Frequently, we use intel_runtime_pm_get/_put around a small block.
Formalise that usage by providing a macro to define such a block with an
automatic closure to scope the intel_runtime_pm wakeref to that block,
i.e. macro abuse smelling of python.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190114142129.24398-15-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Track the temporary wakerefs used within the selftests so that leaks are
clear.
v2: Add a couple of coarse annotations for mock selftests as we now
loudly warn about the errors.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190114142129.24398-14-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The majority of runtime-pm operations are bounded and scoped within a
function; these are easy to verify that the wakeref are handled
correctly. We can employ the compiler to help us, and reduce the number
of wakerefs tracked when debugging, by passing around cookies provided
by the various rpm_get functions to their rpm_put counterpart. This
makes the pairing explicit, and given the required wakeref cookie the
compiler can verify that we pass an initialised value to the rpm_put
(quite handy for double checking error paths).
For regular builds, the compiler should be able to eliminate the unused
local variables and the program growth should be minimal. Fwiw, it came
out as a net improvement as gcc was able to refactor rpm_get and
rpm_get_if_in_use together,
v2: Just s/rpm_put/rpm_put_unchecked/ everywhere, leaving the manual
mark up for smaller more targeted patches.
v3: Mention the cookie in Returns
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190114142129.24398-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
When we first introduced the reset to sanitize the GPU on taking over
from the BIOS and before returning control to third parties (the BIOS!),
we restricted it to only systems utilizing HW contexts as we were
uncertain of how stable our reset mechanism truly was. We now have
reasonable coverage across all machines that expose a GPU reset method,
and so we should be safe to sanitize the GPU state everywhere.
v2: We _have_ to skip the reset if it would clobber the display.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190103112104.19561-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Although we cannot do a full system-level test of suspend/hibernate from
deep with the kernel selftests, we can exercise the GEM subsystem in
isolation and simulate the external effects (such as losing stolen
contents and trashing the register state).
v2: Don't forget to hold rpm
v3: Suspend the GTT mappings, and more rpm!
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96526
References: 5ab57c7020 ("drm/i915: Flush logical context image out to memory upon suspend")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jakub Bartmiński <jakub.bartminski@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Bartmiński <jakub.bartminski@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180830134806.21939-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
