that's the bulk of filesystem drivers dealing with inodes of their own
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
We're supposed to be testing that the fh_fsid's match but because the
parenthesis are in the wrong place, then we only check the first
byte.
Fixes: 9558f2500a ('nfsd: add fh_fsid_match helper')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The pnfs code will need it too. Also remove the nfsd_ prefix to match the
other filehandle helpers in that file.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
The filehandle structs all use host-endian values, but will sometimes
stuff big-endian values into those fields. This is OK since these
values are opaque to the client, but it confuses sparse. Add __force to
make it clear that we are doing this intentionally.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
The only real user of this header is fs/nfsd/nfsfh.h, so merge the
two. Various lockѕ source files used it to indirectly get other
sunrpc or nfs headers, so fix those up.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Testing NFS4.0 by pynfs, I got some messeages as,
"nfsd: inode locked twice during operation."
When one compound RPC contains two or more ops that locks
the filehandle,the second op will cause the message.
As two SETATTR ops, after the first SETATTR, nfsd will not call
fh_put() to release current filehandle, it means filehandle have
unlocked with fh_post_saved = 1.
The second SETATTR find fh_post_saved = 1, and printk the message.
v2: introduce helper fh_clear_wcc().
Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
As of commit 43a9aa64a2 "NFSD:
Fill in WCC data for REMOVE, RMDIR, MKNOD, and MKDIR", we sometimes call
fh_unlock on a filehandle that isn't fully initialized.
We should fix up the callers, but as a quick fix it is also sufficient
just to remove this assertion.
Reported-by: Marius Tolzmann <tolzmann@molgen.mpg.de>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
