Expand the power tree description with the 0V9 and 1V8 supplies to the
RK3399 PCIe block. The NanoPis M4 and NEO4 just route 2 lanes to the
user expansion pins, so there's not much more to say at the board level
for them; NanoPC-T4 has a standard M.2 connector so we can at least
claim the 3.3V supply to that too.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a04a17f4b9b12e8698c76b34e7ca22f0c81845ce.1573908195.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Although it appeared to follow logically from the bindings, apparently
the thermal framework can't properly cope with a single cooling device
being shared between multiple maps. The CPU zone is probably easier to
overheat, so remove the references to the (optional) fan from the GPU
cooling zone to avoid things getting confused. Hopefully GPU-intensive
tasks will leak enough heat across to the CPU zone to still hit the
fan trips before reaching critical GPU temperatures.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5bb39f3115df1a487d717d3ae87e523b03749379.1573908197.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
NanoPC-T4 has a dedicated circuit for driving a 12V fan from PWM1,
so let's add that along with some rough empirically-derived thermal
settings for the benefit of anyone determined enough to hook one up.
The vendor does not currently offer a suitable fan, but this seems as
good a place as any to note that pre-terminated 3-pin JST GH connectors
are readily available online, and if you even have to ask, then splicing
one of those really will be orders of magnitude cheaper and simpler than
getting set up to crimp the teeny-tiny things by hand.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
In common with most Rockchip reference designs, NanoPC-T4 has a passive
IR receiver connected to PWM3. In lieu of a specialised driver for
PWM-based IR pulse measurement, running the pin as a GPIO with the basic
driver works perfectly well.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
The nanopi4 boards differ primarily in their power trees, with the main
5V and 3.3V rails having very different topologies on the smaller USB-C
powered boards vs. the 12V-powered T4, as well as minor variation in
other regulators related to various external connectors.
Additionally, the recovery key is only present on the T4 - ADC_IN1 is
simply pulled high and not exposed on the other boards - and the lowest
common denominator for MMC speed is actually HS200 according to the
vendor DTs.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
This adds a device tree for the NanoPC-T4 SBC, which is based on the
Rockchip RK3399 SoC and marketed by FriendlyELEC.
Known working:
- Serial
- Ethernet
- HDMI
- USB 2.0
All of the interesting stuff is in a .dtsi because there are at least
two other boards that share most of it: NanoPi M4 and NanoPi NEO4.
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
[rm: various further cleanup]
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
