The names of the functions used for blocking/unblocking EC
transactions during suspend/hibernation suggest that the transactions
are suspended and resumed by them, while in fact they are disabled
and enabled. Rename the functions (and the flag used by them) to
better reflect what they really do.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
There still is a race that may result in suspending the system in
the middle of an EC transaction in progress, which leads to problems
(like the kernel thinking that the ACPI global lock is held during
resume while in fact it's not).
To remove the race condition, modify the ACPI platform suspend and
hibernate callbacks so that EC transactions are blocked right after
executing the _PTS global control method and are allowed to happen
again right after the low-level wakeup.
Introduce acpi_pm_freeze() that will disable GPEs, wait until the
event queues are empty and block EC transactions. Use it wherever
GPEs are disabled in preparation for switching local interrupts off.
Introduce acpi_pm_thaw() that will allow EC transactions to happen
again and enable runtime GPEs. Use it to balance acpi_pm_freeze()
wherever necessary.
In addition to that use acpi_ec_resume_transactions_early() to
unblock EC transactions as early as reasonably possible during
resume. Also unblock EC transactions in acpi_hibernation_finish()
and in the analogous suspend routine to make sure that the EC
transactions are enabled in all error paths.
Fixes https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14668
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Reported-and-tested-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
There is a race between resume from hibernation and the EC driver
that may result in restoring the hibernation image in the middle of
an EC transaction in progress, which in turn may lead to
unpredictable behavior of the platform.
To remove that race condition, add a helpers for suspending and
resuming EC transactions in a safe way to be executed by the ACPI
platform hibernate pre-restore and restore cleanup callbacks.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14668
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Reported-and-tested-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Although the majority of PCI devices can generate PMEs that in
principle may be used to wake up devices suspended at run time,
platform support is generally necessary to convert PMEs into wake-up
events that can be delivered to the kernel. If ACPI is used for this
purpose, PME signals generated by a PCI device will trigger the ACPI
GPE associated with the device to generate an ACPI wake-up event that
we can set up a handler for, provided that everything is configured
correctly.
Unfortunately, the subset of PCI devices that have GPEs associated
with them is quite limited. The devices without dedicated GPEs have
to rely on the GPEs associated with other devices (in the majority of
cases their upstream bridges and, possibly, the root bridge) to
generate ACPI wake-up events in response to PME signals from them.
Add ACPI platform support for PCI PME wake-up:
o Add a framework making is possible to use ACPI system notify
handlers for run-time PM.
o Add new PCI platform callback ->run_wake() to struct
pci_platform_pm_ops allowing us to enable/disable the platform to
generate wake-up events for given device. Implemet this callback
for the ACPI platform.
o Define ACPI wake-up handlers for PCI devices and PCI root buses and
make the PCI-ACPI binding code register wake-up notifiers for all
PCI devices present in the ACPI tables.
o Add function pci_dev_run_wake() which can be used by PCI drivers to
check if given device is capable of generating wake-up events at
run time.
Developed in cooperation with Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
We discovered that at least one machine (HP Envy), methods in the DSDT
attempt to call external methods defined in a dynamically loaded SSDT.
Unfortunately, the DSDT methods we are trying to call are part of the
EC initialization, which happens very early, and the the dynamic SSDT
is only loaded when a processor _PDC method runs much later.
This results in namespace lookup errors for the (as of yet) undefined
methods.
Since Windows doesn't have any issues with this machine, we take it
as a hint that they must be evaluating _PDC much earlier than we are.
Thus, the proper thing for Linux to do should be to match the Windows
implementation more closely.
Provide a mechanism to call _PDC before we enable the EC. Doing so loads
the dynamic tables, and allows the EC to be enabled correctly.
The ACPI processor driver will still evaluate _PDC in its .add() method
to cover the hotplug case.
Resolves: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14824
Cc: ming.m.lin@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Linux/ACPI core files using internal.h all PREFIX "ACPI: ",
however, not all ACPI drivers use/want it -- and they
should not have to #undef PREFIX to define their own.
Add GPL commment to internal.h while we are there.
This does not change any actual console output,
asside from a whitespace fix.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This patch makes acpi_init() call acpi_wakeup_device_init() directly.
Previously, acpi_wakeup_device_init() was a late_initcall (sequence 7).
acpi_wakeup_device_init() depends on acpi_wakeup_device_list, which
is populated when ACPI devices are enumerated by acpi_init() ->
acpi_scan_init(). Using late_initcall is certainly enough to make
sure acpi_wakeup_device_list is populated, but it is more than
necessary. We can just as easily call acpi_wakeup_device_init()
directly from acpi_init(), which avoids the initcall magic.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
CC: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This patch makes acpi_init() call acpi_sleep_proc_init() directly.
Previously, acpi_sleep_proc_init() was a late_initcall (sequence 7),
apparently to make sure that the /proc hierarchy already exists:
2003/02/13 12:38:03-06:00 mochel
acpi sleep: demote sleep proc file creation.
- Make acpi_sleep_proc_init() a late_initcall(), and not called from
acpi_sleep_init(). This guarantees that the acpi proc hierarchy is at
least there when we create the dang file.
This should no longer be an issue because acpi_bus_init() (called early
in acpi_init()) creates acpi_root_dir (/proc/acpi).
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This patch makes acpi_init() call init_acpi_device_notify() directly.
Previously, init_acpi_device_notify() was an arch_initcall (sequence 3),
so it was called before acpi_init() (a subsys_initcall at sequence 4).
init_acpi_device_notify() sets the platform_notify and
platform_notify_remove function pointers. These pointers
are not used until acpi_init() enumerates ACPI devices in
this path:
acpi_init()
acpi_scan_init()
acpi_bus_scan()
acpi_add_single_object()
acpi_device_register()
device_add()
<use platform_notify>
So it is sufficient to have acpi_init() call init_acpi_device_notify()
directly before it enumerates devices.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This patch makes acpi_init() call acpi_debug_init() directly.
Previously, both were subsys_initcalls. acpi_debug_init()
must happen after acpi_init(), and it's better to call it
explicitly rather than rely on link ordering.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This patch makes acpi_init() call acpi_system_init() directly.
Previously, both were subsys_initcalls. acpi_system_init()
must happen after acpi_init(), and it's better to call it
explicitly rather than rely on link ordering.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This patch makes acpi_init() call acpi_power_init() directly.
Previously, both were subsys_initcalls. acpi_power_init()
must happen after acpi_init(), and it's better to call it
explicitly rather than rely on link ordering.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
CC: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This patch makes acpi_init() call acpi_ec_init() directly.
Previously, both were subsys_initcalls. acpi_ec_init()
must happen after acpi_init(), and it's better to call it
explicitly rather than rely on link ordering.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
CC: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This patch makes acpi_init() call acpi_scan_init() directly.
Previously, both acpi_init() and acpi_scan_init() were subsys_initcalls,
and acpi_init() was called first based on the link order from the
makefile (bus.o before scan.o).
acpi_scan_init() registers the ACPI bus type, creates the root device,
and enumerates fixed-feature and namespace devices. All of this must
be done after acpi_init(), and it's better to call acpi_scan_init()
explicitly rather than rely on the link ordering.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
A number of things that shouldn't be exposed outside the ACPI core
were declared in include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h, where anybody can
see them. This patch moves those declarations to a new "internal.h"
inside drivers/acpi.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
