The at24 driver allows to register I2C EEPROM chips using different vendor
and devices, but the I2C subsystem does not take the vendor into account
when matching using the I2C table since it only has device entries.
But when matching using an OF table, both the vendor and device has to be
taken into account so the driver defines only a set of compatible strings
using the "atmel" vendor as a generic fallback for compatible I2C devices.
So add this generic fallback to the device node compatible string to make
the device to match the driver using the OF device ID table.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Follow the recent trend for the license description, and fix the wrongly
stated X11 to MIT.
The X11 license text [1] is explicitly for the X Consortium and has a
couple of extra clauses. The MIT license text [2] is actually what the
current DT files claim.
[1] https://spdx.org/licenses/X11.html
[2] https://spdx.org/licenses/MIT.html
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
These UniPhier DT files are fine as long as they are compiled in the
Linux build system. It is true that Linux is the biggest user of
DT, but DT is project neutral from its concept. DT files are often
re-used for other projects. Especially for the UniPhier platform,
these DT files are re-used for U-Boot as well.
If I feed these DT files to the FDTGREP tool in U-Boot, it complains
about the node order.
FDTGREP spl/u-boot-spl.dtb
Error at 'fdt_find_regions': FDT_ERR_BADLAYOUT
/aliases node must come before all other nodes
Given that DT is not very sensitive to the order of nodes, this is a
problem of FDTGREP. I filed a bug report a year ago, but it has not
been fixed yet.
Differentiating DT is painful. So, I am up-streaming the requirement
from the down-stream project.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Fix warnings reported when built with W=1:
Node /memory has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
All UniPhier device trees have the common prefix "uniphier-", so
"ph1-" is just making names longer. Recent documents and other
projects are not using PH1- prefixes any more.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
