psr1 is also disabled for panel resolution greater than 32X20.
Added psr2 check to disable only for psr2 panels having resolution
greater than 32X20.
issue was introduced by
commit-id : "acf45d11050abd751dcec986ab121cb2367dcbba"
commit message: "PSR2 is restricted to work with panel resolutions
upto 3200x2000, move the check to intel_psr_match_conditions and fully
block psr."
v2: (Rodrigo)
Add previous commit details which introduced the issue
Fixes: acf45d1105 ("drm/i915/psr: disable psr2 for resolution greater than 32X20")
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Yaroslav Shabalin <yaroslav.shabalin@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Yaroslav Shabalin <yaroslav.shabalin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: vathsala nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/49935bdff896ee3140bed471012b9f9110a863a4.1495729964.git.vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit bef8c056fb)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Psr2 is enabled only for y cordinate panels.Once GTC (global time code)
is implemented,this restriction is removed so that psr2
can work on panels without y cordinate support.
v2: (Rodrigo)
- Move the check to intel_psr_match_conditions
v3: (Rodrigo)
- add return false
v4: rebase
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484173710-3138-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
Program EDP_PSR_DEBUG_CTL (PSR_MASK) to enable system
to go to deep sleep while in psr2.PSR2_STATUS bit 31:28
should report value 8 , if system enters deep sleep state.
Also, EDP_FRAMES_BEFORE_SU_ENTRY is set 1 , if not set,
flickering is observed on psr2 panel.
v2: (Ilia Mirkin)
- Remove duplicate bit definition 25:27
v3: rebase
v4: rebase
v5: rebase
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484267484-21843-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
As per bpsec, CHICKEN_TRANS_EDP bit 12 ,15 must be programmed in
psr2 enable sequence.
bit 12 : Program Transcoder EDP VSC DIP header with a valid setting for
PSR2 and Set CHICKEN_TRANS_EDP(0x420cc) bit 12 for programmable
header packet.
bit 15 : Set CHICKEN_TRANS_EDP(0x420cc) bit 15 if Y coordinate is supported
v2: (Rodrigo)
- move CHICKEN_TRANS_EDP bit set logic right after setup_vsc
v3:(Rodrigo)
- initialize chicken_trans to CHICKEN_TRANS_BIT12 instead of 0
v4:(chris wilson)
- use BIT(12), remove CHICKEN_TRANS_BIT12
- remove unnecessary comments
- update commit message
v5:
- rename bit 12 PSR2_VSC_ENABLE_PROG_HEADER
- rename bit 15 PSR2_ADD_VERTICAL_LINE_COUNT
v6:(Rodrigo)
- remove TRANS_EDP=3, use cpu_transcoder
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: vathsala nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484247691-20930-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
As per edp1.4 spec , alpm is required for psr2 operation as it's
used for all psr2 main link power down management and alpm enable
bit must be set for psr2 operation.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: vathsala nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483356663-32668-6-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
Screen freeze observed if AUX_FRAME_SYNC is not disabled
on psr2 exit.AUX_FRAME_SYNC needed for psr2 is enabled during
psr2 entry. It must be disabled on psr2 exit.
v2: rebase
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484147673-2044-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
Psr1 and psr2 are mutually exclusive,ie when psr2 is enabled,
psr1 should be disabled.When psr2 is exited , bit 31 of reg
PSR2_CTL must be set to 0 but currently bit 31 of SRD_CTL
(psr1 control register)is set to 0.
Also ,PSR2_IDLE state is looked up from SRD_STATUS(psr1 register)
instead of PSR2_STATUS register, which has wrong data, resulting
in blankscreen.
hsw_enable_source is split into hsw_enable_source_psr1 and
hsw_enable_source_psr2 for easier code review and maintenance,
as suggested by rodrigo and jim.
v2: (Rodrigo)
- Rename hsw_enable_source_psr* to intel_enable_source_psr*
v3: (Rodrigo)
- In hsw_psr_disable ,
1) for psr active case, handle psr2 followed by psr1.
2) psr inactive case, handle psr2 followed by psr1
v4:(Rodrigo)
- move psr2 restriction(32X20) to match_conditions function
returning false and fully blocking PSR to a new patch before
this one.
v5: in source_psr2, removed val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vathsala Nagaraju <vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patil Deepti <deepti.patil@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484244059-9201-1-git-send-email-vathsala.nagaraju@intel.com
In commit c39055b072 ("drm/i915: Pass dev_priv to
intel_setup_outputs()"), I forgot to update the kerneldoc for
intel_psr_init() init, leading to warnings when building the
documentation:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c:822: warning: No description found for parameter 'dev_priv'
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c:822: warning: Excess function parameter 'dev' description in 'intel_psr_init'
Fixes: c39055b072 ("drm/i915: Pass dev_priv to intel_setup_outputs()")
Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1480420127-11382-1-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com
Pass dev_priv to intel_setup_outputs() and functions called by it, since
those are all intel i915 specific functions. Also, in the majority of
the functions dev_priv is used more often than dev. In the rare cases
where there are a few calls back into drm core, a local dev variable was
added.
v2: Don't convert dev to &dev_priv->drm in intel_dsi_init. (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1479910904-11005-1-git-send-email-ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com
A bunch of source files with just a few instances of the
incorrect INTEL_INFO use.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
A small selection of macros which can only accept dev_priv from
now on and a resulting trickle of fixups.
v2: Keep original order. (Ville Syrjala)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
Saves 864 bytes of .rodata strings and ~100 of .text.
v2: Add parantheses around dev_priv. (Ville Syrjala)
v3: Rebase.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
This saves 3248 bytes of .rodata strings.
v2: Add parantheses around dev_priv. (Ville Syrjala)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
This reverts
commit 1c80c25fb6
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Wed May 18 18:47:12 2016 +0200
drm/i915/psr: Make idle_frames sensible again
There are panels that needs 4 idle frames before entering PSR,
but VBT is unproperly set.
Also lately it was identified that idle frame count calculated at HW
can be off by 1, what makes the minimum of 2, at least.
Without the current vbt+1 we are with the risk of having HW calculating
0 idle frames and entering PSR when it shouldn't. Regardless the lack
of link training.
[Jani: there is some disagreement on the explanation, but the commit
regresses so revert it is.]
References: http://marc.info/?i=20160904191153.GA2328@light.dominikbrodowski.net
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Fixes: 1c80c25fb6 ("drm/i915/psr: Make idle_frames sensible again")
Cc: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org # v4.8-rc1+
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1473295351-8766-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
- refactor ddi buffer programming a bit (Ville)
- large-scale renaming to untangle naming in the gem code (Chris)
- rework vma/active tracking for accurately reaping idle mappings of shared
objects (Chris)
- misc dp sst/mst probing corner case fixes (Ville)
- tons of cleanup&tunings all around in gem
- lockless (rcu-protected) request lookup, plus use it everywhere for
non(b)locking waits (Chris)
- pipe crc debugfs fixes (Rodrigo)
- random fixes all over
* tag 'drm-intel-next-2016-08-08' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel: (222 commits)
drm/i915: Update DRIVER_DATE to 20160808
drm/i915: fix aliasing_ppgtt leak
drm/i915: Update comment before i915_spin_request
drm/i915: Use drm official vblank_no_hw_counter callback.
drm/i915: Fix copy_to_user usage for pipe_crc
Revert "drm/i915: Track active streams also for DP SST"
drm/i915: fix WaInsertDummyPushConstPs
drm/i915: Assert that the request hasn't been retired
drm/i915: Repack fence tiling mode and stride into a single integer
drm/i915: Document and reject invalid tiling modes
drm/i915: Remove locking for get_tiling
drm/i915: Remove pinned check from madvise ioctl
drm/i915: Reduce locking inside swfinish ioctl
drm/i915: Remove (struct_mutex) locking for busy-ioctl
drm/i915: Remove (struct_mutex) locking for wait-ioctl
drm/i915: Do a nonblocking wait first in pread/pwrite
drm/i915: Remove unused no-shrinker-steal
drm/i915: Tidy generation of the GTT mmap offset
drm/i915/shrinker: Wait before acquiring struct_mutex under oom
drm/i915: Simplify do_idling() (Ironlake vt-d w/a)
...
Rather than a mismash of struct drm_device *dev and struct
drm_i915_private *dev_priv being used freely within a function, be
consistent and only pass along dev_priv.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470324762-2545-22-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Bspec says:
"Restriction : SRD must not be enabled when the PSR Setup time from DPCD
00071h is greater than the time for vertical blank minus one line."
Let's check for that and disallow PSR if we exceed the limit.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Since we now subclass struct drm_device, we can save pointer dances by
noting the equivalence of struct drm_device and struct drm_i915_private,
i.e. by using to_i915().
text data bss dec hex filename
1073824 4562 416 1078802 107612 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1068976 4562 416 1073954 106322 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Created by the coccinelle script:
@@
expression E;
identifier p;
@@
- struct drm_i915_private *p = E->dev_private;
+ struct drm_i915_private *p = to_i915(E);
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467628477-25379-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-45-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-44-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename
1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-43-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
I just wanted to get rid of the rmw cycle for gen9, but this also
fixes some bugs we haven't carried over, like using recommended
precharge and timeout values.
Also I noticed that we don't set the fastwake sync length on skl, and
that's used by PSR2 selective updates. Fix that.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Cc: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1463590036-17824-6-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
On bdw/hsw we have a separate psr dp aux registers to set up, but on
bdw it's shared with the main dp aux thing. Which means any subsequent
dp aux transaction will trample over it, and hence must be done
beforehand.
Also this means we can't do any dp aux transactions while PSR is
active, or at least we must restore the old state.
Probably need a psr disable/enable pair around dp aux transactions in
general.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Cc: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1463590036-17824-5-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
This reverts
commit dfaf37baa0
Author: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Date: Mon Dec 7 14:45:20 2015 -0800
drm/i915: Fix idle_frames counter.
and
commit 97173eaf5f
Author: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Date: Tue Jul 7 16:28:55 2015 -0700
drm/i915: PSR: Increase idle_frames
and implements
commit d44b4dcbd1
Author: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Date: Fri Nov 14 08:52:31 2014 -0800
drm/i915: HSW/BDW PSR Set idle_frames = VBT + 1
without the hack to use 2 idle frames when VBT says 1. We keep the + 1
just for safety, although I haven't really figured out why that one
exists.
It's nonsense. idle_frames = number of frames where the screen is
entirely idle before we think about entering PSR.
idle_patter = part of link training, and we probably totally butchered
link training because we told the hw to entirely skip it. No wonder
PSR occasionally just fell over.
I suspect the reason we've increased idle frames is that it makes PSR
entry slightly less likely, and more likely to happen in a quite
system, which probably increased the changes the panel came back up
without link training. The proper fix is to implement link training
for PSR.
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Cc: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1463590036-17824-3-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
The default of 0 is 500us of link training, but that's not enough for
some platforms. Decoding this correctly means we're using 2.5ms of
link training on these platforms, which fixes flickering issues
associated with enabling PSR.
v2: Unbotch the math a bit.
v3: Drop debug hunk.
v4: Improve commit message.
Tested-by: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com>
Cc: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95176
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Cc: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: fritsch@kodi.tv
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1463590036-17824-2-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
dev_priv is what the macro works hard to extract, pass it directly.
> sed 's/\([A-Z].*(dev_priv\)->dev)/\1)/g'
v2:
- Include all wrapper macros too (Chris)
v3:
- Include sed cmdline (Chris)
v4:
- Break long line
- Rebase
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460016485-8089-1-git-send-email-joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com
This is for callers who want micro-second precision but are not
waiting from the atomic context.
v2:
* Fix atomic waits. (Dave Gordon)
* Use USEC_PER_SEC and USEC_PER_MSEC. (Chris Wilson)
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
With a reliable frontbuffer tracking and all instability corner cases
on Haswell and Broadwell solved let's re-enabled PSR by default on
these platforms.
In case a new issue is found and PSR is the main suspect, please check
if i915.enable_psr=0 really makes your problem go away. If this is the case
PSR is the culprit so after that please check if i915.enable_psr=2
or i915.enable_psr=3 solves your issue and please let us know.
There are many panels out there and not all implementations apparently
work as we would expect.
In case you needed to force it on standby or disabled or in case of any
PSR related bug please report it at bugs.freedesktop.org.
In a bugzilla entry for PSR is desirable:
- dmesg (drm.debug=0xe)
- output of /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_status
- Platform information. Vendor, model, id, pci id.
- Graphical environment: Gnome, KDE, openbox, etc...
- Details how to reproduce.
- Also good if you could run PSR test cases of Intel-gpu-tools
- Please mention if forcing main link standby or main link off helps you.
There are Intel-gpu-tools test cases that can be helpful to
determine if PSR is working as expected:
kms_psr_sink_crc and kms_psr_frontbuffer_tracking.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455278893-1307-2-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
With a reliable frontbuffer tracking and all instability corner cases
solved for this platform let's re-enabled PSR by default.
In case a new issue is found and PSR is the main suspect, please check
if i915.enable_psr=0 really makes your problem go away,
please report it at bugs.freedesktop.org.
In a bugzilla entry for PSR is desirable:
- dmesg (drm.debug=0xe)
- output of /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_status
- Platform information. Vendor, model, id, pci id.
- Graphical environment: Gnome, KDE, openbox, etc...
- Details how to reproduce.
- Also good if you could run PSR test cases of Intel-gpu-tools
- Please mention if forcing main link standby or main link off helps you.
There are Intel-gpu-tools test cases that can be helpful to
determine if PSR is working as expected:
kms_psr_sink_crc and kms_psr_frontbuffer_tracking.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This will give us flexibility to enable PSR by default independently so
issues and corner cases in one platform won't affect others were we have
it working properly.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Unfortunately we don't know all panels and platforms out there and we
found internal prototypes without VBT proper set but where only
link in standby worked well.
So, before enable PSR by default let's instrument the PSR parameter
in a way that we can identify different panels out there that might
require or work better with link standby mode.
It is also useful to say that for backward compatibility I'm not
changing the meaning of this flag. So "0" still means disabled
and "1" means enabled with full support and maximum power savings.
v2: Use positive value instead of negative for different operation mode
as suggested by Daniel.
v3: As Paulo suggested use 2 to force link standby and 3 to force link
fully on. Also split the link_standby introduction in a separated patch.
v4: Use DRM_ERROR for link off request on platforms that don't support and
Remove the quirk promise.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1454356928-19779-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Link standby support has been deprecated with 'commit 89251b177
("drm/i915: PSR: deprecate link_standby support for core platforms.")'
The reason for that is that main link in full off offers more power
savings and on HSW and BDW implementations on source side had known
bugs with link standby.
However that same HSD report only mentions BDW and HSW and tells that
a fix was going to new platforms. Since on Skylake link standby
didn't cause the bad blank flickering screens seen on HSW and BDW
let's respect VBT again for this and future platforms.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Current code not just block link_standby for non DDI platforms but also
block PSR from work on other ports B/C/D/E.
So, besides change any behaviour let's just fix the mess a bit here and
reuse HSW check to block the other ports and reduce the second if only to
link stadnby request.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
This bit is also reserved on Skylake. Actually the only
platform that supports this is Haswell, so let's fix
this logic and apply this link entry time only for the
platform that supports it, i.e. Haswell.
This also changes the style to let more clear platform
differences outside the reg write. We would probably catch
this case sooner if separated, or not...
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1449880291-21388-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
The cherryview device shares many characteristics with the valleyview
device. When support was added to the driver for cherryview, the
corresponding device info structure included .is_valleyview = 1.
This is not correct and leads to some confusion.
This patch changes .is_valleyview to .is_cherryview in the cherryview
device info structure and simplifies the IS_CHERRYVIEW macro.
Then where appropriate, instances of IS_VALLEYVIEW are replaced with
IS_VALLEYVIEW || IS_CHERRYVIEW or equivalent.
v2: Use IS_VALLEYVIEW || IS_CHERRYVIEW instead of defining a new macro.
Also add followup patches to fix issues discovered during the first
review. (Ville)
v3: Fix some style issues and one gen check. Remove CRT related changes
as CRT is not supported on CHV. (Imre, Ville)
v4: Make a few more optimizations. (Ville)
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wayne Boyer <wayne.boyer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1449692975-14803-1-git-send-email-wayne.boyer@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
'commit 97173eaf5 ("drm/i915: PSR: Increase idle_frames")' was a mistake.
The special case it tried to cover was already being covered by
the DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT. So this ended up duplicated.
So, instead of reverting that let's take this opportunity and unify
the idle_frame definition in a single place so we standardize the access
and avoid room for that same mistake again.
Few changes with this patch:
1. Instead of just respecting the VBT we set a
global minumum with max(). So we are sure that we will avoid corner cases
in case VBT is doing something we don't understand.
2. Instead of minimum 5 we use 6. When introducing the idle_frames += 4 case
we considered that minimum was 2. All because the off-by-one issue.
v2: Unified idle_frame definition.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1449528320-27655-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
It is not a bad idea to disable the PSR feature on Sink
when we are disabling on the Source.
v2: Move dpcd write inside mutex protected area as suggested by Sonika.
Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Suggested-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
When we introduced PSR we let LPSP masked allowing us to get PSR
independently from the audio runtime PM. However in one of the
attempts to get PSR enabled by default one user reported one specific
case where he would miss screen updates if scrolling the firefox in a
Gnome environment when i915 runtime pm was enabled. So for
this specific case that (I could never create an i-g-t test case)
we decided to remove the LPSP mask and let HW tracking taking care of
this case. The mask got removed later by my
commit 09108b90f0 ("drm/i915: PSR: Remove Low Power HW tracking mask.")
So we started depending on audio driver again, what is bad.
With previous commit
"drm/i915: PSR: Let's rely more on frontbuffer tracking."
we transfered the PSR exit responsability totally to SW frontbuffer
tracking. So now can safelly shut off a bit the HW tracking, or
at least this case that makes us to depend on other drivers.
v2: Update commit message since this patch by itself doesn't solve
the bugzilla entries.
v3: Another attempt to improve commit message.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau damien.lespiau@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The ultimate goal here is to remove the dependency we
currently have on audio driver power to get PSR working.
Since with audio driver runtime PM disabled the Hardware tracking
believes graphics is fully active and prevent PSR Entry, or
in other words continuously exit PSR.
So, the idea is to transfer the PSR exit responsability
from the HW tracking to the SW tracking (frontbuffer tracking),
who is really mature right now.
However with LPSP masked out there might be cases where we could
miss exit from HW tracking since it can be relying on this,
like a specific case reported at our mailing list who
user reported he would miss screen updates if scrolling firefox
in a Gnome environment when i915 runtimepm was enabled.
So before masking out LPSP again to make us independent from
the audio driver we need to make sure that all our cases
are coverred from the frontbuffer tracking perspective,
where the flush means invalidate and flush.
Without this patch for HSW, BDW and SKL we just do the
invalidate part when the flush wasn't originated by a page flip
because we were trusting the HW tracking for the flip case.
So let's rely more on frontbuffer tracking and do the
invalidation regardless the origin as expected for all platforms.
v2: Improve commit message as suggested by Paulo.
v3: Another attempt to let commit message more clear.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau damien.lespiau@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Commit (89251b17) intended to remove this line and let only one
DP_PSR_EN_CFG set, but it was wrong and this call is now duplicated
at the code.
Also "& ~DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE" doesn't do anything at all. It
was like that since I introduced this call but probably the idea
was to be informative and make clear statement that we were not using
the link standby. So it is better to remove this one here and let
the code a bit cleaner.
v2: Improve commit message as requested by Paulo.
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau damien.lespiau@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On the commit 3301d40921 ("drm/i915: PSR: Fix DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT logic")'
we already had identified that DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT
doesn't mean we shouldn't send TPS patterns, however we start sending the
minimal TP1 as possible and no TP2.
For most of the panels this is ok, but we found a reported case where
this is not true and panel keeps frozen without updating the screen for a while.
We could just get this case after patch "PSR: Don't Skip aux handshake on
DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT." is applied since that one fix the
hard freeze on this kind of panels.
Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91436#c19
Cc: Ivan Mitev <ivan.mitev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Since the beginning there is a confusion on the meaning of this bit.
A previous patch had identified this already and fixed it partially:
'commit 3301d409 ("drm/i915: PSR: Fix DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT logic")
DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT means the source doesn't need to do the
training, but it doesn't tell to avoid TP patterns or to skip
aux handshake.
This patch fixes the hard freeze reported.
Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91436
Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91437
Cc: Ivan Mitev <ivan.mitev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
With 'commit 30886c5a ("drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR: Increase wait delay
time before active PSR.")' we fixed a blank screen when first
activation was happening immediately after PSR being enabled.
There we gave more time for idleness by increasing the delay
between re-activating sequences.
However, commit "drm/i915: Delay first PSR activation."
delay the first activation in a better way keeping a good PSR
residency. So, we can now reduce the delay on re-enable.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
