With very small change to test script we can trigger softlockup due to
bogus assignment of 'p' (policy to be examined) on restart.
Previously the two to-be-merged nodes had same address/prefixlength pair,
so no erase/reinsert was necessary, we only had to append the list from
node a to b.
If prefix lengths are different, the node has to be deleted and re-inserted
into the tree, with the updated prefix length. This was broken; due to
bogus update to 'p' this loops forever.
Add a 'restart' label and use that instead.
While at it, don't perform the unneeded reinserts of the policies that
are already sorted into the 'new' node.
A previous patch in this series made xfrm_policy_inexact_list_reinsert()
use the relative position indicator to sort policies according to age in
case priorities are identical.
Fixes: 6ac098b2a9 ("xfrm: policy: add 2nd-level saddr trees for inexact policies")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
... and back to inexact tree.
Repeat ping test after each htresh change: lookup results must not change.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
The existing script lacks a policy pattern that triggers 'tree node
merges' in the kernel.
Consider adding policy affecting following subnet:
pol1: dst 10.0.0.0/22
pol2: dst 10.0.0.0/23 # adds to existing 10.0.0.0/22 node
-> no problems here. But now, lets consider reverse order:
pol1: dst 10.0.0.0/24
pol2: dst 10.0.0.0/23 # CANNOT add to existing node
When second policy gets added, the kernel must check that the new node
("10.0.0.0/23") doesn't overlap with any existing subnet.
Example:
dst 10.0.0.0/24
dst 10.0.0.1/24
dst 10.0.0.0/23
When the third policy gets added, the kernel must replace the nodes for
the 10.0.0.0/24 and 10.0.0.1/24 policies with a single one and must merge
all the subtrees/lists stored in those nodes into the new node.
The existing test cases only have overlaps with a single node, so no
merging takes place (we can always remove the 'old' node and replace
it with the new subnet prefix).
Add a few 'block policies' in a pattern that triggers this, with a priority
that will make kernel prefer the 'esp' rules.
Make sure the 'tunnel ping' tests still pass after they have been added.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Colin Ian King says:
Static analysis with CoverityScan found a potential issue [..]
It seems that pointer pol is set to NULL and then a check to see if it
is non-null is used to set pol to tmp; howeverm this check is always
going to be false because pol is always NULL.
Fix this and update test script to catch this. Updated script only:
./xfrm_policy.sh ; echo $?
RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory
FAIL: ip -net ns3 xfrm policy get src 10.0.1.0/24 dst 10.0.2.0/24 dir out
RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory
[..]
PASS: policy before exception matches
PASS: ping to .254 bypassed ipsec tunnel
PASS: direct policy matches
PASS: policy matches
1
Fixes: 6be3b0db6d ("xfrm: policy: add inexact policy search tree infrastructure")
Reported-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
add a script that adds a ipsec tunnel between two network
namespaces plus following policies:
.0/24 -> ipsec tunnel
.240/28 -> bypass
.253/32 -> ipsec tunnel
Then check that .254 bypasses tunnel (match /28 exception),
and .2 (match /24) and .253 (match direct policy) pass through the
tunnel.
Abuses iptables to check if ping did resolve an ipsec policy or not.
Also adds a bunch of 'block' rules that are not supposed to match.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
