Some platforms, like those in the DRA7 and AM57 families, require the
scaling of multiple regulators in order to properly support higher OPPs.
Let the ti-cpufreq driver determine when this is required and pass the
appropriate regulator names to the OPP core so that they can be properly
managed.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ti-cpufreq will be responsible for calling dev_pm_opp_set_regulators on
platforms that require AVS and ABB regulator support so we must be
able to defer probe if regulators are not yet available, so change
ti-cpufreq to be a module_platform_driver to allow for probe defer.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
call of_node_put to release the refcount of np.
Signed-off-by: Zumeng Chen <zumeng.chen@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Rather than letting the ti-cpufreq driver match against 'ti,am4372'
machine compatible during probe let's match against 'ti,am43' so that we
can support both 'ti,am4372' and 'ti,am438x' platforms which both match
to this compatible.
Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
If 'dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw()' fails, 'opp_data->opp_node' refcount
will be decremented 2 times.
One, just a few lines above, and another one in the error handling path.
Fix it by simply moving the 'of_node_put' call of the normal path.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm:config ARM_TI_CPUFREQ
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm: bool "Texas Instruments CPUFreq support"
...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
Lets remove the couple traces of modular infrastructure use, so that
when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only.
Since module_init translates to device_initcall in the non-modular
case, the init ordering remains unchanged with this commit.
We also delete the MODULE_LICENSE tag etc. since all that information
is already contained at the top of the file in the comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Some TI SoCs, like those in the AM335x, AM437x, DRA7x, and AM57x families,
have different OPPs available for the MPU depending on which specific
variant of the SoC is in use. This can be determined through use of the
revision and an eFuse register present in the silicon. Introduce a
ti-cpufreq driver that can read the aformentioned values and provide
them as version matching data to the opp framework. Through this the
opp-supported-hw dt binding that is part of the operating-points-v2
table can be used to indicate availability of OPPs for each device.
This driver also creates the "cpufreq-dt" platform_device after passing
the version matching data to the OPP framework so that the cpufreq-dt
handles the actual cpufreq implementation. Even without the necessary
data to pass the version matching data the driver will still create this
device to maintain backwards compatibility with operating-points v1
tables.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
