_offset' may be used uninitialized
      in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
   } else if (krecord[i].insn_offset <= prev_offset) {
             ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:4***:38: note: 'prev_offset' was declared here
  u32 i, nfuncs, urec_size, min_size, prev_offset;

Although the compiler is wrong here, the patch makes sure
that prev_offset is always initialized, just to silence the warning.

v2: fix a spelling error in the commit message.

Signed-off-by: Peter Oskolkov <posk@google.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-17 10:40:16 +01:00
Yonghong Song
b1e8818cab bpf: btf: support 128 bit integer type
Currently, btf only supports up to 64-bit integer.
On the other hand, 128bit support for gcc and clang
has existed for a long time. For example, both gcc 4.8
and llvm 3.7 supports types "__int128" and
"unsigned __int128" for virtually all 64bit architectures
including bpf.

The requirement for __int128 support comes from two areas:
  . bpf program may use __int128. For example, some bcc tools
    (https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/tree/master/tools),
    mostly tcp v6 related, tcpstates.py, tcpaccept.py, etc.,
    are using __int128 to represent the ipv6 addresses.
  . linux itself is using __int128 types. Hence supporting
    __int128 type in BTF is required for vmlinux BTF,
    which will be used by "compile once and run everywhere"
    and other projects.

For 128bit integer, instead of base-10, hex numbers are pretty
printed out as large decimal number is hard to decipher, e.g.,
for ipv6 addresses.

Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-16 22:53:44 +01:00
Yonghong Song
17e3ac8125 bpf: fix bpffs bitfield pretty print
Commit 9d5f9f701b ("bpf: btf: fix struct/union/fwd types
with kind_flag") introduced kind_flag and used bitfield_size
in the btf_member to directly pretty print member values.

The commit contained a bug where the incorrect parameters could be
passed to function btf_bitfield_seq_show(). The bits_offset
parameter in the function expects a value less than 8.
Instead, the member offset in the structure is passed.

The below is btf_bitfield_seq_show() func signature:
  void btf_bitfield_seq_show(void *data, u8 bits_offset,
                             u8 nr_bits, struct seq_file *m)
both bits_offset and nr_bits are u8 type. If the bitfield
member offset is greater than 256, incorrect value will
be printed.

This patch fixed the issue by calculating correct proper
data offset and bits_offset similar to non kind_flag case.

Fixes: 9d5f9f701b ("bpf: btf: fix struct/union/fwd types with kind_flag")
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-11 10:40:54 +01:00
Song Liu
beaf3d1901 bpf: fix panic in stack_map_get_build_id() on i386 and arm32
As Naresh reported, test_stacktrace_build_id() causes panic on i386 and
arm32 systems. This is caused by page_address() returns NULL in certain
cases.

This patch fixes this error by using kmap_atomic/kunmap_atomic instead
of page_address.

Fixes: 615755a77b (" bpf: extend stackmap to save binary_build_id+offset instead of address")
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-01-10 16:02:17 +01:00
Daniel Borkmann
d3bd7413e0 bpf: fix sanitation of alu op with pointer / scalar type from different paths
While 979d63d50c ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer
arithmetic") took care of rejecting alu op on pointer when e.g. pointer
came from two different map values with different map properties such as
value size, Jann reported that a case was not covered yet when a given
alu op is used in both "ptr_reg += reg" and "numeric_reg += reg" from
different branches where we would incorrectly try to sanitize based
on the pointer's limit. Catch this corner case and reject the program
instead.

Fixes: 979d63d50c ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic")
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-05 21:32:38 -08:00
Linus Torvalds
96d4f267e4 Remove 'type' argument from access_ok() function
Nobody has actually used the type (VERIFY_READ vs VERIFY_WRITE) argument
of the user address range verification function since we got rid of the
old racy i386-only code to walk page tables by hand.

It existed because the original 80386 would not honor the write protect
bit when in kernel mode, so you had to do COW by hand before doing any
user access.  But we haven't supported that in a long time, and these
days the 'type' argument is a purely historical artifact.

A discussion about extending 'user_access_begin()' to do the range
checking resulted this patch, because there is no way we're going to
move the old VERIFY_xyz interface to that model.  And it's best done at
the end of the merge window when I've done most of my merges, so let's
just get this done once and for all.

This patch was mostly done with a sed-script, with manual fix-ups for
the cases that weren't of the trivial 'access_ok(VERIFY_xyz' form.

There were a couple of notable cases:

 - csky still had the old "verify_area()" name as an alias.

 - the iter_iov code had magical hardcoded knowledge of the actual
   values of VERIFY_{READ,WRITE} (not that they mattered, since nothing
   really used it)

 - microblaze used the type argument for a debug printout

but other than those oddities this should be a total no-op patch.

I tried to fix up all architectures, did fairly extensive grepping for
access_ok() uses, and the changes are trivial, but I may have missed
something.  Any missed conversion should be trivially fixable, though.

Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-03 18:57:57 -08:00
Daniel Borkmann
979d63d50c bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic
Jann reported that the original commit back in b2157399cc
("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") was not sufficient
to stop CPU from speculating out of bounds memory access:
While b2157399cc only focussed on masking array map access
for unprivileged users for tail calls and data access such
that the user provided index gets sanitized from BPF program
and syscall side, there is still a more generic form affected
from BPF programs that applies to most maps that hold user
data in relation to dynamic map access when dealing with
unknown scalars or "slow" known scalars as access offset, for
example:

  - Load a map value pointer into R6
  - Load an index into R7
  - Do a slow computation (e.g. with a memory dependency) that
    loads a limit into R8 (e.g. load the limit from a map for
    high latency, then mask it to make the verifier happy)
  - Exit if R7 >= R8 (mispredicted branch)
  - Load R0 = R6[R7]
  - Load R0 = R6[R0]

For unknown scalars there are two options in the BPF verifier
where we could derive knowledge from in order to guarantee
safe access to the memory: i) While </>/<=/>= variants won't
allow to derive any lower or upper bounds from the unknown
scalar where it would be safe to add it to the map value
pointer, it is possible through ==/!= test however. ii) another
option is to transform the unknown scalar into a known scalar,
for example, through ALU ops combination such as R &= <imm>
followed by R |= <imm> or any similar combination where the
original information from the unknown scalar would be destroyed
entirely leaving R with a constant. The initial slow load still
precedes the latter ALU ops on that register, so the CPU
executes speculatively from that point. Once we have the known
scalar, any compare operation would work then. A third option
only involving registers with known scalars could be crafted
as described in [0] where a CPU port (e.g. Slow Int unit)
would be filled with many dependent computations such that
the subsequent condition depending on its outcome has to wait
for evaluation on its execution port and thereby executing
speculatively if the speculated code can be scheduled on a
different execution port, or any other form of mistraining
as described in [1], for example. Given this is not limited
to only unknown scalars, not only map but also stack access
is affected since both is accessible for unprivileged users
and could potentially be used for out of bounds access under
speculation.

In order to prevent any of these cases, the verifier is now
sanitizing pointer arithmetic on the offset such that any
out of bounds speculation would be masked in a way where the
pointer arithmetic result in the destination register will
stay unchanged, meaning offset masked into zero similar as
in array_index_nospec() case. With regards to implementation,
there are three options that were considered: i) new insn
for sanitation, ii) push/pop insn and sanitation as inlined
BPF, iii) reuse of ax register and sanitation as inlined BPF.

Option i) has the downside that we end up using from reserved
bits in the opcode space, but also that we would require
each JIT to emit masking as native arch opcodes meaning
mitigation would have slow adoption till everyone implements
it eventually which is counter-productive. Option ii) and iii)
have both in common that a temporary register is needed in
order to implement the sanitation as inlined BPF since we
are not allowed to modify the source register. While a push /
pop insn in ii) would be useful to have in any case, it
requires once again that every JIT needs to implement it
first. While possible, amount of changes needed would also
be unsuitable for a -stable patch. Therefore, the path which
has fewer changes, less BPF instructions for the mitigation
and does not require anything to be changed in the JITs is
option iii) which this work is pursuing. The ax register is
already mapped to a register in all JITs (modulo arm32 where
it's mapped to stack as various other BPF registers there)
and used in constant blinding for JITs-only so far. It can
be reused for verifier rewrites under certain constraints.
The interpreter's tmp "register" has therefore been remapped
into extending the register set with hidden ax register and
reusing that for a number of instructions that needed the
prior temporary variable internally (e.g. div, mod). This
allows for zero increase in stack space usage in the interpreter,
and enables (restricted) generic use in rewrites otherwise as
long as such a patchlet does not make use of these instructions.
The sanitation mask is dynamic and relative to the offset the
map value or stack pointer currently holds.

There are various cases that need to be taken under consideration
for the masking, e.g. such operation could look as follows:
ptr += val or val += ptr or ptr -= val. Thus, the value to be
sanitized could reside either in source or in destination
register, and the limit is different depending on whether
the ALU op is addition or subtraction and depending on the
current known and bounded offset. The limit is derived as
follows: limit := max_value_size - (smin_value + off). For
subtraction: limit := umax_value + off. This holds because
we do not allow any pointer arithmetic that would
temporarily go out of bounds or would have an unknown
value with mixed signed bounds where it is unclear at
verification time whether the actual runtime value would
be either negative or positive. For example, we have a
derived map pointer value with constant offset and bounded
one, so limit based on smin_value works because the verifier
requires that statically analyzed arithmetic on the pointer
must be in bounds, and thus it checks if resulting
smin_value + off and umax_value + off is still within map
value bounds at time of arithmetic in addition to time of
access. Similarly, for the case of stack access we derive
the limit as follows: MAX_BPF_STACK + off for subtraction
and -off for the case of addition where off := ptr_reg->off +
ptr_reg->var_off.value. Subtraction is a special case for
the masking which can be in form of ptr += -val, ptr -= -val,
or ptr -= val. In the first two cases where we know that
the value is negative, we need to temporarily negate the
value in order to do the sanitation on a positive value
where we later swap the ALU op, and restore original source
register if the value was in source.

The sanitation of pointer arithmetic alone is still not fully
sufficient as is, since a scenario like the following could
happen ...

  PTR += 0x1000 (e.g. K-based imm)
  PTR -= BIG_NUMBER_WITH_SLOW_COMPARISON
  PTR += 0x1000
  PTR -= BIG_NUMBER_WITH_SLOW_COMPARISON
  [...]

... which under speculation could end up as ...

  PTR += 0x1000
  PTR -= 0 [ truncated by mitigation ]
  PTR += 0x1000
  PTR -= 0 [ truncated by mitigation ]
  [...]

... and therefore still access out of bounds. To prevent such
case, the verifier is also analyzing safety for potential out
of bounds access under speculative execution. Meaning, it is
also simulating pointer access under truncation. We therefore
"branch off" and push the current verification state after the
ALU operation with known 0 to the verification stack for later
analysis. Given the current path analysis succeeded it is
likely that the one under speculation can be pruned. In any
case, it is also subject to existing complexity limits and
therefore anything beyond this point will be rejected. In
terms of pruning, it needs to be ensured that the verification
state from speculative execution simulation must never prune
a non-speculative execution path, therefore, we mark verifier
state accordingly at the time of push_stack(). If verifier
detects out of bounds access under speculative execution from
one of the possible paths that includes a truncation, it will
reject such program.

Given we mask every reg-based pointer arithmetic for
unprivileged programs, we've been looking into how it could
affect real-world programs in terms of size increase. As the
majority of programs are targeted for privileged-only use
case, we've unconditionally enabled masking (with its alu
restrictions on top of it) for privileged programs for the
sake of testing in order to check i) whether they get rejected
in its current form, and ii) by how much the number of
instructions and size will increase. We've tested this by
using Katran, Cilium and test_l4lb from the kernel selftests.
For Katran we've evaluated balancer_kern.o, Cilium bpf_lxc.o
and an older test object bpf_lxc_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o and l4lb
we've used test_l4lb.o as well as test_l4lb_noinline.o. We
found that none of the programs got rejected by the verifier
with this change, and that impact is rather minimal to none.
balancer_kern.o had 13,904 bytes (1,738 insns) xlated and
7,797 bytes JITed before and after the change. Most complex
program in bpf_lxc.o had 30,544 bytes (3,817 insns) xlated
and 18,538 bytes JITed before and after and none of the other
tail call programs in bpf_lxc.o had any changes either. For
the older bpf_lxc_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o object we found a small
increase from 20,616 bytes (2,576 insns) and 12,536 bytes JITed
before to 20,664 bytes (2,582 insns) and 12,558 bytes JITed
after the change. Other programs from that object file had
similar small increase. Both test_l4lb.o had no change and
remained at 6,544 bytes (817 insns) xlated and 3,401 bytes
JITed and for test_l4lb_noinline.o constant at 5,080 bytes
(634 insns) xlated and 3,313 bytes JITed. This can be explained
in that LLVM typically optimizes stack based pointer arithmetic
by using K-based operations and that use of dynamic map access
is not overly frequent. However, in future we may decide to
optimize the algorithm further under known guarantees from
branch and value speculation. Latter seems also unclear in
terms of prediction heuristics that today's CPUs apply as well
as whether there could be collisions in e.g. the predictor's
Value History/Pattern Table for triggering out of bounds access,
thus masking is performed unconditionally at this point but could
be subject to relaxation later on. We were generally also
brainstorming various other approaches for mitigation, but the
blocker was always lack of available registers at runtime and/or
overhead for runtime tracking of limits belonging to a specific
pointer. Thus, we found this to be minimally intrusive under
given constraints.

With that in place, a simple example with sanitized access on
unprivileged load at post-verification time looks as follows:

  # bpftool prog dump xlated id 282
  [...]
  28: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r7 +0)
  29: (79) r2 = *(u64 *)(r7 +8)
  30: (57) r1 &= 15
  31: (79) r3 = *(u64 *)(r0 +4608)
  32: (57) r3 &= 1
  33: (47) r3 |= 1
  34: (2d) if r2 > r3 goto pc+19
  35: (b4) (u32) r11 = (u32) 20479  |
  36: (1f) r11 -= r2                | Dynamic sanitation for pointer
  37: (4f) r11 |= r2                | arithmetic with registers
  38: (87) r11 = -r11               | containing bounded or known
  39: (c7) r11 s>>= 63              | scalars in order to prevent
  40: (5f) r11 &= r2                | out of bounds speculation.
  41: (0f) r4 += r11                |
  42: (71) r4 = *(u8 *)(r4 +0)
  43: (6f) r4 <<= r1
  [...]

For the case where the scalar sits in the destination register
as opposed to the source register, the following code is emitted
for the above example:

  [...]
  16: (b4) (u32) r11 = (u32) 20479
  17: (1f) r11 -= r2
  18: (4f) r11 |= r2
  19: (87) r11 = -r11
  20: (c7) r11 s>>= 63
  21: (5f) r2 &= r11
  22: (0f) r2 += r0
  23: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0)
  [...]

JIT blinding example with non-conflicting use of r10:

  [...]
   d5:	je     0x0000000000000106    _
   d7:	mov    0x0(%rax),%edi       |
   da:	mov    $0xf153246,%r10d     | Index load from map value and
   e0:	xor    $0xf153259,%r10      | (const blinded) mask with 0x1f.
   e7:	and    %r10,%rdi            |_
   ea:	mov    $0x2f,%r10d          |
   f0:	sub    %rdi,%r10            | Sanitized addition. Both use r10
   f3:	or     %rdi,%r10            | but do not interfere with each
   f6:	neg    %r10                 | other. (Neither do these instructions
   f9:	sar    $0x3f,%r10           | interfere with the use of ax as temp
   fd:	and    %r10,%rdi            | in interpreter.)
  100:	add    %rax,%rdi            |_
  103:	mov    0x0(%rdi),%eax
 [...]

Tested that it fixes Jann's reproducer, and also checked that test_verifier
and test_progs suite with interpreter, JIT and JIT with hardening enabled
on x86-64 and arm64 runs successfully.

  [0] Speculose: Analyzing the Security Implications of Speculative
      Execution in CPUs, Giorgi Maisuradze and Christian Rossow,
      https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.04084.pdf

  [1] A Systematic Evaluation of Transient Execution Attacks and
      Defenses, Claudio Canella, Jo Van Bulck, Michael Schwarz,
      Moritz Lipp, Benjamin von Berg, Philipp Ortner, Frank Piessens,
      Dmitry Evtyushkin, Daniel Gruss,
      https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.05441.pdf

Fixes: b2157399cc ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation")
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-02 16:01:24 -08:00
Daniel Borkmann
b7137c4eab bpf: fix check_map_access smin_value test when pointer contains offset
In check_map_access() we probe actual bounds through __check_map_access()
with offset of reg->smin_value + off for lower bound and offset of
reg->umax_value + off for the upper bound. However, even though the
reg->smin_value could have a negative value, the final result of the
sum with off could be positive when pointer arithmetic with known and
unknown scalars is combined. In this case we reject the program with
an error such as "R<x> min value is negative, either use unsigned index
or do a if (index >=0) check." even though the access itself would be
fine. Therefore extend the check to probe whether the actual resulting
reg->smin_value + off is less than zero.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-02 16:01:24 -08:00
Daniel Borkmann
9d7eceede7 bpf: restrict unknown scalars of mixed signed bounds for unprivileged
For unknown scalars of mixed signed bounds, meaning their smin_value is
negative and their smax_value is positive, we need to reject arithmetic
with pointer to map value. For unprivileged the goal is to mask every
map pointer arithmetic and this cannot reliably be done when it is
unknown at verification time whether the scalar value is negative or
positive. Given this is a corner case, the likelihood of breaking should
be very small.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-02 16:01:24 -08:00
Daniel Borkmann
e4298d2583 bpf: restrict stack pointer arithmetic for unprivileged
Restrict stack pointer arithmetic for unprivileged users in that
arithmetic itself must not go out of bounds as opposed to the actual
access later on. Therefore after each adjust_ptr_min_max_vals() with
a stack pointer as a destination we simulate a check_stack_access()
of 1 byte on the destination and once that fails the program is
rejected for unprivileged program loads. This is analog to map
value pointer arithmetic and needed for masking later on.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-02 16:01:24 -08:00
Daniel Borkmann
0d6303db79 bpf: restrict map value pointer arithmetic for unprivileged
Restrict map value pointer arithmetic for unprivileged users in that
arithmetic itself must not go out of bounds as opposed to the actual
access later on. Therefore after each adjust_ptr_min_max_vals() with a
map value pointer as a destination it will simulate a check_map_access()
of 1 byte on the destination and once that fails the program is rejected
for unprivileged program loads. We use this later on for masking any
pointer arithmetic with the remainder of the map value space. The
likelihood of breaking any existing real-world unprivileged eBPF
program is very small for this corner case.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-02 16:01:24 -08:00
Daniel Borkmann
9b73bfdd08 bpf: enable access to ax register also from verifier rewrite
Right now we are using BPF ax register in JIT for constant blinding as
well as in interpreter as temporary variable. Verifier will not be able
to use it simply because its use will get overridden from the former in
bpf_jit_blind_insn(). However, it can be made to work in that blinding
will be skipped if there is prior use in either source or destination
register on the instruction. Taking constraints of ax into account, the
verifier is then open to use it in rewrites under some constraints. Note,
ax register already has mappings in every eBPF JIT.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-02 16:01:24 -08:00
Daniel Borkmann
144cd91c4c bpf: move tmp variable into ax register in interpreter
This change moves the on-stack 64 bit tmp variable in ___bpf_prog_run()
into the hidden ax register. The latter is currently only used in JITs
for constant blinding as a temporary scratch register, meaning the BPF
interpreter will never see the use of ax. Therefore it is safe to use
it for the cases where tmp has been used earlier. This is needed to later
on allow restricted hidden use of ax in both interpreter and JITs.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-02 16:01:24 -08:00
Daniel Borkmann
c08435ec7f bpf: move {prev_,}insn_idx into verifier env
Move prev_insn_idx and insn_idx from the do_check() function into
the verifier environment, so they can be read inside the various
helper functions for handling the instructions. It's easier to put
this into the environment rather than changing all call-sites only
to pass it along. insn_idx is useful in particular since this later
on allows to hold state in env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx].

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2019-01-02 16:01:24 -08:00
David S. Miller
339bbff2d6 Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Daniel Borkmann says:

====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2018-12-21

The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.

There is a merge conflict in test_verifier.c. Result looks as follows:

        [...]
        },
        {
                "calls: cross frame pruning",
                .insns = {
                [...]
                .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
                .errstr_unpriv = "function calls to other bpf functions are allowed for root only",
                .result_unpriv = REJECT,
                .errstr = "!read_ok",
                .result = REJECT,
	},
        {
                "jset: functional",
                .insns = {
        [...]
        {
                "jset: unknown const compare not taken",
                .insns = {
                        BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
                                     BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
                        BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1),
                        BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0),
                        BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
                },
                .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
                .errstr_unpriv = "!read_ok",
                .result_unpriv = REJECT,
                .errstr = "!read_ok",
                .result = REJECT,
        },
        [...]
        {
                "jset: range",
                .insns = {
                [...]
                },
                .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
                .result_unpriv = ACCEPT,
                .result = ACCEPT,
        },

The main changes are:

1) Various BTF related improvements in order to get line info
   working. Meaning, verifier will now annotate the corresponding
   BPF C code to the error log, from Martin and Yonghong.

2) Implement support for raw BPF tracepoints in modules, from Matt.

3) Add several improvements to verifier state logic, namely speeding
   up stacksafe check, optimizations for stack state equivalence
   test and safety checks for liveness analysis, from Alexei.

4) Teach verifier to make use of BPF_JSET instruction, add several
   test cases to kselftests and remove nfp specific JSET optimization
   now that verifier has awareness, from Jakub.

5) Improve BPF verifier's slot_type marking logic in order to
   allow more stack slot sharing, from Jiong.

6) Add sk_msg->size member for context access and add set of fixes
   and improvements to make sock_map with kTLS usable with openssl
   based applications, from John.

7) Several cleanups and documentation updates in bpftool as well as
   auto-mount of tracefs for "bpftool prog tracelog" command,
   from Quentin.

8) Include sub-program tags from now on in bpf_prog_info in order to
   have a reliable way for user space to get all tags of the program
   e.g. needed for kallsyms correlation, from Song.

9) Add BTF annotations for cgroup_local_storage BPF maps and
   implement bpf fs pretty print support, from Roman.

10) Fix bpftool in order to allow for cross-compilation, from Ivan.

11) Update of bpftool license to GPLv2-only + BSD-2-Clause in order
    to be compatible with libbfd and allow for Debian packaging,
    from Jakub.

12) Remove an obsolete prog->aux sanitation in dump and get rid of
    version check for prog load, from Daniel.

13) Fix a memory leak in libbpf's line info handling, from Prashant.

14) Fix cpumap's frame alignment for build_skb() so that skb_shared_info
    does not get unaligned, from Jesper.

15) Fix test_progs kselftest to work with older compilers which are less
    smart in optimizing (and thus throwing build error), from Stanislav.

16) Cleanup and simplify AF_XDP socket teardown, from Björn.

17) Fix sk lookup in BPF kselftest's test_sock_addr with regards
    to netns_id argument, from Andrey.
====================

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-20 17:31:36 -08:00
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
77ea5f4cbe bpf/cpumap: make sure frame_size for build_skb is aligned if headroom isn't
The frame_size passed to build_skb must be aligned, else it is
possible that the embedded struct skb_shared_info gets unaligned.

For correctness make sure that xdpf->headroom in included in the
alignment. No upstream drivers can hit this, as all XDP drivers provide
an aligned headroom.  This was discovered when playing with implementing
XDP support for mvneta, which have a 2 bytes DSA header, and this
Marvell ARM64 platform didn't like doing atomic operations on an
unaligned skb_shinfo(skb)->dataref addresses.

Fixes: 1c601d829a ("bpf: cpumap xdp_buff to skb conversion and allocation")
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-20 23:19:12 +01:00
David S. Miller
2be09de7d6 Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net
Lots of conflicts, by happily all cases of overlapping
changes, parallel adds, things of that nature.

Thanks to Stephen Rothwell, Saeed Mahameed, and others
for their guidance in these resolutions.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2018-12-20 11:53:36 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski
9b38c4056b bpf: verifier: reorder stack size check with dead code sanitization
Reorder the calls to check_max_stack_depth() and sanitize_dead_code()
to separate functions which can rewrite instructions from pure checks.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-20 17:28:28 +01:00
Jakub Kicinski
960ea05656 bpf: verifier: teach the verifier to reason about the BPF_JSET instruction
Some JITs (nfp) try to optimize code on their own.  It could make
sense in case of BPF_JSET instruction which is currently not interpreted
by the verifier, meaning for instance that dead could would not be
detected if it was under BPF_JSET branch.

Teach the verifier basics of BPF_JSET, JIT optimizations will be
removed shortly.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-20 17:28:28 +01:00
Martin KaFai Lau
fdbaa0beb7 bpf: Ensure line_info.insn_off cannot point to insn with zero code
This patch rejects a line_info if the bpf insn code referred by
line_info.insn_off is 0. F.e. a broken userspace tool might generate
a line_info.insn_off that points to the second 8 bytes of a BPF_LD_IMM64.

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-19 15:42:55 -08:00
Yonghong Song
76c43ae84e bpf: log struct/union attribute for forward type
Current btf internal verbose logger logs fwd type as
  [2] FWD A type_id=0
where A is the type name.

Commit 9d5f9f701b ("bpf: btf: fix struct/union/fwd types
with kind_flag") introduced kind_flag which can be used
to distinguish whether a forward type is a struct or
union.

Also, "type_id=0" does not carry any meaningful
information for fwd type as btf_type.type = 0 is simply
enforced during btf verification and is not used
anywhere else.

This commit changed the log to
  [2] FWD A struct
if kind_flag = 0, or
  [2] FWD A union
if kind_flag = 1.

Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-19 00:47:56 +01:00
Jiong Wang
0bae2d4d62 bpf: correct slot_type marking logic to allow more stack slot sharing
Verifier is supposed to support sharing stack slot allocated to ptr with
SCALAR_VALUE for privileged program. However this doesn't happen for some
cases.

The reason is verifier is not clearing slot_type STACK_SPILL for all bytes,
it only clears part of them, while verifier is using:

  slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL

as a convention to check one slot is ptr type.

So, the consequence of partial clearing slot_type is verifier could treat a
partially overridden ptr slot, which should now be a SCALAR_VALUE slot,
still as ptr slot, and rejects some valid programs.

Before this patch, test_xdp_noinline.o under bpf selftests, bpf_lxc.o and
bpf_netdev.o under Cilium bpf repo, when built with -mattr=+alu32 are
rejected due to this issue. After this patch, they all accepted.

There is no processed insn number change before and after this patch on
Cilium bpf programs.

Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-18 14:45:01 -08:00
Matt Mullins
a38d1107f9 bpf: support raw tracepoints in modules
Distributions build drivers as modules, including network and filesystem
drivers which export numerous tracepoints.  This enables
bpf(BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN) to attach to those tracepoints.

Signed-off-by: Matt Mullins <mmullins@fb.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-18 14:08:12 -08:00
Yonghong Song
ffa0c1cf59 bpf: enable cgroup local storage map pretty print with kind_flag
Commit 970289fc0a83 ("bpf: add bpffs pretty print for cgroup
local storage maps") added bpffs pretty print for cgroup
local storage maps. The commit worked for struct without kind_flag
set.

This patch refactored and made pretty print also work
with kind_flag set for the struct.

Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-18 01:11:59 +01:00
Yonghong Song
9d5f9f701b bpf: btf: fix struct/union/fwd types with kind_flag
This patch fixed two issues with BTF. One is related to
struct/union bitfield encoding and the other is related to
forward type.

Issue #1 and solution:

======================

Current btf encoding of bitfield follows what pahole generates.
For each bitfield, pahole will duplicate the type chain and
put the bitfield size at the final int or enum type.
Since the BTF enum type cannot encode bit size,
pahole workarounds the issue by generating
an int type whenever the enum bit size is not 32.

For example,
  -bash-4.4$ cat t.c
  typedef int ___int;
  enum A { A1, A2, A3 };
  struct t {
    int a[5];
    ___int b:4;
    volatile enum A c:4;
  } g;
  -bash-4.4$ gcc -c -O2 -g t.c
The current kernel supports the following BTF encoding:
  $ pahole -JV t.o
  [1] TYPEDEF ___int type_id=2
  [2] INT int size=4 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED
  [3] ENUM A size=4 vlen=3
        A1 val=0
        A2 val=1
        A3 val=2
  [4] STRUCT t size=24 vlen=3
        a type_id=5 bits_offset=0
        b type_id=9 bits_offset=160
        c type_id=11 bits_offset=164
  [5] ARRAY (anon) type_id=2 index_type_id=2 nr_elems=5
  [6] INT sizetype size=8 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=64 encoding=(none)
  [7] VOLATILE (anon) type_id=3
  [8] INT int size=1 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=4 encoding=(none)
  [9] TYPEDEF ___int type_id=8
  [10] INT (anon) size=1 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=4 encoding=SIGNED
  [11] VOLATILE (anon) type_id=10

Two issues are in the above:
  . by changing enum type to int, we lost the original
    type information and this will not be ideal later
    when we try to convert BTF to a header file.
  . the type duplication for bitfields will cause
    BTF bloat. Duplicated types cannot be deduplicated
    later if the bitfield size is different.

To fix this issue, this patch implemented a compatible
change for BTF struct type encoding:
  . the bit 31 of struct_type->info, previously reserved,
    now is used to indicate whether bitfield_size is
    encoded in btf_member or not.
  . if bit 31 of struct_type->info is set,
    btf_member->offset will encode like:
      bit 0 - 23: bit offset
      bit 24 - 31: bitfield size
    if bit 31 is not set, the old behavior is preserved:
      bit 0 - 31: bit offset

So if the struct contains a bit field, the maximum bit offset
will be reduced to (2^24 - 1) instead of MAX_UINT. The maximum
bitfield size will be 256 which is enough for today as maximum
bitfield in compiler can be 128 where int128 type is supported.

This kernel patch intends to support the new BTF encoding:
  $ pahole -JV t.o
  [1] TYPEDEF ___int type_id=2
  [2] INT int size=4 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED
  [3] ENUM A size=4 vlen=3
        A1 val=0
        A2 val=1
        A3 val=2
  [4] STRUCT t kind_flag=1 size=24 vlen=3
        a type_id=5 bitfield_size=0 bits_offset=0
        b type_id=1 bitfield_size=4 bits_offset=160
        c type_id=7 bitfield_size=4 bits_offset=164
  [5] ARRAY (anon) type_id=2 index_type_id=2 nr_elems=5
  [6] INT sizetype size=8 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=64 encoding=(none)
  [7] VOLATILE (anon) type_id=3

Issue #2 and solution:
======================

Current forward type in BTF does not specify whether the original
type is struct or union. This will not work for type pretty print
and BTF-to-header-file conversion as struct/union must be specified.
  $ cat tt.c
  struct t;
  union u;
  int foo(struct t *t, union u *u) { return 0; }
  $ gcc -c -g -O2 tt.c
  $ pahole -JV tt.o
  [1] INT int size=4 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED
  [2] FWD t type_id=0
  [3] PTR (anon) type_id=2
  [4] FWD u type_id=0
  [5] PTR (anon) type_id=4

To fix this issue, similar to issue #1, type->info bit 31
is used. If the bit is set, it is union type. Otherwise, it is
a struct type.

  $ pahole -JV tt.o
  [1] INT int size=4 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED
  [2] FWD t kind_flag=0 type_id=0
  [3] PTR (anon) kind_flag=0 type_id=2
  [4] FWD u kind_flag=1 type_id=0
  [5] PTR (anon) kind_flag=0 type_id=4

Pahole/LLVM change:
===================

The new kind_flag functionality has been implemented in pahole
and llvm:
  https://github.com/yonghong-song/pahole/tree/bitfield
  https://github.com/yonghong-song/llvm/tree/bitfield

Note that pahole hasn't implemented func/func_proto kind
and .BTF.ext. So to print function signature with bpftool,
the llvm compiler should be used.

Fixes: 69b693f0ae ("bpf: btf: Introduce BPF Type Format (BTF)")
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-18 01:11:59 +01:00
Yonghong Song
f97be3ab04 bpf: btf: refactor btf_int_bits_seq_show()
Refactor function btf_int_bits_seq_show() by creating
function btf_bitfield_seq_show() which has no dependence
on btf and btf_type. The function btf_bitfield_seq_show()
will be in later patch to directly dump bitfield member values.

Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-18 01:11:59 +01:00
Daniel Borkmann
6c4fc209fc bpf: remove useless version check for prog load
Existing libraries and tracing frameworks work around this kernel
version check by automatically deriving the kernel version from
uname(3) or similar such that the user does not need to do it
manually; these workarounds also make the version check useless
at the same time.

Moreover, most other BPF tracing types enabling bpf_probe_read()-like
functionality have /not/ adapted this check, and in general these
days it is well understood anyway that all the tracing programs are
not stable with regards to future kernels as kernel internal data
structures are subject to change from release to release.

Back at last netconf we discussed [0] and agreed to remove this
check from bpf_prog_load() and instead document it here in the uapi
header that there is no such guarantee for stable API for these
programs.

  [0] http://vger.kernel.org/netconf2018_files/DanielBorkmann_netconf2018.pdf

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-17 13:41:35 -08:00
Alexei Starovoitov
9242b5f561 bpf: add self-check logic to liveness analysis
Introduce REG_LIVE_DONE to check the liveness propagation
and prepare the states for merging.
See algorithm description in clean_live_states().

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-15 01:28:32 +01:00
Alexei Starovoitov
19e2dbb7dd bpf: improve stacksafe state comparison
"if (old->allocated_stack > cur->allocated_stack)" check is too conservative.
In some cases explored stack could have allocated more space,
but that stack space was not live.
The test case improves from 19 to 15 processed insns
and improvement on real programs is significant as well:

                       before    after
bpf_lb-DLB_L3.o        1940      1831
bpf_lb-DLB_L4.o        3089      3029
bpf_lb-DUNKNOWN.o      1065      1064
bpf_lxc-DDROP_ALL.o    28052     26309
bpf_lxc-DUNKNOWN.o     35487     33517
bpf_netdev.o           10864     9713
bpf_overlay.o          6643      6184
bpf_lcx_jit.o          38437     37335

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-15 01:28:32 +01:00
Alexei Starovoitov
b233920c97 bpf: speed up stacksafe check
Don't check the same stack liveness condition 8 times.
once is enough.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2018-12-15 01:28:32 +01:00
Martin KaFai Lau
d9762e84ed bpf: verbose log bpf_line_info in verifier
This patch adds bpf_line_info during the verifier's verbose.
It can give error context for debug purpose.

~~~~~~~~~~
Here is the verbose log for backedge:
	while (a) {
		a += bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
		bpf_trace_printk(fmt, sizeof(fmt), a);
	}

~> bpftool prog load ./test_loop.o /sys/fs/bpf/test_loop type tracepoint
13: while (a) {
3: a += bpf_get_smp_processor_id();
back-edge from insn 13 to 3

~~~~~~~~~~
Here is the verbose log for invalid pkt access:
Modification to test_xdp_noinline.c:

	data = (void *)(long)xdp->data;
	data_end = (void *)(long)xdp->data_end;
/*
	if (data + 4 > data_end)
		return XDP_DROP;
*/
	*(u32 *)data = dst->dst;

~> bpftool prog load ./test_xdp_noinline.o /sys/fs/bpf/test_xdp_noinline type xdp
; data = (void *)(long)xdp->data;
224: (79) r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 -112)
225: (61) r2 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0)
; *(u32 *)data = dst->dst;
226: (63) *(u32 *)(r2 +0) = r1
invalid access to packet, off=0 size=4, R2(id=0,off=0,r=0)
R2 offset is outside of the packet

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-14 14:17:34 -08:00
Martin KaFai Lau
23127b33ec bpf: Create a new btf_name_by_offset() for non type name use case
The current btf_name_by_offset() is returning "(anon)" type name for
the offset == 0 case and "(invalid-name-offset)" for the out-of-bound
offset case.

It fits well for the internal BTF verbose log purpose which
is focusing on type.  For example,
offset == 0 => "(anon)" => anonymous type/name.
Returning non-NULL for the bad offset case is needed
during the BTF verification process because the BTF verifier may
complain about another field first before discovering the name_off
is invalid.

However, it may not be ideal for the newer use case which does not
necessary mean type name.  For example, when logging line_info
in the BPF verifier in the next patch, it is better to log an
empty src line instead of logging "(anon)".

The existing bpf_name_by_offset() is renamed to __bpf_name_by_offset()
and static to btf.c.

A new bpf_name_by_offset() is added for generic context usage.  It
returns "\0" for name_off == 0 (note that btf->strings[0] is "\0")
and NULL for invalid offset.  It allows the caller to decide
what is the best output in its context.

The new btf_name_by_offset() is overlapped with btf_name_offset_valid().
Hence, btf_name_offset_valid() is removed from btf.h to keep the btf.h API
minimal.  The existing btf_name_offset_valid() usage in btf.c could also be
replaced later.

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-14 14:17:34 -08:00
Daniel Borkmann
9f8c1c5712 bpf: remove obsolete prog->aux sanitation in bpf_insn_prepare_dump
This logic is not needed anymore since we got rid of the verifier
rewrite that was using prog->aux address in f6069b9aa9 ("bpf:
fix redirect to map under tail calls").

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2018-12-13 12:42:44 -08:00