I just learned that &struct_name.member_name works and looks pretty
even. It doesn't (yet) link to the member directly though, which would
be really good for big structures or vfunc tables (where the
per-member kerneldoc tends to be long).
Also some minor drive-by polish where it makes sense, I read a lot
of docs ...
v2: Review from Eric.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170125062657.19270-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
sed -e 's/\( \* .*\)struct &\([_a-z]*\)/\1\&struct \2/' -i
Originally I wasnt a friend of this style because I thought a
line-break between the "&struct" and "foo" part would break it. But a
quick test shows that " * &struct \n * foo\n" works pefectly well with
current kernel-doc. So time to mass-apply these changes!
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1483044517-5770-6-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
This reverts commit 77953bd136.
This causes a kernel panic when trying to assign a blob to a property,
and has obviously never been tested.
Fixes: 77953bd136 ("drm: Unify handling of blob and object properties")
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Liu Ying <gnuiyl@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/8c0d3482-1bb5-6a15-b105-6bda2b31b5dc@linux.intel.com
- remove kerneldoc for drm-internal functions
- drm_property_replace_global_blob isn't actually atomic, and doesn't
need to be. Update docs&comments to match
- document all the types and try to link things a bit better
- nits all over
v2: Appease checkpatch in the moved code (Archit)
Reviewed-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160829082757.17913-9-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
They work exactly the same now, after the refcounting unification a bit
ago. The only reason they're distinct is backwards compat with existing
userspace.
Cc: Daniel Stone <daniels@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160829082757.17913-8-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
This just contains the base property classes and all the code to
handle blobs. I think for any kind of standardized/shared properties
it's better to have separate files - this is fairly big already as-is.
v2: resurrect misplaced hunk (Daniel Stone)
Cc: Daniel Stone <daniel@fooishbar.org>
Reviewed-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20160829082757.17913-7-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
