Replace MAX_ADDR_LEN with its numeric value to fix the following
linux/packet_diag.h userspace compilation error:
/usr/include/linux/packet_diag.h:67:17: error: 'MAX_ADDR_LEN' undeclared here (not in a function)
__u8 pdmc_addr[MAX_ADDR_LEN];
This is not the first case in the UAPI where the numeric value
of MAX_ADDR_LEN is used instead of symbolic one, uapi/linux/if_link.h
already does the same:
$ grep MAX_ADDR_LEN include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
__u8 mac[32]; /* MAX_ADDR_LEN */
There are no UAPI headers besides these two that use MAX_ADDR_LEN.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@altlinux.org>
Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The first netlink attribute (value 0) must always be defined as none/unspec.
This is correctly done in inet_diag.h, but other diag interfaces are wrong.
Because we cannot change an existing API, I add a comment to point the mistake
and avoid to propagate it in a new diag API in the future.
CC: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This patch allows to dump BPF filters attached to a socket with
SO_ATTACH_FILTER.
Note that we check CAP_SYS_ADMIN before allowing to dump this info.
For now, only AF_PACKET sockets use this feature.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
sk_rmem_alloc is disclosed via /proc/net/packet but not via netlink messages.
The goal is to have the same level of information.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This value is disclosed via /proc/net/packet but not via netlink messages.
The goal is to have the same level of information.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Follow the common pattern and define *_DIAG_MAX like:
[...]
__XXX_DIAG_MAX,
};
Because everyone is used to do:
struct nlattr *attrs[XXX_DIAG_MAX+1];
nla_parse([...], XXX_DIAG_MAX, [...]
Reported-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
