With this value, we de-facto disable the feature. Since it
is not working yet, disable it completely.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
There are a few places not using it, use it at those places.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
When we need only one antenna, we should refrain from using
the antenna that is shared with BT if BT load is high.
Fix this.
Reviewed-by: Eyal Shapira <eyal@wizery.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
The sharing model will differ in new hardware. Define the
non shared antenna based on the device so that different
devices can have different names for the non shared antenna.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
smps_mode is used uninitialized in a debug statement in AP
mode, so always initialize it.
While at it, fix a typo.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
The variable 'u32 mode' exists twice, the latter shadowing
the former - remove the latter since there's no need for
two variables.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Our legal structure changed at some point (see wikipedia), but
we forgot to immediately switch over to the new copyright
notice.
For files that we have modified in the time since the change,
add the proper copyright notice now.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
According to new requirements, the ACK / CTS kill mask is
not related to reduced TX power anymore. This allows to
remove the code that tracked reduced TX power enablement
across different interfaces.
The ACK / CTS kill mask is now fetch from a table. It
depends on the Activity grading (activity from BT) and on
the Look Up Table (LUT) type.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
When TxTxCo-Running is active, we can relax the constraints
on the rate control.
When RxRxCo-Running is active, we can relax the constrains
on SMPS.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
No need to send the big BT_COEX_CMD command, we have now
a much thiner command that updates only what is needed.
Adapt the code to that.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
No need to send the big BT_COEX_CMD command, we have now
a much thiner command that updates only what is needed.
Adapt the code to that.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
No need to send the big BT_COEX_CMD command, we have now
a much thiner command that updates only what is needed.
Adapt the code to that, and open the patch to the updates.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Start the new BT Coex implementation.
Don't react to notifications for now - only the initial
configuration is implemented. The rest will happen in next
patches.
Since coex.c now uses the new the new structures in all
functions, we need to adapt the code to compile, even if it
doesn't run yet.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
A new API is coming. This new API is not backward
compatible. So we need to keep the old commands to be able
to work with the former API.
Move all the current code into a new file: coex_legacy.
If a firmware with the new API is detected, we currently
just bail out since the implementation of the new API will
come in future patches.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
If BT is active, we need to refrain from using the shared
antenna. This logic is done in the firmware when we use the
link quality tables. But for management frames, the rate is
written in the Tx command by the driver.
Hence the driver needs to make sure not use the shared
antenna when BT is active for any frames that don't use
the rate scale table such as management frames or multicast.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
This really belongs to the constants file.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
When the firmware enables TxTxCorunning, we can lift the
constaints on the rate control.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
We can Tx in MIMO rates when we are in TxTx Disallow mode
just like we can when we are in Tight mode.
Same if we are in 5Ghz regardless of the mode we are.
Change the code to allow MIMO in these cases.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
This was not used is unlikely to be used, just kill it.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
I forgot to disable the reduced Tx power in a few paths.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
The firmware needs to know on what channel we run before we
set the association bit in the MAC context. Change a bit the
flow to achieve this.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
CMD_SYNC is really 0 which is confusing:
if (cmd.flags & CMD_SYNC) is always false.
Fix this by simply removing its definition.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
All messages should have a trailing newline, add all the
missing ones. Also make all messages constants, replacing
the single one that pointlessly used a variable.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
The commit below introduced a bug in the validity bits in
init. Due to that, all the Coex mechanism stopped sending
kills to the BT side. Fix that.
Fixes: b9fae2d54c ("iwlwifi: mvm: BT Coex add support for Co-running block")
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Calling iwl_send_bt_init_conf for INIT firmware is not a
problem, and calling iwl_send_bt_prio_tbl from
iwl_send_bt_init_conf allows us to prepare for new API.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
The BT Coex API underwent a minor backward compatible API
change.
We now need to set an invalid value in the override fields.
While at it, add kerneldoc comments on the fields in the
command.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
This is really not needed. This is a remainder from a C99
initialiser.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
A few entries were wrong and this caused throughput issues.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [3.13+]
Fixes: dac94da8db ("iwlwifi: mvm: new BT Coex API")
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Implement Adaptive Tx Power Control algorithm.
ATPC basically tries to decrease the tx power
as much as possible while the throughput is
not being hurt.
Signed-off-by: Eliad Peller <eliadx.peller@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
I forgot to send the new Look Up Table to the firmware and
I also forgot to free the command which is kzalloc'ed.
This code is relevant for 7265 device only.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
In order to debug the firmware, we need to be able to set
the BT priority of WiFi packets. This priority is set based
on the type of the packet (control frames, EAPOL etc...).
For debugging purposes, allow to override this priority by
a debugfs controlled value.
Enable this feature that needs this priority to be able to
test it.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
We can now define the priority against BT per AC. This is
possible with a newer firmware that allows to define the
priority with 2 bits.
Note that this change is compatible with older firmware
since older firmware will simply ignore the new bit (11),
and we still set the old bit (12) in the same cases as
before.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
This code is really related to BT Coex - move it to the coex
file.
Also - prepare for a FW API change that will happen soon:
Bits 11 and 12 will be allocated for BT priority. Today, we
only have bit 12.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
