The existing UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY annotations happen to be good indicators
of where entry code calls into C code for the first time. So also use
them to mark the end of the stack for the ORC unwinder.
Use that information to set unwind->error if the ORC unwinder doesn't
unwind all the way to the end. This will be needed for enabling
HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE for the ORC unwinder so we can use it with the
livepatch consistency model.
Thanks to Jiri Slaby for teaching the ORCs about the unwind hints.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/20180518064713.26440-5-jslaby@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Apparently the binutils 2.20 assembler can't handle the '&&' operator in
the UNWIND_HINT_REGS macro. Rearrange the macro to do without it.
This fixes the following error:
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:521: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:521: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:521: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:521: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:521: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:521: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:521: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:521: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:521: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement
Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 39358a033b ("objtool, x86: Add facility for asm code to provide unwind hints")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e2ad97c1ae49a484644b4aaa4dd3faa4d6d969b2.1502116651.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Some asm (and inline asm) code does special things to the stack which
objtool can't understand. (Nor can GCC or GNU assembler, for that
matter.) In such cases we need a facility for the code to provide
annotations, so the unwinder can unwind through it.
This provides such a facility, in the form of unwind hints. They're
similar to the GNU assembler .cfi* directives, but they give more
information, and are needed in far fewer places, because objtool can
fill in the blanks by following branches and adjusting the stack pointer
for pushes and pops.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/0f5f3c9104fca559ff4088bece1d14ae3bca52d5.1499786555.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
