Commit Graph

7526 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Hans van Kranenburg
b50836edf9 btrfs: introduce nparity raid_attr
Instead of hardcoding exceptions for RAID5 and RAID6 in the code, use an
nparity field in raid_attr.

Signed-off-by: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:34 +01:00
Hans van Kranenburg
da612e31ae btrfs: fix ncopies raid_attr for RAID56
RAID5 and RAID6 profile store one copy of the data, not 2 or 3. These
values are not yet used anywhere so there's no change.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:33 +01:00
Hans van Kranenburg
baf92114c7 btrfs: alloc_chunk: fix more DUP stripe size handling
Commit 92e222df7b "btrfs: alloc_chunk: fix DUP stripe size handling"
fixed calculating the stripe_size for a new DUP chunk.

However, the same calculation reappears a bit later, and that one was
not changed yet. The resulting bug that is exposed is that the newly
allocated device extents ('stripes') can have a few MiB overlap with the
next thing stored after them, which is another device extent or the end
of the disk.

The scenario in which this can happen is:
* The block device for the filesystem is less than 10GiB in size.
* The amount of contiguous free unallocated disk space chosen to use for
  chunk allocation is 20% of the total device size, or a few MiB more or
  less.

An example:
- The filesystem device is 7880MiB (max_chunk_size gets set to 788MiB)
- There's 1578MiB unallocated raw disk space left in one contiguous
  piece.

In this case stripe_size is first calculated as 789MiB, (half of
1578MiB).

Since 789MiB (stripe_size * data_stripes) > 788MiB (max_chunk_size), we
enter the if block. Now stripe_size value is immediately overwritten
while calculating an adjusted value based on max_chunk_size, which ends
up as 788MiB.

Next, the value is rounded up to a 16MiB boundary, 800MiB, which is
actually more than the value we had before. However, the last comparison
fails to detect this, because it's comparing the value with the total
amount of free space, which is about twice the size of stripe_size.

In the example above, this means that the resulting raw disk space being
allocated is 1600MiB, while only a gap of 1578MiB has been found. The
second device extent object for this DUP chunk will overlap for 22MiB
with whatever comes next.

The underlying problem here is that the stripe_size is reused all the
time for different things. So, when entering the code in the if block,
stripe_size is immediately overwritten with something else. If later we
decide we want to have the previous value back, then the logic to
compute it was copy pasted in again.

With this change, the value in stripe_size is not unnecessarily
destroyed, so the duplicated calculation is not needed any more.

Signed-off-by: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:33 +01:00
Hans van Kranenburg
23f0ff1ec4 btrfs: alloc_chunk: improve chunk size variable name
The variable num_bytes is really a way too generic name for a variable
in this function. There are a dozen other variables that hold a number
of bytes as value.

Give it a name that actually describes what it does, which is holding
the size of the chunk that we're allocating.

Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:33 +01:00
Hans van Kranenburg
2f29df4fc2 btrfs: alloc_chunk: do not refurbish num_bytes
The variable num_bytes is used to store the chunk length of the chunk
that we're allocating. Do not reuse it for something really different in
the same function.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:33 +01:00
Ethan Lien
3cd24c6980 btrfs: use tagged writepage to mitigate livelock of snapshot
Snapshot is expected to be fast. But if there are writers steadily
creating dirty pages in our subvolume, the snapshot may take a very long
time to complete. To fix the problem, we use tagged writepage for
snapshot flusher as we do in the generic write_cache_pages(), so we can
omit pages dirtied after the snapshot command.

This does not change the semantics regarding which data get to the
snapshot, if there are pages being dirtied during the snapshotting
operation.  There's a sync called before snapshot is taken in old/new
case, any IO in flight just after that may be in the snapshot but this
depends on other system effects that might still sync the IO.

We do a simple snapshot speed test on a Intel D-1531 box:

fio --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=32 --bs=4k --rw=write --size=64G
--direct=0 --thread=1 --numjobs=1 --time_based --runtime=120
--filename=/mnt/sub/testfile --name=job1 --group_reporting & sleep 5;
time btrfs sub snap -r /mnt/sub /mnt/snap; killall fio

original: 1m58sec
patched:  6.54sec

This is the best case for this patch since for a sequential write case,
we omit nearly all pages dirtied after the snapshot command.

For a multi writers, random write test:

fio --ioengine=libaio --iodepth=32 --bs=4k --rw=randwrite --size=64G
--direct=0 --thread=1 --numjobs=4 --time_based --runtime=120
--filename=/mnt/sub/testfile --name=job1 --group_reporting & sleep 5;
time btrfs sub snap -r /mnt/sub /mnt/snap; killall fio

original: 15.83sec
patched:  10.35sec

The improvement is smaller compared to the sequential write case,
since we omit only half of the pages dirtied after snapshot command.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Ethan Lien <ethanlien@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:33 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
c629732d24 btrfs: Remove unused extent_state argument from btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered
This parameter was never used, yet was part of the interface of the
function ever since its introduction as extent_io_ops::writepage_end_io_hook
in e6dcd2dc9c ("Btrfs: New data=ordered implementation"). Now that
NULL is passed everywhere as a value for this parameter let's remove it
for good. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:32 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
8cc0237abc btrfs: Remove extent_page_data argument from writepage_delalloc
The only remaining use of the 'epd' argument in writepage_delalloc is
to reference the extent_io_tree which was set in extent_writepages. Since
it is guaranteed that page->mapping of any page passed to
writepage_delalloc (and __extent_writepage as the sole caller) to be
equal to that passed in extent_writepages we can directly get the
io_tree via the already passed inode (which is also taken from
page->mapping->host). No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:32 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
7789a55aa1 btrfs: Move epd::extent_locked check to writepage_delalloc's caller
If epd::extent_locked is set then writepage_delalloc terminates. Make
this a bit more apparent in the caller by simply bubbling the check up.
This enables to remove epd as an argument to writepage_delalloc in a
future patch. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:32 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
fc8a168aa9 btrfs: Check for missing device before bio submission in btrfs_map_bio
Before btrfs_map_bio submits all stripe bios it does a number of checks
to ensure the device for every stripe is present. However, it doesn't do
a DEV_STATE_MISSING check, instead this is relegated to the lower level
btrfs_schedule_bio (in the async submission case, sync submission
doesn't check DEV_STATE_MISSING at all). Additionally
btrfs_schedule_bios does the duplicate device->bdev check which has
already been performed in btrfs_map_bio.

This patch moves the DEV_STATE_MISSING check in btrfs_map_bio and
removes the duplicate device->bdev check. Doing so ensures that no bio
cloning/submission happens for both async/sync requests in the face of
missing device. This makes the async io submission path slightly shorter
in terms of instruction count. No functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:32 +01:00
Anand Jain
ab457246f8 btrfs: remove redundant replace_state init
dev_replace::replace_state has been set to
BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_ITEM_STATE_NEVER_STARTED (0) in the same function,
So delete the line which sets replace_state = 0;

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:32 +01:00
Filipe Manana
6d4cbf7903 Btrfs: remove no longer used io_err from btrfs_log_ctx
The io_err field of struct btrfs_log_ctx is no longer used after the
recent simplification of the fast fsync path, where we now wait for
ordered extents to complete before logging the inode. We did this in
commit b5e6c3e170 ("btrfs: always wait on ordered extents at fsync
time") and commit a2120a473a ("btrfs: clean up the left over
logged_list usage") removed its last use.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:31 +01:00
Filipe Manana
59b0713a8a Btrfs: simpler and more efficient cleanup of a log tree's extent io tree
We currently are in a loop finding each range (corresponding to a btree
node/leaf) in a log root's extent io tree and then clean it up. This is a
waste of time since we are traversing the extent io tree's rb_tree more
times then needed (one for a range lookup and another for cleaning it up)
without any good reason.

We free the log trees when we are in the critical section of a transaction
commit (the transaction state is set to TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING), so it's
of great convenience to do everything as fast as possible in order to
reduce the time we block other tasks from starting a new transaction.

So fix this by traversing the extent io tree once and cleaning up all its
records in one go while traversing it.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:31 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
46cc775e29 btrfs: Adjust loop in free_extent_buffer
The loop construct in free_extent_buffer was added in
242e18c7c1 ("Btrfs: reduce lock contention on extent buffer locks")
as means of reducing the times the eb lock is taken, the non-last ref
count is decremented and lock is released. As the special handling
of UNMAPPED extent buffers was removed now there is only one decrement
op which is happening for EXTENT_BUFFER_UNMAPPED case.

This commit modifies the loop condition so that in case of UNMAPPED
buffers the eb's lock is taken only if we are 100% sure the eb is going
to be freed by the current executor of the code. Additionally, remove
superfluous ref count ops in btrfs test.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:31 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
9cfc8ba712 btrfs: Remove special handling of EXTENT_BUFFER_UNMAPPED while freeing
Now that the whole of btrfs code has been audited for eb reference count
management it's time to remove the hunk in free_extent_buffer that
essentially considered the condition

  "eb->ref == 2 && EXTENT_BUFFER_DUMMY"

to equal "eb->ref = 1". Also remove the last location
which takes an extra reference count in alloc_test_extent_buffer.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:31 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
df44971468 btrfs: Remove unnecessary tree locking code in qgroup_rescan_leaf
In qgroup_rescan_leaf a copy is made of the target leaf by calling
btrfs_clone_extent_buffer. The latter allocates a new buffer and
attaches a new set of pages and copies the content of the source buffer.
The new scratch buffer is only used to iterate it's items, it's not
published anywhere and cannot be accessed by a third party.

Hence, it's not necessary to perform any locking on it whatsoever.
Furthermore, remove the extra extent_buffer_get call since the new
buffer is always allocated with a reference count of 1 which is
sufficient here.  No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:31 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
8c7eeb6557 btrfs: Remove extra reference count bumps in btrfs_compare_trees
When the 2 comparison trees roots are initialised they are private to
the function and already have reference counts of 1 each. There is no
need to further increment the reference count since the cloned buffers
are already accessed via struct btrfs_path. Eventually the 2 paths used
for comparison are going to be released, effectively disposing of the
cloned buffers.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:30 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
24cee18a1c btrfs: Remove extraneous extent_buffer_get from tree_mod_log_rewind
When a rewound buffer is created it already has a ref count of 1 and the
dummy flag set. Then another ref is taken bumping the count to 2.
Finally when this buffer is released from btrfs_release_path the extra
reference is decremented by the special handling code in
free_extent_buffer.

However, this special code is in fact redundant sinca ref count of 1 is
still correct since the buffer is only accessed via btrfs_path struct.
This paves the way forward of removing the special handling in
free_extent_buffer.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:30 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
6c122e2a0c btrfs: Remove redundant extent_buffer_get in get_old_root
get_old_root used used only by btrfs_search_old_slot to initialise the
path structure. The old root is always a cloned buffer (either via alloc
dummy or via btrfs_clone_extent_buffer) and its reference count is 2: 1
from allocation, 1 from extent_buffer_get call in get_old_root.

This latter explicit ref count acquire operation is in fact unnecessary
since the semantic is such that the newly allocated buffer is handed
over to the btrfs_path for lifetime management. Considering this just
remove the extra extent_buffer_get in get_old_root.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:30 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
5c623d334a btrfs: Remove needless tree locking in iterate_inode_extrefs
In iterate_inode_exrefs the eb is cloned via btrfs_clone_extent_buffer
which creates a private extent buffer with the dummy flag set and ref
count of 1. Then this buffer is locked for reading and its ref count is
incremented by 1. Finally it's fed to the passed iterate_irefs_t
function. The actual iterate call back is inode_to_path (coming from
paths_from_inode) which feeds the eb to btrfs_ref_to_path. In this final
function the passed eb is only read by first assigning it to the local
eb variable. This variable is only modified in the case another eb was
referenced from the passed path that is eb != eb_in check triggers.

Considering this there is no point in locking the cloned eb in
iterate_inode_refs since it's never being modified and is not published
anywhere. Furthermore the cloned eb is completely fine having its ref
count be 1.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:30 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
e5bba0b0f8 btrfs: Remove needless tree locking in iterate_inode_refs
In iterate_inode_refs the eb is cloned via btrfs_clone_extent_buffer
which creates a private extent buffer with the dummy flag set and ref
count of 1. Then this buffer is locked for reading and its ref count is
incremented by 1. Finally it's fed to the passed iterate_irefs_t
function. The actual iterate call back is inode_to_path (coming from
paths_from_inode) which feeds the eb to btrfs_ref_to_path. In this final
function the passed eb is only read by first assigning it to the local
eb variable. This variable is only modified in the case another eb was
referenced from the passed path that is eb != eb_in check triggers.

Considering this there is no point in locking the cloned eb in
iterate_inode_refs since it's never being modified and is not published
anywhere. Furthermore the cloned eb is completely fine having its ref
count be 1.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:30 +01:00
Qu Wenruo
d9cb2459b2 btrfs: tests: Use BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_SIZE to replace the intermediate number
In extent-io self test, we need 2 ordered extents at its maximum size to
do the test.

Instead of using the intermediate numbers, use BTRFS_MAX_EXTENT_SIZE for
@max_bytes, and twice @max_bytes for @total_dirty.  This should explain
why we need all these magic numbers and prevent people to modify them by
accident.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:30 +01:00
Omar Sandoval
ed46ff3d42 Btrfs: support swap files
Btrfs has not allowed swap files since commit 35054394c4 ("Btrfs: stop
providing a bmap operation to avoid swapfile corruptions"). However, now
that the proper restrictions are in place, Btrfs can support swap files
through the swap file a_ops, similar to iomap in commit 67482129cd
("iomap: add a swapfile activation function").

For Btrfs, activation needs to make sure that the file can be used as a
swap file, which currently means that it must be fully allocated as
NOCOW with no compression on one device. It must also do the proper
tracking so that ioctls will not interfere with the swap file.
Deactivation clears this tracking.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:29 +01:00
Omar Sandoval
60ca842e34 Btrfs: rename and export get_chunk_map
The Btrfs swap code is going to need it, so give it a btrfs_ prefix and
make it non-static.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:29 +01:00
Omar Sandoval
eede2bf34f Btrfs: prevent ioctls from interfering with a swap file
A later patch will implement swap file support for Btrfs, but before we
do that, we need to make sure that the various Btrfs ioctls cannot
change a swap file.

When a swap file is active, we must make sure that the extents of the
file are not moved and that they don't become shared. That means that
the following are not safe:

- chattr +c (enable compression)
- reflink
- dedupe
- snapshot
- defrag

Don't allow those to happen on an active swap file.

Additionally, balance, resize, device remove, and device replace are
also unsafe if they affect an active swapfile. Add a red-black tree of
block groups and devices which contain an active swapfile. Relocation
checks each block group against this tree and skips it or errors out for
balance or resize, respectively. Device remove and device replace check
the tree for the device they will operate on.

Note that we don't have to worry about chattr -C (disable nocow), which
we ignore for non-empty files, because an active swapfile must be
non-empty and can't be truncated. We also don't have to worry about
autodefrag because it's only done on COW files. Truncate and fallocate
are already taken care of by the generic code. Device add doesn't do
relocation so it's not an issue, either.

Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:29 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
abbb55f4cd btrfs: Remove extent_io_ops::split_extent_hook callback
This is the counterpart to merge_extent_hook, similarly, it's used only
for data/freespace inodes so let's remove it, rename it and call it
directly where necessary. No functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:29 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
5c848198aa btrfs: Remove extent_io_ops::merge_extent_hook callback
This callback is used only for data and free space inodes. Such inodes
are guaranteed to have their extent_io_tree::private_data set to the
inode struct. Exploit this fact to directly call the function. Also give
it a more descriptive name. No functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:28 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
a36bb5f9a9 btrfs: Remove extent_io_ops::clear_bit_hook callback
This is the counterpart to ex-set_bit_hook (now btrfs_set_delalloc_extent),
similar to what was done before remove clear_bit_hook and rename the
function. No functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:28 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
e06a1fc99c btrfs: Remove extent_io_ops::set_bit_hook extent_io callback
This callback is used to properly account delalloc extents for data
inodes (ordinary file inodes and freespace v1 inodes). Those can be
easily identified since they have their extent_io trees ->private_data
member point to the inode. Let's exploit this fact to remove the
needless indirection through extent_io_hooks and directly call the
function. Also give the function a name which reflects its purpose -
btrfs_set_delalloc_extent.

This patch also modified test_find_delalloc so that the extent_io_tree
used for testing doesn't have its ->private_data set which would have
caused a crash in btrfs_set_delalloc_extent due to the btrfs_inode->root
member not being initialised. The old version of the code also didn't
call set_bit_hook since the extent_io ops weren't set for the inode.  No
functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:28 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
65a680f6b7 btrfs: Remove extent_io_ops::check_extent_io_range callback
This callback was only used in debug builds by btrfs_leak_debug_check.
A better approach is to move its implementation in
btrfs_leak_debug_check and ensure the latter is only executed for extent
tree which have ->private_data set i.e. relate to a data node and not
the btree one. No functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:28 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
7087a9d8db btrfs: Remove extent_io_ops::writepage_end_io_hook
This callback is ony ever called for data page writeout so there is no
need to actually abstract it via extent_io_ops. Lets just export it,
remove the definition of the callback and call it directly in the
functions that invoke the callback. Also rename the function to
btrfs_writepage_endio_finish_ordered since what it really does is
account finished io in the ordered extent data structures.  No
functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:28 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
d75855b451 btrfs: Remove extent_io_ops::writepage_start_hook
This hook is called only from __extent_writepage_io which is already
called only from the data page writeout path. So there is no need to
make an indirect call via extent_io_ops. This patch just removes the
callback definition, exports the callback function and calls it directly
at the only call site. Also give the function a more descriptive name.
No functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:27 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
5eaad97af8 btrfs: Remove extent_io_ops::fill_delalloc
This callback is called only from writepage_delalloc which in turn is
guaranteed to be called from the data page writeout path. In the end
there is no reason to have the call to this function to be indrected via
the extent_io_ops structure. This patch removes the callback definition,
exports the function and calls it directly. No functional changes.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ rename to btrfs_run_delalloc_range ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:27 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
06f2548f9d btrfs: Add function to distinguish between data and btree inode
This will be used in future patches that remove the optional
extent_io_ops callbacks.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:27 +01:00
Qu Wenruo
05a37c4860 btrfs: volumes: Make sure no dev extent is beyond device boundary
Add extra dev extent end check against device boundary.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:27 +01:00
Qu Wenruo
5eb193812a btrfs: volumes: Make sure there is no overlap of dev extents at mount time
Enhance btrfs_verify_dev_extents() to remember previous checked dev
extents, so it can verify no dev extents can overlap.

Analysis from Hans:

"Imagine allocating a DATA|DUP chunk.

 In the chunk allocator, we first set...
   max_stripe_size = SZ_1G;
   max_chunk_size = BTRFS_MAX_DATA_CHUNK_SIZE
 ... which is 10GiB.

 Then...
   /* we don't want a chunk larger than 10% of writeable space */
   max_chunk_size = min(div_factor(fs_devices->total_rw_bytes, 1),
       		 max_chunk_size);

 Imagine we only have one 7880MiB block device in this filesystem. Now
 max_chunk_size is down to 788MiB.

 The next step in the code is to search for max_stripe_size * dev_stripes
 amount of free space on the device, which is in our example 1GiB * 2 =
 2GiB. Imagine the device has exactly 1578MiB free in one contiguous
 piece. This amount of bytes will be put in devices_info[ndevs - 1].max_avail

 Next we recalculate the stripe_size (which is actually the device extent
 length), based on the actual maximum amount of available raw disk space:
   stripe_size = div_u64(devices_info[ndevs - 1].max_avail, dev_stripes);

 stripe_size is now 789MiB

 Next we do...
   data_stripes = num_stripes / ncopies
 ...where data_stripes ends up as 1, because num_stripes is 2 (the amount
 of device extents we're going to have), and DUP has ncopies 2.

 Next there's a check...
   if (stripe_size * data_stripes > max_chunk_size)
 ...which matches because 789MiB * 1 > 788MiB.

 We go into the if code, and next is...
   stripe_size = div_u64(max_chunk_size, data_stripes);
 ...which resets stripe_size to max_chunk_size: 788MiB

 Next is a fun one...
   /* bump the answer up to a 16MB boundary */
   stripe_size = round_up(stripe_size, SZ_16M);
 ...which changes stripe_size from 788MiB to 800MiB.

 We're not done changing stripe_size yet...
   /* But don't go higher than the limits we found while searching
    * for free extents
    */
   stripe_size = min(devices_info[ndevs - 1].max_avail,
       	      stripe_size);

 This is bad. max_avail is twice the stripe_size (we need to fit 2 device
 extents on the same device for DUP).

 The result here is that 800MiB < 1578MiB, so it's unchanged. However,
 the resulting DUP chunk will need 1600MiB disk space, which isn't there,
 and the second dev_extent might extend into the next thing (next
 dev_extent? end of device?) for 22MiB.

 The last shown line of code relies on a situation where there's twice
 the value of stripe_size present as value for the variable stripe_size
 when it's DUP. This was actually the case before commit 92e222df7b
 "btrfs: alloc_chunk: fix DUP stripe size handling", from which I quote:
   "[...] in the meantime there's a check to see if the stripe_size does
 not exceed max_chunk_size. Since during this check stripe_size is twice
 the amount as intended, the check will reduce the stripe_size to
 max_chunk_size if the actual correct to be used stripe_size is more than
 half the amount of max_chunk_size."

 In the previous version of the code, the 16MiB alignment (why is this
 done, by the way?) would result in a 50% chance that it would actually
 do an 8MiB alignment for the individual dev_extents, since it was
 operating on double the size. Does this matter?

 Does it matter that stripe_size can be set to anything which is not
 16MiB aligned because of the amount of remaining available disk space
 which is just taken?

 What is the main purpose of this round_up?

 The most straightforward thing to do seems something like...
   stripe_size = min(
       div_u64(devices_info[ndevs - 1].max_avail, dev_stripes),
       stripe_size
   )
 ..just putting half of the max_avail into stripe_size."

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/b3461a38-e5f8-f41d-c67c-2efac8129054@mendix.com/
Reported-by: Hans van Kranenburg <hans.van.kranenburg@mendix.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
[ add analysis from report ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:27 +01:00
Qu Wenruo
e72d79d6bc btrfs: Refactor find_free_extent loops update into find_free_extent_update_loop
We have a complex loop design for find_free_extent(), that has different
behavior for each loop, some even includes new chunk allocation.

Instead of putting such a long code into find_free_extent() and makes it
harder to read, just extract them into find_free_extent_update_loop().

With all the cleanups, the main find_free_extent() should be pretty
barebone:

find_free_extent()
|- Iterate through all block groups
|  |- Get a valid block group
|  |- Try to do clustered allocation in that block group
|  |- Try to do unclustered allocation in that block group
|  |- Check if the result is valid
|  |  |- If valid, then exit
|  |- Jump to next block group
|
|- Push harder to find free extents
   |- If not found, re-iterate all block groups

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
[ copy callchain from changelog to function comment ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:26 +01:00
Qu Wenruo
e1a4184815 btrfs: Refactor unclustered extent allocation into find_free_extent_unclustered()
This patch will extract unclsutered extent allocation code into
find_free_extent_unclustered().

And this helper function will use return value to indicate what to do
next.

This should make find_free_extent() a little easier to read.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
[Update merge conflict with fb5c39d7a8 ("btrfs: don't use ctl->free_space for max_extent_size")]
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:26 +01:00
Qu Wenruo
d06e3bb690 btrfs: Refactor clustered extent allocation into find_free_extent_clustered
We have two main methods to find free extents inside a block group:

1) clustered allocation
2) unclustered allocation

This patch will extract the clustered allocation into
find_free_extent_clustered() to make it a little easier to read.

Instead of jumping between different labels in find_free_extent(), the
helper function will use return value to indicate different behavior.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:26 +01:00
Qu Wenruo
b4bd745d12 btrfs: Introduce find_free_extent_ctl structure for later rework
Instead of tons of different local variables in find_free_extent(),
extract them into find_free_extent_ctl structure, and add better
explanation for them.

Some modification may looks redundant, but will later greatly simplify
function parameter list during find_free_extent() refactor.

Also add two comments to co-operate with fb5c39d7a8 ("btrfs: don't use
ctl->free_space for max_extent_size"), to make ffe_ctl->max_extent_size
update more reader-friendly.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:26 +01:00
Lu Fengqi
e2907c1a6a btrfs: extent-tree: Detect bytes_pinned underflow earlier
Introduce a new wrapper update_bytes_pinned to replace open coded
bytes_pinned modifiers. Now the underflows of space_info::bytes_pinned
get detected and reported.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:26 +01:00
Qu Wenruo
9f9b8e8d0e btrfs: extent-tree: Detect bytes_may_use underflow earlier
Although we have space_info::bytes_may_use underflow detection in
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota(), we have more callers who are
subtracting number from space_info::bytes_may_use.

So instead of doing underflow detection for every caller, introduce a
new wrapper update_bytes_may_use() to replace open coded bytes_may_use
modifiers.

This also introduce a macro to declare more wrappers, but currently
space_info::bytes_may_use is the mostly interesting one.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:25 +01:00
Filipe Manana
85dd506c8e Btrfs: remove no longer used stuff for tracking pending ordered extents
Tracking pending ordered extents per transaction was introduced in commit
50d9aa99bd ("Btrfs: make sure logged extents complete in the current
transaction V3") and later updated in commit 161c3549b4 ("Btrfs: change
how we wait for pending ordered extents").

However now that on fsync we always wait for ordered extents to complete
before logging, done in commit 5636cf7d6d ("btrfs: remove the logged
extents infrastructure"), we no longer need the stuff to track for pending
ordered extents, which was not completely removed in the mentioned commit.
So remove the remaining of the pending ordered extents infrastructure.

Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:25 +01:00
Filipe Manana
ce02f03266 Btrfs: remove no longer used logged range variables when logging extents
The logged_start and logged_end variables, at btrfs_log_changed_extents,
were added in commit 8c6c592831 ("btrfs: log csums for all modified
extents"). However since the recent simplification for fsync, which makes
us wait for all ordered extents to complete before logging extents, we
no longer need those variables. Commit a2120a473a ("btrfs: clean up the
left over logged_list usage") forgot to remove them.

Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-17 14:51:25 +01:00
Linus Torvalds
d089709045 for-4.20-rc5-tag
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE8rQSAMVO+zA4DBdWxWXV+ddtWDsFAlwH0k8ACgkQxWXV+ddt
 WDtmVg/+Kgvk7laQI9bLEr1/30eG1JfBUMHcVE1F8+g99l28m1Yihjd21j9norVd
 YexBz53jgKou+zV+37CKWBYT1uDPq7CIoxctkdE2j9U0s+RmsqDrhech0dsBsfMR
 jo9VnHJFuJSxGMhjfGnFV+wMtAr4q5aQptNGBl+hR1MvMneroktFv+0WiLmp0Vhj
 +6Iq9WAClJYpgk//cI7nhKkscdzWwRyN3V9RUtdNeYklk1D7l1WprlaPzw22WA9u
 VjQVMICjEaJeIixIwT/D8lz05QgjKlqy1z6faYG5JuJxoYQikuNv/xe2dhZVm35A
 aNsBR0byf3zzuXKQZAlvXJ6/gYPvep+KI7epPyBOdycaqoZza7rQ+/MkSAgQ77Vk
 yBnQuhqiw9Srjh6LDWFkNclVln2wymRKd1SqpZmFPRZre/8L+DU+I8RRaeS2/WcE
 M2k+awRD0oVofbB+hxkFIoR+I1Ggkp2rxQlTT/41tGx0geWC3AGX+TlKSW6ZM5HD
 lRmRXIsVocfighKEnI3Zy7ecZuwCI4/4D6+PQtyhCJb3tDigZ/a4UEYdSVucG8CG
 SuQ5YMn+MyyKT0wH8xkGKDGT15YZ+u9Q/BmPHZRL6sSouFpiCQHA5miD1YA+t1d9
 qMjH6Ycz46Y3j2M0BDfDcm714zoD5/bgeSy5SPC3Zh5lQCGpeIk=
 =VW/F
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-4.20-rc5-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs fix from David Sterba:
 "A patch in 4.19 introduced a sanity check that was too strict and a
  filesystem cannot be mounted.

  This happens for filesystems with more than 10 devices and has been
  reported by a few users so we need the fix to propagate to stable"

* tag 'for-4.20-rc5-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
  btrfs: tree-checker: Don't check max block group size as current max chunk size limit is unreliable
2018-12-05 09:58:17 -08:00
Qu Wenruo
10950929e9 btrfs: tree-checker: Don't check max block group size as current max chunk size limit is unreliable
[BUG]
A completely valid btrfs will refuse to mount, with error message like:
  BTRFS critical (device sdb2): corrupt leaf: root=2 block=239681536 slot=172 \
    bg_start=12018974720 bg_len=10888413184, invalid block group size, \
    have 10888413184 expect (0, 10737418240]

This has been reported several times as the 4.19 kernel is now being
used. The filesystem refuses to mount, but is otherwise ok and booting
4.18 is a workaround.

Btrfs check returns no error, and all kernels used on this fs is later
than 2011, which should all have the 10G size limit commit.

[CAUSE]
For a 12 devices btrfs, we could allocate a chunk larger than 10G due to
stripe stripe bump up.

__btrfs_alloc_chunk()
|- max_stripe_size = 1G
|- max_chunk_size = 10G
|- data_stripe = 11
|- if (1G * 11 > 10G) {
       stripe_size = 976128930;
       stripe_size = round_up(976128930, SZ_16M) = 989855744

However the final stripe_size (989855744) * 11 = 10888413184, which is
still larger than 10G.

[FIX]
For the comprehensive check, we need to do the full check at chunk read
time, and rely on bg <-> chunk mapping to do the check.

We could just skip the length check for now.

Fixes: fce466eab7 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Verify block_group_item")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.19+
Reported-by: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-12-04 15:05:30 +01:00
Linus Torvalds
121b018f8c for-4.20-rc4-tag
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE8rQSAMVO+zA4DBdWxWXV+ddtWDsFAlv9qYgACgkQxWXV+ddt
 WDupPQ/8DdeLZYQG1tlx2Q+X4/tqPVyAzUjguYzbIY7wvSs1zbEEedENsD8E97yC
 So8ooGnP5B6/dqVidLFQBPwTXN59GybYbrDci8qh0DOJTl3+1r8byD9JC+iofrOF
 tltJkZ+eCOQyyqHHzlzw15uNOg48Qzj1oXvTAcE0P6iN5UcvcfwRW/S39pjsn63C
 63zc09XJ1hmJMJTWZo5h3GoD2UvzrwGXPKXNdv/NWkw9sqQbWdjvZFdqKbvY1VeM
 Oa6FPAPErJqEEEePhpDYbyRcnzjJRMs0deLGpGGChGldQxgMO8ILzBwh/KalfzK7
 h7LIuv1EclUqlyv0mXPqg2E/C3n2UMPqQYFsK9Lt+4Y/PkrWA2jx0lSg0fBl3k8c
 7PyiTqPNPNF8LU48tPEnOzJuNPkquOycgdyQOUpHnS43OF5OLIb6tVyjK4eJHRWw
 xtP65M72qM8T65+gsxYcdm0lvIDLidIwFS+2g4ibKU7EwlYkTC9AHFIAyFKTgxeP
 MpkIH90mKhSxOpbq8RICgr2jWcJZYoFQ4soi1oE+bgyjv75PyhJ0eXOprCh/4KZp
 nkXlPy2skkO9gGecyvr51x/opDEjEkObyOjQm2LhhWYvgcnHgW8Zp1jhQKxabHvz
 iZdVIs/agOerpk1d9ZBHhIXOeS2UcE5klqVRAdf961Wobh+HNis=
 =cCvI
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-4.20-rc4-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:
 "Some of these bugs are being hit during testing so we'd like to get
  them merged, otherwise there are usual stability fixes for stable
  trees"

* tag 'for-4.20-rc4-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
  btrfs: relocation: set trans to be NULL after ending transaction
  Btrfs: fix race between enabling quotas and subvolume creation
  Btrfs: send, fix infinite loop due to directory rename dependencies
  Btrfs: ensure path name is null terminated at btrfs_control_ioctl
  Btrfs: fix rare chances for data loss when doing a fast fsync
  btrfs: Always try all copies when reading extent buffers
2018-11-28 08:38:20 -08:00
Pan Bian
42a657f576 btrfs: relocation: set trans to be NULL after ending transaction
The function relocate_block_group calls btrfs_end_transaction to release
trans when update_backref_cache returns 1, and then continues the loop
body. If btrfs_block_rsv_refill fails this time, it will jump out the
loop and the freed trans will be accessed. This may result in a
use-after-free bug. The patch assigns NULL to trans after trans is
released so that it will not be accessed.

Fixes: 0647bf564f ("Btrfs: improve forever loop when doing balance relocation")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@163.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-11-23 13:47:46 +01:00
Filipe Manana
552f0329c7 Btrfs: fix race between enabling quotas and subvolume creation
We have a race between enabling quotas end subvolume creation that cause
subvolume creation to fail with -EINVAL, and the following diagram shows
how it happens:

              CPU 0                                          CPU 1

 btrfs_ioctl()
  btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl()
   btrfs_quota_enable()
    mutex_lock(fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock)

                                                  btrfs_ioctl()
                                                   create_subvol()
                                                    btrfs_qgroup_inherit()
                                                     -> save fs_info->quota_root
                                                        into quota_root
                                                     -> stores a NULL value
                                                     -> tries to lock the mutex
                                                        qgroup_ioctl_lock
                                                        -> blocks waiting for
                                                           the task at CPU0

   -> sets BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLED in fs_info
   -> sets quota_root in fs_info->quota_root
      (non-NULL value)

   mutex_unlock(fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock)

                                                     -> checks quota enabled
                                                        flag is set
                                                     -> returns -EINVAL because
                                                        fs_info->quota_root was
                                                        NULL before it acquired
                                                        the mutex
                                                        qgroup_ioctl_lock
                                                   -> ioctl returns -EINVAL

Returning -EINVAL to user space will be confusing if all the arguments
passed to the subvolume creation ioctl were valid.

Fix it by grabbing the value from fs_info->quota_root after acquiring
the mutex.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-11-22 18:59:59 +01:00
Robbie Ko
a4390aee72 Btrfs: send, fix infinite loop due to directory rename dependencies
When doing an incremental send, due to the need of delaying directory move
(rename) operations we can end up in infinite loop at
apply_children_dir_moves().

An example scenario that triggers this problem is described below, where
directory names correspond to the numbers of their respective inodes.

Parent snapshot:

 .
 |--- 261/
       |--- 271/
             |--- 266/
                   |--- 259/
                   |--- 260/
                   |     |--- 267
                   |
                   |--- 264/
                   |     |--- 258/
                   |           |--- 257/
                   |
                   |--- 265/
                   |--- 268/
                   |--- 269/
                   |     |--- 262/
                   |
                   |--- 270/
                   |--- 272/
                   |     |--- 263/
                   |     |--- 275/
                   |
                   |--- 274/
                         |--- 273/

Send snapshot:

 .
 |-- 275/
      |-- 274/
           |-- 273/
                |-- 262/
                     |-- 269/
                          |-- 258/
                               |-- 271/
                                    |-- 268/
                                         |-- 267/
                                              |-- 270/
                                                   |-- 259/
                                                   |    |-- 265/
                                                   |
                                                   |-- 272/
                                                        |-- 257/
                                                             |-- 260/
                                                             |-- 264/
                                                                  |-- 263/
                                                                       |-- 261/
                                                                            |-- 266/

When processing inode 257 we delay its move (rename) operation because its
new parent in the send snapshot, inode 272, was not yet processed. Then
when processing inode 272, we delay the move operation for that inode
because inode 274 is its ancestor in the send snapshot. Finally we delay
the move operation for inode 274 when processing it because inode 275 is
its new parent in the send snapshot and was not yet moved.

When finishing processing inode 275, we start to do the move operations
that were previously delayed (at apply_children_dir_moves()), resulting in
the following iterations:

1) We issue the move operation for inode 274;

2) Because inode 262 depended on the move operation of inode 274 (it was
   delayed because 274 is its ancestor in the send snapshot), we issue the
   move operation for inode 262;

3) We issue the move operation for inode 272, because it was delayed by
   inode 274 too (ancestor of 272 in the send snapshot);

4) We issue the move operation for inode 269 (it was delayed by 262);

5) We issue the move operation for inode 257 (it was delayed by 272);

6) We issue the move operation for inode 260 (it was delayed by 272);

7) We issue the move operation for inode 258 (it was delayed by 269);

8) We issue the move operation for inode 264 (it was delayed by 257);

9) We issue the move operation for inode 271 (it was delayed by 258);

10) We issue the move operation for inode 263 (it was delayed by 264);

11) We issue the move operation for inode 268 (it was delayed by 271);

12) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 270 (it was
    delayed by 271). We detect a path loop in the current state, because
    inode 267 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move
    operation for inode 270. So we delay again the move operation for
    inode 270, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 267 is
    moved;

13) We issue the move operation for inode 261 (it was delayed by 263);

14) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 266 (it was
    delayed by 263). We detect a path loop in the current state, because
    inode 270 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move
    operation for inode 266. So we delay again the move operation for
    inode 266, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 270 is
    moved (its move operation was delayed in step 12);

15) We issue the move operation for inode 267 (it was delayed by 268);

16) We verify if we can issue the move operation for inode 266 (it was
    delayed by 270). We detect a path loop in the current state, because
    inode 270 needs to be moved first before we can issue the move
    operation for inode 266. So we delay again the move operation for
    inode 266, this time we will attempt to do it after inode 270 is
    moved (its move operation was delayed in step 12). So here we added
    again the same delayed move operation that we added in step 14;

17) We attempt again to see if we can issue the move operation for inode
    266, and as in step 16, we realize we can not due to a path loop in
    the current state due to a dependency on inode 270. Again we delay
    inode's 266 rename to happen after inode's 270 move operation, adding
    the same dependency to the empty stack that we did in steps 14 and 16.
    The next iteration will pick the same move dependency on the stack
    (the only entry) and realize again there is still a path loop and then
    again the same dependency to the stack, over and over, resulting in
    an infinite loop.

So fix this by preventing adding the same move dependency entries to the
stack by removing each pending move record from the red black tree of
pending moves. This way the next call to get_pending_dir_moves() will
not return anything for the current parent inode.

A test case for fstests, with this reproducer, follows soon.

Signed-off-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
[Wrote changelog with example and more clear explanation]
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2018-11-21 17:03:50 +01:00